Slashdot Mirror


Celebrating Spam's Ten-Year Anniversary

khalua writes "Netcraft has a story that 10 years ago today, the first widely recognized spam was sent by... oh the irony...a law firm. Hate to see what a beast it grows into when it's 20." Reader prostoalex writes "Ever wonder why spam is so prevalent and who buys all those revolutionary products sold at unbelievable prices? Direct Marketing Association estimates $11.7 billion was spent on goods and services pitched via unsolicited e-mail. The average buy was $155, which exceeds the average of $114 that opt-in e-mail generated. It's worth noting that US e-commerce sales in general generated $50 billion total last year, however, the data was presented by a different researcher."

11 of 275 comments (clear)

  1. "First"? by tverbeek · · Score: 5, Informative

    Come on... that Canter & Siegel green-card-lottery spam-scam wasn't the first spam by a long-shot... maybe the first spam to get written up the print media. Usenet was already littered with off-topic commercial posts and crossposted garbage by then, and unsolicited e-mailings (on a much smaller scale than today) were hardly unheard-of.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:"First"? by drooling-dog · · Score: 2, Informative

      It seems so long ago... I remember very well back in the late 80s and early 90s when spam was virtually unheard of. There was very strong community pressure against any commercial/promotional use of the Internet. What's remarkable is that this was so effective for so long.

  2. Slashdot once again behind the times. by mrshowtime · · Score: 5, Informative

    The first spam was sent May 3, 1978 -- 25 years ago . (It was written May 1 but sent on May 3.) The end of the month marks the 11th anniversary of when the first time a USENET posting got named a spam. Once again, Slashdot editors need to start checking the validity of their article before posting.

    --
    "Jeremy, you need to get to an internet cafe and cut and paste some appropriate sentiments about me from the world wide
    1. Re:Slashdot once again behind the times. by RaymondInFinland · · Score: 2, Informative

      Look here for the exact message and the reaction of the community to the first SPAM message being send by email.

  3. It's True! Spam works. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    While irritating as hell to many, the sad truth is that spam works. And I know this from first-hand experience (Don't you love AC's!?).

    You know all those viagra ads you get? Well chances are it's not from us (I've never met someone who's gotten one of our spams), but maybe you have. In any case, we have margins 100% - 200% higher for people who buy via bulk mail than via other advertising methods, and sales are pretty darn good. I would imagine this isn't too surprising considering the kind of people who would actually respond to spam aren't that wise. In any case, as much as it is hated, it is effective. If it wasn't effective it wouldn't happen.

  4. Bringing Down AOL by stand · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is older than 10 years, but Tim Bray tells a funny story about how he might have brought down AOL back in 1988 in response to getting a spam email from someone with the email address lipstick@aol.com.

    He launched a job to send an angry response email every 10 seconds. He forgot about it until he heard a couple of guys talking a few days later about how their aol accounts were down over the weekend.

    Check it out, it's pretty hilarious.

    --
    Four fifths of all our troubles in this life would disappear if we would just sit down and keep still. -C. Coolidge
  5. Happy spam anniversaries by ultraslacker · · Score: 5, Informative

    Oddly enough, hormel's spam first appeared on store shelves on March 5, 1937. Heard on the radio this am...

  6. 1978: The first internet E-mail spam, sent by DEC by stuffduff · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you do some digging at Brad Templeton's Home Page, his History of Spam has a different version of the history. DEC may have not been the first!

    --
    "Can there be a Klein bottle that is an efficient and effective beer pitcher?"
  7. This was the SECOND. by Mechanist · · Score: 5, Informative

    This report is mistaken. The first large-scale spamming of Usenet preceeded this one by nearly two months. I remember it well, as I used Usenet pretty heavily at the time.

    It wasn't lawyers hawking green cards who really got the ball rolling. It was a religious nut warning us all about the end of the world. On January 17, 1994, Clarence L. Thomas IV (not the Supreme Court guy) spammed all known Usenet groups with a message titled Global Alert For All: Jesus is Coming Soon .

    You can see the original message in Google's archives. And you can read about some of the after-effects in RISKS 15.49, from February 1994.

    Canter & Siegel, the green card spammers, certainly earned their awful reputation. But they were only ripping off someone else's idea.

    --
    And you may ask yourself, well, how did I get here?
  8. Interview wih Siegel by AceCaseOR · · Score: 2, Informative

    This story is a little old, but back in 1994, Siegel was interviewed by K. K. Campbell. She's just a little out there. You can read the interview here

    --
    Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
  9. A little information by Vexware · · Score: 1, Informative
    For those curious among you, click to view the original USENET post by Carter and Siegel, the infamous "green-card scam" (did they know they would start a phenomenom?).

    And perhaps you already know this, but the Nigerian scam is named the "419 scam" after the corresponding table in the Nigerian Criminal Code Act. For the lazy among you:

    419. Any person who by any false pretence, and with intent to defraud, obtains from any other person anything capable of being stolen, or induces any other person to deliver to any person anything capable of being stolen, is guilty of a felony, and is liable to imprisonment for three years.

    If the thing is of the value of one thousand naira or upwards, he is liable to imprisonment for seven years.

    It is immaterial that the thing is obtained or its delivery is induced through the medium of a contract induced by the false pretence.

    The offender cannot be arrested without warrant unless found committing the offence.

    --
    "Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect" -- Linus Torval