Slashdot Mirror


Diamond Age Coming Soon

Roland Piquepaille writes "In 'The many facets of man-made diamonds,' Chemical & Engineering News (C&EN) writes that synthetic diamonds are getting bigger and cheaper. An example: for Valentine's Day, you can buy a yellow colored man-made diamond, visibly indistinguishable from a natural one, for $4,000 per carat. This is a 30% discount when compared with a natural diamond. This very long article also says that if synthetic diamond makers are targeting the jewelry market first, these new products will have an impact on many other industries. Not only is it now possible to grow bigger diamonds, you also can choose their color. 'Colored diamonds, which are valuable and very rare, can be created by introducing carefully controlled elemental impurities into the stone,' says C&EN. For instance, nitrogen produces a yellow stone. Infusing boron into the growing diamond produces a blue gem. This overview contains some details, references and photos of men-made diamonds, but read the original article for even more technical explanations if you have the time."

9 of 404 comments (clear)

  1. If diamonds weren't a monopoly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The price would be a lot lower anyway. They've got tons of em, they just let out a select portion each year.

    1. Re:If diamonds weren't a monopoly by RT+Alec · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Old article, from 1982, but quite revealing (I think there was a posting on this to Slashdot a few years back).

      The diamond trade is not only a carefuly controlled monopoly, but the whole idea of diamonds being "rare" and "valuable" is a carefuly crafted (over almost 100 years) con on (mainly) Americans.

    2. Re:If diamonds weren't a monopoly by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or we could also save $4000 by not paying such a ridicilous ammount for a crystalline form of carbon.

    3. Re:If diamonds weren't a monopoly by CaptBubba · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Think about it... custom gemstones.

      Send a picture of your sweetheart off with $4,000 and in a month or so you'll get back a 3/4 carat diamond the exact same color of her eyes. I have a hard time believing that the fact that it wasn't "natural' would really set somebody off because after all it is still a diamond and not only that, but it is her diamond.

      These people could make a fortune.

  2. Re:Possible regulation? by Chester+K · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The diamond industry (mining, cutting, and selling) is quite large. Is it possible they can convince governments to regulate the man-made ones, and have them somehow marked to allow people to note the difference? It may seem a bit out-there, but there's a lot of money at stake for a lot of people.

    You can bet that DeBeers will fight until the bitter end to preserve their diamond monopoly.

    Let's hope they lose.

    --

    NO CARRIER
  3. The real money isn't in jewelry by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's in electronics. Diamonds have plenty of intersiting properites that make them highly desirable for semiconducter applications, as well as heatsinks. See this article for some info. There's a problem, though, real diamonds simply don't come large enough, pure enough, and in the right kinds to make this practical on anything but a small scale. This will not be a problem with synthetics, they can cook up whatever kind they like, and Apollo at least makes them very, very pure. That's where the real money will be at. As big as jewelry is, it pales in comparison to eveltonics, espically given that we will eventually hit the limit of what silicon is capable of. The synthetic makers are basically just using jewelry as a means to an end, to finance their bussiness to get them to the state where they can start mass producing for other uses.

  4. Date of bitter end by tepples · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The bitter end will come in 2023, when Apollo Diamond's U.S. patents on chemical vapor deposition are scheduled to expire.

  5. I would never buy a diamond by Schemat1c · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Any woman that ends up with me knows right from the start not to expect diamonds or gold from me. I have no problem buying jewlery, but I buy from independant artisans. Not only does it support the little guy but to me it means lot more to give a unique, one of a kind gift as opposed to some generic diamond/gold piece that you can buy in any mall in the country.

    --

    "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
  6. thats just silly, by pablo_max · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Its amazing to me that we all know diamonds are NOT rare at all, yet we still pay a premium for them. Anyone who watched the discovery channel knows that there are in fact HUGE stores of diamonds held back to keep the price up. I would be willing to bet that colored diamonds are not that rare at all, but are kept back in all but tiny numbers to make them seem that way. We know that DeBeers is evil. We know that deal in blood diamonds so they are certainly not above this.
    Heck ADM and its competitors were in a global plot to keep lycean (spelling) prices high for years and they weren't killing people, so just think how far DeBeers would go. \

    Assuming that the diamonds are not rare at all as most of us know, what then is the point of making them? They are only cheaper then the inflated price but would most likely be more expensive if people knew the truth about diamonds. IMHO anyways.