Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Claim They Cloned Humans

dustinbarbour writes "A South Korean-led research team has cloned human embryos to produce embryonic stem cells, a scientific first that promises to reignite public debate over cloning. Medical researchers hope to use cloned embryonic stem cells to someday treat diseases such as diabetes and Parkinson's. The cells potentially could create rejection-free transplant organ tissues." There's another story in the NYT.

8 of 607 comments (clear)

  1. The topic here is rather misleading... by freerecords · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The team detailed here has not cloned a human has such. It has cloned the stem cells in an embryo specifically for stem cells. The claims that they have made (also made in New Scientist this week) are not as radical as the claims made by the Raelians and Panayiotis Zavos, and so are much more believable than can be expected by looking at this title :) I say all power to the team doing this as they are obviously going for something that is going to eventually become a pioneering field for saving life. I think the key issue is that they are cloning the cells (i believe) rather than the entire embryo, and so the issue of Sanctity of Life does not come into it. Tim

    --
    tim
  2. Stem cells important but by Gr8Apes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it's only a matter of time before someone does clone a human. There's nothing mysterious or exceptionally difficult about it as compared to cloning sheep, cows, horses, etc.

    The ethical questions are something else entirely, due to the fact that at this time, there's no way to relibaly bring forth healthy clones (most have some sort of genetic defect).

    There's also a general misconception that a clone will be just like the clonee. Something that's extremely unlikely, just look at identical twins.

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  3. Back to the Forefront by Evil+Schmoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... and the inexorable march of science continues unabated. This is a significant breakthrough, if not a huge step forward, in the process, and there will probably be another within 12-18 months, and so on. FWIW, I think the most positive aspect of this is that it will bring bioresearch back into the public eye, and will hopefully foster intelligent, measured discussion on the obvious benefits and admitted drawbacks to all forms of new technology, bio, nano, or otherwise. As the proliferation of nuclear technology (now 60 years old) has shown, technology will out, despite all attempts to contain it. Therefore, we need to be discussing the ethics and ramifications of said technology well before it becomes public domain. Note that I'm not advocating the containment of technology -- heaven forbid! I'm merely suggesting that we're not yet ready to deal with these issues as a nation or as a race, and the time to begin thinking about them is sooner rather than later.

  4. Life-saving potential by Durandal64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Stem cell technology has the potential to save millions of lives. Clearly, we need to issue bans on it.

  5. Cloning . . . good. by aynrandfan · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Could someone please tell me what the hell gets people so damn scared about the issue of cloning?

    Opponents of cloning fear the development will lead to cloned babies.

    What if it does? So what? Clone me anytime. All it means is that there will be another guy who looks just like me walking around. Will the clone think and act like me? Fuck no; the people who think cloned genes will equal a cloned mind are the types who worry about cloned little Hitlers running around. Don't place your faith in Hollywood movies to show you what cloning is all about.

    Cloned people are not any less human than "naturally born" people. What makes a human is intellect, not just how one was born.

    --

    ----

    "Ours was a free culture. It is becoming much less so."-Lawrence Lessig

  6. Re:Article title misleading by cybermace5 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Tell me - *exactly* when does a "human embryo" become a "human"?

    It's the simplest question in the world. You want the truth? You want to know exactly when an embryo or fetus becomes a human?

    It becomes a human the moment that the woman carrying it decides she wants it, and it is a tragedy if something goes wrong. She'll sing to it, look at the sonographs, eat right, and buy baby supplies.

    If she doesn't want it, it's a simply a piece of extra tissue and can be terminated and disposed of.

    Got it? Good.

    By the way, the father's view on the issue either way happens to be irrelevant.

    --
    ...
  7. Re:Important to note.... by mirko · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Which says a lot about michael's editorial talent...

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  8. Cloning is like Prostitution by Aidtopia · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cloning is like prostitution. Moral or not, legal or not, people are going to do it and get paid for it. The question is whether we want an open, regulated industry or an underground one.