Slashdot Mirror


iPod Mini Sells Out

burgburgburg writes "According to USATODAY.com, the iPod mini is virtually sold out after two weeks. As we know, it had 100,000 on pre-order. It's the top seller at the Apple Store, where they advise people that there will be a one to three week wait. And it isn't a component shortage that's causing the delays. It's the huge demand amongst teens (for the colors) and athletes who like exercising with the ultralight device. While many here on /. felt that the mini was overpriced and pointed out that for $50 extra, you could buy a regular iPod with 15GB of storage instead of the 4 GB of the mini, Apple seems to have correctly identified the price point and the market they were going after. The space has become so hot that Creative's MuVo2 has also been selling well, but also for a slightly different reason. The MuVo2, which also has 4 GB of capacity, uses a CompactFlash card (which can be used in a digital camera). People have been buying the MP3 player and taking it apart for the card, which would cost more than the $200 dollars for the MuVo2."

26 of 499 comments (clear)

  1. Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Say it ain't so!

    While many here on /. felt that the mini was overpriced and pointed out that for $50 extra, you could buy a regular iPod with 15GB of storage instead of the 4 GB of the mini, Apple seems to have correctly identified the price point and the market they were going after.

    Which should tell /. readers a couple things:

    /.'ers don't fit the target demographics (Ow! That hurts!)

    /.'ers are apparently sedentary, they sit at their screens so much that weight isn't a consideration, for that matter, they can listen to stuff while sitting at the screen, so why bother?

    /.'ers are more interested in pushing consumer technology to its more than whether there's a need. (It's all about the game!)

    /.'ers must be colorblind (I'm R/G) so the colors aren't interesting, let along exciting.

    /.'ers were wrong, and can't stand being wrong and are currently working on a strategy to change that rather than get a date for a Friday night. (Hey! This is important!)

    So what's the average age of a slashdotter? Undoubtably there must be a few in the target demographic, now how many have kids in the group?

    I identify more with Homer Simpson than Britney Spears and I'm cool with that, inspite of the tone of that post. Now if you'll excuse me I need to go buy some cargo pants, Justin Timberlake CD's, and iPod mini and a stone of oatmeal (because it's the right thing to do.)

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Yeah, the main selling point to me is that it is smaller. If I wanted to maximize hard drive space for the dollar I could drag around a IDE tower.

      Sure, and you could hack the thing, install Linux on it, and play Ogg tunes. I'm sure there's people whose eyes don't glaze over as we go into the technical details and merits of our accomplishments. I'm always shocked when I run into someone who knows what I'm talking about.

      "A left handed 9.4GB veeblefetzer with interchangeable 3.0 GHz portrzebie, no kidding?"

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Cthefuture · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You have to remember, the couple hundred posts you see on any given Slashdot thread are only a couple hundred opinions of the most active posters. It in no way respresents what the majority of people reading Slashdot think.

      I mean, you're talking tens of thousands of people versus only a couple hundred posts. Think about it.

      There are many regular lemmings lurking about.

      --
      The ratio of people to cake is too big
    3. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by moonbender · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, size and weight isn't everything, but the iPod mini does seem to have a fairly nice balance. I'd rather settle for half the storage if it allow a 20% decrease in size, but it's still a lot better than the traditional HD players while retaining mostly all their pro's.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    4. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Nexum · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You'll be happy to hear that things are really still a they always have been... deleting the folder is still how you delete an app in OS X, and it's a great way of working.

      The parent is talking about setting up a hardware device... but even then, there's so little that you need to do when using the iPod in a standard way I don't know what he's on about.

      Rest assured

      --

      This sig has been deprecated.
    5. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by darc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One of the reasons they do not allow you to remove the optical drive is to standardize installation and support procedures, as well as software distribution. Although you might not need an optical drive, the majority of people do. It is rather difficult to install the operating system with one computer that lacks an optical drive, and even more difficult to tell the user that when they are on the tech support line, having not bought a cdrom drive.

      The fact of the matter is that most people DO indeed need a cdrom drive to install applications and lack the technical expertise to stream a cdrom over the network. Further, crazy options make it much more complicated to support. "Does your system have the following ports ...." Never mind how difficult it is to get them to identify their computer if they need to read off a 20 feature list with it.

      At some point, you have to be practical, and i'd say this is the line.

      --
      Tired of legitimate data sources? Try UNCYCLOPEDIA
    6. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by rufo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's from almost two years ago, and none of the few failures mention the word "run" or "jog". Sorry, please play again. :P

      --
      My English teacher once told me that two positives don't make a negative. Two words for her: Yeah, right.
    7. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by e3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the bad news is that my ipod died while i was jogging. the relative good news is that it survived training for 3 marathons through the hot, humid summer and cold, cold midwestern winters. personally i was amazed that it lasted a year and half through 15+ miles runs and lots and lots of sweat [ it was tightly wrapped to by arm with an ace bandage and would accumulate lots of salt ].

      --
      http://snowdeal.org [mutated daily]
    8. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by Patik · · Score: 3, Insightful
      That is what surprises me most when I see completely wrong posts moderated up to +5 .... when all the moderators are fooled all the time it makes me worry about humanity :)
      I think moderators are persuaded by previous moderations. When you see a post and you're not quite sure if it's a good one or not, but someone else has already modded it up, then you start to think that it is good and you're probably just missing something, so you mod it up as well.
    9. Re:Slashdotters==Curmudgeons? by phpsocialclub · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My mp3 collection is 230GB, what I am I to do,

      really, if you can not decide on 4gb of music to go on run or to the gym, you probably should spend the extra money and buy the big one

      Remember the people buying these are the same people that might have just retired the disc man or shockingly, a walkman.

      once again, Steve Jobs has hit the nail on the head, even with the pundits and ./s disagreeing the whole time.

      Isn't apple going out of business any ways,

  2. Kinda validate their price point by joshv · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know a lot of people complained about the price, but given the fact that they've now sold out, Apple would have been stupid to set a lower price.

    1. Re:Kinda validate their price point by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Selling out on launch isn't impressive?

      Okay, that's your opinion, fine. However, couple that with, "but given the fact that they've now sold out, Apple would have been stupid to set a lower price," and you're being somewhat silly.

      A) Set a price at $250. Sell out
      B) Set a price at $200. Sell out

      Which one *logically* is more intelligent.

      Apple chose A. *If* they need to lower the price, they have that choice. If they don't, they can keep the price high.

      What you imply is Apple should have set B; and if they did that, they would have lost at least $5,000,000 in preorders as it were, not counting the sales channel!

    2. Re:Kinda validate their price point by Moofie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Don't be ridiculous. If you want to buy a Sony product, you have to buy a Sony product.

      But you can just as easily buy one from a dozen other manufacturers.

      Microsoft, on the other hand, has a monopoly on the entire personal computer industry. If you don't think they use that monopoly power to destroy competition, you're a poor student of history.

      Yes, Apple killed the clone manufacturers. However, the deal struck with the clone mfr's was absolutely murdering Apple. They were losing enormous sales to competitors (who didn't have to do their own R&D), and couldn't sustain their own in-house development.

      Apple decided to stop doing this, and they've been doing great since. However, seeing as how they have, what? Five percent of the PC market, calling them a monopoly and comparing them to Microsoft makes you look pretty silly.

      Of course Apple is money hungry. That's OK, in and of itself. They make some great products to get money, and I think thats just fine.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  3. Re:Supply and Demand? by BFedRec · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think the point is that the components aren't hard to come by, they've just not slapped enough of them together to meet the demand. Assembly time is the bottle neck not component availablity.

    CharlesP

  4. Re:Disassembling for fun and profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just be careful about the negative feedback you'll get from calling them flash cards instead of minidrives with CF interfaces...

  5. Re:Remember kids... by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'll put it this way: I have a lot more faith in Apple than I do in the rumor sites. Apple does their homework before they release something; they haven't really had a flop since the G4 Cube (which was a cool idea regardless, it kind of predated the SFF PCs with the same concept.) I guess their strategy now is to stay one step ahead of everyone who tries to copy them. It seems to be working, at least for now.

  6. Re:Demo Nitrus2 at CES, pics and article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Little mixed up at your "I will never understand how people can be talked into spending enormous sums on an inferior product". I see from your web link that "Rio is also pricing the new Nitrus very aggressively. It will retail for $249.00 and will ship this month." Isn't that the same price as the mini?

  7. But what about market share? by argent · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't think I was ever worried about it not selling. My thought was (and is) that it's not going to make that much difference long-term to market share.

    The thing that I saw Jobs hammer over and over agan was market share. He wanted the iPod to not just be the biggest seller, but to be the majority of the market. So... the question is, are these new iPod Mini sales new iPod sales, or are they existing iPod users trading "up"?

    According to Jobs, there's three market segments. I thnk he was a bit deceptive about the details of the segments with his "$50 more" line, but the basic outlines seem to be pretty solid. There's the low end flash based devices, there's the midrange flash and maybe small disk, and there's the high end. The iPod owns the high end.

    In terms of market size, the low end and the high end are the biggest. It seems to me that someone interested in market share would go for the wide open low end with a flash based $180 "iPod micro". Not dive in to the most competitive part of the market with a price that seems designed to cannibalise their own sales.

  8. Re:The real problem is simple... by gmhowell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dude, yer sooooo coool. I wish I could rail against Apple/Jobs with all your self-righteousness.

    I will never understand how people can be talked into spending enormous sums on an inferior product through a snazzy marketing campaign.

    No kidding. For $170, I can get a 1.5 GB Nitrus. For only $80 more (less than 50% increase in price) I can get a product with about 240% more capacity (the iPod mini).

    "Oh, but what about the Muvo2?" According to Amazon, it's not yet available.

    So, for $50, I get a better looking unit (arguable, I agree) FireWire support, AAC support (you can tout WMA all you want, but when the vast, vast majority of online sales are AAC, I could care less about WMA) And I don't have to explain to the average person why I bought such a ghetto player.

    Sorry, but there is nothing standout between the iPod and the Rio offerings from a purely objective standpoint. Judging by the sellout of the first run, $50 doesn't mean anything to people in this marketplace, so the choice of one over the other is purely subjective. Trying to pretend otherwise just makes you look like a whiner.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  9. What if space is a premium? by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All it really validates is that most consumers are fools and will fall for any hype the Apple marketing department throws at them. If people were intelligent enough to do a little research, they could find that buying a full-blown iPod for only 50 dollars more would be a much wiser decision, space wise, or another portable mp3 player entirely, rather than shelling out an insane amount of money for an Apple iPod that is shiny, pretty, and has "cool" commercials...

    People can see themselves, rather easily, that the larger iPod is only $50 more.

    But here's a mind-boggling concept - perhaps they know, but are basing choice on something other than $/MB!!!

    A smaller device can be carried more often. I got one of the original palm pilots, but really didn't use it. Then I got a Palm V which has been in my pocket every day for the last few years. Similarily, the smaller size of the iPod mini makes it much more practical to carry about. For my use of an iPod the larger version is fine, but there are a lot of people that want as small a device as possible to work out with. Heck, one of the standard accessories you can buy with the iPod mini is a armband! Although a normal iPod is small, I would not want it bound to my arm for any length of time.

    Now in addition consider a further possibility - perhaps, there are a lot of people that don't even have 4MB of music. Perhaps they only like boy bands and the collected greatest works fit into a few hundred k. For whatever reason, there are a lot of people that are not that in to music and do not have a huge variety, or a need for a large library on the go. For these people, the new iPod is simply $50 less for an even smaller product. In fact I have a 5GB iPod, not much larger, and have never really felt that much of a pull to go for a larger one as long as this works - it holds enough somgs for a ten hour roadtrip, and I can re-load when I want to switch it up. Again, if I were buying now I might go for a $50 less device just because I lived with 5MB for so long as was perfectly happy.

    I'm not even going to go into fashion because I am pretty sure that's a minorty of what is making this device popular.

    Last question - do you always supersize every fast food meal you buy? Why, it's only $0.20 more for a pound of frys!! Who would be stupid enough to not buy that!!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  10. Perhaps your requirements... by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    are not reasonable, or mainstream. Perhaps Apple has figured out what most people's requirements really are. Marketing alone can carry a product only for so long, products with legs have more going for them than marketing.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  11. If anything, the mini iPod price was too LOW by alispguru · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To an economist, "demand is far greater than supply" is just another way of saying "the price is too low".

    Can you imagine the Slashdot collective opinion, though, if Apple had priced it at $300? "You can get three times as much storage for the same price? Apple is insane!"

    Goes to show that geeks are not Apple's target market, at least for consumer gear.

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  12. Surprize!! by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The reason is, like a lot of slashdot readers, the media also does not think that something like the iPod mini will do well at all. So when they consistently do something surprising (like actually selling the devices at a tremendous rate) it's news because the news people are all astonished, and assume the rest of us are as well. They are basically saying "Can you believe this?".

    And of course there's a bit of infiltration - not by the Apple diehards, but by the products themselves which convert confused people such as yourself to an Apple fan once they start using the product. The trick is that you assume it's all marketing fluff with no substance, and that's where the disconnect lies. I'm not even sure why people like you think the interest is from marketing as I do not see that much marketing from Apple compared to many other things.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  13. Ummmm... by PasteEater · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How to legally obtain music for your iPod.
    Step Five: Sell all those CDs you just bought to another used CD shop.

    See, the whole idea of making a backup is that only one copy will be in use at a time. As soon as you sell that CD, someone else could listen to at the same time as you, which now makes your copy illegal (since you no longer own the original).
    Nice try though.

    --
    There are two kinds of people in the world: those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
  14. Re:No. Are you kidding ME? by Moofie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    MS's lock on the Office market made it impossible for Apple to pursue its lawsuit (which was a stone cold cinch) re: the theft of the QuickTime code that made up MS's media player solutions.

    The $150M and the continuing support of Office Mac (which, by the way, is absurdly profitable for MS) were part of the settlement deal.

    Had Microsoft not had the power to utterly destroy Apple (by stopping development of Office, and making a big stink about it) Apple would have been able to wring far, far, far more money out of MS.

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  15. Re:199$ Neuros, 20gb HD, FM, FM transmitter Open s by Chucker23N · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Butt-ugly, web site is confusing to navigate, cites dimensions and weight that go far beyond the iPod, hard drive seems to be 2.5 inches which makes the whole thing clunky. Button arrangement is needlessly complicated; software said not to work on any Unix on the web site (the iPod works flawlessly even on various free Unixes out there). Doesn't play official successor to MP3, AAC.

    The one interesting positive point is that it plays Ogg Vorbis, but I only see such files every few months...