Slashdot Mirror


NASA Tests X-43A

An anonymous reader writes "NASA TV has live coverage of the launch of the X-43A scram jet flight. Hopes are that the unmanned vehicle will reach speeds in excess of mach 7-10. The last flight a few years ago failed." Stephen Watts sends this link for X-43A background information.

21 of 263 comments (clear)

  1. Nooooooooo!!! by pwroberts · · Score: 5, Funny

    Noooo, don't Slashdot it, you insensitive clods!

    I was getting a great feed of the boring pre-launch stuff for the last 2 hours, now y'all'll've gone and ruined it ;-(

    1. Re:Nooooooooo!!! by Gogo+Dodo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Use the Windows Media Player feed, nobody on /. will ever be using that. Or they won't admit it...

  2. Re:launch it allready! *dammit* by xenocyst · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and destroy it again because they forgot something
    good idea

    --
    And, no, I should not have used the goddamn Preview mode first.
  3. awesome picts by aarku · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nasa has a lot of interesting pictures of the X-43A posted.

  4. Speed doesn't matter by elFarto+the+2nd · · Score: 5, Funny

    Even if its moving at mach 7...we can still slashdot it!

    Regards
    elFarto

  5. $185 million dollar project... by levram2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...and they can't show a readable countdown timer on the screen.

  6. play by play by aarku · · Score: 4, Informative

    "All stations we are a go for launch at this time..."
    "10 seconds launch on my mark"
    "5 4 3 2 1 launch"
    "Ignition!"
    "Guidance on"
    "we are supersonic"
    (bunch of everything is nominal)
    past mach 3
    separation of booster
    fuel is off
    recovery complete
    "Good job"
    "Really pretty"

  7. Launch by Senjutsu · · Score: 4, Informative

    Success. Launch and recovery went off without a hitch. There's a lot of happy looking people in control right now.

  8. How does this help? by /dev/trash · · Score: 4, Insightful

    it all uses the same bandwidth pool right?

  9. Mach Freakin' 5 by Goyuix · · Score: 4, Informative
  10. Re:mach 5?!? by technoid_ · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thats one fast RV. I thought 110mph in a Winnebago was fast, but this beats that hand down.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but 3 lefts do - Lew of GO magazine
  11. Amusing terminology by RedDirt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I had to laugh out-loud when one of the NASA folks (S2?) referred to the B52 as a BUFF. (Air Force jargon: Big Ugly Fat Fscker ...)

    Still chuckling a bit. =)

    --
    James
  12. Re:Not that fast by Drathus · · Score: 5, Informative

    > Mach 5 is kinda meh. X15-A2 did mach 6.8 with pilot, in the 1960's

    Yes, it did. However the scram jet is a significant improvement just in terms of fuel savings. Not having to carry the oxygen itself and having the system work means more then the final speed it reached.

  13. Re:Passed Mach 5 before the loss of signal by More+Trouble · · Score: 4, Informative
    The X15A-2 was a rocket. To wit:

    The X-15 engine was an XLR-99 single chamber rocket. It produced 60,000 pounds of thrust and it burned 18,000 pounds of liquid oxygen and anhydrous ammonia in 85 seconds. The propellants were fed by a steam driven turbopump; the source of the steam was hydrogen peroxide decomposed by passing through a silver screen catalyst bed.

    What they tested today doesn't carry oxygen, instead scooping it out of the atmosphere.

    :w
  14. It broke the speed record... by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 4, Informative
  15. Re:Launch successful by Rick.C · · Score: 4, Funny
    Tests completed through Mach 5, it seems. I thought this would go to Mach 7?

    Well yeah, but that's with overclocking.

    --
    You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
    "Math in a song is good."-Linford
  16. Ramjet != Scramjet by linoleo · · Score: 4, Informative

    From Wikipedia:

    When the air inside a ramjet exceeds the speed of sound (meaning an aircraft speed of around Mach 5+) combustion fails to occur properly. This is overcome in a scramjet (supersonic combustion ramjet). Scramjets are a new concept still in the research stages. Usually, the inlet is much wider (typically the entire underside of the craft) so the compression is less and the air remains at supersonic speeds. Some designs use reactive chemicals or gases other than standard jet fuel. Normally, the design of the jet is much more complex. Like a ramjet the scramjet must already be moving extremely fast before it will start working, but theoretically, speeds in excess of Mach 20 are possible.

    --
    Be faithful to your obsessions. Identify them and be faithful to them, let them guide you like a sleepwalker. JG Ballard
  17. Childhood Memories... by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Circumfrence of Earth / Mach 5

    It would take about 6 and a half hours to get from here and back again.

    So in "Hare We Go" when Bugs Bunny threw the baseball around the world to show Christopher Columbus that the world is round, he threw the ball at about Mach 785 or so. Somehow he managed to put enough spin on it that it orbited the planet, the natives applied the stickers, AND he caught the ball.

  18. Re:Not that fast by Moofie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You are wrong.

    A supersonic combusting ramjet is way way way incredibly more technically challenging than a regular ramjet.

    Managing the shock wave systems to provide adequate fuel mixing and ignition is only barely possible today with the biggest computer simulations on the planet.

    I don't know what you consider "revolutionary", but sustained supersonic combustion is a Really Big Deal.

    --
    Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  19. More Details on Successful Flight by Pooua · · Score: 4, Informative
    "EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE, California: An experimental X-43 pilotless plane has broken the world speed record for an atmospheric engine, briefly flying at 7,700 kilometers (4,780 miles) per hour -- seven times the speed of sound, NASA said.

    "The hypersonic aircraft, a cross between a jet and a rocket, was dropped from the wing of a modified B-52 bomber, boosted by an auxiliary rocket to an altitude of nearly 100,000 feet (30,000 meters) and flew on its own power for 10 seconds, said the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

    "After the 10-second test firing, the X-43A glided through the atmosphere conducting a series of aerodynamic maneuvers for about six minutes before plunging into the Pacific Ocean, as planned."

    Channel News Asia: Experimental hypersonic aircraft breaks world speed record, flies at Mach 7

    "A minute before 2 p.m., the craft was dropped from 40,000 feet. A few seconds later, the rocket flared, boosting the jet skyward on a streak of flame and light. At about 100,000 feet, the rocket was dropped away.

    "The scramjet then took over, using up about two pounds of gaseous hydrogen fuel before it glided and then plunged into the Pacific Ocean about 400 miles off the California coast."

    Mercury News: Preliminary data shows NASA jet streaked 5,000 mph in test flight

    --
    Taking stuff apart since 1969 (TM)
  20. Re:Free ramjet? by rebelcool · · Score: 4, Informative

    probably wouldnt need to. The speed it would impact the ocean would bash the hell out of it.

    Scramjets are very simple (mechanically) devices. No moving parts. However, they are geometrically, extremely complex and precise. The speed it would hit the ocean would damage the combustion chamber to the extent it would be about as useful as a scramjet made from a tin can.

    --

    -