Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Seeks Patent On Virtual Desktop Pager

ihabawad writes "Microsoft has a patent on file for this really cool new technology called 'virtual desktops' where you see a 'pager' on the screen. Read all about it by searching under "Published Applications" for patent #20030189597 at the US Patent and Trademark Office. You know, I had a dream that I was using such a thing once; what was it called? -- yes, FvwmPager! Weird, eh?"

18 of 716 comments (clear)

  1. PF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    roses are red
    violets are blue
    in soviet russia
    poems write you

  2. FR1ST PS0T!!!11! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    FR1ST PS0T!!!11! OMG LOL WTF

    1. Re:FR1ST PS0T!!!11! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      um... you fail it?

    2. Re:FR1ST PS0T!!!11! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      FATMOUSE DOES NOT CARE ABOUT YOUR SILLY uspto. FATMOUSE CARES ONLY FOR FEEDING. AND 1st POST.

    3. Re:FR1ST PS0T!!!11! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      FATMOUSE always FEEDING. SOMETIMES misses 1st P0ST.

  3. Frsity posty haiku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    this is not first post
    Sadly, slow as a turtle
    Yes, I fail it.

  4. Truth about linux co$t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Let's have a close look at the costs involved when running a Linux system.

    An important factor in Linux' cost is its maintenance. Linux requires a *lot* of maintenance, work doable only by the relatively few high-paid Linux administrators that put themselves - of course willingly - at a great place in the market. Linux seems to be needing maintenance continuously, to keep it from breaking down.

    Add to this the cost of loss of data. Linux' native file system, EXT2FS, is known to lose data like a firehose spouts water when the file system isn't unmounted properly. Other unix file systems are much more tolerant towards unexpected crashes. An example is the FreeBSD file system, which with soft updates enabled, performance-wise blows EXT2FS out of the water, and doesn't have the negative drawback of extreme data loss in case of a system breakdown.

    According to Linux advocates, an alternative to EXT2FS would be ReiserFS. Unfortunately, ReiserFS is still in beta stage. This means it is not intended for production use (although according to many Linux advocates this shouldn't be a problem, which makes me wonder how (little) valuable they find your data).

    The other proposed 'solution', EXT3FS, is nothing more than an ugly hack to put journaling into the file system. All the drawbacks of the ancient EXT2FS file system remain in EXT3FS, for the sake of 'forward- and backward compatibility'. This is interesting, considering that the DOS heritage in the Windows 9x/ME series was considered a very bad thing by the Linux community, even though it provided what could be called one of the best examples of compatibility, ever. When it's about Linux, compatibility constraints don't seem to be that much of a problem for Linux advocates.

    Back to Linux' cost. Factor in also the fact that crashes happen much more often on Linux than on other unices. On other unices, crashes usually are caused by external sources like power outages. Crashes in Linux are a regular thing, and nobody seems to know what causes them, internally. Linux advocates try to hide this fact by denying crashes ever happen. Instead, they have frequent "hardware problems".

    The steep learning curve compared to about any other operating system out there is a major factor in Linux' cost. The system is a mix of features from all kinds of unices, but not one of them is implemented right. A Linux user has to live with badly coded tools which have low performance, mangle data seemingly at random and are not in line with their specification. On top of that a lot of them spit out the most childish and unprofessional messages, indicating that they were created by 14-year olds with too much time, no talent and a bad attitude.

    I could go on and on and on, but the conclusion is clear. Linux is not an option for any one who seeks a professional OS with high performance, scalability, stability, adherence to standards, etc.

    1. Re:Truth about linux co$t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Wow! That's really clever! I had no idea about some of that stuff!

      Did you really just type all that stuff in that quickly? I'm impressed. You must type very quickly! Are you one of those "hackers" I've heard so much about?

      Man, I tell ya - that's the great thing about Slashdot! You get all these really brilliant people, who you know are posting Anonymously for reasons of national security, sharing the inside information with us that we otherwise would never see! If you, dear parent poster, hadn't seen fit to tell me about the big SCAM that Linux is, I'd never have known!

      Thanks a million, and keep 'em coming!

    2. Re:Truth about linux co$t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Thanks for confirming my story!

    3. Re:Truth about linux co$t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      "Thanks for confirming my story!"

      Why, sure! Glad to help!

      Err... which part did I confirm? I'm pretty sure I didn't actually say anything about Windows or Lunix, or... wait a minute! Did you mean that you thought I sounded like a 14-year-old! Hey, now, come on! That wasn't very nice. Here I was, thanking you for enlightening me, and you gotta go and get all nasty with me!

      You're not one of those "trolls" I've heard so much about, are you?

    4. Re:Truth about linux co$t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      My Windows 2k box has a 412 day uptime.

  5. I AGREE WITH THIS POST (nt) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    nt

  6. Re:Jesus fucking christ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Flamebait? FLAMEBAIT!?!?!??!?

    I'll show you some "flamebait", you god damned cocksucking motherfucking jesus christ'n son of a cum guzzling bitch! Come into my immediate vicinity and I'll give you a dose of motherfucking flamebait you will NEVER forget.

    P.S. Get fucked!

  7. Re:crazy! by kilfarsnar · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    The viruses are pretty much a given...

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  8. Re:Jesus fucking christ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Hmm, so far I've managed a flamebait, an off-topic, and a troll moderation.

    What in the living fuck are you cock licking moderators going to moderate THIS post with? You're running out of unique moderation tags.

  9. WRONG, SKINNY WEAKLING. by FATMOUSE · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I care not for your silly "first post." It contains no calories and therefore is of no interest to me.

    This "frosty piss" you malnourished nerds speak of, however, intrigues me. What is its nutritional value, and more importantly, does it contain cholesterol?

    FATMOUSE MUST FEED.

  10. MOD PARENT UP!!! +1 INSIGHTFUL (nt) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    nth