Slashdot Mirror


Novell Quotes AT&T on Derivative Works

grendelkhan writes "Novell has released their latest correspondance with the litigous bastards ordering them to stop the lawsuit by noon tomorrow, and clarify what the SVRX licensing agreements with AT&T meant regarding derivative works. The letter quotes AT&T from the April '85 issue of $echo as stating that they 'claim no ownership interest in any portion of such a modification or derivative work.' So much for the ladder rung analogy." And reader highwaytohell links to today's CRN article in which Eben Moglen suggests that the SCO/Linux lawsuit cannot move ahead "until SCO resolves its dispute with Novell. And regardless of which company prevails in court, he said, customers won't have to pay any company for a license fee since both claimants--SCO and Novell--have distributed the Linux code under the GPL. Once again, SCO have no comment."

2 of 354 comments (clear)

  1. Up2date by swordboy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    For those that like to follow this stuff, I have found Google News to be an amazing service. I can only wonder what might come along and top these guys.

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
  2. Re:Meanwhile, back on the western front... by Shichinintai · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    You trivialize the issue. Male circumcision was originally promoted in the West as a deterrant to the "sin" of masturbastion. In such a Puritan society, it was an easy association to cleanliness. Muslims also promote female circumcision for much the same reasons. Neither case respects the humans rights of the victim. If saner minds prevailed, this were dangerous surgery would never be inflicted upon a newborn infant.