Slashdot Mirror


WineConf 2004 Wrapup

IamTheRealMike writes "Well, the attendants are back home and the writeups have been written - WineConf 2004 is over, and Brian Vincent of Wine Weekly News fame has written a comprehensive account of the conference. Wine hackers the world over congregated in snow-covered Minneapolis to talk shop and try and locate the magic bullet to make Wine better, faster. Cheers!"

5 of 190 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Believe me, I love it as much as anybody, but. by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 5, Informative
    Mods, please ignore this post, it's just a troll. Wine doesn't even have a TCP/IP stack, it (of course) uses the underlying hosts stack, ie the Linux/FreeBSD/Whatever stack. "Wait states for unsupported hardware" is entirely meaningless, Wine does not have hardware support, again that's delegated to the underyling operating system.

    Of course, if the poster can show specific sections of code he feels have "fundamental flaws" and describe them satisfactorily then I'll take my words back.

  2. Re:Believe me, I love it as much as anybody, but. by jhunsake · · Score: 5, Informative

    From his journal....

    The Specious Project
    09:45 AM February 12th, 2004 [ Add Friend | #61699 ]
    Hi, thanks for reading the journal.

    Any posts from this account are part of the Specious Project, which challenges the quality of the Slashdot moderation system by posting plausible-sounding, yet factually inaccurate comments to Slashdot stories.

    Usually a simple Google search will reveal any errors, and anyone moderating Specious Project posts up are reacting only to the sound and tone of authority, rather that the actual content. We try not to talk to those people at parties.

  3. Re:Have a nice cup of flaming hot death! by kalidasa · · Score: 4, Informative

    You notice there aren't any projects to run Mac OS apps under Linux.


    Au contraire.

  4. Re:WINE Windows Driver Support by Derek+Pomery · · Score: 4, Informative

    Oh, no prob. If Windows does it, should be a snap for those Linux boys.
    So, you wouldn't happen to have an NTFS spec handy? Maybe you could get one from MS?
    So far, I consider Linux reading NTFS and writing verrrry carefully without changing number of blocks a file uses to be impressive given it is all reverse engineering.
    But hey. There's a solution, maybe you remember seeing this posted on /., multiple times?
    NTFS full write

    Oh, and btw, WINE does work with 95 too. Check your configs and documentation.

    --
    -- perl -e'print pack"H*","6e656d6f406d38792e6f7267"' /. ate my old sig. Bastards.
  5. Re:Legality question.. by MrNybbles · · Score: 4, Informative
    WINE does not require a copy of XP except if you want to have good NTFS support. Many people who want or need good NTFS support already have Windows XP. If you want good NTFS support and don't have Windows XP then you are probably out of luck.

    The Linux Kernel 2.6.x so far does not have very good NTFS writing support. With few exceptions I would suggest not using 2.6.x NTFS support until it nolonger says it is experimental. Also, I think the NTFS.SYS driver from WINE calls the Windows XP driver ntoskrnl.exe. The NTFS.SYS talked about in the article is part of WINE.

    --
    Losing faith in humanity one person at a time.