NetBSD Packages Collection Releases A New Branch
jschauma writes "On behalf of the pkgsrc team, Alistair
Crooks announced today that a new pkgsrc-2004Q1 branch of the NetBSD Packages
Collection was created last night, and the freeze on committing to the
pkgsrc trunk is now over. This branch, which includes some 4518
actively-maintained and supported packages, introduces a self-hosted pkgsrc
infrstructure as part of the ever growing support of even more operating
systems as well as a number of other goodies. Please see Alistair's
message to the netbsd-announce mailing list for details."
Wantss the FROSTY PISS, we do! Must gets uss that preciouss FROSTY PISS!
Which one died first Open, Net or Free ?
FreeBSD
NetBSD
OpenBSD
'All the *BSD is dying posts are contained in this one post'
Thankyou for merging these posts into a coherent and well thought out argument for the adoption of Linux in the corporate server and home desktop markets.
Slashdots reputation and continuing value as a source of relevent information and its unbiased support for all things open source are an inspiration to me. - Mr KnightCap.
Remember the episode when Kenny was zombified ?
His dead corpse dropped his arm in front of an old wonman who called it cute.
I suppose the same thing happend here.
Dead corpses tend to "branch" bits out.
Slashdot has to post BSD stories once in a while so they can act like a sponge for the retards to ruin and keep them from ruining all the other stories. The comments are useless on any BSD story, due to retard concentration. Allowing Anonymous posts doesn't help anything.
HitScan
From Improving
Passive Packet Capture: Beyond Device Polling.
"Linux, a very popular OS used for running network appliances,
performs very poorly with respect to other OSs used in the same
test" (FreeBSD and Win2k).
"The Linux kernel module is almost as fast as the userspace
FreeBSD application".
Percentage of packets captured (in user space), using device polling, at
80,000 packets per second? Linux 5.6%, FreeBSD 99.9%. Linux manages
99.5% only using a kernel module.
SO LINUX MUST GO TO KERNEL SPACE TO ALMOST BE AS FAST AS FREEBSD
WITHIN USER SPACE!
Maybe if you BSD is dying trolls stopped crapping on here about BSD
dying and instead actually learned a language apt for your OS of choice,
you might actually be able to bring Linux up to "dead status" with the
BSD's.
But wait, it gets worse! While trying to capture packets from a
DoS application, Linux could only manage capture rates of 0.8% in user
space and 9.7% in kernel space, while FreeBSD managed 74.7% in user
space!
"FreeBSD performs much better than Linux"
"it is obvious that a vanilla FreeBSD systems is much more
efficient than a vanilla Linux system when used for packet
capture."