Slashdot Mirror


Novell Makes More Open Source Moves

cbnet2004 writes "In what can be considered a win for Linux, Novell has announced NetWare will cease to exist as a standalone product by the end of the year. However, the CEO says: 'We are still committed to it and it is not going away. Our new Open Enterprise Server offering will have two components to it: SuSE Linux Enterprise Server and NetWare. NetWare is here for a long time to come.'" Read on for more bits from Novell's BrainShare conference, including a planned company-wide move to Linux.

Roger Foss writes "Novell has announced it will release its cross platform iFolder file synchronization software as open source. This is pretty cool: far more transparent and easier to use than Unison or some of those friendly Rsync variants. iFolder does multi-master delta synchronization and is user friendly. The source software will be available at Novell's own Forge site and release under the GPL. This sure beats Novell's earlier open source efforts, when they released their proprietary IPX protocol stuff years ago. For those who want to try it, there's a live demo site that I doubt would withstand slashdotting."

Finally, mj01nir writes "According to Miguel de Icaza's web log, Chris Stone just announced that Novell will be moving the whole company to OpenOffice by the end of the year, and to Linux on the desktop a year after.

47 of 351 comments (clear)

  1. Guess it's not the right time to become a CNE by darthcamaro · · Score: 5, Interesting

    funny how things change, a few years ago I thought I had it made cause i had a CNE and now it's not worth crap....

    1. Re:Guess it's not the right time to become a CNE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I got an MCSE few years ago, and now am rolling in cash, own two brand new cars and sleeping with a different girl every night.

      On the other hand, your kernel is more stable, I hear, and I envy you for that.

    2. Re:Guess it's not the right time to become a CNE by ciroknight · · Score: 5, Funny

      Bill, is that you?!

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    3. Re:Guess it's not the right time to become a CNE by PacoTaco · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The MCSE and other Microsoft certifications are signed by Bill Gates. I think it's pretty ironic, considering that he dropped out of college.

    4. Re:Guess it's not the right time to become a CNE by rodgerd · · Score: 5, Funny

      The bad news is you've been giving a virus to all the girls.

    5. Re:Guess it's not the right time to become a CNE by King_TJ · · Score: 5, Informative

      I just attended a "computer professionals" meeting here in St. Louis, where a Novell rep. gave a presentation on Novell's product line and roadmap for the future.

      As I understand it, the next version of Netware is going to give users the option to install with a traditional Novell kernel at the core of it, or alternately, a Linux kernel.

      We asked him why they didn't just "go all the way" and turn Netware into a "value added layer" on top of Linux, rather than bothering with continued support of the old Netware kernel.

      Basically, he said that *could* happen in the distant (5+ years away) future - but currently, the old kernel is considered by many to be "robust" and "tried and true", so they'd be hesitant to switch to a Linux kernel in the short term future. Still too many enterprise customers with a "If it works, why change it?" mentality...

      In any case, I think Linux may breathe some new life into the Novell Netware line - rather than phase it out. Novell seems interested in such things as the ability to plug in Linux-based additions to Netware, rather than having only .NLM modules written specifically for Netware as options. (EG. Novell shops could turn servers into such things as SQL database servers as well as just file/print servers, without resorting to purchasing additional boxes to do it.)

      I wouldn't toss the CNE out as "worthless" just yet. It may enjoy a small resurgence in usefulness, if Novell plays their cards right.

  2. Are they hiring? by twigles · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh man, Linux and OpenOffice in a big US company!

    It just makes me so happy .

    In other news, SCO does something dispicable to ruin my good mood.

    1. Re:Are they hiring? by RetiredMidn · · Score: 5, Interesting
      C'mon in, the water's fine!

      I work at Novell; I have installed OpenOffice.org, uninstalled MSOffice, and my laptop dual-boots Suse and XP (only until I can eliminate the last few dependencies caused by my development requirements).

      I am a Mac user at home, and I am so psyched that I am this close to a zero-Microsoft environment!

    2. Re:Are they hiring? by RetiredMidn · · Score: 4, Interesting
      As a Mac user, are you proud of Novell's current support for Mac? Do you expect your opinion to change in the future?

      Fair question, AC. As a Mac user/developer, Novell was, at best, barely relevant to me in the past. When I worked in a Mac-based office of a mostly-Wintel software house several years ago, the IT department's insistence on Novell servers was something of an annoyance, given their marginal Mac support.

      Although Mac support is not the highest priority at Novell right now (although there have been some recent announcements in that direction), I can tell you that Novell's intranet has become much more Mac-friendly lately, if only as a by-product of embracing open standards (and open source) instead of Windows as the default desktop; Apple's (e.g., Safari's) moves in this direction are also a factor. Looking forward, I'm hopeful, if only because of the common *nix ground between the Mac and Linux; it's a far more comfortable fit than WIndows. We haven't quite reached the stage where I could justify a Mac as my development machine, but it's not inconceivable...

      In case you're wondering, I'm currently doing Java development for Novell.

  3. Its One Hell Of A Good Start by Korgan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have to admit I'm surprised its taken Novell this long to announce their move to Linux + OpenOffice.org given how long they've now had Ximian in the fold. I would've expected them to have announced their intention to do so a lot sooner.

    This is a huge coup. Not only are IBM doing the same thing with their desktops (although they're porting MSOffice instead of using a Free office suite) but with Novell, one of the oldest Networking platform companies still surviving, announcing this on top of all their other efforts, people are really going to start taking notice and realising that maybe Linux truly is Prime Time for businesses now.

    Then again... So far its only been companies that have a lot to do with Linux and Linux based services that have announced this. Would be very nice if someone like HP, Dell, or Gateway came out and got on the bandwagon. That would hold a lot more weight with the average IT manager or C-level management.

    Still, slow small steps turn to huge gallops rather quickly in the IT world :-)

    1. Re:Its One Hell Of A Good Start by kephunk · · Score: 5, Informative

      IBM is NOT porting MS Office to Linux. They are currently using it in conjuction with WINE. The ultimate goal would be for them to use OpenOffice.org as well.

  4. Don't sweat it by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A couple of years from now, all the RHCEs will be bummed because the latest OpenBEOS certification will be the new hotness... More serously though, certifications such as these are just another product for OS vendors to sell.

    --
    Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    1. Re:Don't sweat it by dzelenka · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, I work in a Novell shop and really hesitated to put in the hours to get a CNE. I had already let me MSCE expire. I just cringed every time I realized that the tests were both a cash cow for the OS companies and a tool for their marketing department. I ended up getting an OS agnostic CISSP and specialized in the security side of things.

      Now it looks like my years of studying and using Linux are going to put me ahead of my coworkers who trudged down the CNE path.

      It's good to have a life choice pay off once in a while!

      --
      Bah!
  5. In a related story... by capz+loc · · Score: 5, Funny

    Millions of Linux geeks across the globe orgasm in unison.

  6. I was laughed at... by BJZQ8 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was laughed at by some "consultants" that had formerly worked in my school district, when I started converting their Novell systems over to Linux. Now that it's done, and things work better than ever, Novell decides to convert itself over to Linux wholesale...who's laughing now?

    1. Re:I was laughed at... by BJZQ8 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, they wouldn't have HAD to hire me...but the $100,000 a year the "consultants" were sucking from the school district was a bit of a large pill to swallow. I have saved them a huge amount of money converting to systems that don't need annual license updates, nor constant reboots, nor babbling Certified people to fix them.

  7. Kind of sad... by weave · · Score: 4, Informative
    As an old IT guy, I remember Novell from the early days. I still remember the hype of version 2 where it added support for fault-tolerant mirroring and would take full advantage of the new 286 processors.

    Gessh...

    1. Re:Kind of sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      And the swap of 50 diskettes to build...

    2. Re:Kind of sad... by whiteranger99x · · Score: 4, Funny

      28.....50....all that really proves is that you two are a bunch of old farts who remember the bad ol' days :P

      --
      Join the TWIT army now!
  8. GNOME? C#? by Vargasan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Did anyone else notice that the iFolder project page only mentions GNOME?

    iFolder: integrated file sharing in the GNOME, Windows, and OS X desktops.

    Also, iFolder is written in C#. I guess that comes with the territory.

    Development Status: 2 - Pre-Alpha
    Environment: Win32 (MS Windows), Gnome
    Intended Audience: Developers, End Users/Desktop, System Administrators
    License: GNU General Public License (GPL)
    Operating System: MacOS, Windows, Linux
    Programming Language: C#
    Topic: File Sharing, Gnome, Filesystems

    --
    Putting the romance back into necromancer.
    1. Re:GNOME? C#? by ciroknight · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My Guess is that it can run under KDE, but they're not supporting it. After all, they do OWN Ximian now, that does kinda put them in the GNOME support realm.

      --
      "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
  9. Grammer tells us something.... by TheOtherKiwi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...but I'm not sure what...

    Novell has announced NetWare will cease to exist as a standalone product

    Um, "cease to exist" means a lot more than "cease to exist as a standalone product" in fact, they are opposite meanings. The highlighting emphasises the negative...I think this is a great announcement that sends a confused message. Hey they are adopting Linux more strongly, thats good right? They are not dropping NetWare, thats good for current NetWare users.

    The glass is half full...

    --

    -- Sig meltdown immine...
    1. Re:Grammer tells us something.... by PacoTaco · · Score: 5, Funny
      Grammer tells us something....

      Does the spelling tell us anything?

  10. Finally by Macfox · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A brave move, but a welcomed one at that. It's going to be interesting next 12 months to see if Novell has made the right move.

    Netware is a solid platform and proven its stability, where Windows has failed. On the other hand Novells 1st generation software hasn't always been the best.

    Will the Netware zealots adopt the linux based services quick enough for Novell to cover its investment? Lets hope....Time will tell.

    --
    Area51 - We are watching...
    1. Re:Finally by jmulvey · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Netware is a solid platform and proven its stability, where Windows has failed.

      Not sure about that one, chief. File & Print services have become a commodity service. I mean, freaking Microsoft Exchange (a mail product) can do File services. Novell has stood still for way too long. I remember back in '97 getting my CNE for Novell 4.11. Today, NetWare 6 is practically the exact same system.

      Novell has for too long denied the value of the application server. Now they are being forced to make choices because it has finally come down to do-or-die for them. Sure, it's good to see that the company, when finally scared witless can make the right decision.

      But unfortunately, I think innovation is an area where Microsoft has simply kicked Novell's ass. And in this case Novell has nobody to blame but themselves for sitting on their hands.

      Sure Novell still has superior File & Print capability, that isn't enough anymore to float a boat the size of Novell.

    2. Re:Finally by Ath · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Netware is the product that contains the file and print services.

      Novell is a company that has a whole range of products, including Netware.

      And while I agree that file and print services are treated like a commodity now, Novell has kicked Microsoft's ass in innovation in that area.

      Ever manage trustee rights on Netware versus NT? NT uses the same crap from the LAN Manager days, which is basically made up of hidden files which contain trustee information. Try blocking access to a single file three levels deep to a single user. With Netware, you can do it. With Microsoft's offerings, you cannot.

      iFolder? Take a look at iFolder and tell me that Microsoft has kicked Novell's ass in file service innovation. It does BYTE level diff syncronization. So if you have a 20MB Powerpoint presentation and you change one word in one slide, it only syncronizes the small change. Microsoft's solution? Syncronize the whole file.

      Print services are a commodity too. But compare NDPS with Microsoft's print services. NDPS has so much more administrative functionality.

      Sorry, but to say Netware 6 (and 6.5 is the current release) is the same as 4.11 is a statement only made by someone who is ignorant on the topic. The Netware kernel may not have significant changes, but the services running on top of it are amazing. I recommend that you actually look into it before spreading such inaccurate information.

      If your point is only one about perception, I agree with you. File and print services are treated like a commodity. But don't start making statements about Microsoft innovating in those areas when, in fact, they haven't done anything since NT 3.5 came out and they support pushing print drivers to the client ... but on only NT clients.

  11. Novell's Direction by corngrower · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Netware has had its heyday. When customers found out they needed TCP/IP to internetwork, the days of a strictly local area network, as NetWare were numbered.

    With their purchases of Ximian and SuSE last year, it was pretty clear that Novell managment saw the need to take their company in a new direction. Novell chooses to embrace the new world. SCO tries to fight against it.

    1. Re:Novell's Direction by askegg · · Score: 4, Informative

      You are partly correct, but there are a couple of points to make:

      1) IPX/SPX is a routable protocol, so it is not limited to the LAN.

      2) IPX/SPX is better than TCP/IP in mnay respects, but the Unix community was committed to a non-proprietory protocol.

      3) Early versions of Windows used NetBIOS, which is no good for the routed world.

      4) Short sighted managers figured since they have Microsoft on the desktop in front of them, doesn't it make sense to have a Microsoft Server?

      --
      I don't make predictions, and I never will.
  12. It's kind of strange.... by dubdays · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I just got a position as the IT director at my company. They've been using Netware for years. Just before the SuSE/Novell news, I was planning to switch to SuSE for all server applications. Even bought some hardware to try it out. Now, I'm thinking about using those Netware licenses a little while longer....

    Hey, think I can trade one or two of those in for a boxed copy of 9.1 pro??? We can all dream, I suppose...

  13. Stupid question probably by modder · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sorry, but I don't know much about netware. The article talks about a netware "kernel" version.

    How do they "integrate" this with Linux, exactly? (or am I missing something.)

    1. Re:Stupid question probably by Degrees · · Score: 5, Informative
      A couple years ago, under Eric Schmidt, Novell started moving away from IPX/SPX and toward TCP/IP. Essentially, they had to re-write everything. But (to the smarter people at Novell) this was an opportunity - it let them separate the "services" from the transport. Thus, "NetWare" has really become another set of services, on top of (whatever) protocol you want.

      If you were to put a sniffer on my NetWare 5 network, you would see the File and Print services (and NCP services) are TCP/IP packets. The only thing that forces me to run IPX are the stupid JetDirect cards. But I digress.

      Currently, the NetWare OS is a set of NLMs (NetWare Loadable Modules). This is what they talk about when they say the NetWare 'kernel'. I'm pretty sure it is C code and some Assembler.

      The plan is that when you install NetWare 7, you will get your choice of 'kernels' - either the old NLM based one, or the new Linux 2.6 based one.

      And, since all the NetWare services will be / can be running on Linux - those services can be integrated into a Linux distibution.

      The most valuable Novell service is its eDirectory. They also have an application distribution product, ZENWorks; and of course their email system, GroupWise; a whole set of products that use the Directory for tailored access (BorderManager firewall, a web-portal product, biometric security, single-sign-on password management, iFolder file synchronization, and more).

      So the 'integration' is perhaps better described as porting what they do to both platforms. Your choice of kernel - but you will still be running eDirectory and other Novell services.

      Did I explain that well enough?

      --
      "The most sensible request of government we make is not, "Do something!" But "Quit it!"
  14. Now there's an interesting offer... by Coryoth · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the article:

    But if Microsoft open-sourced Windows, which Messman said he did not think would happen as this was a huge cash cow for the Redmond, Wash., software company, Novell would help its customers use open-source Windows if this happened and they wanted it, he added.

    If DeBeers starts giving away diamonds for free, we'll be sure to make sure our clients get some. In the event that a magic fairy inserts $50 billion into our bank account, we'll share that with our clients.

    Sure. Whatever.

    Jedidiah.

  15. that's some good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    with all the corporate support for OSS related projects, it is becoming a real contender on the server side against Microsoft. I wonder how much this eats into Microsoft's server sales they were counting on. Looks like all the "unix conversions" MS was counting on to continue their grow isn't going to happen. In fact looks they're gonna get hurt. The only real cash cow left for MS will be windows and office. Feel like the writing is on the way for the gradual and slow shift from world leader to just another player. MS won't die, but it will become less important as time goes on.

  16. iFolder is really cool by Degrees · · Score: 4, Interesting
    And the only thing missing was a Linux client, so this is good news.

    It will be nice when the NetWare server gets full Linux compatiblity. Really, it will be a Linux server that supports NetWare services - but the distinction won't matter.

    Personally, I would like to see the NetWare editor ported to Linux. I can't stand vi, and there really isn't a simple console (text-mode) editor geared for DOS/Windows users available on Linux. The NetWare EDIT program still fits the bill as arcane enough to not be yet-another-DOS-Edit clone, but does simple editing very easily. Cut-and-pastes between files, too. Its just a matter liking what you know.

    --
    "The most sensible request of government we make is not, "Do something!" But "Quit it!"
  17. That's it, Novell. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have gone from not caring about a single thing Novell has done to them being one of my favorite companies, ever.

    Buying Suse and Ximian, moving to Linux as a desktop, with OpenOffice.org? Then cancelling their most popular product for Linux? They seem very, very committed to F/OSS.

    This has got to be the first time I've ever said this about a company's reaction to Linux on slashdot, but they just, somehow, gained a customer, and a recommendation to friends.

    Congrats Novell, you've won my support, and the support of the entire Linux community.

    1. Re:That's it, Novell. by voideng · · Score: 4, Informative

      eDirectory hasn't been called NDS for a few years now,and eDirectory has been running on Linux/AIX/Solaris/HP-UX for a few years now. I beleive you can still get a 50k seat license for free. Although it is closed source, it is one of the best LDAP implementations avalible. Two large shops that are using eDirectory are the Star Alliance (a group of airlines) who uses it for customer tracking requireming a directory system for soem 300 million objects. The other big one I know of is CNN (take a look at the bottom of their page, powered by eDirectory). CNN did not allow for a fair comparison agianst the other directory systems, and they still won the contract, everytime you surf CNN their directory is updated.

  18. Nice by BCW2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I like Novell. In fact the rights and permissions are just like Unix or Linux: You have nothing until someone gives it to you.

    Isn't M$ major flaw in that area? You have everything until someone takes it away.

    A secure system or network is based on a sound philosophy. Notice the difference!

    --
    Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
    1. Re:Nice by ejdmoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      NTFS is not that way at all. Initial permissions are based on basically two things:
      1. If you own the file, you get full control.
      2. The rest of the permissions are *inherited* from their parent, assuming the parent is set up to propogate it's permissions. If you don't want to give everyone permissions to files in a certain folder, you have that folder set not to allow propogation.

      The fact is that linux (well, more properly, the associated file systems) are very limited in their permissions. It is often desirable, in a proper setup, to have the right people get permissions automatically, without having to give it to them! NTFS has advanced features that do a good job of staying out of the way until you need them.

      *duck*

    2. Re:Nice by askegg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, except that (in typical MS style) the ACL's are stamped onto EVERY folder and file. Making changes to file system security consumes vast amounts of CPU and thrashes the HDD. Plus, you can't assign secuity based on the AD structure (everyone is sales has read access to this directory). Only groups and users will do. Microsoft file system security os only a little better than Linux. Both still are missing very granular rights - try revoking permissions to list, read, rename, delete, copy or execute individually on these platforms.

      --
      I don't make predictions, and I never will.
  19. I still need convincing... by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...other that moving applications from NLM to ELF, I don't see any giant advantages to this on the server end. We already have apache, tomcat, ssh, etc, etc for Netware.
    And on the desktop, I have memories of Novell trying to take on MS once before and failing horribly. I'm skeptical. I can't see how any "synergy" with Linux will make Netware a better product than it already is--aside from the PR buzz it's getting and the goodwill from the Linux community.

    1. Re:I still need convincing... by fferreres · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The only difference this time, is many companies against MS for the first time on a single plataform push. That is, SUN, IBM, Novell, Sony (their are losing control of music distribution w/Linux, XBox a threat, etc.) Phillips, Oracle, Intel, SGI, Governments ... and many others already aligned or getting ready for it.

      This is not the same as IBM pushing OS/2, Novell Netware, SUN Solaris (as mandated OS), etc.

      Adn there is nothing Microsoft can do, because if MS wants to grow further, which is dificult, they need to pick many battles at once, and thats what they are actually doing, putting 70% of the IT SW and SRV companies against them. They need Oracle DB market, SUNs java (.NET), Novell Netware (LAN, they got them with NT), IBM's AIX and OS/2 (already done), the music industry, the hardware control (signed drivers? DRM?)...

      I say the IT WWI is in the preliminary phase.

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    2. Re:I still need convincing... by voideng · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The Netware threading model is signficantly better than the Linux model. Apache on Netware using the same hardware will out perform Linux. The test we ran about 6 weeks ago was RH AS 2.1 vs Netware 6.0 both were running Apache 2.0.

  20. Novell's 1st big gift to Open Source by jaylee7877 · · Score: 5, Informative

    iFolder is a major gift to the Linux community and is an excellent sign to me that Novell is committed to Open Source Model not just the "we're on the Linux boat" fad. Until you've used iFolder and seen your files move from desktop to desktop with little to no effort on your part, you just can't understand. It's seamless, it's secure and it's reliable. I encourage all of you to give it a try! Thanks for a great product and thanks for believing in the OSS community Novell!

  21. Please Novell, don't screw this one up by akajerry · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Novell has got a great position.

    1) They got tried and tested file, print, directory, and groupware services (including mail, calendar and secure IM services) - that's probably 50% of the windows server market right there

    2) They got good security and infrastructure management offerings. Microsoft can't even compete in this category.

    3) They got an enterprise class J2EE / Web Services platform from their SilverStream acquisition. (that's the other 50% of the windows market)

    4) They have their own linux distro now from SUSE

    5) They have a Linux on the desktop offering from Ximian

    6) They have a world class distribution, partners program and support organization with over a decade of experience.

    7) They've got a good core system integration group from CTP

    8) And they are trying to replicate the success of the Certified Netware Enginneer with the new Certified Linux Engineer program. (MSCE was a complete rip off of the NE program)

    Only one problem, they have managed to screw up every acquisition they did in the 90's.

    Please Novell, don't screw this one up. We're counting on you.

  22. Some people still run Novell networks by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... The ones who care about security.

    I work for a comapny that makes a network monitoring product so my sample may be skewed. Regardless, a lot of people would probably be surprised how many networks still use Novell to handle their network logins, file sharing, etc. becuase its more secure than Windows. Some of this may be security through obscurity but the answer we consistently get when we ask people why they still run Netware is that its more secure.

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
  23. Novell topic icon? by mj01nir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OK, so now can Novell get their own topic? Please? I mean, Corel still has their own topic.

    Throw us old Novell guys a bone willya?

    --
    the no .sig .sig
  24. Re:Not flamin, honest question. by Paladin128 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Whats not to like about that? Why do I need Linux?

    The future. The Netware kernel is aging, and cost of continuing hardware support is high. By using Linux, Novell gets a wider range of hardware support largely for free. They also get to capitalize on other open source software, like Samba, rather than implementing thier own CIFS layer.

    If it ain't broke, don't fix it, by any means! However, in 5-10 years when you outgrow your current setup, you'll be happy that Novell switched to the Linux kernel for Netware. They can now focus on innovating more in the userland stuff, and take comfort in the fact that almost all new hardware they'd want to use will be supported by the community.

    --
    Lex orandi, lex credendi.