Slashdot Mirror


Canadian Record Industry Presses ISPs in Court

An anonymous reader writes "'Internet service providers have neither an obligation nor, in some cases, the technical means to help the recording industry identify 29 alleged music pirates, a federal judge heard yesterday.' The article continues, 'Shaw Cable, the most defiant company among the pack, poked holes in CRIA's case and accused the music industry of planning an extended fishing expedition for the purpose of forcing individuals into costly settlements before cases ever get to trial. This is the same strategy used by sister organization the Recording Industry Association of America, lawyers argued.'"

5 of 247 comments (clear)

  1. Canada - Land of the free? by Zone-MR · · Score: 4, Informative

    Seems canada's status as the new land of the free may have been short-lived.

    1. Re:Canada - Land of the free? by c_oflynn · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually they are suing uploaders ONLY - they have no legal ground to sue downloaders.

  2. wrong by dsanfte · · Score: 5, Informative
    From the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, passed in 1982:

    Fundamental freedoms

    2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:

    a) freedom of conscience and religion;
    b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
    c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
    d) freedom of association.


    So yes, we do indeed have freedom of speech, and it is protected.
    --
    occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
  3. Brand new law in Italy is gonna hunt down sharers by SilveRo_kun · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yesterday an anti-piracy "decreto di legge" (for the moment only for movies, but it will be extended) was passed (the final step before it becomes a law). It is somewhat like the new european law, but it is stricter with sharers. The ISPs are by law forced to hand over to the "Guardia di Finanza" (cops) the info on the sharers whenever a copyright owner complains (the law says that if they don't comply, they can be fined for up to 250.000 euros). The sharers will then be fined "simbolically": (1500 euros), and the information of the fined sharer will be published (!!!) on a national newspaper!! Yup, no kiddin', Italy sucks, and if you know italian you can check for your self here: http://www.beniculturali.it/download/DL_Cinema_PCM 12032004.pdf
    More info can be found here: http://punto-informatico.it/p.asp?i=47374 , but unfortunately it's all in Italian (I am waiting to find an article in english to submit the story....)

  4. What I dont get is.. by anethema · · Score: 4, Informative

    Are the CRIA making sure to go only after the P2P users who have uploaded?

    I ask since...possesing copies of music you dont own, including P2P downloading is TOTALLY LEGAL here in canada. (first link is to the govt site explaining fair use, explaining you can copy any music, even music you dont own, as long as YOU are the one making the copy)

    Fair use covers the fact that I can 100% legally borrow my friends cd's and copy them. He, on the other hand, CAN NOT make a copy for me.

    So I guess Canada is not totally regressing into the USA :)

    --


    It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.