Slashdot Mirror


SpaceShipOne Completes Second Test Flight

waynegoode writes "According to an article at Space.com, Scaled Composites' SpaceShipOne suborbital rocket plane made its second powered flight today. The piloted vehicle was powered by a hybrid rocket motor to over 105,000 feet. The engine burned for 40 seconds, zipping to Mach 2. SpaceShipOne is one of several projects competing for the $10 million X Prize. Slashdot mentioned yesterday that it received a license from the FAA, the first license for a suborbital rocket."

11 of 194 comments (clear)

  1. Anybody else still in the running? by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As only a casual X-Prize follower, SpaceShipOne is the only X-Prize contestant team name I can come up with off the top of my head now.

    Is there any other team that's anywhere close to keeping SpaceShipOne's pace, or are they now the presumed winner of the X-Prize unless they really stumble?

    1. Re:Anybody else still in the running? by budgenator · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The FAA sub-orbital space flight license is required for U.S. contenders in the X Prize competition.
      The impression I got was that Americans teams needed FAA license, and probably foreign teams opperating in the US. I'd suppose that a Russian team opperating inside Russia would have their own licenses or permits from appropriate Russian agencies. I'm unsure if the X-prise rules specify where the opperation has to take place.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  2. Curses, foiled again! by SB9876 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Drat, someone beat me on the article submission. At least this time, the editors will finally have a decent reason to reject my submission, though.

    Unless something goes seriously wrong with Scaled's program, it looks they've got the thing pretty much sewn up. The only serious competitors to Scaled right now are Carmack's Armadillo and those craaazy Canucks on the Da Vinci project. Given that this is almost exactly 1/3 of the way to the X Prize and that they already have broken the red tape barrier, I have trouble seeing anyone catching up to Rutan and crew at this point.

    1. Re:Curses, foiled again! by SB9876 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      True, it's basically a test of designs at this point. Rutan and company could probably go for the X Prize tomorrow is they felt like it but at great risk to the pilots. Conversely, they might find out that at mach 3, SpaceShipOne has unfixable stability problems. Basically, that's back to the drawing board and all chances for a win are gone then.

      However, sing as how no other team has even tested a full scale demonstrator yet, Rutan is firmly in the lead. Armadillo hasn't even figured out their entire landing proceedure yet. It's hard to figure out where Da Vinci is at since they're site is somewhat short on details. It took a while to even figure out that they had physical components ready. Unless something goes wrong, it's hard to see anyone passing Scaled at this point.

  3. Re:I hope they get there, but what next? by mrright · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There is a very logical upgrade path from a suborbital to an orbital vehicle.

    A manned suborbital vehicle going to 100km altitude needs a reaction control system to orient itself in a vacuum. It needs to be pressurized. And it needs a (small) heat shield.

    So it really is a space craft that just does not have enough delta-v to make orbit.

    By increasing the available delta-v incrementally you can work out the bugs much easier than if you had to do it all in one big step like they did with the shuttle.

    A suborbital craft is also very interesting as a reusable first stage for a microsattelite launch vehicle. For example with the payload of the spaceship one and an expendable upper stage it should be possible to get about 10kg into low earth orbit. This would be very interesting for universities and radio amateurs that can not affor d a large launch vehicle.

    The DOD has also shown some interest in microsattelites. This is a nice way to make some money while developing a real reusable orbital space craft.

    --
    Private property is the central institution of a free society (David Friedman)
  4. Re:Can't wait by nizo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Bah the prudes can rate me into oblivion, but I'm telling ya the average joe going into space is what will change everything.

  5. Re:1/3 of the way there... by JesseL · · Score: 2, Interesting

    According to the rules they only have to have one person actually go up. They have to have accomodation for 3 passengers, but they can substitute an equivalent mass of inert payload instead. Since the ship has to fly twice in two weeks there is a strong incentive for it to make at least the first landing intact.

    --
    "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
  6. Re:how long now? by Thagg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually, SpaceShip One is a shirtsleeve environment. The pilots don't wear pressure suits. I believe all the windows are double-paned, each of which would hold pressure by themselves. The environmental controls on the ship are pretty simple, there are scrubbers to remove CO2 and water vapor, and they have an oxygen bottle to bleed some oxygen into the cabin.

    Pressure suits are a real pain, and they restrict the pilot's vision, hearing, and motion so much that it's really good if you can avoid them. SpaceShip One is no walk in the park to fly, the pilot really needs all the help he can get to fly it.

    Godspeed, Burt.

    thad

    --
    I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
  7. Re:sub-orbital != orbital by mrright · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The X-Price vehicles itself will not compete with orbital launch vehicles. But they are a good way to learn how to build a real reusable space vehicle instead of just converted ICBMs like we have been doing for the last 50 years.

    And there is a commercial rocket in production that is small compared to its competitors and has a reusable first stage. It will be used to launch satellites for the DOD, among others.

    There are already plans to scale this vehicle up to a much larger size. And the first stage will still be reusable.

    --
    Private property is the central institution of a free society (David Friedman)
  8. IS This Design A Dead End? by reallocate · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My understanding is that the Rutan craft will accelerate to a few times the speed of sound and then coast to 60 kilometers.

    Remembering that achieving orbit is a matter of velocity, not altitude, is the Rutan design a dead end? I.e., could this design achieve orbit with the addition of a more powerful engine? (I know the easy answer is "Yes", but I'm asking if this particular design is capable of orbital flight.) If so, would the Rutan's rather unusual reentry approach work in a return from orbit?

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  9. Re:Bet this one only went 1/3 of the way because.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
    A few months ago I got a behind-the-scenes tour of Scaled Composites facilities in Mojave. Of course the highlight of the day was getting to walk around the hangar where the Space Ship One and White Knight were stored. I can assure you that they have the thermal control and attitude control problems taken care of. Exoatmospheric, they use reaction jet thrusters to orient the spacecraft, just like any manned spacecraft. For the re-entry, the pilot really has to do nothing, just feather the wings and the spacecraft is inherently stable and will seek the desired re-entry attitude. Moreover, the re-entry attitude (seen in this page's banner (third of left at top)) presents a large surface area... to accomplish most of the decel in the higher, thinner atmosphere where heating is not as much of a problem. Of course, they can do this because, unlike the shuttle, they have no need to provide lift, which would require higher speeds in denser air and leads to temperature issues.

    WYIAARS.