Peer to Peer and Spam in the Internet
RobertDHaskins writes "A very interesting series of papers from Helsinki University of Technology on the topics of P2P and spam. Written by PhD students they are a little long, but some very good coverage of the state of the art."
I don't have time to read a document hundreds of pages long, especially not one that's packed with information: I need a quick summary.
Could someone post a one line summary? For example,
Linux good; Microsoft bad; SCO evil; RMS god.
John.
I'm sure theres even more complicated things you can do with P2P, such as organizing nodes for filesharing and so on.
P2P filesharing, what a great idea! I wonder when somebody's going to try to do that...
Can we get the RIAA to shut these guys down?
The Finns have noticed that no-one understands Finnish, so they've become extremely good at putting things in more popular languages. For example you can get the news in Latin courtesy of Finnish Radio (today's headline: Kerry candidatus democratarum.)
Raise the price to $0.50 / email, I'd actually enjoy it.
If I can get through 5 spams / minute I'd be making and extra $100/hour just for reading email.
That'll probably create another 'profession' after the Spam-Boom.
(Note in all lower cases now in the post-Spam-Boom era)
work from home and make $3000 a day by clicking the charge button
In Northern Europe people can speak generally 3 languages fluently. The have good schools there. They generally have better goverments as well.
Did I say that ?
I meant to say that they are a bunch of liberal left-wing socialist radicals who get their english training in order to become terrorists.
Am I American again ?
Phew!
The other question then is who gets this money?
Simple. I do. Hand it over.
Sincerely,
Darl McBride
I've already blocked Russia ip adresses from sending me email.
I dont know anyone there, yet the security department at Microsoft.ru kept sending me friendly patches attached to their messages.
a replacement peer to peer trusted reviewer system should be perfectly viable using encryption to guarantee the validity of a particular vouch for a link. Good reviewers, identified by their public key, build their reputation by word of mouth (or text of keyboard)
/.? Yeah, that's worked wonders for quality assurance on these message boards!
You mean like a poster/moderator/meta-mod system such as implemented right here on
100 years from now it will probably be klingon...
And I'll post using the login New Here and say "No, I'm New Here."
And I'll keep thinking it's funny each time I do it.