Beagle 2 Failure Theories
Dan East writes "New Scientist has an article discussing the failure of ESA's Beagle 2 Lander. Theories as to why the landing failed include thinner than expected upper atmosphere, extreme atmospheric temperature fluctuations, and possible physical damage to Beagle 2 seen in an image acquired immediately after it separated from Mars Express. Recent data acquired by Mars Express, as well as NASA's Mars Rovers, are helping direct investigations into the failure. So far only around half of Beagle 2's landing ellipse has been imaged in an attempt to locate remnants of the lander. USA Today is also running an AP story on these latest theories."
EUians are fucking idiots ?
relax, it's just a joke.
just like your space program.
<rimshot>
-- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
fuck with the US again and you will see more of the same.
and while I am at it why is "Manifesto of the Communist Party" under the "GNU Free Documentation License."
fucking commies, get the fuck out of my country and off my internet.
The last SCO artical is getting close to the bottom of the page!
We need another one fast!! Anyone?!?
Re: your sig. Have you seen any of FORT KNOX's commetns? there you go.
the batteries "lose capactity"
My capacity was once so lose I sat on the crapper most of the day.
So basically we're saying that the European retards didn't retard enough?
0- Eamonman Proud member of DNRC
by all those cigarettes
Beagle 2 fails it
Mars is just too hard to probe
Europeans suck
Go America! Not only did we NOT fail it, but we are operating TWO successful probes! Eat that you communist hippie EuroSHIT Union!