Slashdot Mirror


It's Official -- Star Wars on DVD

savagexp writes "There's yet to be an actual press release, but according to DVDFile.com, 20th Century Fox and LucasFilm have confirmed that The Original Trilogy will arrive on September 21st in a four-disc set. More info can be had here."

9 of 646 comments (clear)

  1. Press Relase Link by Icepick_ · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.starwars.com/episode-iv/news/2004/02/ne ws20040210.html

  2. Yes, but it's not really the original by signe · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not the original Star Wars trilogy. It's the version that Lucas ham-handedly put together in 1997. It definitely won't be on my list of must-have DVDs, regardless of how much I would love to own the original trilogy on DVD.

    Greedo did not shoot first.

    -Todd

    --
    "The details of my life are quite inconsequential..."
  3. Originaltrilogy.com by DeadBugs · · Score: 5, Informative

    It may not be too late to visit the Original Trilogy website and sign the petition to get the original un-updated version put on DVD. 50,000 have signed up already!

    Well it may be too late, but the fans must be heard!

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
  4. Re:what's the difference? by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Informative

    Some superflous new scenes added, like computer generated spaceships flying around. More computer generated aliens in the background.

    In the first film, they took some cutting-room floor footage of Han talking to Jabba as he's preparing to take off in the Millenium Falcon. (I thought I read somewhere that Marlon Brando was actually playing Jabba in that scene). Anyways, they put in a computer generated Jabba walking alongside Han, and it looks pretty cheesy to me.

    I hate overused computer animation. I think it looks out of place and fake, and the world of Star Wars was much more believable made out of foam rubber costumes and cheesy props.

    The big one that gets all the geeks riled up is they changed the Cantina scene, so that Jabba's bounty hunter shoots at Han, and he kills him in 'self defense'. In the original, Han just shoots him under the table and gets up and leaves.

    It effectively changes Han's character from an outlaw who cares only about himself, to some sort of good guy who found himself in trouble.

    I haven't seen the special edition versions of the other two movies.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  5. Re:They'll have more releases by Chibi · · Score: 5, Informative
    I imagine Peter Jackson saw the above and was a bit inspired when he released Lord of the Rings several times.


    New Line Cinema and Peter Jackson have been very upfront about their release plans for the Lord of the Rings movies. Saying they are doing the same thing as Lucas is inaccurate... at least so far. Plenty of people thinking they will put out some form of mega-collector's set after the final (extended) movie comes out. But, up to now, they have been very fan-friendly in terms of their openness regarding the release plan.

    --
    If all you have are silver bullets, everything looks like a werewolf.
  6. Re:what's the difference? by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 5, Informative

    Plus, in the starport Jabba's moving around, and has all these expressions, just like a lame-ass cartoon. It contrasts terribly with the stationary, smug, heartless Jabba we know and love from his palace and on his yacht in the Sarlacc Pit scene.

    In the first film, they took some cutting-room floor footage of Han talking to Jabba as he's preparing to take off in the Millenium Falcon.

    Want to hate that scene even more?

    Notice the part where Han circles Jabba while proposing a deal. Originally, that was fine since Jabba was a fat guy who looked like the rancor handler. But now that they were pasting a big slug with a long tail over the guy, Han couldn't really walk around hom anymore. Unadjusted, Han would be walking right through the animation.

    Their solution? Make it look like Han is stepping on Jabba's tail by cutting him from the background and moving him up a bit then down a bit as he circles Jabba. They even make Jabba comically cringe when Han "steps" on his tail. This looks about as real as when a kid bounces a doll along the ground to make it "walk".

  7. Re:what's the difference? by Earlybird · · Score: 5, Informative

    IMDb's "alternate versions" section is your friend: Star Wars, The Empire Strikes Back, Return of the Jedi.

  8. Firefly is the answer ... by MS_leases_my_soul · · Score: 5, Informative

    FireFly is the answer. You have a kick-ass writer/director who is more than willing and able and actors who have already put in some amazing acting. You have a plotline that grabs you by the gut and pulls you along for a ride.

    I warn everyone who has not seen Firefly yet -- if you get the DVDs and start watching them, you will go one half of the best ride of your life. It will be like getting on the world's greatest rollercoaster (with 10 loops!), making through the first 3 loops and having the rollercoaster stop in the middle of the ride. You will love what you get and be disgusted that there is not more.

    Still, if people continue to buy the DVDs and word of mouth continues to spread, there is still the movie in the works and hope for SciFi or someone else to pick it up. Fox should be smart enough to put it into production again as long as they are getting paid.

  9. Re:HDDVD by 0123456 · · Score: 5, Informative

    "High-end 11-megapixel digital cameras are generally considered to be slightly inferior to 35mm film."

    Remember: 35mm _still_ frames go along the film, whereas 35mm _movie_ frames go across the film. Also, only a fraction of the frame is actually used in movies, due to the widescreen aspect ratio. That means a lot less pixels are required to get the same resolution.

    A lot of 35mm movie effect shots are rendered at around 2048x1024-ish resolutions, so while 2 megapixels is a little low for the full 35mm movie resolution, it's not far off.