Next Generation Mail Clients Reviewed
kreide writes "E-mail is the 'killer app' of the Internet; an enormous number of messages are exchanged every day, and while web-based mail has become very popular in recent years, many people still prefer the added speed and flexibility of a mail client application. In this review I compare the next generation of the most popular e-mail clients, including Evolution, KMail, Opera and Mozilla, and their usability in dealing with large number of messages."
it is pretty nice, why did it not get reviewed? Is this site biased or something?
I'm not a microsoft support but I think it is a little remiss not to include the next generation of Outlook in your review. It seems to be the "most popular" client everywhere I've ever worked.
I would think that including outlook express (even instead of teh full outlook) would've been good. Also, a quick comparison to one of the free webmail systems like the hotmail web interface would've been nice.
Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
So apparently Outlook Express isn't popular at all. Funny... I guess it's just convinient then...
I hate these biased reviews. Popular would be based on usage wouldn't it???
---
Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
At the risk of being unpopular (gulps), I have to put in my say for the new Outlook. I'm surprised Outlook 2003 wasn't included in the review, since it offers significant enhancements over the version in the article. The concept of "search folders" and being able to flag messages for follow-up in many colours is, simply put, invaluable. Mozilla mail doesn't even come close--although it should.
So the obvious question is how are we going to fix it?
I mean both a technical solution and a way of implementing a new standard world wide. Any ideas? Would it be possible to have some sort of backwards compatibility to ease in a transfer?
The Borg assimilated my race & all I got was this lousy T-shirt