Slashdot Mirror


Fido Launches New Broadband Wireless Access

bug-eyed monster writes "Fido is launching a new wireless internet service with 'Download at speeds of up to 2.2 Mbps,' in Richmond BC and Cumberland ON. It uses a special modem that plugs into a regular network card. The technology providers' websites, Microcell and Inukshuk, inform us that the service uses Multipoint Communications Systems (radio-based) in the 2500 MHz range. The modem can be used anywhere within Richmond and 'up to 2.5km away from any network base station' (no idea if it can also run on batteries). Of course, this is all torture for me since I live next-door in Vancouver, just out of reach of the network."

41 of 209 comments (clear)

  1. When you say Fido by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think FidoNet. And then I get sad.

    1. Re:When you say Fido by Vskye · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, I think the original thread should be
      modded up since the first thing I thought of
      when seeing this article was the "Fidonet", which
      existed way prior to the internet. Accessing the
      net back then .. when it started was normally via
      a 300 baud modem connect to a local collage VAC
      system, and then only with a terminal program,
      and that would allow you to ftp to sunsite and
      such. Off my ramp now, FidoNet was a good thing
      even though the phone bills could set you back
      hundreds of U.S. dollars a month. (trust me on this!) I've personally known of a few eastern
      hubs that would pass mail to europe and have
      bills that would be over $1k U.S. a month. (and
      people bitch about their $100 a month inet connection...!)

      --
      Life was hell, then I discovered Linux...
    2. Re:When you say Fido by Fortyseven · · Score: 2, Funny

      Prior to the internet's mainstream popularity, you mean. ;)

      But yeah, that was the first thing I thought of. Visions of free user-supported wireless internet from one side of the globe to the other danced in my head. Email taking over a day to get anywhere...Quake matches taking a lifetime...almost like the ping from here to Mars.

  2. Inukshuk's Logo? by FractusMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Now The People Will Know We Were Here."

  3. Re:Torture by mrmorden · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hah!

    I never thought I would feel so lucky to be moving back to Richmond in two weeks!

  4. Re:Torture by legend · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You should check out http://www.awirelessgateway.com/

    --
    If you can't figure out my address, just drop me an e-mail and I will explain.
  5. Cantenna? by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Of course, this is all torture for me since I live next-door in Vancouver, just out of reach of the network.

    If you're desperate and the terrain will cooperate, perhaps build a cantenna(or buy one of those wire-dish highly directional antennas). You might have to open up the modem to get an external antenna installed...although the modem might be leased, making that a no-go option.

  6. Visionary Company by IANAL(BIAILS) · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm more and more impressed with Fido as time goes on. For those of you who aren't on the West Coast of Canada, Fido's cell plan is something like $45 per month, unlimited local calls. I'm not sure what other cell plans are like in the US, but for Canada, Fido's the first to try anything like that... makes it easy to simply replace your landline with a cell for not much more $$.

    1. Re:Visionary Company by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the USA, we have one oddball cell company called Cricket that offers unlimited local calls and a decent rate for long distance. The problem is that roaming isn't available from these guys at any price... stray outside of your home zone and the phone simply doesn't work. They only exist in spotty metro areas, nowhere close to coast-to-coast availabity.

    2. Re:Visionary Company by cmallinson · · Score: 2, Informative
      Didn't Telus buy Fido just a few years ago?

      Telus bought Clearnet a few years ago. Fido ran into bankruptcy problems a while back and many expected them to be bought out, but they seem to be recovering.

    3. Re:Visionary Company by Feztaa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You can switch SIM cards between providers on the same phone? Every time I talk about switching my fido SIM card into a roger's phone, they're always like "you can't do that" and whatnot.

      That's what bugs me the most about cellphones, each provider has their own network, and each phone only works on one network. I wish cellphones were more like the internet; it doesn't matter who your ISP is, they all connect to the same internet.

  7. Warning: Bandwidth limited... by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Informative

    This won't satisfy most /. readers. The CAN$40 a monthly fee only covers 20 GB down and 5 GB up. Extra GBs cost CAN$10 each.

    1. Re:Warning: Bandwidth limited... by highwindarea · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm in Australia, most Australian geeks don't even dream about download more the 3-4 gigs a month.

      --
      I think this internet thing sounds like a good idea
    2. Re:Warning: Bandwidth limited... by antic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Christ, on some 56k dial-up plans Australians are charged AUD$140 (USD$100+) per GB. $10 would be fantastic!

      And that's a 20GB allowance. Dial-up plans here these days have 200MB/month (!), and ADSL plans are often the same for the cheaper (AUD$30) plans.

      If you were giving away 20GB for $30-40/month here, you'd have everyone buying into it.

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    3. Re:Warning: Bandwidth limited... by jonbrewer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Warning: Bandwidth limited... This won't satisfy most /. readers. The CAN$40 a monthly fee only covers 20 GB down and 5 GB up. Extra GBs cost CAN$10 each.


      Idiot. Alarmist too. It's a traffic limit, not a bandwidth limit. And besides, 20GB is well beyond what 90% of users (of broadband connections) use.

  8. I was just thinking the other day by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Interesting
    how cool it would be if everyone had a Wireless Access Point on their rooftop, and formed a p2p wireless mini-internet with no bandwidth restrictions and free for all (minus the cost of the hardware).

    No restrictions in dense areas such as urban centers, since you could always route around a full AP, and free as in not having to pay some ISP by becoming you're very own.

    I currently have the only AP for at least 4-5 blocks, it would be great if I had geeky neighbors who'd like to give it a try. I'm sure this idea is as old as dirt by now, but it was the first thing I thought of when I read this.

  9. "Up to" - uh oh by Animats · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "Up to" probably means "when nobody else is using the network". How many people share spectrum with this thing? This is, really, a desktop 3G cellular modem.

    Also note that data transfer costs $10/gigabyte after the first 20GB (down) or 5GB (up) in a month.

    Personally, I think it should be considered false advertising to advertise "up to" anything. Vendors should have to provide a guaranteed minimum.

    1. Re:"Up to" - uh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >Personally, I think it should be considered false advertising to advertise "up to" anything. Vendors should have to provide a guaranteed minimum.

      Personally, I think it's up to the consumers to decide which non-essential service is right to them based on accurate information provided. Fido isn't lying to you, this is the maximum possible speed. If it isn't enough information, and you can't manage to get more info from Fido, it's absolutely Caveat Emptor.

  10. Re:Ahh the pain of waiting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No fair my ass. If what you meant by your comment is that those living in areas with a higher population density greater deserve the opportunity to participate in the trials then recognize that the point of this pilot is do the opposite.

    Case in point: Richmond is a sprawl of low-density housing comprised of [1-3] floor dwelling units and an almost perfectly flat topography. These qualities allow the first phase of the public trial to expose the benefits and shortcomings of the non-LOS system that iFido uses while not biting off a larger customer base than they can chew.

    By doing the inverse (high population density, rolling topography) these companies would have a larger-than-they-can-handle trial customer base (given that anyone within the reach of the signal can sign up) and more urban jungle + rolling hills. That is not a recipe for getting the trial off the ground; indeed it is a recipe for a difficult trial that would most possibly end in failure. Further, if they allowed a limited number of participants, then that is plain bad customer relations for those who attempt to sign up but are rejected because the quota has already been met (customers are fickle creatures)...

    Don't like it? Move! :)

  11. Wow... by Zakabog · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I saw this -

    $20 per month for the first 6 months (regular price: $40 per month)

    and thought, damn that's really good for 2.2mbps down wireless internet, then I saw

    Monthly transfer: up to 20 GB (download) and 5 GB (upload)

    I wouldn't want any kind of internet that gives you limits. I don't know how often I'd use 20GB a month but I'm sure it's very often (lots of bittorent downloading, websites full of flash animations and streaming video, and even games.) If you play UT 2K3 for just 4 hours a day, 25 days a month (that's like coming home from school or work, and playing a few hours) that's around 2 gigs or 1/10th your total bandwidth, for something that uses hardly any bandwidth (around 5-6K/sec and remember there's also hundreds of mutators on like every server and then 10 meg maps.) And how's the upload speed? Latency? I dunno I like the idea of having a wireless ISP and it'd be really cool for a laptop, I don't think this should be uses as your main ISP alone.

    1. Re:Wow... by shepd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is standard for most ISPs. At least, unlike certain others, they are being upfront about the limits. No ISP can afford a 24x7 leech @ $40 monthly.

      Other ISPs, who either don't want to kick users, or weren't upfront about their limits will find other methods to "fix" the problem users.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  12. Sounds good to me. by Dekar · · Score: 4, Interesting
    "To enjoy iFido wireless high-speed Internet, all you need is a standard Ethernet card and Windows 95/98/Me/NT/2000/XP or Mac/OS/Linux/UNIX."

    The above sounds good, but I'm more worried about the small prints:

    "The monthly price is for data transfer of up to 20 GB (download) and 5 GB (upload). A charge of $10 applies per additional GB per month. If you didn't opt for a 24-month Fido Agreement, you're eligible for a smaller discount and your service must remain activated for 90 consecutive days."

    20GB/5GB should be enough for anyone really using it as a 2nd connection, but considering the price (40$/month after the 6th month), most people will want to use this as their primary connection and better watch out for extra charges (although people using cable might already be used to those transfer limits).

    The whole package seems like a nice deal anyway, but I'm kind of worried about the saturation of frequencies these days...

  13. It will never happen by Mitchua · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's no way they could provide coverage like this in an area with a lot of high-rises. The people on the far side of the building would have horrible reception. Imagine trying to cover an area like downtown Vancouver or Toronto?

  14. Re:Three reasons why this is a Bad IdeaTM by fsterman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1) If this takes off there certainly will be a compatible minicard for your laptop too.
    2) Cheaper than paying your DSL, Starbucks, etc. Commuting, in the park, etc.
    3) While stealing is a nice thing some of us don't have that advantage. We might want 2.2 Mbps throughput at a decent price. Last time I checked it was $500 set up fee including a stationary antenna, and $100 for that kind of throughput to my house. This is also MUCH cheaper than my $60 Cable 1 Mbps connection.
    This would make for a very nice home server.

    --
    Is there anything better than clicking through Microsoft ads on Slashdot?
  15. Re:Competition? by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They're really a specialised use entry more than anything else. Because this service has a 20 GB download and 5 GB upload cap before you start paying through the nose for bandwidth, both cable and DSL broadband seem like a better deal.

    You'd have to be quite a road warrior to need your broadband access to follow you all over town. Wouldn't it be easier to just rely on wired access being where you need it, and then putting it up with WiFi?

  16. The up/down cap by yellowcord · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Lots of people are mentioning the 20/5 GB cap for this service and I was wondering if anybody has Telus DSL with their (insanely low, in my oppinion) cap of 5/1 GB cap. Do they ever come after you after that? I avoided them like the plague when I came to Alberta.

    1. Re:The up/down cap by devnullify · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I use an independent DSL provider [Uniserve, if anyone is wondering], but I have experience with the two big guys around here as well.

      On Shaw, I was hounded for weeks by their 'abuse' team, and eventually dropped their service because of it. Even after I cut back on the bandwidth usage, they were bitching about me running a DNS server (WTF?!?). Their policy is 'cut the user offline on a friday night at 5pm so they can't get ahold of us until Monday, and ask questions later'.

      Telus I've never really had a problem with, other than their reluctance to sell static addresses, and their shitty customer support. I've exceeded their caps in both directions, run servers on their service...never once got a call from them.

      DSL is definitely slower than cable around here though. Shaw connections are rocket fast for downloads, but latency is a bit unstable. DSL is far better for gaming, especially an indy provider...my remote gateway pings about 11-15ms, I've found CS servers where I get consistent 20ms latency). Telus is usually around 25-30ms to the gateway.

      I've found both Shaw and Telus to be rather unstable, especially Telus in the past year or two (since they started running a transparent proxy for HTTP requests). It seems the proxy server just dies once in a while for up to an hour, then comes back (everything works, except for www). Annoying.

      Their ATM network is rock solid though, so if you can find a non-Telus provider that leases ATM channels, you'll probably get better reliability and more flexibility from your ISP. The only downtime I've had in the past 8 months or so is from power outages, and I get a static IP :D

  17. Re:Three reasons why this is a Bad IdeaTM by Medgur · · Score: 2

    Has someone made a nice and convenient area map of the saturation you mentioned? I'd love to spend some time downtown with my laptop, but I don't have a clue where the hot spots are.

  18. You're not thinking in the right frame of mind... by barc0001 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is intended as a *REPLACEMENT* for your home broadband, not as a portable solution. The "portable" modem is about as big as your cable modem is. The pricing is about the same as Shaw or Telus. The portability of it is just an afterthought, and a nice touch if you want to move your computer around from one room to the next.
    As for why you would want this, there are still lots of places in the GVRD where you can only get Telus OR Shaw or possibly neither, and if it turns out your Telus connection drops out several times a day (like ours at the office does), this is a viable alternative without Shaw telling you there's no cable to your building, but for $1000 they'd be happy to pull it there for you. Not like that's ever happened with me or anything...

  19. Verizon by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 2, Interesting

    On a side note, Verizon Wireless is rolling out CDMA2000 1X-EVDO throughout the US. Currently, Washington DC and San Diego are online. Service is $80 a month for unlimited. It runs 1-2mbps. Where there is no 1X-EVDO service, it drops back to 1X-RTT (~60kbps).

  20. Fido... by Nexzus · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Also has a GPRS network for use with a Novatel Wireless Merlin card. Not quite sure of the speed, but I'd imagine being able to access the net from anywhere would come in handy. Price for the card, and monthly package, is a little steep, though. Plus, like other posters have mentioned wifi access is pretty ubiquitous.

    OT:

    Anyone else notice the ads for the "ROKU network music player" Quite a nifty looking device, and if I were looking for a network music player, I'd look into it. But you'd have to pry my audiotron from my cold dead hands.

    --
    Karma: Can only be portioned out by the Cosmos.
    1. Re:Fido... by Random+Frequency · · Score: 2, Informative

      GPRS has a latency that's just high enough to prevent voice over IP. FIdo is no exception. This appears to be some sort of 802.11 concoction that operates on a higher frequency range much like fatport or the other wireless providers out there.

  21. Out of RANGE?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    >> Of course, this is all torture for me since I live next-door in Vancouver, just out of reach of the network."

    Two Words...

    Names, actually...

    Yagi - Uda

    Many years ago, these two Nipponese rf engineers designed a nifty, easy to build yourself, high gain antenna, that at the frequencies you need, is quite a small package.

    You see them all over, they look like sideways, one dimensional xmas trees. They are made in many sizes, for different frequencies.

    They are however, mostly line of sight, with increasing signal attenuation (crappier signal) if the path is blocked by anything, like mountians, buildings, big trees, etc..

    Don't give up hope. Experiment a little, and see if you can't connect to their network.

    You may even be able to find a techy inside the company, who is willing to go above and beyond the call of duty, and help you out, over time, to see if you can make the connection.

    Don't give up, go for it!

  22. This is a bit bothersome... by AnimeFreak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am on Fido in Greater Vancouver -- Richmond is a part of the area, and Fido's reception is varying. I go to Richmond on a bi-weekly basis, and it gets a bit irritating that sometimes when I enter certain buildings, my reception drops considerably, sometimes to the point where it is unusable.

    Fido (Microcell) uses GSM, which most likely means that this service is GPRS-based, which works on the same waveband if I remember right. They're notorious for offering awesome packages, but pitiful reception in certain areas.

    I hope that if they're going to introduce this service that they actually improve the signal quality, because it isn't GSM that is the problem -- Rogers AT&T Wireless uses the same system, but it is the fact that there isn't enough nodes for me to connect to.

    I am a very happy Fido customer regardless, but there are times where the reception blackouts do piss me off.

  23. Re:richmond? by AnimeFreak · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Relatively?" More like it is entirely flat. The only hills you'll find are when you're hitting the tunnel, an overpass on the 99 or 91, or the five bridges that go into the city.

    The reason why Microcell is introducing the service into the area is partly due to the fact that the majority of Richmond's population is west of Highway 99, which means the population is relatively dense. In fact, the majority of the population sits around Richmond Centre, which isn't really all that large of an area when you look at it.

  24. should be easily fixed by rkoot · · Score: 2, Interesting
    if you have a friend who is lives on the border of the richmond network area, couldn't you get him to point a wireless antenna (I believe there 15 miles and more success stories, search slashdot) to you, so you could use your friends box as a router to the richmond Fido network?
    just the thought..

    r.

  25. Reminds me of the well known Vancouver joke.... by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 3, Funny

    What river separates China from India?

    The Fraser.

    Richmond/Delta, get it? Yeah, it's not the best joke and anyone from Vancouver has probably heard it a thousand times...

    Whooooosh...there's the sound of evaporating karma.

  26. Directional? by dj245 · · Score: 3, Informative

    These kinds of service are not even close to being new. There is a service here locally that has wireless internet, and they have been operating for the past three years. Why is slashdot covering a press release from an ISP web page anyway? Mod me down, troll, but its been my experience that these pages/ads are 90% hype , 5% marketing, and 5% service agreement. The only thing somewhat interesting about this is that this is non-directional, and the local service in my town just rolled out non-directional modems only six months ago. On second though, not very interesting at all. Move along, nothing to see here.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  27. Virginia Coverage by ThoreauHD · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you are in the state of Virginia, USA. There is a 3 MBit wireless host called:

    http://www.r-comm.net/

    They are friendly fellas and their rates are comparable with DSL pricing. Nice if you are out in the sticks.

  28. Re:Fido's offering is MMDS by puzzled · · Score: 2, Informative



    FYI the manufacturer will tell you the di-lithium crystals only need to be replaced every ten thousand light years or so.

    OFDM is a good thing, but it ain't all that. Claims of non line of site operation are nice, with some of the products it will work a lot of the time, but you can never, ever build a business plan based on the builder's claim of radio performance.

    Write me when you've done fifty installs and let me know how well it works :-)

    --
    I am very easy to get along with, but I don't have time to waste being nice to people who are being stupid. -Theo
  29. Re:be prepared for busy signals :) by jaraxle · · Score: 2, Informative

    Been with Fido in Winnipeg for some time now, as has a friend of mine at work, and neither of us have any complaints with the service. Albeit, Winnipeg is a smaller metro area than the Vancouver or Toronto areas...

    jaraxle