Slashdot Mirror


Canadian Minister Promises to Fix Copyright Law

Mashiki writes "In Canada, we can download Mp3's and their assorted goodness without too much of a hassle, recently the CRIA and their friends lost the court case. Well, it would appear that the new Federal Heritage Minister Helene Scherre, has spoken and those words were: 'As minister of Canadian Heritage, I will, as quickly as possible, make changes to our copyright law.'"

7 of 569 comments (clear)

  1. CDR Tax by Alternate+Interior · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So does that mean the CD-R Tax disappears?

    /not canadian

  2. If you're in Canada (like me) reminder her... by barc0001 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That a federal election isn't that far off... And slogans like "Helene Scherre wants to put your kids in prison" look great on T-shirts and the news...

    1. Re:If you're in Canada (like me) reminder her... by Ubernurd · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Here's what I just told her:

      Record labels and stores make most of the money from CD sales in stores while most musicians make their money from CD's and merchendise sold at the side of the stage at live events. Attendance is determined by the popularity of the band and without p2p filesharing, many Canadian bands wouldn't be as well known as they are. Canada is a sparsely populated landmass and it's expensive to tour. mp3's are the best way to reach the most people to boost attendance. So are you truly looking out for my best interests (I'm a Canadian musician with 3 Cd's in stores) or are you catering to the labels lobbying for legislation?

      --
      Stack overflow: pid 352258, proc httpd, addr 0x11f7ffff0, pc 0x12000195c Segmentation fault (core dumped)
  3. Malcolm has the right idea by silvaran · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Fair enough. Some people download music, some people don't. But consider his quote:

    "I think it's a challenge for the industry, to try and find a new way to survive."

    This lends creedence to many a /.'ers comment that the music industry is holding onto a failing business. We don't need them anymore. Despite being wrapped up in the industry by being the winner of a [cheap knock-off] American Idol* contest, he sees the Industry's role as "a new way to survive," as opposed to some criminal challenge that they must overcome.

    My hats off to him, especially given his previous quote, "Whether people download or not, as long as they're listening to music."

    * Yes, I'm a Canadian. Paul Martin has yet to earn my respect.

  4. Re:No power. by janbjurstrom · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The bottom line is that we pay levies now to download music, and the music industry shouldn't be able to make us pay levies and buy music.

    This is very bizarre, isn't it. In my country, alcohol is treated in this way: artificially high taxes (meant, in this case, to keep consumption down - for national health reasons, they say), and laws against making your own (for the same reasons, manage consumption).

    Ok, the analogy might not be perfect - but shall we treat music as a barely legal drug?

    --
    668.5
  5. Re:WTF???? by pla · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So in what world is putting a file ... in a publicly shared folder for others to obtain _not_ a violation of the copyright act?

    The actual ruling read more like an extreme interpretation of "plausible deniability". Basically, while we geeks might laugh at the idea of "accidentally" leaving files in a shared directory, the masses of computer users often really don't understand the difference between what makes the choice of where to keep their music legal or illegal. Additionally, as several of the RIAA's suits showed, some people believe that paying for Kazaa means they have paid for access to the music.

    Sounds stupid? Sure, to us. But if the majority of people doing this honestly do not understand whether or not they have broken the law, the law becomes essentially unenforceable. As one possible Devil's Advocate situation, I can imagine someone installing Kazaa for some random legal purpose, then deciding to store all their own legally ripped music in the directory Kazaa conveniently made for them.


    Downloading copyrighted materials may be perfectly legal in Canada (albeit unethical

    Actually, I'd disagree about the "unethical". Canada has really quite high taxes on all blank recording media, a sort of "we assume you'll copy our stuff, so get your money in the blanks" approach to piracy. Thus, since the punishment comes built-in to the media itself (whether or not they use it to pirate music doesn't change the "tax"), you could reasonably call it perfectly moral to go ahead and commit a crime already paid for.

  6. Re:Gee... by Phekko · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Haven't you ever heard of price fixing? This should be something along the same lines ;)

    From the beginning of CD times, the price to manufacture a CD record has gone down all the time. Yet I haven't witnessed a single price drop in CD prices. Somehow the laws of supply and demand don't work in the record industry and I fail to see how this is not a monopoly/cartel. Think about it: Same companies all over the world. About the same price levels everywhere, regardless of record company or country.

    Yes, I do believe politicians are indeed "fixing" things for the record industry. What else is new? Recording industry is just too powerful. The real question is what to do about it. My ignorant answer is that bands should become independent entreprenours and forget about the record companies altogether. 100% is a lot more than 5% or 10% even if you lower your prices a bit. I don't know what the current percentage of profits for the bands is but I do believe some the OSS principles could be applied to the music industry and the rest would be pretty simple to work out with common sense. Or then I'm puffing on the wrong ciggie again.

    --

    Sigs for Nerds. Sigs that Matter.