Slashdot Mirror


Wireless Alliance Touts 'Magic Touch' RFID Tech

An anonymous reader writes "Nokia, Sony and Philips have launched a new wireless technology, called Near Field Communication, that could be a threat to Bluetooth. Based on RFID, they say it will enable electronic devices to interact -- for m-commerce, file-swapping or to download info from the Web -- when touched together."

5 of 132 comments (clear)

  1. Range by rjstanford · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Of course, unless they're very careful, it will also enable devices to communicate when they're within a couple of feet. Still, as long as the software folk treat it as "always chatting" communication, and build in the proper safeguards, rather than assuming that every conversation is spawned by a dedicated request to speak, things should be fine. This will be fun to watch.

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  2. Other uses? by Gr33nNight · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can I implant one of these in my gf, so when I touch her, it will tell me how many guys she has been with lately?

    1. Re:Other uses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sounds like she's already getting implanted ;-)

  3. Depressing by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 5, Funny
    electronic devices to interact ... when touched together

    So now your electronics can get more than you do. How depressing is that?

    --
    True story.
  4. different from Bluetooth by hak1du · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bluetooth has a usable range up to 300ft (there are also specs for 30ft and 3ft); it is commonly used for laptops and handhelds to connect to modems, printers, GPS receivers, and access points from across the room. Something that has a range of only a foot or so won't compete there.

    I don't see much use for these new short-range wireless technologies--they aren't short-range enough to use their range limitations for security, and they aren't long-range enough to move into Bluetooth territory. Furthermore, there are short-range versions of Bluetooth.

    For secure communications, IrDA would still be a better choice. For anything else, you might as well use Bluetooth.

    But, hey, with enough marketing and sales muscle, these companies will probably manage to force another proprietary standard upon us, whether it is a good idea or not.