Slashdot Mirror


War of the Worlds Remake

subtropolis writes "The Guardian has an article about a remake of the classic. Spielberg directing, T. Cruise acting. The guy who did Jurassic Park I & II did the screenplay. Anyone else think Bruce Sterling would've been a good choice for that? Quoth the article: 'While HG Wells was an enthusiastic supporter of many of the film adaptations of his work, the likely attitude that Orson Welles might have had to another director taking one of the works with which he became most closely associated, can only be a matter of conjecture.'"

14 of 518 comments (clear)

  1. Hollywood declares war on a classic by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Interesting
    A sad day for the people of earth...

    While I think Spielberg has done some fine films, I also think he's done some utter rubbish. Cruise, I have little respect for in any role other than martian invader for this film. I expect nothing less than an insipid action picture filled with orange fireball explosions and Cruise trying to look heroic and utterly out of place with the subject.

    Can you can't tell this is one of my favorite books? The 1953 movie was utterly camp, despite assertions of playing off cold war fears, but expect it to look good in comparison. I'm rather bummed and would prefer some artsy director and a cast of unknowns and trying to stay true to the underlying message of Well's original tale, rather than focusing on the vehicle (martians invading earth, killing people, etc.)

    The difference between Heinlein's Starship Troopers and the movie 'adaptation' will probably be the same in this instance.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Hollywood declares war on a classic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Hollywood's eating it's young.

      Somewhere out there is a writer with an original story, a powerbook and a digicam.

    2. Re:Hollywood declares war on a classic by HaveNoMouth · · Score: 5, Funny
      I think you dislike Cruise just because he's Cruise and not necessarily for any specific acting reason. As much as people tag him as an "action" hero, he's actually not. How many "action" pictures has he actually been in? Most of his films are deeper than that. The Last Samurai was an excellent film.

      Right on. "Mission Impossible" (1 and 2), for example, were fantastically deep films, with downright Mamet-like plots, and Cruise was fantastic in them! They greatly exceeded the quality of the TV show!

      Likewise with "Minority Report." What a wonderful triumph of cinematic art that was! Why, if PKD were alive I'm sure it would have brought a tear to his eye.

      I was really thinking Cruise had far too much gravitas and depth for WoW. I really believe the part should go to someone with a lighter touch, who could be more believable in the role. Like Pauly Shore or maybe Rob Schneider.

      Not.

    3. Re:Hollywood declares war on a classic by Ranger96 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      [sarcasm]Yep, "Schindler's List" and "Saving Private Ryan" were definitely garbage.[/sarcasm]

      Don't equate your own personal tastes in movies with the talent or lack thereof of the movie maker.

      Ranger96

      --
      What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun.-Ecclesiastes 1:9
    4. Re:Hollywood declares war on a classic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You guys need to stop focusing in on the title, and realize what the movie was -- an excellent parody of WWII propaganda films that happens to share the same name and bare-bones plotline of the book. They are two different creatures, each good in its own arena --- the movie as satire and action film, the book as an idealogical platform and true sci-fi.

      Haven't you guys seen Robocop? Remember all the satire in that movie?

      Just relax already -- someone took the title of your favorite book and pasted it on a movie that was very different from the book. Don't put down the movie just because it isn't the book.

  2. No more imagination.. by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    What's next, a remake of Citizen Kane, Casablanca or Blade Runner?

    Don't laugh, in 50 years you may very well be taking your grandkids to a remake of Star Wars..

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  3. In other news.... by Kenja · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news, engineers are working on wrapping Orson Welles body in copper wire as a means to harness the energy generated by him spinning in his grave.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  4. Where will it be set? by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It appears this is going to be set in 1898, which is about the right time, but will the Aliens land in Woking in Surrey? If so, where will they film it? Woking today doesn't look a lot like it did 100 years ago. (Although there's a nice statue of an alien war machine in near the shopping centre).

    The other question is will it follow the plot of the book reasonably closely, or will it diverge after a few pages, like Minority Report did?

  5. Musical War of the Worlds by robslimo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm all in favor of a new movie remake; not so sure Tom Cruise should be in it. Oh, well.

    You might think it odd, until you hear it, but I really enjoy listening to Jeff Wayne's Musical War of the Worlds

    Richard Burton did the first person narration and members of the Moody Blues performed a lot of the music. Very good.

  6. Hang on there Mr Half-Glass-Empty! by FortKnox · · Score: 5, Insightful

    True, they will hack this story to pieces...

    HOWEVER

    If you look at the bright side, if someone enjoys the movie, they'll be more encouraged to read the book. I read Heinlein's Starship Troopers after I saw the movie and thought "Wow, they hacked the crap outta something that really doesn't translate well to the movie media at all." (And I also am reading the Bourne Identity cause I enjoyed the movie a ton. And the book is VERY different than the movie, and much better, might I add). So, if it is bearable to watch, more people are more likely to read the book to discover everything that the book includes, but the movie doesn't.

    There's a bright side, after all ;-)

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  7. Orson or H.G? by __aamkky7574 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm confused about exactly what they are making a film of:

    • a film of the original novel, or
    • a film of the radio series of the original novel
    I'd love to see an authentically Victorian-decoed version of the original novel in the original setting, but not a remake of one set in the US. No disrepect to the US geeks here, but the Aliens-Invade-Uncle-Sam storyline has been done way too many times by now.

    I'd rather to see stiff-upper-lipped men in scarlet jerkins taking on the Hun From Space! "Zulu" meets "The League of Extraordinary Gentlement" (albeit with a better script).

    "Martians... thousands of 'em. Wait 'til you see the greens of their tentacles, boys, before you strike!"

    P.

  8. Re:Not Tom. by sharkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    Keanu Reeves!

    Whoa.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  9. Top 10 Spielberg Changes to 'War of the Worlds' by Ruprecht+the+Monkeyb · · Score: 5, Funny

    10. Addition of 'good alien' who helps the poor humans escape.
    9. Movie being remade as a comeback vehicle for Kate Capshaw
    8. Additional 30 minute epilogue containing interminable scenes of humanity and the aliens co-existing in the far future
    7. What? No Tom Hanks?
    6. Grover's Mill insufficiently multicultural, so location will be moved to San Francisco.
    5. Aliens killed by sneaking oxygen tank aboard spaceship and shooting it with a rifle.
    4. Main characters will be ethnically-diverse adolescents that are smarter than all the adults. (Note: unknown whether Tom will play an adult or child)
    3. Aliens will be cute, furry, and ever-so-marketable.
    2. Changes 'War' to 'Misunderstanding' so as to not upset children.
    1. Complete abandonment of subtlety, moral ambiguity, or any semblance of creativity

  10. Re:Better ending? by Fishstick · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hmmm, maybe the twist will be that HIV mutates to MIV and the invaders all die of AIDS.

    On the mac + alienos thing, remember this?


    Independence Day - CERT alert

    From: CERT Bulletin
    Newsgroups: comp.security.announce,rec.humor
    Subject: CERT Advisory CA-96.13 - Alien/OS Vulnerability
    Date: 4 July 1996 20:52:15 GMT
    Organization: CERT(sm) Coordination Center - +1 412-268-7090
    CERT(sm) Advisory CA-96.13
    July 4, 1996
    Topic: ID4 virus, Alien/OS Vulnerability

    The CERT Coordination Center has received reports of weaknesses in
    Alien/OS that can allow species with primitive information sciences
    technology to initiate denial-of-service attacks against MotherShip(tm)
    hosts. One report of exploitation of this bug has been received.
    When attempting takeover of planets inhabited by such races, a trojan
    horse attack is possible that permits local access to the MotherShip
    host, enabling the implantation of executable code with full root access
    to mission-critical security features of the operating system.
    The vulnerability exists in versions of EvilAliens' Alien/OS 34762.12.1
    or later, and all versions of Microsoft's Windows/95. CERT advises
    against initiating further planet takeover actions until patches
    are available from these vendors. If planet takeover is absolutely
    necessary, CERT advises that affected sites apply the workarounds as
    specified below.
    As we receive additional information relating to this advisory, we will
    place it in
    ftp://info.cert.org/pub/cert_advisories/CA-96.13.R EADME
    We encourage you to check our README files regularly for updates on
    advisories that relate to your site.

    I. Description
    Alien/OS contains a security vulnerability, which strangely enough
    can be exploited by a primitive race running Windows/95. Although
    Alien/OS has been extensively field tested over millions of years by
    EvilAliens, Inc., the bug was only recently discovered during a
    routine invasion of a backwater planet. EvilAliens notes that
    the operating system had never before been tested against a race
    with "such a kick-ass president."
    The vulnerability allows the insertion of executable code with
    root access to key security features of the operating system. In
    particular, such code can disable the NiftyGreenShield (tm)
    subsystem, allowing child processes to be terminated by unauthorized
    users.
    Additionally, Alien/OS networking protocols can provide a
    low-bandwidth covert timing channel to a determined attacker.
    II. Impact
    Non-privileged primitive users can cause the total destruction of
    your entire invasion fleet and gain unauthorized access to
    files.
    III. Solution
    EvilAliens has supplied a workaround and a patch, as follows:
    A. Workaround
    To prevent unauthorized insertion of executables, install a
    firewall to selectively vaporize incoming packets that do not
    contain valid aliens. Also, disable the "Java" option in
    Netscape.
    To eliminate the covert timing channel, remove untrusted
    hosts from routing tables. As tempting as it is, do not use
    target species' own satellites against them.
    B. Patch
    As root, install the "evil" package from the distribution tape.
    (Optionally) save a copy of the existing /usr/bin/sendmail and
    modify its permission to prevent misuse.

    The CERT Coordination Center thanks Jeff Goldblum and Fjkxdtssss for
    providing information for this advisory.

    If you believe that y

    --

    There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
    Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.