Slashdot Mirror


U.S. Interior Dept. Unplugged... Again

IO ERROR writes "The U.S. District Court ordered the Department of Interior to take all its systems offline for the third time, saying that its systems were too insecure to be left open. Among the systems to go offline are those that process payments owed to American Indians and Internet access in schools on Indian reservations. DOI employees cannot use the Web or send or receive e-mail."

21 of 299 comments (clear)

  1. No web at work ... the humanity ... by petabyte · · Score: 5, Funny

    DOI employees cannot use the Web or send or receive e-mail.

    *thinks about what he does at work*
    So they're letting everybody go home early then? :)

    1. Re:No web at work ... the humanity ... by SeinJunkie · · Score: 5, Funny

      So they're letting everybody go home early then?


      It's the government, they already left.
  2. Here's the original occurence by klipsch_gmx · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...as reported by internet.com. Interestingly it seems that even the previous time was not really the first?

    "For the second time in less than two years, a federal judge has ordered the Interior Department to disconnect from the Internet in order to protect $1 billion in American Indian money managed by the agency.

    U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth said Interior's refusal to cooperate with a court-appointed master who wanted to test the security of Interior's systems, prompted the decision. The government claimed it did not cooperate with Security Assurance Group of Annapolis, Md., because they could not agree on the "rules of engagement."

    1. Re:Here's the original occurence by skrysakj · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There are no such things as rules of engagement. All bets are off, all techniques are viable, no holds barred.

      Dress up as a tech guy and talk you way in? Go for it.
      Hack through someone's PC, why not?
      Send in a small remote control vehicle to snoop? Definitely.
      Fake some IDs, listen to employee conversations at a nearby bar after work, sleep with employees and get them to tell secrets, go through trash, make phone calls, take photos, plant bugs, rob, steal, cheat, lie.....

      That's how it's done "for real", so why not train that way? Why not TEST that way?

      What's wrong with "Train like you fight, fight like you train"?

      I'm glad they were shut down if they threw a hissy fit because they couldn't agree on "rules of engagement". Wake up to the real world ladies and gentlemen.

    2. Re:Here's the original occurence by Piquan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Fake some IDs, listen to employee conversations at a nearby bar after work, sleep with employees and get them to tell secrets, go through trash, make phone calls, take photos, plant bugs, rob, steal, cheat, lie.....

      ...mug the IT manager for his SecureID, blackmail the tape monkey for backups, assassinate the night guardsman, sure, whatever.

      Less severe? One part of a real attack might involve calling in a bomb threat to get one key employee away from his desk. I suspect that it may be better to simulate that part rather than panic the entire building: have one of the high-ups that you're working with call the employee away from his desk for a half hour. Or something.

      Yes, the real world doesn't play by rules. But if testing causes more harm than it would have prevented, then it shouldn't take place.

    3. Re:Here's the original occurence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Fake some IDs, listen to employee conversations at a nearby bar after work, sleep with employees and get them to tell secrets, go through trash, make phone calls, take photos, plant bugs, rob, steal, cheat, lie.....

      Let me guess, you work for the Interior Department? Nice try.

  3. "Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by grub · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Why would systems with access to funds be connected directly to the net? No system with that level of risk should ever be connected to the net unless there's a damn good reason. Even online banking webservers are throughouly isolated from the core banking systems. This is just sheer stupidity.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by grub · · Score: 5, Informative


      then how exactly do they update your bank account?

      Online banking allows you to play with your accounts. If it's hacked it's your data they screw with. The entire bank doesn't become a victim.

      Your[sic] one of those bozo's that says "I'll never use my credit card online"

      I use my card online all the time.

      Not to mention a number of "private" networks use the internet as a backbone.

      They're called "VPNs". Good luck hacking a properly maintained one anytime soon.

      I know exactly what I'm speaking about. Go back to sleep.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:"Larry, Moe & Curly Consulting" by kfg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In the old days it used to be hard to get small businesses to expose themselves to the net at all. They were paranoid about running so much as a webserver for simple customer services.

      Nowadays it's getting tough to convince them they need to keep a computer offline to protect sensitive core business data, even if it means a bit of sneaker netting now and again.

      Perhaps times will change again as they swing back to paranoid.

      Real men may upload their data to ftp and let everyone else mirror it. Smart men pull the ethernet cord. If nothing else you don't want the IRS/SEC to be able to pull your data off of someone else's server. You can't wipe what you don't have sole possession of.

      KFG

  4. Awww, man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    There goes my sweet FTP server with the 0 day warez and the fat pipe!

  5. Looking Inward.. by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
    Dept of Interior can't get outside of itself.

    Seems rather appropriate. What software are they running?

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  6. DOI understands Firewater instead of Firewalls by James+McP · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is really sad. I first heard of the DOI's incredible mishandling of the Indian trust here on slashdot a few years ago when they were shut down the first time.

    I can understand having problems recompiling literally centuries of data for tens of thousands of people. But c'mon, you can't figure out how to set up firewalls with VPN connections between disparate groups?

    Could you imagine any private organization like a mutual fund or retirement investor leaving SSNs and customer information online on websites? Imagine the smack down from the government! But if it's the gov't itself nada. Thank god (or Great Spirit, whatever) that there's at least one judge willing to do the right thing.

    --
    I've been on slashdot so long I'm starting to get out of touch with the cool stuff if it ain't on slashdot.
  7. Re:Since the article doesn't mention, I'll ask: by andih8u · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, if you've ever contracted for the government, you'd know that trying to get anything done is close to impossible. Any step you take has to be combed through by several beurocrats who have no more interest in anything other than plodding through their days on the way to retirement. Even if you do manage to get all of the systems designed and get ready to roll the upgrades out, someone will just come along and axe the plan while they try to figure out if this move will make them risk their neck in the slightest.

    Trying to work for people who essentially can't be fired is a nightmare.

    --


    slashdot, news for crazed liberal socialist zealots
  8. As an Indian, I can say this by tacokill · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's cool. We'll just keep the casino money.

  9. It's a political thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "The Interior Department said the order "is a new frontier in this court's efforts to run the operations of executive branch agencies."

    "We are working closely with the Department of Justice to quickly respond to this order in the appropriate legal venue," the agency said in a faxed statement. //

    It's a political thing. Probably not much of a technical problem here at all. Somebody's making a move for power somewhere and now all of this BS. They are punishing the Interior by taking down links with schools on them rather than just blocking traffic via access lists and firewalls.

    If they really had a problem with some of the services being provided as insecure they could have either firewalled those services or just blocked them at the router. Since, they did not take a rational approach to solving the problem, the problem is likely a political one from one greybearded idiot to another.

    Been a consultant for the government. Seen it. I once went almost 4 months doing nothing but earning good money while waiting for the Chicago Tollway to resolve some political infighting. 4 months of sitting at home, watching TV and basically chilling out on Illinois tax dollars.

    It was lovely.

  10. 2001? by klipsch_gmx · · Score: 5, Informative

    Looks like the Interior Department has been having computer problems for a long time (December 2001!):

    "Web wanderers looking for information on national parks, government mapping services or geological disasters will need to get their information from non-official websites for a while.

    U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth issued the order late Wednesday after a report showed that the computer system which handles $500 million annually in royalties from Indian land has major security holes that make it easy to access the system, alter records and possibly divert funds."

  11. Re:Technology vs. Indians by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Informative

    You don't really understand what happened do you?

    Firstly, there is no Indian "race" or "nation" that was in conflict with the United States.

    There were many conflicts with many tribes and there are many settlements which differ in scope and letter of the agreement.

    Since the closing of the Frontier in 1890 and the end of major military action with the American Indians around the same time the rights of the American Indians have changed and the role of the government in thier lives has changed.

    The crux of this arguement between the DOI/BIA and the folks suing them isn't about monetarily reimbursing for "or practically annahilating their race" it's about mismangement of natural resources on lands which are on Reservations or were on Reservations which are held in trust by the United States Government who act as stewards of the resources, both discovered and undiscovered.

    Basicly the DOI/BIA has lost billions of dollars of money that should have been paid out to various tribes and various private citizens. Not only that, but they can't figure out a webserver that holds confidental information on the monies going out to private citizens that can't be exploited.

  12. May It Please The Court... by SEWilco · · Score: 5, Funny
    • The US Department of the Interior web site is not responding.
    • We Slashdot users are glad to assist in ensuring that DOI web servers can not function for the next 48 hours.
    • The DOI is required to accept gifts from Indian Tribes under several circumstances. Are the DOI mail servers and web servers properly accepting gifts from tribe representatives?

      "(g) No Refusal Gift Acceptance Policy
      All Department of the Interior employees may accept gifts offered to them by representatives of Indian Tribes, Alaska Native Organizations, Insular and foreign governments when refusal to accept such gifts would be likely to cause offense or embarrassment or otherwise adversely affect relations with the United States."

    • Are DOI machines accepting gifts from Indian Tribe servers which are equipped with generous worm programs?
  13. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by jsprat · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Unless you're the garbage man...


    You'd be surprised what people will just throw in the trash.

  14. Re:I wonder about the old paper systems by AllenChristopher · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "Secure data would be physically secure. It's not like you can just walk in a building and get that stuff that is locked up. It's pretty tough."

    You need to read "Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feyman." Feyman raids the safes that contain the plans for the atomic bomb repeatedly, both for entertainment and to get work done faster. He walks through a hole in the fence around Los Alamos repeatedly, always exiting through the gate. The guard doesn't catch on until he's done it many times.

    I was able to get almost anywhere in my university dorms with a penknife, despite locked doors at the end of every hall.

    The problem with locks and guard and secure areas is that they're so visually impressive, it's easy to assume that they will work. With bicycle couriers and janitors moving around all the time, workers get used to unfamiliar faces and forget to check ID.

  15. Shred them, m'boy, shred them! by Evil+Schmoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Which is why secured government facilities are required to shred all classified documents. And as for Mr. Feynman's legendary escapades, Los Alamos was recently severely upbraided by the DOE for its lax security.

    Most government facilities have the lowest level of classified information ("Secret"). Very few have "Top Secret" or higher. And even with Secret, there are very extensive procedures in place in terms of document storage, personnel access, etc.; you're not going to be able to get in with a penknife, leastways not when the document is in a 2-ton graphite safe with 70-point rotary dial behind an armed guard gate.

    And as for the guy who found a 10-Base T hub? Dude. That's nothing. We throw old junk away all the time. I just threw 5 Betacam SP decks, worth about $6000 each, in the trash last week. Remember, the agencies can't sell equipment; only the GSA sells surplus, and that's at auction. And it's not like the agencies get credit for turning stuff in. So there is no financial incentive for the agencies to save old equipment, and the paperwork is far too much of a hassle to deal with, just to get it transferred off the books to surplus. (You have to verify condition and certify it, blah blah blah.) So we just get it written off as damaged beyond repair, and toss it.

    Believe me, I'd take the stuff home if I could, but then I'd technically be stealing. It has to be officially thrown away first.

    God Bless America.