Slashdot Mirror


Virus Writers - The Enemy Within

Slob Nerd writes "An interesting read from todays Observer "He's 21, he's got dreadlocks, likes punk bands... and his hobby could wreck your computer in seconds. Clive Thompson infiltrates the secret world of the virus writers who see their work as art - while others fear that it is cyber-terrorism.""

21 of 380 comments (clear)

  1. Virus Writers by ThisNukes4u · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Virus writers, while technically skilled, are complete dumb butts for using their skills in ways that are harmful to society and businesses, even if it's not their fault that it is easy to do thanks to Microsoft. They'd be better off using their skills for something more productive.

    --
    thisnukes4u.net
    1. Re:Virus Writers by flatt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I doubt you'll get much opposition to your point but are you going to pay them? It's the same reason kids get involved in gangs and whatnot: boredom and lack of belonging/recognition.

      Easy problem to find, harder problem to solve.

    2. Re:Virus Writers by tommck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Did you see the jobs they have? assistant in a home for the disabled?
      There aren't that many high tech jobs in eastern Europe. I know a guy who moved to the US from Bulgaria and he said that all his friends were bored with life and wrote viruses for fun. Nobody there would hire them to do tech work.

      Ironically, now that outsourcing is targetting Eastern Europe, one of your problems (viruses, etc) might be subdued a bit (a bit!) by one of our other problems (jobs leaving the country). Of course, people elsewhere will always be around to write them.

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
    3. Re:Virus Writers by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      These aren't virus writers, these are just regular script kiddies. Nothing interesting.

  2. Deftones aren't a punk band by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And the technical side of the article is a pile of shit as well. Virii don't "reprogram parts of your computer". Script kiddies generally don't download virii, but trojan clients.

  3. Dupe, or no dupe... by nordicfrost · · Score: 5, Insightful


    With quotes like this: 'This guy,' he proclaimed, 'is the best at Visual Basic.' I really understand the level of these guys... Show me an 1 k, auto-replicating, ASM-written worm spreading like the lightening through an undocumented hole and I'll be impressed. These are nothing more than wannebe punks.

  4. Re:It's the fucking USERS, not VIRUS WRITERS' faul by rholliday · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, users bear some responsibility for viruses' spread. Yes, I'm all for education of users. I work in tech support, believe me I'd love more educated users. Usually, I'm the one giving the basic lessons in the difference between a hard disk and a CD-ROM drive.
    But the lion's share of the blame has to rest on the virus writers' collective shoulders. The vast majority have no pretensions of "educating the masses," or "simple curiosity." No, most of them just want to either a) screw people over for the hell of it, or b) get their (hopefully anonymous) 15 minutes of fame. These are the same types of people who will eventually be hired to write adware, spyware, and spamming apps. They are not heros. They are not admirable. They are degenerates and sociopaths, and they gives nerds and hackers horrible images with the very same "stupid users" that we have to interact with (and often get paid by) every day of our lives.

    --
    Xbox reviews.. We think they're funny.
  5. Wreck MY computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry, no, all my computers run Linux, FreeBSD and Mac OS X.

    I wish that, just for once, articles aimed at the public would be a little more accurate."

    "He's 21, he's got dreadlocks, likes punk bands... and if you use Microsoft software, his hobby could wreck your computer in seconds"

  6. Re:Hmmm by __past__ · · Score: 4, Insightful
    If nobody would write viruses, nobody would need virus scanners.

    Not to mention that people do not understand that they should not run arbitrary email attachments. Every few weeks we have a major worm outbreak because millions of people happily run every piece of malicious code they find.

    As for "real" worms that don't require a collaborative user to spread, it can hardly get worse than it is now, with all the knowledge and awareness we have. The really ugly ones spread in minutes, faster than anyone can react. (Also, they never seem to die, Nimda for example is still active.)

  7. cannot kick-start? by bo0ork · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "A virus cannot kick-start itself; a human needs to be fooled into clicking on it."
    What, the author never heard of floppy disks, autostart.ini or malformed html?
    --
    Does everything include nothing?
  8. Some other hobbies... by Robo+Dojo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1. Cooking*
    2. Cars
    3. Boats
    4. Trains
    5. Swords
    6. Guns

    Just because you do them, doesn't mean you test them out on innocent people. How are these virus writers any different?

    *Applies to slashdot readers, only.

  9. Re:... and his homepage ... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Wow, BAT files and Javascript viruses! Man, that is K-RAD! Reminds me of going to a computer store and editing autoexec.bat to do an ECHO "THIS COMPUTER SUCKS" loop when I was 10 years old. Would really confuse the people who worked there.


    Anyway, anybody who thinks this qualifies as elite virus writing needs their head examined. There is really nothing elite about a script file. Not to mention that it should be apparent in this day and age that trashing other people's computers is not only very uncool but incredibly likely to get you thrown in federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison.

  10. Re:My Hero by sadomikeyism · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I read this morning (and submitted to Slashdot) a story ...

    Here is a fantastic new concept: how about people submit ORIGINAL stories to slashdot, not just pointers to stories published elsewhere on the web? Citing references to support your points is fine, but how about /.ers creating some original content for a change?

    --
    "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves
  11. Karma penalty ? by S3D · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sholdn't be there Karma penalty for posting dup...triplicate article ? Isn't it amount to trolling ?

  12. Re:Virus Conspiracy by jjohnson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you have any evidence, or anything beyond "it all fits" type speculation, then you've got a huge story there. If you don't, then your tinfoil hat is showing.

    --
    Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
  13. Re:Writing poor articles for fun and profit by You're+All+Wrong · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He wasn't talking about mpegs infecting computers, he mentioned files that _appear to be mpegs_ infecting computers. Typically by renaming them and then attaching with a different mime type, or simply by appending a second extension to the end which "usefully" doesn't get displayed by the recipient's mail reader. It's been done a hundred times, and will be done a hundred times more.

    It's your comprehension skills that are called into question the most here.

    Because that wasn't your only mistake.

    Nowhere does it call Iron Maiden a punk band. The young one who lived at home with his parents was listening to Maiden. The 21-year old VB-er was the one who was into punk.

    Engage brain before posting, please.

    YAW.

    --
    Your head of state is a corrupt weasel, I hope you're happy.
  14. Re:Society and business are good? by ccmay · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Americans, five percent of the world's population consume a third of the world's resources.

    And Europeans, maybe eight percent of the world's population, consume at least another third, so get off your high horse. The fact is that anybody in the developed Western world uses resources at a far greater rate than a Third World peasant. Self-righteous moral preening about how your car gets five miles per gallon more than mine is of little meaning in the great scheme of things.

    Much of that consumption is used in building things that end up in other countries anyway. If America builds a machine tool or sewage treatment plant or airplane that ends up in some third-world Ickystan, have we really taken anything away from the Ickystanian man, or have we actually done him a favor?

    Plague of locusts indeed. If you subscribe to such idiocy, at least recognize that you are one too.

    -ccm

    --
    Too much Law; not enough Order.
  15. He's 21, he's got dreadlocks, likes punk bands by frovingslosh · · Score: 3, Insightful
    He's 21, he's got dreadlocks, likes punk bands...

    Sounds like we now know who to send the mobs with torches and pickforks after.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  16. Re:My Hero by Temporal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Your post was modded "troll" because it was blatant FUD. Pro-unix FUD, perhaps, but FUD nonetheless. You assert that Unix is superior to Windows because most viruses only run on Windows. The simple fact of the matter is that most viruses run on Windows because Windows has nearly 100% market share of people who aren't computer saavy. A worm for Linux would never work because Linux users know better than to run untrusted executables, and Linux users usually patch OpenSSH right away when a remote root exploit is found. The number of Linux machines left open to attack is so small that a virus or worm simply would not be able to propogate. Meanwhile, there are hundreds of millions of Windows users just waiting to open any e-mail attachment you send them, and who haven't ever heard of Windows Update.

    Unix is not inherently less vulnerable to viruses than Windows is. No, user/root separation does not hinder e-mail viruses designed to DDoS web sites. Yes, there is software running on your Unix box right now that has buffer overrun vulnerabilities.

  17. Re:My Hero by gaijin99 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Even if what you say is true, which I dispute, it still doesn't make my primary observation: they aren't computer virus, they're Windows virus, any less true. A "computer virus" would be one which operated on computers as a general class, regardless of hardware configuration or operating system. Actually, I wonder if such a beastie is possible, it'd have to be a *BIG* monster...

    Also, while my box may well have overrun vulnerabilities (doubtless true), I disagree completely with your statement that if *NIX machines had the marketshare there would be as many virus for them. I think you are vastly underestimating the user/root separation. At the very least it prevents a single user infection from affecting the entire machine. Yes, a single user could infect his own home directory tree and of course this could be used to DDoS someone. However, there would not be a situation similar to the Outlook/Outlook Express situation where simply recieving a viral mail would infect the system; *NIX apps aren't designed that stupidly.

    I have no doubt that if/when *NIX becomes more common there will be more *NIX virus, but to say that its "just as bad" is to buy into MS's own FUD.

    My case in point here is Mac OS X, it has a fairly large userbase, and most of that userbase is not computer expert (one of the Mac selling points is that it is (theoretically) simpler to use than Windows). Yet there has not been a significant number of Mac OS X virus (virus for older Mac OSes are more common by far). Why? Because Mac OSX is mostly BSD UNIX.

    --
    "Mission Accomplished" -- George W. Bush May 1, 2003
  18. Re:My Hero by JuggleGeek · · Score: 4, Insightful
    sorry but a good graffiti is art!!!

    If you spray paint your crap over my building, you are a vandal. I don't care if you have the skill of Michelangelo, Da Vinci, and Rembrandt combined, you don't have the right to paint on things that belong to other people. If you do, you are a vandal. Period.

    True artists can find legitimate outlets - they even get paid. Graffit art is done by gang members and other scum. Virus writers are simiply their online equivilent.