Slashdot Mirror


NASA Open Source License Still Up For Discussion

Russ Nelson writes "There's been plenty of heated discussion about the NASA Open Source License, but although the OSI board approved five licenses and sent back seven, the NASA License is still up in the air, so to speak, hehe."

5 of 132 comments (clear)

  1. I'm there! by Bombcar · · Score: -1, Troll

    from the tax-dollars-want-to-benefit-the-commonweal dept.

    I wanna support the commonweal too!.

    Though maybe not.....

  2. Re:Public Domain! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    because putting it in the public domain means "they" can have it - it was good hard working Americans who paid for it, not lazy Communist Russians

  3. Re:Yeah, why not..... by reality-bytes · · Score: 0, Troll

    I wholeheartedly agree with you. IP is a pointless waste of money and as America is my best hope for manned exploration of space, I worry when their space program becomes embroiled in beaurocracy.

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
  4. Re:GPL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    What fucking asshole moderator modded this Redundant?

    How could it possibly be redundant? It is the first fucking post you fucking moron!

    Do you fucking shit-for-brains moderators even know what redundant means?

    Here's a clue: You are.

  5. Re:Karma: Bad by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: -1, Troll

    Naah... It'll fly a short distence and blow up in our faces. NASA has experience in this area going back to Apollo.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck