Slashdot Mirror


Nvidia Drivers Enforce Macrovision's Rules

Ant writes "According to 'Nvidia Macrovision DVD-TV rules forced on consumers', Nvidia drivers 41.09 and onwards include 'stringent checks' to comply with Macrovision requirements. That could mean if you have a TV encoder that does not support Macrovision, you may well get an error message depending on what DVD software player you are using, the company has said."

17 of 306 comments (clear)

  1. This has been here for a while by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those of us with older nvidia cards, this means we can't watch dvds anymore! thankfully you can use DVD Idle to get around this.

    1. Re:This has been here for a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      thankfully you can use DVD Idle to get around this.

      Yes, thankfully we can spend money on software to re-enable functionality that was purposefully broken.

      I am really just so thankful.

    2. Re:This has been here for a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I was not aware that nvidia cards forced you to install every driver update.

      This isn't insightful, just dickish. Driver updates do a lot more than just add copy protection - they increase performance and fix bugs, too.

      Yes, you could keep running your detonator 40s without upgrading, and that's probably a great solution for people running old, integrated chipset or underpowered cards. But for the majority of nvidia driver users it's not useful advice at all. Good luck playing Far Cry, or any other new game on pre-41.09 drivers. Hamstringing a video card that costs twice as much or more than your average game console, so that it can't ably play games anymore, is not an acceptable solution.

      There's no reason to play apologist here or to tell people to stop complaining. The complaint is just, and the situation fixable. If you don't have anything useful to contribute... don't contribute at all.

  2. Great move ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...for ATI.

    1. Re:Great move ! by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 5, Interesting

      ...and for the people using open-source drivers

      Let's see how the "nvidia are great, we trust their binary drivers" fanboys react to this one...

  3. Non free badness by James_Duncan8181 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    And this is why I only run stuff with free drivers...

    Time for thanks for the DRI team, methinks.

    --
    "To any truly impartial person, it would be obvious that I am right."
    1. Re:Non free badness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Unfortunately it seems there are no free drivers that support 3D acceleration for anything but the lowest end and older graphics cards. The "nv" driver for nvidia cards only supports 2d, and the "radeon" driver (from DRI) only supports 3d acceleration in the Radeon 9200 and below - not 9500/9600/9700/9800.

      What this means is if you want to play 3D games in Linux, you have to use non-free drivers. I *wish* there was some hardware out there that was mid-range and had free drivers!

      Having said all that, I believe the article is about Windows, rather than Linux, though the restrictions might also exist on the Linux binary-only nvidia drivers.

    2. Re:Non free badness by ZorinLynx · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This makes me wonder how much NVidia got bribed to enforce this stuff.

      I mean, why would a company like NV bother with this unless there was a financial incentive?

      It seems rather silly, overall. Why would anyone want to copy a DVD to a VHS tape? It pretty much kills the picture quality and destroys any special features the DVD might have had. Especially when you can just copy the raw MPEG stream from the disc!

  4. Just wait by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 5, Informative

    Somebody will keep hacking the reference drivers and put them online.

    Right now I'm using a different tool to circumvent various dvd protections.
    DVDIdle, no regions, no Macrovision, no nothing and it even lets me skip those annoying warnings "Thou shalt not reproduce this disc"

    --
    This is the sig that says NI (again)
  5. This is news? by Jarnis · · Score: 5, Informative

    The article is over an year old. (March 20, *2003*)

    Current nVidia drivers are 56.xx series.

    'News' indeed...

    1. Re:This is news? by borgdows · · Score: 5, Funny

      Slashdot new motto: Oldies for Nerds. Stuff that doesn't matter anymore!

  6. almost hesitate to mention it by _Shorty-dammit · · Score: 5, Interesting

    for fear of reprisal towards them/him, but TVTool works just fine for disabling Macrovision with NVIDIA cards. At least with the GF3 in my HTPC machine I get no complaints from any DVD player software with TVTool's Macrovision disable option turned on. And I've been updating its drivers with every official release up until 53.03, just got lazy with the post-53.03 releases cuz everything works.

  7. Re:ATI Radeon DVD Player and copy protection by DgWatters0 · · Score: 5, Informative
    P.S. I wish there was a digital freedom fighters group with a PayPal account.

    How about the good old EFF? They claim to be "defending freedom in the digital world" which is exactly what you wished for. You can join or just donate and choose paypal as payment method.

  8. Re:ATI 4 life! by Curtman · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have heard, that ATI somehow "supports" opensource communities - or at least gives them more information, than NVidia team.

    Used to support the open source communities would be more like it. I've been using ATI cards for as long as I can remember.

    There was a time when ATI did things for us like funding Precision Insight to develop the open source Radeon driver in the first place. They used to be very good about providing specifications, although under an NDA which for some bizarre reason they require developers to sign, but allow them to publish drivers based on their contents. At the time they were the underdog in the 3D graphics market though.

    Now a days though, they don't fund any OSS development, and provide a binary driver instead. They will not give you specifications for any cards until they are close to their end-of-life. DRI and Gatos have done great work despite this, but ATI shouldn't be congratulated on today's treatment of the open source community.

    They still do have specs available from the developer relations page under NDA. But I doubt you'll get anything from them that would be considered current hardware.

  9. The sum total of my experience with Macrovision by JessLeah · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I tend to use a lot of odd/eclectic combinations of hardware. Once, I had an old Apple II RGB monitor (with an RCA-style plug in the back) which I used to display DVD video output from an old Creative Labs DxR2 decoder. Until I disabled Macrovision, I could not watch the movies I legally paid for (<sarcasm>from Wal-Mart, like a Good American(TM)</sarcasm>). So I had to break the law to watch what I legally paid for. (For the record, I was also using a Linux box to play the DVD, so <sarcasm>obviously I'm some sort of evil hacker criminal</sarcasm>).

    At another point, I had a set-top DVD player, and was trying to use it with an old TV player which had only a coaxial RF input. So at first I passed the signal through a VCR, which of course made Macrovision wreck the signal (image fading in and out, just like in the previous example). Until I scrapped an old Nintendo RF adaptor (which is probably DMCA-illegal for some convoluted reason also-- I mean, hell ,<sarcasm>'Consumers' have no right to open up products they paid for</sarcasm>) and rebuilt it into a generalized RCA-to-coax adaptor suitable for use on the DVD player, I couldn't play my (again legally paid for at a Good American Retail Outlet(TM)) DVDs.

    So, let's review. Macrovision has made it more difficult for me to play legally-owned DVDs. And it's pissed me off even more at the MPAA for getting in bed with those fucktards. So... what, again, does Macrovision do to decrease piracy? I can testify that it makes me more interested in disobeying the MPAA cartel's stupid rules, since all it seems to do is annoy people and force them to buy (or build) more equipment...

  10. They certainly are good at screwing themselves... by Featureless · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Content Trust(tm) has decreed that "the analog hole must be plugged." They must somehow enjoy this quixotic quest, chasing all over the countryside playing whack-a-mole with the work of so many individuals (and the products of so many companies so much bigger than they). And they've even showed up at nvidia's doorstep. "Look, you want to be in the video card business, not the lawsuit business. Are you sure you want to endanger your relationship with Mr. Capone?"

    Meet our friend Mr. Macrovision. Phew, another glorious victory for the Content Trust(tm) over the Stupid/Evil Consumer(tm)!

    What's positively hilarious about this is that no one gives a shit about copying content back to analog. Hello - it's 2004, people. This perfectly exemplifies the stuck-in-the-distantly-receeding-past mentality these guys have. Analog hole? What about the gaping digital hole? People who bother are copying straight to their computer! Fully 3/4 of the people reading this probably haven't used their VCRs since they last dusted off the video store's copy of Capricorn One.

    Yet the Trust still races around showing everyone who's boss. That Macrovision protection is important! Ignore it at your peril! Hah.

    All this will accomplish is that more people who use their computer with their TV are going to have a problem.

    And those people will get angry. Who wouldn't? What an insult! They will soon learn about the foreign, boring field of intellectual property law - it's neither so foreign nor so boring anymore. They'll also learn about the messy campaign the Content Trust(tm) is running to hijack it.

    They will find that, to watch their own videos, they need to go into the back alley, to meet the Dread Pirates(tm)... only, look how friendly and helpful they are. "I think I'll remember them - I'll probably be back again soon."

  11. Re:Alternatives... by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    There are alternatives to Nvidia. No one is forcing you to use Nvidia hardware.

    That sounds like the excuse people get when they protest about Bush taking away their freedoms. Nobody's forcing you to live here you know, you could move to Canada hippie. The fact of the matter is, in the desktop graphics world Nvidia and ATI cards are the only viable options. The rest of the stuff out there is crap hardware-wise. Unfortunately both of these platforms are encumbered with binary-only drivers.

    Sure, there was a day when Matrox ruled the roost, but the days of 2D-only use are long gone by most people. Anyone hoping to play games will need to purchase an Nvidia or ATI card. Matrox is only good for spreadsheets, word processing, and CAD.