Slashdot Mirror


Nvidia Drivers Enforce Macrovision's Rules

Ant writes "According to 'Nvidia Macrovision DVD-TV rules forced on consumers', Nvidia drivers 41.09 and onwards include 'stringent checks' to comply with Macrovision requirements. That could mean if you have a TV encoder that does not support Macrovision, you may well get an error message depending on what DVD software player you are using, the company has said."

52 of 306 comments (clear)

  1. This has been here for a while by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those of us with older nvidia cards, this means we can't watch dvds anymore! thankfully you can use DVD Idle to get around this.

    1. Re:This has been here for a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      thankfully you can use DVD Idle to get around this.

      Yes, thankfully we can spend money on software to re-enable functionality that was purposefully broken.

      I am really just so thankful.

    2. Re:This has been here for a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For those of us with older nvidia cards, this means we can't watch dvds anymore!

      I was not aware that nvidia cards forced you to install every driver update.

    3. Re:This has been here for a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I was not aware that nvidia cards forced you to install every driver update.

      This isn't insightful, just dickish. Driver updates do a lot more than just add copy protection - they increase performance and fix bugs, too.

      Yes, you could keep running your detonator 40s without upgrading, and that's probably a great solution for people running old, integrated chipset or underpowered cards. But for the majority of nvidia driver users it's not useful advice at all. Good luck playing Far Cry, or any other new game on pre-41.09 drivers. Hamstringing a video card that costs twice as much or more than your average game console, so that it can't ably play games anymore, is not an acceptable solution.

      There's no reason to play apologist here or to tell people to stop complaining. The complaint is just, and the situation fixable. If you don't have anything useful to contribute... don't contribute at all.

    4. Re:This has been here for a while by DrXym · · Score: 4, Informative

      Or use VideoLan and never have to put up with Macrovision / regional encoding shit ever again.

  2. Great move ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...for ATI.

    1. Re:Great move ! by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 5, Interesting

      ...and for the people using open-source drivers

      Let's see how the "nvidia are great, we trust their binary drivers" fanboys react to this one...

    2. Re:Great move ! by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 3, Funny

      3:00pm: "Let's see how the "nvidia are great, we trust their binary drivers" fanboys react to this one..."

      3:10pm: "Score:0, Flamebait"

      Guess that answers that question.

  3. Non free badness by James_Duncan8181 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    And this is why I only run stuff with free drivers...

    Time for thanks for the DRI team, methinks.

    --
    "To any truly impartial person, it would be obvious that I am right."
    1. Re:Non free badness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Unfortunately it seems there are no free drivers that support 3D acceleration for anything but the lowest end and older graphics cards. The "nv" driver for nvidia cards only supports 2d, and the "radeon" driver (from DRI) only supports 3d acceleration in the Radeon 9200 and below - not 9500/9600/9700/9800.

      What this means is if you want to play 3D games in Linux, you have to use non-free drivers. I *wish* there was some hardware out there that was mid-range and had free drivers!

      Having said all that, I believe the article is about Windows, rather than Linux, though the restrictions might also exist on the Linux binary-only nvidia drivers.

    2. Re:Non free badness by James_Duncan8181 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      >The "nv" driver for nvidia cards only supports >2d, and the "radeon" driver (from DRI) only >supports 3d acceleration in the Radeon 9200 and >below - not 9500/9600/9700/9800. This is true. The nv dirver is currently *very* limited. I know that the 9200 will run UT2004 fine though - what more do you need on a Linux box? Much as I wish it were otherwise, the only thing on the scene that may stretch this is Doom 3, and if you want that I would reccomend waiting till launch date to buy as I have heard rumours that specs may eventually come out of ATI for the higher end chipsets.

      --
      "To any truly impartial person, it would be obvious that I am right."
    3. Re:Non free badness by ZorinLynx · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This makes me wonder how much NVidia got bribed to enforce this stuff.

      I mean, why would a company like NV bother with this unless there was a financial incentive?

      It seems rather silly, overall. Why would anyone want to copy a DVD to a VHS tape? It pretty much kills the picture quality and destroys any special features the DVD might have had. Especially when you can just copy the raw MPEG stream from the disc!

    4. Re:Non free badness by BillyBlaze · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Even if the Linux binary drivers have this restriction, it wouldn't really matter. The way it works is, in order to license DVD playback technology, software must comply with a bunch of restrictions - region locking, not skipping ads or warnings, and telling the graphics card to turn on Macrovision (so you can't record the TV-out on a VCR). And now these NVidia cards won't tell the software Macrovision is on when it really isn't, so the software will refuse to play the DVD.

      The upshot is, if you use an unlicensed DVD player, like MPlayer, Ogle, or VLC, it will never even try to turn on Macrovision, so the driver change will have no effect. Granted, this may be illegal, in the Land of the Free at least. (IANAL)

    5. Re:Non free badness by rsmith-mac · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This makes me wonder how much NVidia got bribed to enforce this stuff.

      The real question is if it was a bribe, or a threat? Certainly, Macrovision and the DVD-forum wouldn't be too happy about a product not supporting Macrovision, so how likely would it be that they could/would attack Nvidia over their cards not supporting Macrovision? There's certainly a decent case for claiming that non-compliant cards are copyright removal device, setting Nvidia up for a DMCA suit.

    6. Re:Non free badness by riprjak · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because macrovision is so important on a computer; I know that there are hunders of pirates out there with videos plugged in to the macrovision disabled TV out on their pc's just recording high quality DVD's onto vhs, watching and intently pausing and skipping adverts and messages.

      Naturally none of these guys ever just decrypts the data on the dvd, strips out just the movie and audio track and re-encodes in onto a vcd or dvd4 with an automagic program, no, as this is clearly much more difficult;

      Face it, Macrovision is done, obsolete; It is no longer an impediment, or even reasonable barrier to copy protection; its only remaining function is to prevent FAIR USE.

      As with my CD's, I rip all of my DVDs into divx files which I store on the hard drive of my HTPC so I can choose the video/audio I want from the comfort of the sofa; this is perfectly legal in Australia, we call it "media shifting"; for those of you in the US, I believe this is called "Piracy". You see, we still have to comit a crime before we get punished for it down here ;)

      Once upon a time, there was a Land of the Free, called the United States of America, where such freedoms were protected by law; but then an evil fairy by the name of Bono came along and stole all of those freedoms in the name of keeping a mouse eared tool of Nazi Propaganda in the hands of a large corporation (lets not think about why you would want to continue to own such a thing)long after the death of its misguided creator; now those who love freedom must run to hallowed sanctuaries like Australia or New Zealand, where we are still free... thought the dark evil stain of North American Copyright Law has leapt the big pond and now begins to tarnish our beautiful Australia; man, New Zealand is going to be crowded soon :)

      wow, where did that soapbox come from???
      sorry guys :)
      err!
      jak

  4. Long live... by Lord+of+Ironhand · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... binary drivers!

  5. Then I guess... by freidog · · Score: 4, Informative

    it's a good thing, older Nvidia drivers are so easily found.

  6. Never had a problem like this... by thrill12 · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...using 44.09 drivers under 2000.
    Then again, I am using TVTool to get my Nvidia card to go TV-out in full-screen and without macrovision. Not that I need the last one, never interested in copying DVD to VHS anyway.

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
  7. Just wait by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 5, Informative

    Somebody will keep hacking the reference drivers and put them online.

    Right now I'm using a different tool to circumvent various dvd protections.
    DVDIdle, no regions, no Macrovision, no nothing and it even lets me skip those annoying warnings "Thou shalt not reproduce this disc"

    --
    This is the sig that says NI (again)
  8. This is news? by Jarnis · · Score: 5, Informative

    The article is over an year old. (March 20, *2003*)

    Current nVidia drivers are 56.xx series.

    'News' indeed...

    1. Re:This is news? by borgdows · · Score: 5, Funny

      Slashdot new motto: Oldies for Nerds. Stuff that doesn't matter anymore!

  9. The marketplace is robust by heironymouscoward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And resists such attempts to regulate its behaviour.

    By the same token, producers will continue to try to force their consumers into certain directions.

    It's just part of the grand evolutionary struggle between producers and consumers that has resulted in such wonderful things as P2P and the DCMA.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
  10. revelations from my desk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. People will get around it as fast as they bring it in.

    2. Nvidia will sell a few less units because of this, (what a foolish business strategy). God, have they not heard of a successful strategy called "Ethics?, profit is prime"

    3. Macrovision is a bit pointless when you can rip the dvd straight from the dvdrom drive. Having it there will save the film industry sum in total ZERO.

    These obvious statements have been brought to you by another anonymous coward.

    1. Re:revelations from my desk by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 4, Insightful
      However, implementing DRM isn't unethical, in fact, it is easily argued that it IS ethical to try to stop people from using your product to break the law


      When I buy a videotape I pay a levy due to the fact that I have a right to make a personal copy of a copyrighted work on it.


      How is it ethical for the movie industrie and hardware producers to take away that possibility while on the other side I AM PAYING FOR IT ???


      Sorry but it is not ethical, and it doesn't stop piracy either, never did.

  11. Re:Restrictions on playing DVDs by Malc · · Score: 3, Informative

    Recent versions of WinDVD choke frequently choke on my system with Macrovision errors. They don't seem to happen every time though. This also affects any product that ends up using WinDVD's DShow filters. A rather old Mediamatics DVMatics player works fine every time though. Their DShow filters still work really well after all these years too. Great little player. I have a GeForce DDR 256 in my system. I used TVTool 8 to toggle the TV out on and off, which got the WinDVD stuff working at one point.

  12. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It is much funnier to watch people get all wound up over this like it actually impacts their petty, misinformed existences.

  13. ATI Radeon DVD Player and copy protection by danila · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Copied from here:

    I was just reading about the DVD player included with the ATI Radeon All In Wonder series. It says that screen captures and other things I might want to do will not function if the DVD is copy protected. Here is the quote from the ATI document -

    Recording from a Source Encoded with Analog Copy Protection

    The ATI ALL-IN-WONDER? products detect analog copy protection on the input source and will refuse to capture video from such sources. The record button automatically becomes disabled. Further, TV-ON-DEMAND is not possible with an analog copy protected source.

    Since for all practical purposes there are only two video-card manufacturers and both of them enforce Macrovision DRM, I have no other choice than avoid buying DVDs, at least the legit ones. So it's DivX or DVD-R from P2P or a pirated DVD.

    P.S. I wish there was a digital freedom fighters group with a PayPal account.

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    1. Re:ATI Radeon DVD Player and copy protection by DgWatters0 · · Score: 5, Informative
      P.S. I wish there was a digital freedom fighters group with a PayPal account.

      How about the good old EFF? They claim to be "defending freedom in the digital world" which is exactly what you wished for. You can join or just donate and choose paypal as payment method.

    2. Re:ATI Radeon DVD Player and copy protection by Wyzard · · Score: 3, Informative
      I wish there was a digital freedom fighters group with a PayPal account.

      http://www.eff.org/

  14. almost hesitate to mention it by _Shorty-dammit · · Score: 5, Interesting

    for fear of reprisal towards them/him, but TVTool works just fine for disabling Macrovision with NVIDIA cards. At least with the GF3 in my HTPC machine I get no complaints from any DVD player software with TVTool's Macrovision disable option turned on. And I've been updating its drivers with every official release up until 53.03, just got lazy with the post-53.03 releases cuz everything works.

  15. EFF by YetAnotherName · · Score: 4, Informative

    EFF

    PayPal accepted, amongst other methods.

  16. Re:ATI 4 life! by Curtman · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have heard, that ATI somehow "supports" opensource communities - or at least gives them more information, than NVidia team.

    Used to support the open source communities would be more like it. I've been using ATI cards for as long as I can remember.

    There was a time when ATI did things for us like funding Precision Insight to develop the open source Radeon driver in the first place. They used to be very good about providing specifications, although under an NDA which for some bizarre reason they require developers to sign, but allow them to publish drivers based on their contents. At the time they were the underdog in the 3D graphics market though.

    Now a days though, they don't fund any OSS development, and provide a binary driver instead. They will not give you specifications for any cards until they are close to their end-of-life. DRI and Gatos have done great work despite this, but ATI shouldn't be congratulated on today's treatment of the open source community.

    They still do have specs available from the developer relations page under NDA. But I doubt you'll get anything from them that would be considered current hardware.

  17. The sum total of my experience with Macrovision by JessLeah · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I tend to use a lot of odd/eclectic combinations of hardware. Once, I had an old Apple II RGB monitor (with an RCA-style plug in the back) which I used to display DVD video output from an old Creative Labs DxR2 decoder. Until I disabled Macrovision, I could not watch the movies I legally paid for (<sarcasm>from Wal-Mart, like a Good American(TM)</sarcasm>). So I had to break the law to watch what I legally paid for. (For the record, I was also using a Linux box to play the DVD, so <sarcasm>obviously I'm some sort of evil hacker criminal</sarcasm>).

    At another point, I had a set-top DVD player, and was trying to use it with an old TV player which had only a coaxial RF input. So at first I passed the signal through a VCR, which of course made Macrovision wreck the signal (image fading in and out, just like in the previous example). Until I scrapped an old Nintendo RF adaptor (which is probably DMCA-illegal for some convoluted reason also-- I mean, hell ,<sarcasm>'Consumers' have no right to open up products they paid for</sarcasm>) and rebuilt it into a generalized RCA-to-coax adaptor suitable for use on the DVD player, I couldn't play my (again legally paid for at a Good American Retail Outlet(TM)) DVDs.

    So, let's review. Macrovision has made it more difficult for me to play legally-owned DVDs. And it's pissed me off even more at the MPAA for getting in bed with those fucktards. So... what, again, does Macrovision do to decrease piracy? I can testify that it makes me more interested in disobeying the MPAA cartel's stupid rules, since all it seems to do is annoy people and force them to buy (or build) more equipment...

  18. Really? That's a shame... by Chordonblue · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...I always buy whatever card gives me the most bang for the buck. I could care less about Macrovision since no DVD I watch ends up having it anyway regardless.

    Based on what I'm hearing about NV40 (16 pipelines, MPEG encoding acceleration, etc.), it seems that Nvidia will be getting my business again this summer, and that hasn't happened for a couple of years now. I currently own a Radeon 9800 Pro.

    I suppose it all depends on your application, but it seems silly to diss a card just because the rules that already exist are being enforced -albeit more stringently. Besides, do you really believe that the drivers are 'unhackable'?

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  19. Re:Windows or Linux? by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 4, Informative

    It requires player support, so no. I highly doubt Xine/Ogle/MPlayer will implement Macrovision.

  20. Should have warnings by t_allardyce · · Score: 3, Interesting

    slightly off-topic rant but since i did some upgrading i havnt been able to got my (ati all-in-wonder very old pro) tv card to work dual screen so i just took it out, my computer doesnt have a dvd drive so i use my PS2 as a dvd player connected up to the tv-card, but now i cant! so off i go to the tv (which is also very old) and find it only has RF-in, no problem, connect the PS2 to video-machine to TV to watch a DVD and hey ho, fucking macrovision kicks in, what am i supposed to do? now im not making this up why would i? i love bit-torrent as much as anyone else, but why the fuck should i suffer and not be able to use the stated features of something ive paid for when it did not say clearly on the box "WILL NOT PLAY DVDs UNLESS CONNECTED DIRECTLY TO YOUR TV" and it obviously does not adhere to any video specifications, as far as im concerned video equipment that uses macrovision is _not_ standard and should either carry a very clear warning or should not be able to even have composite/scart/s-video connectors on it! anything else is mis-representation and a lie to the consumer - i think most people would choose non-cripled hardware if given an educated choice.

    btw clear warning doesnt mean pt.6 font next to "all rights reserved"

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  21. Re:Alternatives = none? by ajs318 · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can stick Macrovision on a composite video signal (maybe even on an S-Video signal) but when you come to modulate it onto RF, the extraneous signals just overload the modulator and end up not coming out of the receiver. Since many older tellies still have no SCART socket, only an RF input, VCRs and cable / satellite boxes will need an RF output for awhile yet. And if RF modulation defeats macrovision, there's no point including it in the first place.

    NTL's pay-per-view movie service is Macrovision-crippled, but Macrovision strippers are readily obtainable from camcorder specialists {they're needed in order to watch macrovision-crippled cassettes/DVDs on most professional-grade monitors}.

    As an aside, what happens if your device's internal macrovision-crippler goes faulty and stops generating the Macrovision spikes? If you never tried to do anything with it that the manufacturers didn't want you doing, then you might never find out it wasn't working!

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  22. They certainly are good at screwing themselves... by Featureless · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Content Trust(tm) has decreed that "the analog hole must be plugged." They must somehow enjoy this quixotic quest, chasing all over the countryside playing whack-a-mole with the work of so many individuals (and the products of so many companies so much bigger than they). And they've even showed up at nvidia's doorstep. "Look, you want to be in the video card business, not the lawsuit business. Are you sure you want to endanger your relationship with Mr. Capone?"

    Meet our friend Mr. Macrovision. Phew, another glorious victory for the Content Trust(tm) over the Stupid/Evil Consumer(tm)!

    What's positively hilarious about this is that no one gives a shit about copying content back to analog. Hello - it's 2004, people. This perfectly exemplifies the stuck-in-the-distantly-receeding-past mentality these guys have. Analog hole? What about the gaping digital hole? People who bother are copying straight to their computer! Fully 3/4 of the people reading this probably haven't used their VCRs since they last dusted off the video store's copy of Capricorn One.

    Yet the Trust still races around showing everyone who's boss. That Macrovision protection is important! Ignore it at your peril! Hah.

    All this will accomplish is that more people who use their computer with their TV are going to have a problem.

    And those people will get angry. Who wouldn't? What an insult! They will soon learn about the foreign, boring field of intellectual property law - it's neither so foreign nor so boring anymore. They'll also learn about the messy campaign the Content Trust(tm) is running to hijack it.

    They will find that, to watch their own videos, they need to go into the back alley, to meet the Dread Pirates(tm)... only, look how friendly and helpful they are. "I think I'll remember them - I'll probably be back again soon."

  23. Re:The software must cooperate by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just a small note, there are cases where dvd + mplayer + tvout will result in mactrovision being used. Read the mplayer documentation.

  24. Keep creating criminals, you captains of industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    On the PC connected exclusively to a TV for DVD watching, I can't watch DVDs... because a TV is connected.

    My first reaction is, "why the hell do I even buy DVDs in the first place when I can download this shit from usenet or IRC and view it with all of the quality and none of the hassle?", not "gee where's my standard DVD player to watch this?".

    As a gullible idiot who legitimately buys software and entertainment media I envy the warez doodz more and more every day. With every "insert original CD to play" and "playback disabled" message I question my purchases. Every time I am forced to apply a crack to achieve the same level of playability pirates have, my sympathy expands.

  25. Re:ATI 4 life! by Ruie · · Score: 3, Interesting
    ATI does provide specifications - under NDA, but it allows publishing open source code.

    The problem with current hardware is that it became very complex, so one needs much more time per single session of coding to achieve something useful. Long stretches of spare time are hard to come by.

    Also, I want to correct you - it was Weather Channel that funded development of 3d DRI driver for radeon 8500 and 9200 cards, not ATI. (see Tungsten Graphics)

    Also ATI does provide sample cards to developers which is big help (hard to find bugs in drivers without testing on real hardware).

  26. Re:Alternatives... by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    There are alternatives to Nvidia. No one is forcing you to use Nvidia hardware.

    That sounds like the excuse people get when they protest about Bush taking away their freedoms. Nobody's forcing you to live here you know, you could move to Canada hippie. The fact of the matter is, in the desktop graphics world Nvidia and ATI cards are the only viable options. The rest of the stuff out there is crap hardware-wise. Unfortunately both of these platforms are encumbered with binary-only drivers.

    Sure, there was a day when Matrox ruled the roost, but the days of 2D-only use are long gone by most people. Anyone hoping to play games will need to purchase an Nvidia or ATI card. Matrox is only good for spreadsheets, word processing, and CAD.

  27. Re:Movies on VHS tapes have Macrovision, too! by Tassach · · Score: 3, Informative
    You need a TBC (time base corrector) if you want to do video capture from VHS with anything resembling decent (or even adequate) image quality. A TBC cleans up the synch signal in video; since macrovision works by messing with the synch, the TBC effectively removes it. It also improves video quality by compensating for the mechanical defects in the VCR and the media (variations in playback speed, stretching of the tape due to age or heat, etc).

    Professional VCRs typically have a TBC built in; you can also get a standalone TBC. Either way, they're not particuarly cheap, but if you're going to be backing up a large VHS library, it's probably a good investment.

    See the ArsTechnica Guide to Capturing, Cleaning, & Compressing Video and the sci.electronics.repair Macrovision FAQ for more info.

    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  28. Use VideoLAN by Czernobog · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've had this for a while, some dvds refusing to play with PowerDVD, simply because my GF2 MX400 PCI has a TV-OUT I've never used. That TV-OUT is on by default, NVidia provides no way to disable it or turn it off, so they simply took my choice from me.
    That is the last NVidia product I will ever buy, even if it means I have to live with sub-par (which isn't the case currently) hardware.

    Back to the point, VideoLAN had come to the rescue. Plays all my dvds, to their full extent, it's free, practical and light.
    Oh. Cross platform too...

    --
    /. Where the truth
    1. Re:Use VideoLAN by mindmaster064 · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's because your video card probably has a brooktree tv encoder whether or not it is actually hooked up to anything (sometimes OTHER models of your card have it, and the manufacture is copying a reference design). The drivers aren't probably smart enough to tell, thus you are screwed simply if you have the encoder, The problem with that is that virtually every nvidia card past riva tnt2 has this encoder. I wonder when these guys will get the idea that maybe some normal users are putting their computer in their living room with the tv and would simply like to output their digital media for their own use. Whoever figures this out probably will be the "next big thing" in video cards simply because modern cpu's are good enough to take over most of the video processing.
      Poly pushing and texture speeds are nice, but mean nothing/little in regard to dvd/mpeg/whatever playback.

      -mind

  29. stop buying them by RdsArts · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, here's a idea.

    Stop buying DVDs.

    They're not water or air, they're fucking DVDs. The world will not end if you do not own the entire 12 season of the Simpsons in full digital with Dolby 5.1 surround sound. And they have made it crystal clear to me and I'd assume to you that they do not want our business. Why still give it to them?

  30. What year is it? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Funny
    From the linked article:

    Nvidia Macrovision DVD-TV rules forced on consumers

    Cuts out other TV encoders

    By INQUIRER staff: Thursday 20 March 2003, 10:19

    In other news, Reagan beats Carter, Soviets back down over Cuban missle issue, and WR Hearst says the USS Maine was sunk my a Spanish mine.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  31. Re:I was wondering which card to buy, now I know. by TrancePhreak · · Score: 3, Informative

    ATI has Macrovision checks in too. Just check out what they say about their AIW line and DVD playback.

    --

    -]Phreak Out[-
  32. Re:ATI 4 life! by Curtman · · Score: 3, Informative
    ATI does provide specifications - under NDA, but it allows publishing open source code.

    I'm pretty sure that's what I said. What they don't do, is provide the specs for the current generation of hardware.

    it was Weather Channel that funded development of 3d DRI driver for radeon 8500 and 9200 cards, not ATI

    Let me refer you to an interview with Daryl Strauss of Precision Insight:

    • Steven: What other companies have contracted Precision Insight to write DRI drivers? Are you working on drivers for any other cards?
      Daryl: The only companies that have announced anything publicly are 3dfx, ATI and Intel.


    As well as the XFree86 documentation:
    • The XFree86 4 driver was funded by ATI and was donated to The XFree86 Project by:

    • Precision Insight, Inc.
      Cedar Park, TX
      USA


    I was mistaken in that it was the Rage128 driver that was funded by ATI, and then the Weather Channel funded that to be extended to the Radeon GPU.

    Also ATI does provide sample cards to developers which is big help

    That is true. I guess they do deserve some credit for that.
  33. Re:Alternatives... by dave1212 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    No, Matrox cards are also used in the digital video and film industry, with their Parhelia cards ruling the roost. Their stuff works great with Final Cut Pro, AfterEffects, and Shake, but then you would be paying a lot more for your video card ($800 and up) than for any 'gaming' card.

  34. Nvidia install script removes all versions by Wormholio · · Score: 4, Informative

    I recently rebuilt the Linux kernel on my laptop, so I thought it would be worthwhile to get the latest Nvidia driver. Having done so, I found that their installer had deleted all copies of nvidea.o under /lib/modules, not just a previous copy for the kernel I was still testing. That means I lost the video driver for the stable kernel I wanted to use between tests. Ouch!

    This has nothing to do with Macrovision, but it's another reason to dislike or distrust Nvidia.

    --
    "Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire." -- William Butler Yeats
  35. I've been reading /. for a long time by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and I hadn't heard about this. If it's not a dupe, don't complain. I'm glad for the article and the discussion. I've seen several helpful links to software that works around this issue. I was planning on getting an Nvidia card with TV out soon, and now I know to watch out for this problem and what to do if I get hit by it.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/