Slashdot Mirror


Monday Releases Cause Crashes

The two big releases yesterday, Apple's Security Update and the DRM-canceling PlayFair, are causing problems. The Security Update appears to break cvs over pserver under some conditions (hangs for a long time, then quits with a malloc error), and ryanw writes, "according to the SF.net forum for playfair, the 'iTMS DRM stripping tool' destroys your purchased songs: the resulting files crash iTunes, the iPod, and QuickTime." Those who follow the rules -- wait a few days to install Apple's updates, and make backups of your iTMS files -- will be unaffected.

18 of 170 comments (clear)

  1. Er...ooops. by System.out.println() · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I really need to learn to wait a few days before installing things. I'm so impatient.

    Even worse, I check a dozen or so Mac sites several times daily, (yes I need a life) so I probably get every update within 8 hours or so of release, if that.

    1. Re:Er...ooops. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I really need to learn to wait a few days before installing things.

      But the coal mines of software updating need canaries like you. ;)

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  2. that'll theach you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...to install version 0.2 of some guy's software

  3. PlayFair 0.2 by ZackSchil · · Score: 5, Informative

    The way PlayFair snags a decryption key doesn't always work, but it tries to decrypt the song anyway. If it finds a bad key and uses it, of course the files are going to come out as garbage! If you swap headers of an m4a file and an m4p file, QuickTime, iTunes and the iPod all crash while reading it also. It does not, as the post suggests, even touch your purchased songs. All decryption is made on a copy. Just more fear mongering.

    I have, however, had no trouble decrypting my songs under Mac OS X. They work perfectly.

    1. Re:PlayFair 0.2 by obijywk · · Score: 5, Informative

      I had trouble with PlayFair at first too (on my Linux machine)... the same thing happened to me - if PlayFair doesn't find a valid key for your song, it goes ahead and creates a messed up file anyway. These files crashed every player I tried them in. After I moved my key into ~/.drms, where PlayFair could find it, the decrypted files came out fine.

      I guess PlayFair needs some improved error checking. But I think it's great... now I can listen to my iTunes songs on my linux machine!

    2. Re:PlayFair 0.2 by ZackSchil · · Score: 4, Informative

      I got to the bottom of the freezing issue!!

      Just delete the folder ~/.drms between each decryption. I wrote a GUI for Mac OS X that integrates with iTunes and I just had to make it delete the .drms folder between encodes to make it work properly.

      Oh, and sorry for replying 2 times to my own post :)

  4. Re:Hmm by System.out.println() · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The security update is the only one worth complaining about - Come on, did you expect a copyright circumvention program to work perfectly?

  5. Brilliant move combining those two stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Brilliant move combining those two entirely seperate stories into one article.

    You just know some ignorant tinfoil-hat wearing /.ers are going to assume that the stories are related somehow, and that the Apple Security Update somehow sabotaged playfair. Sheesh.

    1. Re:Brilliant move combining those two stories by bfg9000 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You noticed the coincidence too, eh? The missing piece is the fact that Steve is a 33rd Degree Freemason and was roommates with a former director of the CIA in college. Throw in the strange map of Area 51 that is steganographically hidden within the default desktop picture, and I think the facts speak for themselves.

      Steve is building an army of mind-controlled minions set to overthrow the alien beings who have taken over Western Civilization and are currently raising us for food.

      Of course, give me a G5 PowerBook and I'll overlook all that.

      --

      I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

  6. Apple protects fair-use by valmont · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The nerds behind PlayFair are doing nothing but harm the very thing they seek to protect: Fair Use. Apple *already* allows you to make an unlimited amount of regular Audio CDs from music you purchased on iTMS. Apple already allows you to listen to your music on any computer running their free iTunes software. THAT *is* fair use. Why go thru the trouble of breaking encryption? just so you could listen to your music on linux? if you're going thru all that trouble then why not create a few audio CDs from all your purchased music, so you could listen to it on your stereo and in your car, AND RIP UN-DRM'ed MP3s onto your linux box?.

    This is all just silly. Why don't "freedom fanboys" either get a clue or stick to WMA, rather than bashing Apple on their attempt to make the RIAA play nice and bragging about circumventing a DRM scheme that has always been loose in the first place.

    i still buy most my music off of amazon, i'm a big fan of physical goods in the mail.

    1. Re:Apple protects fair-use by pudge · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Apple already allows you to listen to your music on any computer running their free iTunes software. THAT *is* fair use.

      Uh. I have five Macs in my house. I can only play music *I purchased* on three of them. It is quite clear: I am being denied my fair use rights. There's really no debating it. What to do about the problem is all that is under debate.

      Why go thru the trouble of breaking encryption? just so you could listen to your music on linux? if you're going thru all that trouble then why not create a few audio CDs from all your purchased music, so you could listen to it on your stereo and in your car, AND RIP UN-DRM'ed MP3s onto your linux box?

      You argue people should use DRM circumvention instead of DRM circumvention? You're quite confused. One method is no more or less legal or justifiable than the other. Both of them are methods to circumvent DRM, and in my case, perfectly legal, since the existing files prevent me from exercising my fair use rights.

    2. Re:Apple protects fair-use by valmont · · Score: 4, Insightful

      interesting points

      Could you please define not portable? When you use iTunes to burn an AUDIO CD, you get a real audio CD, that can be played on any CD player. My GF buys a lot of music off of iTMS and makes lots of CDs which she plays just fine in her car. I must be misunderstanding what you mean by "not portable".

      Please also define for my slow brain what you mean by "extra loss". You mean audio quality loss? See, I believe this is where you and I disagree. From personal experience, and that of a few other people, creating an Audio CD from a bunch of purchased iTMS AAC music doesn't appear to yield any loss in quality (which I believe, we agree on), and ripping MP3's or AAC's from that same CD does not either seem to yield any loss of quality either. The quality of the result from Audio CD ==> MP3/AAC process, will of course depend on what compression settings your ripping software is set to. This would apparently be where you and I disagree.

      I'm sure you are already aware of this and mainly making a point, but there is absolutely nothing legal about getting rid of DRM from music you purchased from iTMS. Most threads I've read about "Fair Use" and Copyright law seem to ignore one simple thing: When you download music from iTMS, you know ahead of time, what the rules are. You agreed to them when clicking "Accept" on the EULA screen iTunes threw at you upon installation. Apple offers you a contract, you accept it by using their service. It is that simple. All musings about "Fair Use" and "Copyright", from this point, are mainly scoped to whether or not Apple and the RIAA have a "moral right" to apply their DRM scheme, whether or not, from a consumer standpoint this is fair, and whether or not, as a consumer, you should choose to use their services and products. If you do choose to use those services, there is absolutely no law you can invoke to justify bypassing their DRM scheme. The only case where you'd have legal recourse would be if you were never warned in advance, if said companies never provided you with the information you needed as a consumer to make an educated choice as to whether or not you should use their services. Such as when certain CDs are sold with DRM built-in, yet advertised as AUDIO CD, which defines a precise digital format which those CDs technically don't conform to.

    3. Re:Apple protects fair-use by log0n · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd mod you down but I'd rather share my thoughts instead.

      Download music isn't a right, it's a privilege. Where do you get this sense of all-encompassing sense of entitlement?

      What you're doing is rationalizing your process for circumventing this privilege of downloading music. You *choose not to support* or use the system Apple makes available for the product that you want to use, and somehow you think your intentional non-compliance justifies the right to 'fair use' how you see fit.

      Just because something exists doesn't mean you have limitless access, control or influence with it. Cope.

      You don't want loss imposed by transcoding between DRMAAC->CD Audio->mp3 (ogg,whatever). So then don't transcode; use the system that was designed for the format. Or, buy the CD or single that you're interested in and have a hard copy that bypasses all this DRM. Or better yet, don't buy anything - not for idealist Anti-DRM reasons, but because you realize that what you want to purchase isn't available for what you intend to do!

      Swapping CDs is a pain? I see where the sense of limitless entitlement comes from.

      Apple can do what they want. You can do what you want as well. But when it comes to who sets the rules for DRM AACs, it's Apple. If you don't like the rules they've set, there's no law that forces you have to buy/use a specific product that has rules you have fundamental disagreement with. Seek a legal alterative that works how you want it to work, or learn to cope with doing without.

    4. Re:Apple protects fair-use by NaugaHunter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I am being denied my fair use rights. There's really no debating it.

      Technically, it is debatable. You can set iTunes on a single machine to share its music, including purchased, with any Macs on the same network. The main reason Apple allows authorization on multiple machines is for fair use when traveling or at an office, and your main server wouldn't be available.

      Whether or not this is convenient for you is a personal matter, but the technology already exists to share your music with any computer you could carry CDs back and forth to, without having to authorize/de-authorize.

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
  7. Dont know if this is related by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I did the update and then had spinning-wheel-of-death four times in a row while trying to run an unrelated program installer and simultaneously burn a DVD. Had to do these operations sequentially to get them to work. (why was I doing both: I was simply multi-tasking my monthly maintainence chores.)

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  8. PlayFair Works!!! by alatesystems · · Score: 5, Informative

    It really does work. The crashing is caused by it not acquiring the key and decrypting it incorrectly with no error checking. This is what you have to do(the only way I know how, because I don't know how to compile it on windows).

    Download it on *nix and do ./configure, make, make install(if you're root).

    On windows, download VLC. Run it and open your encrypted m4p file.

    Now, in c:\documents and settings\username(whatever you're logged in as)\application data\drms, you have the key file. Copy that key file to your ~/.drms dir(create it) on the *nix box.

    Then on the *nix box run ./playfair whatever.m4p new.m4p.

    WHAM! It now works. It grabs the key from your ~/.drms and decrypts it to new.m4p. It works! I've tried it. This is great. Now I can actually buy music(Until apple "fixes" this).

    If someone could compile this on windows it would cut down this process to 2 steps: 1. Run VLC with the file. 2. Run playfair.exe in.mp4 out.m4p

    Thanks,
    Chris Benard

  9. It DOESNT mess with your iTunes songs! by da_dho · · Score: 5, Informative

    Firstly, this tool never touches the original so unless you deleted the original before testing the new one, you are fine. For Example: /usr/local/bin/playfair Secondly, the tool works fine most of the time. At least the mac version, but likely the pc one too. For me, its spits out 3/4 properly drm'd songs then spits out the rest garabage that crash iTunes/Quicktime. Try it yourself people, all you need is a mac with an ipod hooked up to it or just a windows pc.

    --
    Dont do school. Stay in milk. Drink your drugs.
  10. Fair use and the iTMS by nsayer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1. People keep talking about "Fair use." It's a moot point. Fair use is what you can do with intellectual property that you posess (note I did not say "own") WHERE THERE IS NO OTHER GOVERNING AGREEMENT. When you started up iTunes, you clicked through a license that spells out what you may do with the songs you purchase. That is the difference between the iTMS and a CD - CDs don't have shrinkwrap licenses.

    If you are in the United States, giving PlayFair to someone else or posting it on a web site probably violates the DMCA: It is not authorized by the rights holder, and it defeats an effective means of copy control.

    Using PlayFair to decode your purchases to use on machines that don't have iTunes (such as Linux machines) probably is legal under the reverse engineering for compatibility sections of the DMCA, but that law is very full of contradictions and has not been fully tested in the courts.

    I have a suggestion for the PlayFair authors: As you decrypt each song, put the account information in a hidden or comment section of the output file. Anyone using PlayFair to simply use their purchased content themselves would not be hurt by this, and it would provide an additional deterent against putting decoded content up on $P2P_NETWORK_DU_JOUR. It would bolster your eventual defense in court that you were not making a tool for piracy.