Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Data Storage Leaders Introduce New Wares

Posted by simoniker on from the mmm-wares dept.

louismg writes "Data storage giant EMC announced upgrades to their storage hardware family this morning, and claimed performance increases of 25% to 100%, with increased capacity and disk speeds. This comes two weeks after competitor BlueArc announced Titan, the world's biggest ever NAS box, which claims throughput of 5 Gbps and 256 terabytes in a single hardware file system. How much is enough, and as IT administrators, what is the answer to today's issues - improved hardware, or software?"

4 of 29 comments (clear)

  1. I have some predictions too... by ivan256 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I predict that the storage industry will continue to produce boring incremental improvements on archaic paradigms untill somebody comes out with something revolutionary. Yes, that was vague and truly deep. Since you probably didn't read the article, here's the spoiler: it's esentially the same thing the author of the story said. Given the history of the industry, you can bet you'll get old and go grey before something revolutionary comes from one of the established players.

    Something revolutionary is coming soon though.

    1. Re:I have some predictions too... by zuzulo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Adding the dimension of time to data storage as in the link you provide is hardly revolutionary (cf cvs and other version control systems). On the other hand, there are some very interesting developments in distributed file and archival systems.

      Some of this work is happening in the academic community (OceanStore, et al) and some is happening in the commercial sector (Avamar, Connected, etc etc).

      It seems to me that the storage industry is advancing on two main fronts.

      First, hardware is getting better and better at a fairly rapid rate. Storage densities, I/O speeds, hardware based data protection are all improving. This area is generally characterized by incremental improvements like you discuss and is where established players like EMC and other hardware players dominate.

      Second, the community is in the process of developing software that attempts to handle (index, search, backup, restore, distribute, etc) the exponential growth in amount of data stored.

      The difficult problem between the two is the algorithmic one at this time. This is where revolutionary approaches are needed. And, in fact, there are quite a few folks working in this area. More interesting, perhaps, is the number of efforts that have tried and failed to make significant headway.

      I agree that there are likely to be revolutionary changes in the software that we use to interact with data, and sooner rather than later.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    2. Re:I have some predictions too... by ivan256 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Adding the dimension of time to data storage as in the link you provide is hardly revolutionary (cf cvs and other version control systems).

      There have long been snapshoting solutions too, the key diference here is that you can go back to any point in time, and that is truly new. With other version control systems you can only go back to where you manually told it to checkpoint.

      As for revolutions in indexing and searching storage, I have yet to see something that's not a new take on an old concept. There are lots of companies with cluster file systems and database filesystems out there. When somebody comes up with one that's more than incrementally better than what we had 20 years ago, and they can make it work, I'd be interested in hearing about it.

  2. Improved backups.. by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What they need is improved backups. I don't give a fig about space if I can't back it up. So maybe someone should be looking at how we're supposed to be backing this stuff or archive this stuff. Or are we supposed to keep a warehouse of EMCs around? I can lay a bit that we are going to need serious backup infrastructure than what we have today to keep up.

    sri