New RFC Considers .sex TLD Dangerous
netcentric writes "A post on CircleID has reported about an RFC prepared by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd and Declan McCullagh, CNET News.com's Washington D.C. correspondent, analyzing proposals from various parties to mandate the use of special top level domain names (such as .sex or .xxx) or an IP address bit to flag 'adult' or 'unsafe' material or the like. The analysis explains why these ideas are dangerous and ill considered from legal, philosophical, and technical points of view. Here is the post to this report on CircleID along with some commentaries and link to the entire RFC 3675."
A Request For Content, as it were.
At first blush I would consider this a good idea, but seeing that Lieberman endorsed it, I'm forced to knee-jerk the other way.
Now would this "adult bit" be incorporated into the evil bit? Or what?
The Sticky Bit?
I just told someone at work about this, and he said ".sex? What would that be for...porn sites?"
Lets just say I should hope so
Does she have the clap or what?
Free the West Memphis Three!
I don't know about you, but it certainly gives new meaning to some already existing sites.
tomshardware.sex
slashdot.sex
irs.sex
gateway.sex
Internet's about to get real interesting.
At first I read it as .sex STD.
Now _that_ would be a dangerous series of websites.
wbs.
Huh?
"Extrudited"? Is that where they squeeze you through a small hole and then send you back home?
I'm fairly sure that if they took all the porn off the internet there'd only be one website left and it'd be called "BringbackthePorn.com".
goo....My bad that's what you get for scanning the headlines at work *shame*
Yes, yes you were all happy when the GOTO was considered harmful. But it didn't stop there. Oh no. I warned you, I did.
And now see where it's led? Sex considered harmful!
Bring back the GOTO before it is too late!
Recycle PCs and build a wireless community network www.hillsborough.org.nz
I'm all in favor of this kind of TLD.
Preferably something easy to type with one hand.
"It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -David Hume
hmm...
google.sex
Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
Just append .condom to your .sex and you're all set!
i agree. just hope that DDD will have homepage at http://www.ddd.xxx/
that will be fun.
my endian is bigger than yours!
So we should ban it; especially as it creates the very kids we are trying to protect from it, shame on you!
Sorta makes you nostalgic for a president that was doing it to his intern instead of doing it to the country, doesn't it?
"Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney
Who wants to write for Java or .NET when you could do it in .SEX instead?
He was being serious.
After all, a person who doesn't have time to RTFA isn't going to take the time to watch their kids, either.
I'd be more insightful, but I think my puppy is eating my couch.
Hey freaks: now you're ju
Maybe, he's not got time to RTFA because he's watching his kids.
I couldn't read what you wrote.
Your message got cut by my censorship filter on the "boob" in your name, Buck-a-boob-ob.
So much for content control...
--Phillip
Can you say BIRTH TAX
Hell at this point I think Monica Lewinsky should be president and Bush should start his own line of perfume. I haven't smelled that crap she is peddling but it can't be worse than what he is happily flinging in our collective face.
I started reading the RFC and I was initially alarmed by the title ".sex Considered Dangerous". Then I realized that I am a Slashdot reader, so I am unlikely to encounter any actual sex. Whew! That was close!
Ad #1 Ad #2 Ad #3
Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/