Slashdot Mirror


Sony Hints on PS3, PSP, and PS2 Plans

jaaron writes "The Register/GamesIndustry.biz reports on what Sony may have in store in terms of gaming hardware for E3, and according to remarks from Sony Computer Entertainment Europe president David Reeves: 'PSP games will probably be region-free, that PS3 will be intrinsically linked with PSX and may appear in home server and standalone gaming versions, and... Sony may announce a stripped down, PSone-style PlayStation 2 product.'" The interview also mentions: "Looking further ahead, Reeves spoke about Sony's 'ultimate goal' for PlayStation 3 - 'to get into electronic broadband distribution'."

3 of 230 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Thought on region free by Eu4ria · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Especially if they also allow any code to run on the system and maybe even make an SDK available. That way anybody could make homebrew stuff for the system and thus seel even more units.

  2. Re:What I'd like to see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > US $50 is simply too much for a new PS2 game.

    Really? How much time do you spend with a typical game?

    Considering going to a movie for 90 minutes is usually going to set you back at least $15 when you include admission and transportation, good video games are a bargain. I've logged hundreds of hours playing Ratchet and Clank, Socom II, and Dynasty Warriors alone.

  3. Yeah, its sounds like standard Sony marketing by *weasel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This sounds more like Sony marketing to me. Remember all the promises they made regarding the PS2, during the run-up to, and launch of, the Dreamcast?

    This is likely just Sony throwing smoke to steal the thunder from Microsoft, and snow the existing Sony userbase into thinking the PS3 will be much better than it really will be (just like PS2 v DC).

    Either way, two versions of the same console would be gimmicky at best. It'd have the same problem all add-on hardware does: developers can't count on possibly expanded functionality being there on every box, so they don't spend time/money to leverage it in a meaningful way.

    So there would be no reason for the average consumer to buy a psx+ps3 instead of just buying a ps3 and a tivo.

    Perhaps they're trying to push microsoft and nintendo into budling expensive multifunction bits into their boxes -- allowing sony to punish them on unit price and take the 'high-road' of selling a box that 'just does games'.

    Likely the only way Sony will 'screw up' the PS3 and allow Nintendo/MS to reclaim some of the market due their own bad decisions - is if the Cell continues to be behind, and they show up late to market with an outmatched product.

    It's much more likely that any market share reclaimed by Nintendo/MS will be due /their/ own maneuvering - as opposed to Sony screwups.

    --
    // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"