Slashdot Mirror


Overseas Crooks Abuse TTY Phone Service

Rick Zeman writes "The Arizona Daily Star is reporting on how 419 scammers and credit card thieves are abusing the US' TTY service which enables hearing-impaired citizens to make phone calls with the help of an intermediary operator. 'The callers try to use stolen credit-card numbers to make big purchases of merchandise from American companies. The operators often suspect fraud, but they can't just hang up. Federal rules require them to make the calls and keep the contents strictly confidential.' Yes, Virginia, they have no shame...."

8 of 304 comments (clear)

  1. No authentication leads to abuse... by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anything that's totally given away for free meant to help a certain segment of society should at least seek proof that the person taking advantage of the service is a member of that segment of society.

    No government in the USA hands out handcapped parking permits to everyone who asks. There's a documentation process to certify that one is entitled to it. Sure, that process sometimes gets fooled into giving a permit to somebody not entitled to it, but as least there's a paper trail created by such a fraud that can be followed once it is discovered.

    Free TTY services be allowed to issue usernames and passwords to their customers, keep text logs of the conversations, and able to revoke the access of those who abuse their accounts. Basically, the laws that are requiring them to be open are also regulating this service to its death. This needs to be fixed quick.

    1. Re:No authentication leads to abuse... by Unnngh! · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I did a quick googling and found some statistics:

      http://www.access-board.gov/telecomm/marketrep/app endices/ttyvm.htm

      That's 200000-700000 people using an older type of tty terminal. Maintaining a database and logs for this many users alone is a fair-sized task, and the offices are distributed nationwide.

      I'm afraid a cost-benefit analysis would reveal that it's (currently) cheaper to let the scammers scam:(

    2. Re:No authentication leads to abuse... by BlewScreen · · Score: 4, Insightful
      keep text logs of the conversations, and able to revoke the access of those who abuse their accounts.

      You can't be serious... Would you advocate keeping a log of every voice call as well, and revoking phone service from those who "abuse their accounts"???

      Who's going to define "abuse"? Can a TTY user have phone sex, or is this something the deaf shouldn't be allowed to access?

      -bs

      --
      That that is is not that that is not. That that is not is not that that is.
    3. Re:No authentication leads to abuse... by the_mad_poster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Insightful? Last I checked, phone sex was not illegal whereas credit card and wire fraud are.

      I do, however, agree that logging calls is a very, very Bad Thing to do. The companies being scammed need to have safeguards in place to make sure they can not only recognize problems, but go back and figure out what happened, who did it, and where they are with the help of law enforcement.

      TTY ops are intermediaries. Their job is not to protect companies on one side of the line from fraud and vice versa. They are there to channel information, not concern themselves with its content.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
  2. Log today, spam tomorrow (or worse) by starsong · · Score: 5, Insightful

    keep text logs of the conversations

    This one doesn't make sense to me. Do the people who issue handicapped parking permits keep a list of the places people park? These conversations are often intensely personal; it's literally the only way some of these people can use a telephone. I agree completely with authentication, but keeping records seems intrusive and demeaning. And if they are kept, sooner or later the deaf will start getting "targeted" TTY advertisements...

    "You recently mentioned to your mother that you're thinking of moving. Contact Local Realtors Inc for a free consulation!", etc.

    To say nothing of the legal implications; a warrentless wiretap on thousands of American phones, always running, in plain-text, east-to-search format.

  3. ofcourse by Wouter+Van+Hemel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Last year I had to track down some carders operating from the US, who were trying to buy products here in Europe with stolen and/or generated credit card numbers. It makes sense to pull that stunt with people (read: jurisdiction) far from your own home...

    You know how difficult (and expensive) it is to both track down the people and get a conviction? Laws are made on a national level, institutions such as police and justice departements are also pretty much bound to their specific country (unless you just act as if you own the world), hence international crime has little or no resistance. I mean, why would you care if the crime has been committed elsewhere?...

    Same with spam, really. Most spam I receive comes from scumbags on US soil, and it's pretty hard to harm them from here. As opposed to local spammers: a friend of mine once made a real-life visit when he received a spam email from a company not far from where he lives. He didn't get any spam anymore from that company.

    That might be a viable solution to the spam problem anyway: just a global team-up of people willing to visit spammers living close to their own home. I'm not implying a violent posse here. Even a criminal would get a clue when there's suddenly a bunch of very pissed off people in front of his/her door.

  4. Re:We've gotten this by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If there's any people who genuinely use the service...sorry, we just can't afford to spend hours wading through these phone calls to get to you.

    Thankfully, legitimate deaf people can use the internet to make their orders, a lot quicker I would guess.

  5. Big money maker for companies providing relay by yarrick · · Score: 3, Insightful
    But Internet relay service makes up a minuscule fraction of revenues for Sprint, said company spokesman Steve Lunceford.

    "It's not a financial thing for us," he said.

    That's totally false. I used to work for an internet relay company as a relay operator (*cough* begins with an M ends with an I *cough*). Here's the plain and simple facts of it:

    Relay companies get paid XX amount of dollars per day, assuming they can meet a certain service level. They have to answer calls queued into their system within a certain period of time. Every call that isn't answered is counted against their running total.

    If a relay company falls below a certain percent (it's around 80% or so in a 24 hour period of time), they receive NO MONEY for that day. For the company I worked at, they had 1 day last year where they failed to maintain the standard. The amount of money lost for 1 day? Approaching $3 million according to management.

    Anyone saying that business isn't a money making enterprise is full of BS.