Slashdot Mirror


Ars Technica: Deep Inside KDE 3.2

binner writes "Ars Technica features an article 'Deep inside the K Desktop Environment 3.2' written by Datschge and Henrique Pinto. After introducing KDE and the project's structure the authors present some new applications of KDE 3.2. After that they explain the key KDE technologies KParts, DCOP, KIO, Kiosk and KXMLGUI and give examples for code reusage and an overview of efforts to integrate non-KDE applications. For developers Umbrello, Cervisia and Valgrind with KCachegrind are introduced and of course KDevelop 3.0. An examination of licenses precedes the positive conclusion."

20 of 318 comments (clear)

  1. KK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Kirst Kost

  2. kMCP? by UncleBiggims · · Score: 5, Funny

    Deep inside KDE sounds very TRONish. I was hoping for a detailed look at Master Control Program. Oh well, the article must have been posted by a NULL unit.

    Are you Corn Fed?

    1. Re:kMCP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmm, I was thinking more along the line of porn. VCA pictures has a "deep inside" series, IIRC.

    2. Re:kMCP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I read aloud "Deep inside Katie", and this girl at the next station made a face at me.

      Using the library computers sucks. As does being homeless in general.

    3. Re:kMCP? by taniwha · · Score: 2, Funny

      well as an old time (20 years ago now) MCP programmer - and KDE developer .... I never get the two confused

  3. I saw this one last week! by burgburgburg · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Deep Inside Katey Pt 3" had some of the hottest...oh, wait, I misheard. Never mind.

  4. Re:Mac Users UNITE!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    the Apple logo on the back of the screen Photoshop-ed out

    Hmmm. Seems your right. A hexdump of the file header hints at its history:

    0000000: ffd8 ffe0 0010 4a46 4946 0001 0200 0064 ......JFIF.....d
    0000010: 0064 0000 ffec 0011 4475 636b 7900 0100 .d......Ducky...
    0000020: 0400 0000 4000 00ff ee00 0e41 646f 6265 ....@......Adobe
    0000030: 0064 c000 0000 01ff db00 8400 0504 0404 .d..............
  5. Great... by TheSurfer · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wow, that's a nice copy/paste from KDE Dot News...

    Anyways, a really nice article. It's absolutely refreshing after the thousand and one "reviews" of KDE we've seen lately ("oh, look that ugly pixel in the right bottom corner"). We need more of these technically-targetted reviews.

  6. Over-linking by RKone2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it me, or are there way too many links in that article. Do we really need seperate links to the source code download, binaries download, release notes and system requirements pages?

    If someone has done a study on the most effective text to link ratio, I'm sure they'd find that this Ars article is about 10x higher.

  7. Re:As a long time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    hmmmm, I haven't used KDE in years mind you, so I might try it one. But to me, if I'm trying to get away from windows why would I want to use KDE which tries to mimic windows in a lot of ways? looks and feels a lot like windows with it's point an click everything interface.

  8. Re:kMCP? or kMKP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wouldn't that be Master Kontrol Program????

  9. KDE vs. Gnome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    KDE - rad kool 1992 Acura Integra with huge wing, go-fast stripes, bumblebee muffler, NOS, tinted windows, butt-jiggling subwoofer

    Gnome - 1999 beige Toyota Camry sedan

    (*I drive a Camry and I use Gnome)

  10. What a gyp! by sharkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    This installment in the series is NOT as good as the last "Deep Inside" volume I checked out.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  11. Re:Language bindings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
    Not to sound like a troll, but this is a very weak area compared to the Gnome/GTK+ bindings to languages as infrequently-used and obscure as ML, OCAML and Haskell.

    I can just imagine a GUI implemented in a purely functional language:

    Q: I tried to click on the button but nothing is happening? What's wrong?

    A: If we responded to user actions, would create side-effects in the program. We can't condone that.

  12. Arse Technica - Deep Inside KDE 3.2 by elvstone · · Score: 2, Funny

    What's next?

    GNOME - Pre-teen midgets gone wild XXX?

    Sorry, *tired*.

  13. Re:I've stayed away from KDE...until now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    So I shouldn't try it with my 25 mhz 486SX with 16 MB of memory?

  14. Re:KDE just gets better and better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    has supprised(sic) me in that my text was "spell checked" as I was writing this text.


    A good demonstration of said spell checker!

  15. Re:KDE 3.2 by pclminion · · Score: 2, Funny
    Hrm.

    What does it mean, when you're going for "Funny" but get "Troll" instead?

  16. Re:KDE just gets better and better... by Jad+LaFields · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dude, the "Sqrt" button is clearly for the Squirt operation. That's when you take a number and squeeze it until it squirts all over the place. The result is the various pieces of the number jumbled together. For example, Sqrt(54) might result in the bottom part of the five (which looks similar to a comma) and the right section of the four (which looks similar to an 'l'), along with two angle-thingies, which are like radians. See?

    The squirt function is very usefull in electrical engineering and theoretical algorithmic programming. Com'on, didn't they teach you this in trig class?!?

    --
    [SIG] It's like putting a moose in the blender -- a recipe for disaster!
  17. Re:For more on cool things about KDE... by antic · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sorry about getting to the comments so late, but it's taken me all fucking morning to run off reading every link in the /. write-up...

    --
    'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'