Slashdot Mirror


Did HP Defraud the Canadian Government?

lightsaber1 writes "In this age of financial scandal in the Canadian Government it's hardly surprising to see that Hewlett-Packard is now being accused of charging the Canadian Department of National Defence for more than $160 million in software, hardware, and labour that was not delivered. The DND is confident it will get the money back, but HP is denying all responsibility, pinning the blame on an error within the DND itself. In all of this it is clear that the Government can lose track of a lot of money easily and even large companies are not above a little fraud now and then."

26 of 465 comments (clear)

  1. Fraud? Seems like old times... by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Interesting
    In a company I once worked for was a rather nice fellow who worked in the Accounts Payable department. It was discovered that he would have checks issued for as many times as an invoice arrived. Apparently some vendors noticed this and items were paid for as many as 4 times. That they knew what was going on and didn't report it back suggests ethics is a broad problem. Many refused to return the money once it was revealed they had collected multiple times.

    How the heck the guy didn't have any indication something was already paid I have no clue, but others in the finance department would try to catch as many duplicate checks on the way out as they could. As you might have guessed, the company is long gone.

    How is it that the government spent $160-million, got nothing in return and no one noticed?"

    It happens and not just in the public sector.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  2. Exchange rate? by Bobdoer · · Score: 4, Funny

    $160 million in software, hardware, and labour
    So after the exchange rate, what's that in moose?

    1. Re:Exchange rate? by petabyte · · Score: 4, Informative

      I know thats a joke but it raises a good point.

      $160 Million US is 210 Million CA.
      $160 Million CA is 121 Million US.

      Though, if you've lost over 100 Million, whats another 40 Million between friends. I accept donations :).

  3. An interesting difference by Mr.+Ophidian+Jones · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are some differences in the Canadian governmental system than American, and buying off our representatives is a bit harder. Not impossible, mind you.

    Our Senate is appointed, not elected, so campaign funding on that front isn't really viable. Although out-and-out bribery could still be a possibility.

    The Prime Minister is the leader of the party with the most seats in the House of Commons, not a separately elected individual, and therefore controls how the party votes.

    The ethics minister (theoretically) is a watchdog to prevent abuses of power or introducing bills based on the needs of special interest.

    Add into this that each MP has limited power, based on the fact that their ridings are relatively small compared to US electoral areas (population-wise, I'm sure many of the geographical areas are quite large), and it would take a very concentrated effort to garner enough support through bribery and financing to make a dent.

    Of course, this is all from the deep recesses of my high school social science memories, so I could be a bit off.

  4. What? by Malicious · · Score: 5, Funny
    As a red blooded Canadian, I have only one question to ask.

    Who gave the Canadian Department of National Defence $160,000,000?

    --
    01101001001000000110000101101101001000000110001001 10000101110100011011010110000101101110
    1. Re:What? by G-funk · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey man, you never know when oil will be discovered north of the border :-)

      *ducks*

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    2. Re:What? by codemachine · · Score: 4, Informative

      Like the largest oil reserve in the world perhaps? Of course it is all stuck in some bloody tar sands in northern Alberta, making it a bitch to get at.

  5. Re:Sigh by Abcd1234 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Oh please. The Liberal's in Canada are considerably more left than the Republicans in the US. Of course, the Conservative Party here in Canada is also considerably more left than the Republicans in the US. This probably has something to do with less religious fundamentalism in this country.

    The real difference between the Liberal's and the Conservatives in Canada is their fiscal, rather than social policies. Socially, they're very close (though, the conservatives are, unsuprisingly, slightly more socially conservative (see same-sex marriage, marijuana laws, etc)). Fiscally, they are comparable to the Dems/Reps in the US, except the Conservatives in Canada want to cut spending along with taxes, rather than just the latter.

    As for the rest of it, well, that remains to be seen. There was plenty of corruption in the previous Liberal governments. Will that continue? I don't know. Would it be better with an NDP or Conservative government? I'm not so sure...

  6. Looks more like a govt messup... by xot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I would lay my money on this being a govt screwup rather than HP fooling them.Theres no way a big corp like HP would fool a prospective HUGE customer like the canadian govt and charge them for something that they didnt deliver.(and get caught!)
    The world around govt's have know to screw things up due to the sheer laziness and absence of co-ordination between govt departments.Looks like one desk jockey for got to enter a few bills into the accounting system :-)

    --
    Lord of the Binges.
    1. Re:Looks more like a govt messup... by El · · Score: 4, Informative

      Right. And there is no way a big company like Oracle would fool a prospective HUGE customer like the California government and charge them for something they couldn't use like 270,000 licenses for their 230,000 employees, only a quarter of which actually needed to access a database... and yet they did! Now, HP has a slightly better reputation to uphold than Oracle, but still, I wouldn't put it past them. (By the way, doesn't CA (California) have a larger government budget than CA (Canada)?)

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  7. Re:Sigh by Coneasfast · · Score: 5, Informative

    For all those of you who are Americans, you should know that the Liberal party is the same as the Republicans

    This is Wrong! Former PM Chretien and current PM Martin, both Liberal, were for a bill to decriminalize small amounts of marijuana and i believe Chretien wanted to legalize gay marriage throughout all of canada. These are just some examples, but they are definitely as left wing as, if not more than, the USA Democratic Party.

    This is going off-topic but i believe you needed to be corrected on this matter.

    --
    Marge, get me your address book, 4 beers, and my conversation hat.
  8. Black and White Case by fembots · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If HP did receive the payment, but failed to deliver the goods, then isn't it clear who's to blame?

    Imagine if your client mistakenly paid your company $2,000 extra, do you

    (1) keep quiet?
    (2) ask what that $2K is for?

    One of my clients has a habit of overpaying the bill, because it is always late in paying, thus when the next invoice (with 2 months balance) arrives, they then paid the 1st invoice, and the 2nd invoice. I have to tell them that, and hold the credit for the following month(s).

  9. Canada has a department of defense? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why the hell do they need that? It's not like anybody hates Canada. I mean, why do you think US citizens put maple leafs on their backpacks when they travel around Europe?

    The US - yeah, we need a big defense department the way we go around pissing everybody off. But not Canada. They're like a harmless little mouse.

    1. Re:Canada has a department of defense? by gobbo · · Score: 4, Informative
      We remember 1812 and 54/40 or fight!, believe me. Deep down, especially among those canadians who don't have deep ties (family, jobs, etc.) to the U.S., we're just waiting for the tanks to roll across the border and secure oil and water pipelines.

      OK, maybe not. But we have the largest coastline in the world, and we have alliances with other nations that lead to obligations overseas.

      Then there's the national role in "Aid to the Civil Power" -- which means that if there's unrest in a region, like the Oka crisis or the October crisis, they want to be able to roll in and maintain that appearance of canadian civility. Actually there's a lot more tension in this big happy nation than outsiders realize, especially since the conquest of the First Nations isn't complete. In other words, the military unfortunately seems to be primarily there to keep us in line.

      That said, chances are that the bored military administrators screwed up and HP took huge advantage of it.

  10. This is such an incorrect description. by tentimestwenty · · Score: 5, Informative

    Canada has MANY parties. The four biggest are the Liberals, Conservatives, Bloq Quebecois, and the NDP. There are many smaller parties as well and many independents run for seats in the house of commons (like the US congress). The Conservatives are the equivalent to US Republicans. The Liberals (although getting more right wing) are the equivalent to the Democrats. The NDP is quite a bit left, but still in the Democratic vein.

    Overall though, all the parties in Canada, including the Conservatives are more left wing than anything in the US. We have national medicare, publicly funded universities etc. that even the Conservatives fundamentally believe in. Recently, it's true that the Liberals were involved in a scandal involving many millions of dollars of "favours" to private companies, but even these were more along the lines of fast-track bidding and not all out policy-bribery like is common in the US.

    To get back to the original point of the article, with the department of Defence getting shafted by HP, this is likely due to the general incompetence of a few technology people and their managers, not a particular party.

  11. even large companies?? by spazoid12 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    and even large companies are not above a little fraud now and then

    Wow, that's alarming.

    I thought only the tiny puny mom-n-pop companies like Global Crossing and Enron had fraud problems.

  12. Re:Fraud? Seems like old times... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 5, Funny
    In a company I once worked for was a rather nice fellow who worked in the Accounts Payable department. It was discovered that he would have checks issued for as many times as an invoice arrived. Apparently some vendors noticed this and items were paid for as many as 4 times. That they knew what was going on and didn't report it back suggests ethics is a broad problem. Many refused to return the money once it was revealed they had collected multiple times.
    Reminds me of that jewish joke:

    Pappa, what is "business ethics"???

    Oh, my son, this is a very important concept. Hmmm, let's see. Suppose a customer left the store and dropped a $20 bill on the floor and did not notice. This is when business ethics comes into play: should you tell your partner or not???

  13. Recursive court case? by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Gov: We want our money back for the stuff you didn't deliver.

    HP: It is too late. You waited too long to ask.

    Gov: But we didn't have the software and servers to track stuff, and so didn't know fast enough.

    HP: Well, why didn't you get such a computer system?

    Gov: Because you haven't delivered it yet.

  14. I'll bet against the DND by Linegod · · Score: 5, Interesting

    After 17 years in the DND, I'll bet against the DND in this battle. A Defense WAN ripped off from the Reserves (and then re-implemented incorrectly), Admin Clerks and Truckers in charge of IT resources, zero to none knowledge of networking, an Officer corps that believes sending email means that you are an 'e-business' and a R&D section that wonders why it's so difficult to implement Netbios nationally.

    Top that off with a mentality that everything and everything has to run through either an outside consultant or a 10 year contact with a 'Quebec company' (which only means that they have a place in Quebec to send the cheques), and you have a recipe for disaster.

    HP 1, DND 0.

    --
    -- I care not for your foolish signatures.
  15. Coverage of this story on CBC and Radio-Canada by saforrest · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's the The CBC article about this story, and here's the

    Radio-Canada story (in French, of course).

    By the way, I'm quite impressed with Radio-Canada's record at scooping its English equivalent. This story was available on src.ca a good few hours before it was on CBC. A good excuse to practise my French.

  16. Are you pondering what I'm pondering... by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 5, Funny

    If Carly Fiorina becomes Martha Stewart's cell mate, can we expect some tasteful lavendar-scented gingham-pattern HP boxes in the near future?

    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
  17. Re:Huh? by Otter · · Score: 4, Insightful
    He's saying HP collected money and didn't provide goods -- thus, HP engaged in fraud and the government paid out money without checking whether they had recieved the paid-for items and services.

    Whether it's true I don't have the slightest idea but I don't see what the semantic mystery is.

  18. top of the food chain by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "even large companies are not above a little fraud now and then"

    Large companies are above nothing, but they don't commit fraud - the people who work there do. The bigger the company, the less accountable anyone usually is, especially in the billing bureaucracy (ironically staffed by "accountants"). And the bigger the company, the more valuable the "mistakes" which can be pulled off, and accumulated. When I worked for Northern Telecom in Toronto, they failed to pay my tiny consulting company over C$50K, out of C$300K, that they owed us for over 6 months (after the latest allowed pay date). They wasted $Ks of our management's otherwise billable time in the 1990s bubble, making us chase their accounts-payable people around all of North America. And since their bureaucracy was so distributed, no one cared if we stopped working on our deadline until they paid us, so we would just have lost the gig and any leverage on getting paid. To see how consistent this is, consider that from the first week on the project there were career NorTel managers, helpfully reminding me that NorTel commonly pulled that kind of crap, and kept the $Ms in interest on late payments, as part of their profitability. And that was the pattern of most of the larger corporations we had as clients. Smaller companies' billing problems could be dealt with directly, with decisions made by a single person, so turnaround could be swift. Imagine how long it took the Federal Canadian and Ontario Provincial governments to pay us the $10Ks they owed us: years.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  19. Re:Pardon by saforrest · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nope, I'd suggest you practice your English :-)

    Well, as might have been evident from my post :), I'm a Canadian.

    Along with a monarch and a parliamentary system, we inherited mostly British spellings, which includes 'practise' as the verb and 'practice' as the noun.

    Similarly, I can license my code under the GNU General Public Licence.

  20. HP is investigating this themselves by codemachine · · Score: 4, Informative

    Check out the CBC story about this scandal. HP claims that the Canadian government is actually a victim of fraud from someone in the DND. Given the other scandals in this government, I wouldn't be all that shocked.

  21. I think the record will clearly show by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Funny
    That two ink cartridges were, in fact, delivered.

    Hey what do you want for $161 million?

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?