New RFC Considers .sex TLD Dangerous

Posted by michael on Friday March 19, 2004 @11:33AM from the sex-with-sue-almost-as-dangerous dept.

netcentric writes "A post on CircleID has reported about an RFC prepared by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd and Declan McCullagh, CNET News.com's Washington D.C. correspondent, analyzing proposals from various parties to mandate the use of special top level domain names (such as .sex or .xxx) or an IP address bit to flag 'adult' or 'unsafe' material or the like. The analysis explains why these ideas are dangerous and ill considered from legal, philosophical, and technical points of view. Here is the post to this report on CircleID along with some commentaries and link to the entire RFC 3675."

2 of 421 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

heh by DashEvil · 2004-03-19 11:34 · Score: 0, Redundant

Bah! .xxx rocks!

--
-If God wanted people to be better than me, he would have made them that way.
Already addressed by Junky191 · 2004-03-19 11:37 · Score: 0, Redundant

I think this has already been accomplished throught the infamous se.cx area of the internet.