Slashdot Mirror


Man Admits to Bigfoot Hoax

JCMay writes "You know that film we've all seen on TV where a large, hairy creature is walking through the woods, looks back over his right shoulder at the camera, and continues walking on? WorldNetDaily is reporting that a man has admitted to a 1967 bigfoot hoax where he was filmed walking through the woods wearing a gorilla suit."

23 of 113 comments (clear)

  1. the funny part by termos · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ok, now the funny part of this is that it's under the science section ;)

    --
    Note to self: get smarter troll to guard door.
    1. Re:the funny part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In all honesty, Timothy seems to post alot of crap... His articles are old/repetitive (ie they cover discussion in older threads often) and they usually are on stupid subjects. This is a great example of why slashdot should really rethink some of its content aprovers.

    2. Re:the funny part by bob_jordan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Which is where it should be. What was thought to be anthropology turned out to be psychology.

      Bob.

    3. Re:the funny part by Night+Goat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is science. It was a theory which people have tried to prove, some using the scientific method, which now has been proven to be a hoax. As long as theories are being tested with proper methodology, it's science. Jane Goodall, a scientist, was quoted as saying that she's still open to more facts on Bigfoot. She didn't immediately dismiss all Bigfoot sightings as hoaxes, as you seem to be doing with your flippant post.

  2. Already known by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That piece of film was exposed as a hoax long ago, but it didn't affect the true believers. This is a bit similar to the crop circle believers. The people who invented the crop circle came forward and explained how it was done. The true believers think they are lying, and that crop circles are really made by aliens.

    And, I read a book by James Randi a couple years ago where he talks about a cold reader that he trained (like John Edwards). The cold reader did his little tricks, and even after the hoax was exposed, his marks still thought he had some psychic abilities.

    Therefore, I predict Bigfoot believers still have a long and profitable future ahead.

    --
    This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    1. Re:Already known by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Absolutely. Another example, probably closer in circumstances to the Bigfoot hoax, is the Loch Ness Monster. Again, the person who took the photograph admitted it and showed how it was made, but belief in the monster is still high enough to attract thousands of people per year to the lake with cameras, video cameras, SCUBA gear, boats and God knows what else.

    2. Re:Already known by zhenlin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It is called the True-believer syndrome.

    3. Re:Already known by netringer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I could have predicted that the true belivers who had no problem believing the original Bigfoot film clip was real with little evidence would immediately say there was not enough evidence the hoax story is true. They will dig for minor nits to invalidate the hoaxter's story when they gloss over a hundred problems with the original story.

      The same thing happened when it was revealed that the Loch Ness Monster picture was actually a toy submarine and when the Air Force released the true information on the formerly Top Secret Project Mogul which is what really happened at Roswell.

      "It can't be true! Why did they lie all this time? What were they covering up?"

      Maybe it was because the project was Top Secret, get it?

      --
      Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
    4. Re:Already known by blamanj · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A rather famous example of this happened between Arthur Conan Doyle and Erich Weiss aka Harry Houdini. Doyle, author of the Sherlock Holmes stories was an ardent spiritualist. Houdini, as a magician, knew the tricks mediums played on the gullible and had Doyle write a message in private which Houdini then reproduced by having a paint-covered ball "write" the message.

      Houdini would not explain the trick, and Doyle insisted that Houdini must be using supernatural powers. Despite their disagreements, the two men remained friends for some time.

      This site tells about the friendship between Doyle and Houdini.

    5. Re:Already known by Brandybuck · · Score: 3, Informative

      The people who invented the crop circle came forward and explained how it was done.

      Not only did they come forward, they presented a video of themselves making the crop circles.

      One ufologist said before seeing the film that it was impossible for humans to create this particular crop circle because of the "woven" stalks, lack of footprints, etc. Then after being shown the film, she said "well that may explain this one, but it can't possibly explain all of the other unexplainable circles!"

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    6. Re:Already known by sckeener · · Score: 3, Informative

      was exposed as a hoax long ago, but it didn't affect the true believers.

      evidence that can't be proven is a religion. You've either got faith or you've got facts.

      and there is a ton of faith in the world.

      --
      "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
    7. Re:Already known by Chester+K · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ....God knows what else

      Speaking of crazy things people believe in....

      --

      NO CARRIER
    8. Re:Already known by uncoveror · · Score: 3, Funny
      This video is a hoax. Okay, one sighting has been debunked. One among thousands! Before you decide that there is just no such thing as Bigfoot, read this.

      The pictures are not a bear or a guy in a suit.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
  3. Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Next thing I know, they'll also tell me Santa doesn't exist!

  4. Does it matter? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Does the truth matter? The Bigfoot kooks will still insist that the footage is real. Likely, they will claim some sort of conspiracy that caused the man to deny that his real footage was real.

    Ever hear of the "Viking explorers went to Minnesota" theory? I bet you haven't heard that the guy who made this one up admitted it was fake years ago.

    The same thing with crop circles. The guy who started this admitted it years ago, but the mistique and belief (mistaken belief?) remains.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  5. No, he's real.... by Scaba · · Score: 4, Funny

    How do I know? In 1976, Steve Austin - the Six Million Dollar Man - revealed to us that Bigfoot was an experiment by aliens.

  6. They got to him first! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    They got to him and made him tell everyone it was a hoax! Who? The government, probably. Likely, when its useful purpose (to distract Americans from bigger, scarier happenings) was served, they decided it was time to say it was a "hoax."

  7. Me real by gRa · · Score: 4, Funny

    Me is real, just hinding. Silent, not like cameras, big foot not big mouth.

  8. And to think I thought bigfoot was real science... by Captain+Rotundo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sometimes I listen to Coast to Coast... and ussually the guests are so outragously wrong, or dumb (the people who 'record' ghost voices onto 'blank' tapes come to mind, thats so funny its sad) I can't stand more than five minutes.... but occassionally I hear someone talk about Bigfoot, or Crop Circles, or some other nonsence and they actually sound sane... you think 'if this evidence is valid, then....'

    So I wonder for a second or two, why is there no one putting as much effort into showing the faults, or conversly if it is real why hasn't the entire media gone ape-shit over it?

    And suddenly I remember, to most rational people the faults are obvious if you stop for a few minutes and look at the 'evidence' (take a look at Richard Hoagland's wonderful blown up martian images). And to the believers everything that points against them is either from close minded "establishment" scientists, or some grand conspiracy.

    You could give UFO nuts immediate access to EVERYTHING the US gov't has ever produced, and when they found no records of the grand Alien-Gov't summit they would claim that it was all removed.

    While the concept of 'bigfoot' isn't as ridiculous and absurd as aliens coming all the way to our planet is supposedly faster-than-light craft to anally probe whitley steiber, drawn in some wheat, and possibly do things to people that can ussually be otherwise explained with real psycological/physialogic explainations its increasingly closure that that level when NOONE has ever taken a remotely clear photo / video or capture/killed one. Its a figgin lare animal in a relatively well traveled and populated region people!

  9. Washington Post, not Worldnet Daily by yelvington · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Washington Post reported this, not Worldnet Daily, which just pilfered the news.

  10. This confirms an earlier confession... by north.coaster · · Score: 3, Informative

    In December 2002, Ray L. Wallace made a death bed confession that BigFoot was a hoax. CNN had all of the details. I remember seeing accounts that showed photos of the wooden feet, etc.

    /Don

  11. bigfoot research at bfro.net by 3+sets+of+3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Even if you discount 90% of the reports on http://www.bfro.net there will still be enough with actual details that you'll believe bigfoot is capable of evading human capture. There is so much wilderness just in the lower 48 of the USA that a semi-intelligent hominid can easily find refuge as long as it's got a food source. Maine is 98% forest, the states of Washington and Oregon have thousands of square miles of temperate rain forest that is suitable habitat. favorite search terms: dermal ridge bigfoot

  12. Hoax claim a hoax by JMax · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So this guy claims it was him all along; that it was a hoax. Why should we believe him? There is no more evidence to support his claim than the claim that it was really BigFoot out there. Maybe it was somebody *else* in a suit. This claim is meaningless, just like the guy that claimed to be responsible for the classis nessie shot. No proof, not supporting evidence; just a claim.