Slashdot Mirror
Too slow! FBI Shuts Down Hosting Service
Chope writes "If FBI agents showed up at your data center bearing a warrant, would you be able to provide them prompt access to customer data?
BZZZZT! I'm sorry, but you've taken too long to answer. We'll be confiscating all the hardware you use, er, used to use, to run your business. But we'll get it back to you 'real soon now.' Thank you for playing. CarrierHotels.com is carrying the story of a FBI raid on a web hosting company. When the hosting company didn't and/or couldn't provide the information the FBI was looking from its several terabytes of data within "several hours", the FBI decided it was more "efficient" to seize all the web servers and customer data as part of the FBI's investigation of a hacking incident."
It was a corporate gaylord that were offended.
someone was hosting a Dancing Bush site.
--
Billwashere
serves to reinfo8ce startling turn provide sodas,
I'm currently disassembling a new worm which is using ICQ to spread. It downloads code from www.jokeworld.biz and www.ustrading.info.
I reported this 12 hours ago. WTF are those web sites still online?
Tarsnap: Online backups for the truly paranoid
That's right. In Soviet-Controlled World, servers hand over you!
503 Sig Unavailable
The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged.
And they moderate accordingly.
Is this truly the only Earth I can live on?
That rates as an automatic flamebait mod, you silly man!
I voted in the last election, and I live in Brevard County, Florida. I voted for Howard Phillips, the candidate that best matches my values.
As years go by I become increasingly disappointed with the lack of non-rehtorical difference between the Republicans and Democrats. The Republicans talk a good game, but their implemented policies show their true colors: they're not for limited government any more than the Democrats. They'll drive over the cliff at a safe 55 miles per hour instead of the Dem's 100, but they're going over the cliff just as sure.
Some of my letters to Federal officials were obviously NOT congruent with the Republican platform.
I read the book from Micheal Moore, "Stupid White Guys". If you remove the sensationalism he does make a very valid point. His point is that politics is basically screwed up. Clinton in his years talked well, but he was Bush in fancier clothes.
I understand why Nader wants to run. Frankly if I was an American I would vote for him. However, the political mess is not exclusive to the US. In Germany or Canada it is the same mess. Germany talks about reforms, HA!
The more and more I think about this, is that if the politicians are not careful, extremism is going to be the smallest of their problems.
"You can't make a race horse of a pig"
"No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
AAAAB3NzaC1kc3MAAACBAJBUW7VOencpdwDb1PPXytFvoSxKrv sYVsmchujIyJi4Ie5WQ6xXDSDLSmIeiuVGTKZX8muthnTy/I+x B161sqeq0UXu+lB5pTMkZ40RuJCl90pG2C2c81Bxe6rqsJ/5IC uCUjy7hnE+p9LzPWBa2G0vQlFCLJ6nIkKIE7HmsQRhAAAAFQCF b7s7LBRqtqg/vj1t0avf5pd61QAAAIAqwOK1MdPV5MKjTBsNff whguBAYWL5biro/2CwmoGdMlpZULQTLPJITljDDmZqE69TrjWD fGziK3YSwVEQzNsQdfaGbZzeCws146XBhjHT+gcJ0YSeGpcPYx 78pP7lki+JUrG2JfNnC5BJbawl31gO276/QicUi+AibH1P+hsg 1gAAAIBhSnzQ9IhoquzDB7OHXIv3vAA1sUX67587wVkJZpuwxV uSQQJdrjyTb2nSGv11uGpv4MOa5HSpwwbq9LFO9ga5CmVVU2wg UMlZqEPeCM/5pxrwVW5cGjDLeJ/eQpOZOoYaqnhXd0YpeLojy0 89QD1Q0nrnokq9Go1gHM2WT6bJRQ==
Why are /. editors all idiots.
These guys deserved what they got. They should
actually have been put out of business.
It's laughable - correct spelling and grammar here or anywhere else, and the response is "Fuck you, the meaning is understood, English is a fluid language, anyway who cares about spelling and grammar!", but just let someone you don't like do it, and it's the worst thing imaginable.
Two sets of rules. How does it feel to be a hypocrite?
I read the book from Micheal Moore, "Stupid White Guys". If you remove the sensationalism he does make a very valid point.
that it is wrong to be a white man? Seriously, that is the most racist, sexist book ever.
I'm mexican, you insensitive clod.
I hate to break it to you, but I've got brown skin just like yours. But I'm a Texan. I was born here and God willing I'll die here. You should study more about the Tejano contribution to Texas history and the Alamo before getting all offended. There were men born in Mexico who gave their lives for Texasd during the revolution, including at the Alamo.
Remember the Alamo, and God Bless Texas...
You'll work harder with a gun in your back for a bowl of rice a day.
I'm pretty sure that grammar is derived from "all yuor base are belong to us".
Clinton administration under that bastion of civil liberties (nevermind Waco, Ruby Ridge, or Elian Gonzalez)
I hate to get offtopic here, but it really annoys me when democrat bashers don't even know what they're talking about. I bet you listen to Rush Limbaugh or Michael Savage religiously.
Hint, Ruby Ridge happened in '92.
When looking for authoritive information about cancer on the web, do you visit these sites or these?
Firstly, that's not how you spell "uneduated". Secondly, each non-fluid natural language has one very important attribute in common with the others, namely being dead.
What the hell is this crap about toeing party lines? I never have understood it. It's utter bullshit from no matter what angle you look at it. Voters who vote for a candidate just because they are Democrats are fools. They aren't voting on the issues or for the man/woman. They're voting with a word. A single fscking meaningless, pointless, worthless word. Elected official who toe party lines and vote against a bill or resolution simply because it was introduced by the other defunct party is a damned dishonest fool. He/she isn't there voting for the issues that his constituents elected him/her for. They are voting to maintain their party's power and to keep their own job. That's as dishonest as it gets.
What the hell is the point of having political parties? Why can't our elected officials just vote on the issues? Why the hell do they have to play party games? Elected Offical A runs for office by taking a particular stance on Hot Issue Z. His constituents elect him to office because of his stance on Z (and other stances of course). A bill is introduced regarding issue Z. His party Pink doesn't actually like Z and wants to instead vote for Y. Who is Elected Official A loyal to? The people that elected him to office and that he's representing? Or the club Pink that he claims to be a member of? I never will understand the point of political parties.