Slashdot Mirror


Second Generation Homebrew PVR Devices

An anonymous reader writes "It looks like the second generation of homebrew PVRs is on its way. Asus recently released their Digimatrix barebones PC which combines a lot of features in a very slim and stylish box. DVD/CD-R, WiFi, HDTV tuner, FM Tuner, memory card reader etc. All for ~$400. The reviews look good, except that the software that comes with it doesn't look all that great... of course this may not be a problem because there has already been significant effort in getting linux to run on it and most features are working. Combine MythTV with this device and you have an almost perfect PVR? I wonder what other hardware companies have in store for the homebrew PVR market?"

27 of 233 comments (clear)

  1. I wonder how much power it draws by brokeninside · · Score: 5, Interesting

    With a Pentium IV and a fast system bus, I would expect this thing to draw a lot of power. When I went from an Athlon based system to an iMac, my power bill dropped by almost ten bucks a month. I'd hate to see it spike from a set top appliance.

    1. Re:I wonder how much power it draws by Daengbo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Geez, and I was thinking Nehemiah core from VIA. How much do the Pent Ms cost now? I haven't yet seen them in my country (of course, neither have I seen the Epia...) because the Thai IT stores are entirely buzzword compliant.

    2. Re:I wonder how much power it draws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      $10/month ??? What the hell do you pay for power?

      Here we pay $0.06 US/KwH. Lets say I had a regular barebones athlon system:
      Motherboard
      Athlon 2400+
      geforce4mx video card
      1 hard drive 7200rpm
      1 cd-rom or dvd-rom
      1 512MB ddr chip

      This is going to pull about 200W max and more likely 150W continuous

      An IMac takes 130W continuous:
      http://www.talktothemac.com.au/Apple_ Folders/imac/ specs.html

      200W * 24 * 30 = 144kwh = $8.64 US
      130 * 24 * 30 = 93.6kwh = $5.52 US

      A savings of $3.02 US/month.

      And yeah, I have built the above little cheapie box and actually measured the continuous power.

      Either your numbers or off or you are bullshitting...

    3. Re:I wonder how much power it draws by timeOday · · Score: 2, Interesting
      There is already TiVo and ReplayTV, I don't don't think we need another shrinkwrapped "don't look inside" consumer product.

      What I want is a cheap, quiet, hackable box that records and replays high-quality audio and video, with all the normal expansion slots (because I'd also like it to replace my "home server" which does a bunch of other stuff).

      It's a challenge to do, because the only suitable encoder/decoder is the Hauppauge PVR 350 pci card, which is almost $200 by itself.

  2. I like this whole idea by www.fuckingdie.com · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It would be a refreshing change from the everyday norm to have all of our "Comsumer Electronics" built on an open platform. If someone built a computer that was the size of a slim DVD player, and could be operated using any operating system I wanted, I would jump on it.

    But for now at least we still have to put up with either a rather large Media PC, one that doesn't quite fit in with the other components of your home theater I mean, or whatever PoS companies like Sony want to jam down our throats this model year.

    So to make a long story short I would like to see a Computer that looks, and feels, like a super slim DVD player, and Runs Linux. Not too much to ask I think, and then I would be able to do as I please with it.

    Disclaimer: If something like this actually exists please let me know about it. I have, after all, been living in the middle of nowhere northern BC for about 19 years.

    --
    That really is my homepage, no kidding.
    1. Re:I like this whole idea by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 3, Interesting
      This post is a little simplistic. I've downloaded mythtv and even used knoppixmyth which is even easier to use, but getting things to work are far from easy.

      I made no claims about the time involved -- only the parts and the money. Yes, you would probably need to know what you were doing, and know your way around the Linux command line. However, I wanted to point out that it was possible if you wanted to.

      If you're going to shell out $1000 to $1500 to build a PVR when you can buy a Tivo for a couple hundred, it's for the fun / geekiness of it, not because you want a PVR. (And, of course, you could just buy the one featured in this slashdot article to hack if you really want MythTV).

    2. Re:I like this whole idea by The+Vulture · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hell yeah, I have to agree. I could have shelled out a total of $500-$600 for a TiVo with a lifetime subscription, but I like to do things the hard way, it seems. I was seriously considering the TiVo, because it would just work.

      Then, I did some investigation into do-it-yourself PVR's, and stumbled onto MythTV and Freevo. I tried Freevo first, and didn't really like it (even before using it to watch TV), but the clincher was that, at that time, it didn't support PVR functionality (rewinding through the live TV stream).

      I had (still have to some extent) a bunch of older hardware kicking around, so I decided to give MythTV a shot. The hardware was somewhat under-powered, but if I scaled down the capture resolution (to 320x480, for instance), I was able to get it to work. That was enough for me to start spec'ing out some new hardware and make purchases over a period of time.

      It was definitely a learning experience in putting together a MythTV machine, helping find bugs, submitting a small code patch or two. I'd do it again, but that's because I'm usually up for a good challenge. If you want something that just works, seriously, buy a TiVo, that's what they do is make devices that work.

      -- Joe

    3. Re:I like this whole idea by justMichael · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here, have a look at these, they are beautiful, but expensive.

      I'm just about to pull the trigger on one of these, one more clinet to finish up and I just might be ready.

    4. Re:I like this whole idea by Prof.+Reginald · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Has anyone ever considered using the guts of a laptop? that would be a pretty slim computer.

    5. Re:I like this whole idea by toddlg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My "free" HTPC went from Freevo, to mythTV, to Knoppmyth, to the (gasp!) Windows-based (free for personal use, not open source) myHTPC front end.

      The author has not released anything for it since August because he's coming out with a new and improved version sometime real soon.

      Despite that, there's an active community writing/tweaking modules for it, and I've got it to do what I want so far (show the TV listings and weather) since I've not got a Hauppauge card yet.

      I decided to go with myHTPC because for me the learning curve was not quite as steep re: $distro vs. W2K pro.

      I've got a wireless nic in it for the TV/weather updating, use TightVNC to admin it, use it with my StreamZAP remote to control Winamp, etc.

      I almost went with a Linux solution, but just getting this box set up (in an Antec Overture case, btw) has tickled my hardware/fiddling bone enough and I'm able to use it now. YMMV

    6. Re:I like this whole idea by The+Vulture · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The way I look at it, to each their own.

      I investigated myHTPC, read the forums, checked out the available software, and didn't really find what I was looking for. I would imagine that the situation has since changed.

      MythTV in the beginning for me was quite challenging, and I've been using UNIX in some form or another for 10+ years (in fact, I learned UNIX before I learned Windows, turned out to be a fluke in high school computer lab scheduling). There was always documentation for MythTV that evolved, but back when I started using it (MythTV version 0.9 I think), it was still kind of spotty, and there wasn't a straight, easy to follow HOWTO. And compiling, LOTS of compiling, if you wanted everything installed.

      That situation has since changed, there's plenty of RPM packages for Fedora Core 1, AptForRPM takes care of the dependences, and Jarod Wilson has written an excellent MythTV HOWTO.

      I used to have a wireless NIC in my MythTV machine, but the RealTek driver (binary driver) crashes with Fedora, so I can't use that. I adminster my machine (the rare time I need to) via SSH, and use a universal remote control with the IR receiver on the PVR-250.

      I ended up buying a desktop ATX case before the Overture came out (a cheap case), and when it did came out, I was kind of kicking myself. Just out of curiousity, how is it? I've heard both good and bad about it, the main thing is the cooling. Does it run really hot?

      -- Joe

  3. Whoops... by www.fuckingdie.com · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Should have checked the dimensions of this little guy before that last post... it is actually pretty small. Would almost fit into even my home theater setup... that is if my wife would only let me have a computer in the living room.....

    Like I said... Middle of nowhere...

    --
    That really is my homepage, no kidding.
  4. PVRs... for cars? by Sanksa+Wott · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In the spirit of the "second generation of homebrew PVRs", I was wondering...

    Since I travel a lot I have recently been thinking about putting together a PVR-type device for my automobile. With ever-shrinking form factors, hiding the device would be no problem. A simple remote control would be fairly easy to integrate. Several fast-booting distro's come to mind to use as starting points. But before I jump in headfirst, I thought I would ask... has this been done before?

    (I remember an article a few days abo about a totally "wired" automobile, but that's not my goal. Just a simple mass-storage device with access controlls, integrated with a car stereo. )

    -B

    1. Re:PVRs... for cars? by ciroknight · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Probably has been done, but wouldn't it be awesome to have a wireless system installed in the car *as a stereo*, so that you could bring all of your data where-ever you go? If the iPod ever goes WiFi, you could set up a server in your car to support a cross-exchange of music, data being integrated into your environment even deeper.

      It wouldn't be too hard to do what you are saying, hell, I say do it. But it might be a lot healthier on your car to use an old laptop, and find a drive box to put your ultra-large-capacity hard drive into. Would be great to use a device like this, but this is really where SpeedStep and other powersaving archetectures are extremely useful. And with no optical drive to worry about, you could definitely decrease power usage even more.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
  5. MythTV + Hauppauge PVR disappointing by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The MythTV software was good enough; SageTV is better. (Pro-Myth: Video preview in Channel Guide. Pro-Sage: File-naming format, smarter EPG fetching, better EPG data, smarter file-naming format, smarter interfaces, smarter favorites/don't like, smarter conflict resolution, smarter channel guide).

    The IVTV driver would lock up after 12 or 15 hours. That was with Kernel 2.6; probably should have stuck with kernel 2.4.

    Plus it was just torturously harder to use. I have switched to Windows 2000 + SageTV for my Hauppauge PVR-250, with the Hauppauge MVP for watching the movies on TV. It is much better than a Tivo or ReplayTV or Myth. It rocks.

    1. Re:MythTV + Hauppauge PVR disappointing by evilviper · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have a setup that might work even better for you.

      I didn't like MythTV at all. Skipping forward (or backwards) was very sluggish, the interface was cumbersome and complex, the conflict resolution was really complex, and didn't seem to work right anyhow. It needed plugins to do the most basic tasks that any old file-manager can do, etc. So eventually I've settled with the following setup:

      WebVCR+. It gives you an HTML interface to TV listings where you can schedule recordings, and you can set it up to record using any program you like. It uses XMLTV to get the listings. You can use any web browser you like.

      Then you just need a filemanager and a video player. I happen to like emelFM and MPlayer, so I just changed a few key-bindings (to match my remote), and it works quite well.

      I've also got a handful of scripts that do basic things, like convert MPEG-2 streams into MPEG-4. I re-mapped some keyboard shortcuts in AVIdemux2 so I can edit videos entirely with a remote. I made scripts to automate recording of data/audio/video CD. Etc, etc.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  6. Volume by osobear · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As for the noise produced by ASUS DIGIMatrix system, I have to stress that it is very low compared with the level of noise generated by regular desktops or "cubic" mini-systems. Even when the fans rotate at their maximum, the noise level never goes beyond 30dB. For your information: the regular desktop systems generate about 50dB of noise. 50db? That seems pretty loud for a pc... I know mine runs around 40 and it still gets pretty damn annoying during a movie when there is the all-too-pivotal silent scene right at the end. You need some other kind of cooling in there, like water cooling with a no-moving-parts pump. Fan noise is one of the big things that ruins media center PCs now.

  7. XBOX ... by vlad_petric · · Score: 4, Interesting
    An xbox + XBMP provides most of the functionality, and it's only 180$ (in all fairness, you do need a dolby decoder with your speakers, but it has HDTV in it)

    Furthermore, by purchasing an XBOX without actually buying games you make MS lose money :) (they're losing money anyway with xbox, but this way they're losing even more)

    These days it doesn't even take a screwdriver to hack the XBOX ... The (albeit kludgy) software solution works well.

    --

    The Raven

  8. Re:Centrino by ciroknight · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No, what Intel has is ease of use. My Dell Centrino book took less than a minute to configure/reconfigure, for anywhere I went, not to mention it was much less obtrusive than the drivers that DLink included, which ran a utility that not only threw up ugly errors if my signal was shit, but had an ugly splash screen and caused this odd hard drive clicking at the weirdest of times (when the card woke up from sleeping is my only guess). No, I feel that Intel did great justice, and with their support in trying to make a linux driver, I see even more reason to be happy where I am.

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
  9. Re:Almost perfect? by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 3, Interesting
    TiVo subscription fees suck.

    Maybe so, but screenscraping zap2it is NOT a viable option.

    Unless MythTV gets support for Guide+, you'll end up having to pay a subscription when zap2it shuts down mythtv scrapers like tvguide did.

    Yahoo! offers free TV listings, they wouldn't notice a huge increase in traffic if MythTV users switched over, and creating a scraper for their site is not really hard. And, for all I know, there are another dozen portals out there that MythTV users could head to if they got shut down.

    As a matter of fact, scrapers are pretty easy to create (well, if you're a programmer and you know Perl), and easy to create in such a way that it's not too likely you'll be caught. (Caveat coder! Possible TOS violations lurk, so think through whatever you want to do before you do it.)

  10. Replay and DVD player just plain work, now. by Beebos · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While I understand the geek lust for such a device, my two Replays (refubs bought from the Replay site with lifetime subscriptions included) and a DVD player covers all of my entertainment purposes flawlessly. The Replays are networked and can stream video from my PC. The DVD player can play DVDs, CDs, and MP3s. I rarely need to play anyother type of media, which I can already play on regular PC hooked up to my stereo system. It seems unecessary (and maybe more expensive and time consuming) to replace these devices that do their job very well, with a PC that can do it all.

  11. Ahanix by Kaliban923 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I've got an Ahanix case for my mythtv setup and while its a bit big, it fits well in my AV rack. With the right motherboard I get quality AC3 audio on DVDs and overall it works pretty well. However, as a poster above noted, myth still has a few(minor) kinks to work out especially with a Hauppauge PVR 250/350 setup(which I have) but the driver code has been getting better and I am happy to report that other than a memory leaking LCDproc process, my machine has been rock solid for over a month since I upgraded to 0.14 release and the latest Hauppauge drivers.

    Personally, the integrated Music Player, TV recorder/viewer, web interface(and this is the killer app for me) for scheduling recordings make the hassles worth it. Even bought myself a JP1 remote that I reprogrammed so it controls everything seemlessly so my girlfriend faction has increased greatly in the past month or so.

    Getting back to the Ahanix cases, they have several different models with different sizes most with a LCD display(HD44870) that can be used by mythtv if you have lcdproc installed. If you are looking for a HTPC, check them out.

  12. set-top PCs on deck.. by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This looks promising.. Apex makes cheap stuff of decent quality, and the specs on this look promising.

    Basically what the Phantom plans to be (which is why I dont doubt the Phantom will exist). I predict tons of dvd-form-factor PCs marketed as PC/Console/PVR/etc...

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  13. Only supports interlaced HDTV formats? by Kaldaien · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What's the deal with that? 1080i, 720i, 525i (what the hell is that anyway?!)... 1080i's pretty common, but I can't remember the last time
    I've ever seen a 720i source or 525i for that matter.

    I'd really like to see a device with DVI/Component INPUTS so you can use the tuner most cable companies provide with their HDTV service.
    It's a cold day in hell when you can pick up a decent HDTV signal with just an antenna around here.

    If I recall at CES this year there were at least 2 HDTV sets with built-in PVR capabilities, and they could record HDTV content.
    Now that really tickles my fancy, unfortunately your options for getting the recorded content off your TV's PVR are limited :-\

    $999 for an HDTV-VHS recorder (i.e. JVC HM-DH30000 ) is a little high. Seems the PC hardware approach might not be a bad idea,
    ATI has new HDTV tuner hardware on the horizon. If you couple that with a huge hard drive, I'm sure you could potentially beat the over-priced JVC product by a long shot.
    I know I'd certainly jump at the opportunity to buy such a device.

    Unfortunately, this device isn't quite there yet. But it looks like a step in the right direction (given a decent non-proprietary PVR software environment).

    But how long do we really have before TiVo and Replay embrace HDTV recording? Replay already has S/PDIF and Component OUTPUTs (even though they only have analog inputs)...

  14. Keep the tuner give me an IR Blaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Geeze how much longer do I have to hear about video cards with TV Tuners. All I need is channel 4 since all channel selection HAS TO BE through either a sat or cable box.

    A agood IR blaster would turn my PC into a programmable "universal remote".

    When will ATI and NVIDIA get a clue?

  15. I did it for ~ $650 US complete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    I recently put together a homebuilt PVR based on MythTV in a Knopp-Myth distribution for about $650, much less than the $400 barebones gear cited in the article.

    The CoolerMaster ATX-620 fits nicely in my audio rack. Relatively quiet, one discrete blue LED indicator, black brushed aluminum.

    The breakdown:

    • CoolerMaster ATX-620 $139 US
    • Biostar M7V1G motherboard $69
    • Athlon XP 2100 $69
    • 1GB RAM $140
    • PVR-250 capture card $139
    • nVidia MX440 $69
    • NIC $15 (no luck with the onload Rhine VT6102)
    • CD/DVD driver $29
  16. building a pvr by fat32 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Before I was serious about building this box, I decided to see how much of a task it would be to implement it. I picked up a very cheap, no-name video capture card at a local computer show. The box said it used the Brooktree 878 chipset -- one I remembered was well supported by the Video4Linux project. And the price was right for experimentation at US$40. I took it home and installed it on a crappy Pentium 166 I had lying around. I installed the card and Mandrake 8.2 and started playing with the card using XawTV. The I/O and speed limitations of that system kept it from being overly useful as a recorder, but it proved to me that the project was viable and that the equivalent of a second generation Pentium processor could probably do the job adequately.

    As someone who has spent more time on eBay than I care to remember, I naturally started looking for viable hardware there. I found this strange little Hewlett Packard "built for Unisys" PC which is about 1 foot square and about 3.5 inches tall. It features a Sahara-II motherboard and had most of the hardware I needed built into the standard box. I added a mouse and keyboard and the TV capture card and I was ready to start building a solution. It started out as a 300 MHz Celeron with 32 MB of memory, but I decided to fork over another US$30 or so and make it 400 Mhz and 96 MB. It actually worked before the upgrade, but the CPU seemed to be at its edge and I didn't want to use KDE with so little memory.

    I set up the system to autologin to a passwordless user called (appropriately) "tv." I capture the programs into a subdirectory called (strangely enough) "shows."

    The recording rate of the TV capture card appears to max out at 15 frames per second. If I were intending to archive these programs forever, I'd probably invest in a better card. But for timeshifting shows like the evening news from France (for my wife) and The Red Green Show (for me), 15 fps is adequate.