Slashdot Mirror


Subversion 1.0 Released

Phil John writes "Subversion 1.0 has finally been released. The people who maintain CVS have given us a viable replacement for our de-facto (and aged) versioning system. If you're new to Subversion its feature list looks like fixes for everything that is wrong in CVS, renaming, directory structure and metadata version tracking, file deletion, proper management of binary files and it's pretty portable to boot." According to the download page, binaries may take a few days to appear.

19 of 587 comments (clear)

  1. What's with that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    According to the download page, binaries may take a few days to appear.

    What's so good about a version control system that takes days for binaries to appear? That's a pretty big bug to work out. (fp)

    1. Re:What's with that? by coopaq · · Score: 2, Funny
      I think he meant: if you're a programmer that plans on using Subversion, surely you can compile the damn thing yourself, rather than waiting for somebody else to do it for you.

      Dude! I'll wait for the binary. We have a whole
      project written in BASIC that needs to get checked
      in. We're not risking compiling this thing.

      what does compile mean anyway?

    2. Re:What's with that? by ehack · · Score: 4, Funny

      The source for Subversion is in a Subversion archive, so the usual supect who build binaries cannot check it out because they themselves haven't built Subversion yet :)

      --
      This is not a signature.
  2. It's not out yet... by jsquyres · · Score: 3, Funny

    This story seems to have jumped the gun a few hours; the 1.0 tarballs don't seem to be available yet.

    However, you can download the latest Subversion sources from its Bitkeeper repository... no, wait...

  3. still waiting by bcrowell · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't think I'm going to try this version. I think I'll wait until they get to Superversion 1.0. Or maybe Superversion Platinum/Pro++ 1.0.

  4. Re:Yeah it's nice by damiam · · Score: 3, Funny

    Thank you, Mr. Cut-and-Paste (7th comment down).

    --
    It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  5. Re:Filesystem driver? by mohaine · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow, there is a first for everything. The one statement I would have bet large sums of money that I would never hear is that ClearCase's filesystem integration is really nice.

    --
    (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  6. Most need functionality by rmsousa · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does it check for SCO IP on each commit?

    No article should remain without a [bad] SCO joke.

  7. Bah, a few days... by Dog+and+Pony · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... try having a sysadmin that prefers debian and see how long you have to wait. Sigh. I do like subversion lots though! :)

  8. Re:Comparing the software by truth_revealed · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hardly an unbiased evaluation.

    You're right - ask for your money back.

  9. Re:MOD DOWN - NEW TROLL ALERT by orthogonal · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do not mod up people who point out cut-and-paste trolls logged in.

    Many of these are folks who post plagarized articles and then point it out with another account to gain karma.


    Do not mod up ACs who point out that people who point out people who post plagiarized articles.

    Many of these are folks who are stuck in a bizarre recursive process of accusation and counter accusation against
    folks who are stuck in a bizarre recursive process of accusation and counter accusation against
    folks who are stuck in a bizarre recursive process of accusation and counter accusation against
    folks who are stuck in a bizarre recursive process of accusation and counter accusation against

    Oh, wheels-within-wheel-within -- oh just take the blue pill!

  10. Re:slashdot a bit over-eager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    New slogan:

    News for Nerds. Stuff that matters. Things that haven't actually occured yet. ;)

  11. Re:Filesystem driver? by warkda+rrior · · Score: 3, Funny

    You lost me at "[...] filesystem [...] written in Perl"...

    --
    You need to install an RTFM interface.
  12. Re:kernel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    All they need to do to get him to switch is make it proprietary software under a really restrictive license and replace the developers with raving lunatics.

  13. Re:more information by be-fan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ha ha. There never was a subversion 0.8x. The last release before the 1.0 release-candidate was 0.37 :)

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  14. Re:astyle, indent, etc. with subversion by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anyone know if there is a way to use subversion for automatic canonization of code style?

    Yeah, host a python repository with it.

    --
    Like what I said? You might like my music
  15. Re:Question by ryandlugosz · · Score: 2, Funny

    After fourteen months of coding, Subversion became "self-hosting" on August 31, 2001.

    lame. Skynet became self-aware on August 29!

  16. Re:Will I need MSVC? by dmayle · · Score: 3, Funny

    <tongue firmly in cheek>Instead of paying the $1000 for VS, buy an Itanium server. The VS compiler is free for IA64 (though it doesn't come with the IDE). It's included in the (free) MSDN download</tongue>

  17. +1 Civil by jlusk4 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think we need a new moderation category.