Slashdot Mirror


Sun Sacks UltraSparc V and 3300 Employees

bender writes "According to this article, Sun Microsystems has cancelled the next generation UltraSparc V processor even though the chip had already taped out. Perhaps this has something to do with the recent partnerships with AMD and Fujitsu?"

55 of 408 comments (clear)

  1. Worse financial situation than we think? by msgmonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First they settle with Microsoft for $2 billion, and now this. Are things really this bad for Sun?

    1. Re:Worse financial situation than we think? by Grant29 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They can't compete with the cheap hardware. Sure their HW and SW is top notch, but it's just as easy and cheap to through a small linux cluster together to get the high performance needed. (ala Virginia Tech Mac cluster). Sad to say, but I think that the innovative ideas will be squashed by the cheap alternatives. This goes for many companies other than just Sun though.

      --
      Retail Retreat

    2. Re:Worse financial situation than we think? by fm6 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      This goes for many companies other than just Sun though.
      Except that other companies aren't on a holy mission to save the world from Microsoft. There used to be others, but they either went out of business (Be) or watered down the religion (Apple). I always knew that the day would come when Sun would have to make the same choice. The bubble simply delayed that day, as VC-bloated dotcommers willingly paid a premium for Sun's kewler hardware.
    3. Re:Worse financial situation than we think? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 5, Funny
      Except that other companies aren't on a holy mission to save the world from Microsoft.

      Right. That's why Sun was recently seen in a Redmond park giving Microsoft a blow job for a cool 2 mil.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    4. Re:Worse financial situation than we think? by njcoder · · Score: 5, Insightful
      5 Insightful. Do you know how much effort Sun put into all the US and EU anit trust cases?

      When it comes to Microsoft, linux and the OSS talk a good game, but it's sun fighting the fight.

      You think microsoft was going to find a way to kill linux before? Imagine how much easier it will be now without all of sun's money and time spent in the court system.

      The OSS made a big mistake alienating Sun that is going to hurt them. The more and more I read the various OSS 'news' sources, the more I think that somoene, maybe IBM, has gotten the OSS community to take on their fight aginst. MS.

      Every one applauds IBM for their fight against SCO, an annoyance, and ignores Sun for their fight against microsoft.

      THIS IS what their customers want. Sun has always been criticized for not listening to their customers. Their customers want Sun to stop fighting MS and start working with them on better ingegration. So they put asside some of their principles and work things out with Microsoft. And now the OSS community criticizes them about it.

      Let's see, customers on one hand, a bunch of ungrateful people on the other that no matter how much time and money you invest in them, how much software you give them, they just keep asking for more and more and trying to stab you in the bback whenever they can.

      Wake up peaple, if it's such a big deal now that Sun isn't fighting microsoft, why didn't you make it a big deal when Sun WAS fighting microsoft tooth and nail. And in most cases winning.

    5. Re:Worse financial situation than we think? by fm6 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you're a Sun zealot who believes that everything relating to Microsoft is unclean, then yeah, Sun debased itself for a few bucks. But if you're a Sun stockholder or customer who's tired of the way Sun wastes its energies fighting wars that Microsoft won years ago, it's Sun's management finally facing reality.

    6. Re:Worse financial situation than we think? by TheViciousOverWind · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If I had mod points they would have been yours.

      Sun has done a huge effort, trying to make people open their eyes (Perhaps a little too much, with McNealy alienating most people with his comments), and they never had any serious backing by the OSS crowd. Damn shame that they've had to fold, and damn shame that people are now complaining that they've "given up on their principles" - Geez... Why didn't people support those principles in the first place?

      If you can't walk the walk, don't talk the talk

      --
      My <1000 UID is with a hot chick
    7. Re:Worse financial situation than we think? by demachina · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm trying really hard to remember a case where a company stopped "fighting MS and start(ed) working with them" and came out a winner in the end. Dell and Intel might be considered successful partnerships with Microsoft but they are partnerships in name only since Microsoft tends to dictate all the terms and conditions.

      SGI tried to stop fighting and work with Microsoft on Fahrenheit among other things. They pretty much cratered the company in the process. Not sure anyone remembers Fahrenheit, but it was an attempt to develop a next gen 3D API beyond Direct3D, OpenGL and Performer. It became very obvious from day one that it was mostly designed to divert SGI's attention from backing OpenGL against Direct3D. SGI was dreaming of defining the 3D standard for all those millions of Windows desktops. Microsoft wasn't concealing the fact that everything going on there was irrelevant unless it could be shoehorned in to Direct3D:

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/1999/11/29/ms_quiet ly _dumps_windows_opengl/

      Microsoft simply DOESN'T work with its competitors. It very rarely works with its partners. Its partnerships tend to be a smaller companies who think by partnering with Microsoft they are going to be "made men" in the mafia sense of the term, but at some point if the project is successful or not Microsoft will, one way or another "whack" the partner. The one strategy most likely to lead to a desirable outcome is for the small company to sell its assets to Microsoft, probably for less than they are worth, but still make a tidy profit and run.

      Microsoft seduces, it bullies, it uses slight of hand misdirection, it uses, it simply doesn't partner. One thing Scooter used to have right at SUN, you either fight Microsoft or you die, the only other viable strategy is to look small, don't get to profitable, and hope Microsoft doesn't notice you before you cash out.

      --
      @de_machina
  2. They are working on SPARC.NET by LibertineR · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Money talks, Sun employees walk.

  3. Well one thing's for sure by mindless4210 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "On the other hand, the cancellation underscores the difficulties Sun has been facing in the difficult world of chipmaking."
    Doesn't that just say it all?

    --
    Wireless News www.DailyWireless
  4. Bummer... by qw(name) · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is most unfortunate since the UltraSPARC line was extremely efficient. Under heavy loads even an UltraSPARC II with 128MB of RAM could outperform an Intel chip with ten times the RAM.

    1. Re:Bummer... by be-fan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Suns were fast not because the UltraSPARC chips were really good (they actually kinda sucked) but because of the insanely fast memory and I/O busses in a Sun machine. UltraSPARC being canceled is actually a good thing. It lets Sun concentrate on making good machines, and leaves the CPUs to companies who are good at making them.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    2. Re:Bummer... by DarthBart · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bull. There's this really nice thing in the SPARC chips called "hardware contexts". In a multiprocess environment, such as Unix, everytime a process gives up the CPU because its time slice is over you have to swap in a whole new set of registers, counters, and what not.

      In the x86 world, that's 90% done in software (the Xeons and new 64-bit stuff has some hardware support). In a SPARC (all the way back to the original sun4 class of machines), that's all done in hardware.

      Thats why you can throw all sorts of load at a SPARC machine and they keep on chugging, whereas the x86 machine starts falling over faster.

    3. Re:Bummer... by Martin+Blank · · Score: 4, Informative

      RTFA. The UltraSPARC line isn't being cancelled, just the UltraSPARC V, which is based on an entirely different core than the IV, and has nothing to do with what its successor would have used. They're avoiding supporting an architecture that will pop up and go away in the space of a few years, and minimizing the stress on their customers that might otherwise be facing changing from one chip architecture to another in a relatively short span of time.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    4. Re:Bummer... by brlancer · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Suns were fast not because the UltraSPARC chips were really good (they actually ku inda sucked) but because of the insanely fast memory and I/O busses in a Sun machine.

      So, it wasn't the processor specifically, but THE ARCHITECTURE BUILT AROUND IT? For crying out loud, if the supporting architecture doesn't actually support you then you're not doing so well.

      Additionally, the UltraSPARC processors weren't as fast as x86 but they scale much better and have no end in sight, whereas the x86 can't compete in large multiprocessor systems and are starting to show future caps in terms of power, heat, and size. Sun isn't as concerned with higher speeds so they don't get whacked with the same problems, but make a more efficient processor.

      UltraSPARC being canceled is actually a good thing. It lets Sun concentrate on making good machines, and leaves the CPUs to companies who are good at making them.

      The UltraSPARC isn't being cancelled, the mark V is being cancelled.

      As well, who should we point to as good at making processors? Intel created a very poor design which they been able to keep pushing on quickly. They stay focused on releasing newer and faster models constantly, but the design is much poorer and has to constantly kludge itself to keep going. Intel captured the low end market and used that to push itself into higher end systems, but they hit bottlenecks that a better design could have avoided. They are not someone I would hold up as an example to be followed.

      --
      Someone asked if I had patched against MSBlast; I said yes, I installed Linux.
    5. Re:Bummer... by be-fan · · Score: 4, Informative

      x86 CPUs have very few registers to save, so hardware context switches (the x86 does have them via TSS segments) don't buy you anything.

      Hardware context switching is not why SPARC machines can handle huge amounts of load. The handle huge amounts of load because they have crossbar memory controllers, multiple I/O busses, and an OS (Solaris) especially tuned for high load situations.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    6. Re:Bummer... by be-fan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So, it wasn't the processor specifically, but THE ARCHITECTURE BUILT AROUND IT? For crying out loud, if the supporting architecture doesn't actually support you then you're not doing so well.
      Eh? The UltraSPARC performed very poorly on things like SPEC, that were mainly CPU benchmarks. However, Sun machines generally performed well in real-world server scenarios, where the better architecture made up for deficiencies in processor power.

      Additionally, the UltraSPARC processors weren't as fast as x86 but they scale much better and have no end in sight
      How well a CPU scales is more a function of the machines memory and bus architecture than the CPU itself. x86 CPUs like the Opteron can scale very well --- its just that Sun machines are much more commonly equiped with the cross-bar memory controllers and other system support that you need to get a scalable machine.

      whereas the x86 can't compete in large multiprocessor systems and are starting to show future caps in terms of power, heat, and size
      I wouldn't compare SPARC so much with x86 as I would compare it with PowerPC, the former Alpha, PA-RISC, and Itanium. Relative to the other major RISC architectures, SPARC CPUs themselves were never very impressive.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  5. Beginning of the End by Orthogonal+Jones · · Score: 3, Insightful


    Sun cannot compete with Linux/AMD64. Hopefully Microsoft did not buy IP ownership rights for Java, because Sun ought to open-source it before the company expires.

    1. Re:Beginning of the End by bwy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sun cannot compete with Linux/AMD64

      Well, I don't know that Sun is in the same marketspace as AMD/64. Personally I'm still wondering what will fill the gap in every corporate data center I've visited recently. There is a strong trend that I see.... everybody has their "x86" room- it is usually PC Servers running Win32 or maybe Linux. But here is the real trick- the "x86" room is always intranet type apps and *maybe* the rare external web site that gets lower volumes.

      The rest of the datacenter might be things like Sun 6500's, 10Ks, or holy shit, a 15K or two. What fills the gap here? I'm starting to see more and more large IBM servers moving in. I guess IBM is really going to capitalize?

      Also, BTW, a lot of shops now only have a "token" mainframe as I call it. A 390 box that sits at the back of the datacenter happily running whatever few legacy servicing systems might be left that will undoubtably be maintained for years to come. The IT guys still attached to these boxes as admins or programmers are an interesting breed. Talk about skittish folks.

  6. Isn't the reason quite obvious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    They couldn't get Windows to run on it.

  7. Not that fast, buddy by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Sun Microsystems has far more than a couple of years in them. They have too many active customers that could sustain Sun on maintenance fees alone.

    I once worked for US West (a local phone company) and they had entire ROOMS full of nothing but SUN equipment - actually running. I worked in IT for them and I still can't imagine what all of these systems did.

    Anyway, the article is pretty clear that the new Chip platform is simply being eliminated because it's a needless step inbetween their IV and the new processors that are lining up for release... in 2 years.

    So I guess this means I'm feeding a troll that didn't read the article.

    --
    Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
    1. Re:Not that fast, buddy by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I worked in IT for them and I still can't imagine what all of these systems did.
      As somebody who worked at USWest/Qwest, I can now tell you what they did: Improve each directors empire.

      Sad thing is, there is more truth in this than humour.

      But you are right. Back in the mid 80's to early 90's, I was pushing MS over IBM as I thought they could kill IBM (the evil empire who had a monopoly on the industry and was killing everything that they set their evil eye on; sound familiar). I was pretty positive that IBM would die in a few years as their stock declined. But they are stil here (thinkfully) due to the all the hardware that they were selling and all the agreements that were in place. Sun is now in the same place and they will simply have to weather it.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  8. Closer than you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Over beer, this is the way my friend and I see the future:

    0. Gosling leaves Sun for IBM.
    1. All Sun hardware will run on AMD
    2. Sun will port .NET to Solaris. Mono dies swiftly.
    3. Java bytecode will target the CLR
    4. Sun/MS/HP vs. Intel/Dell/IBM/Linux
    5. Apple keeps innovating

    1. Re:Closer than you think by miguel · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Mono JIT on SPARC passes all the tests that the
      Mono x86 JIT passes.

      A lot of the recent focus has been on taking
      advantage of many of the SPARC v9 features
      (like branch prediction) and improving the code
      generation after the initial feature complete
      stage.

  9. Sun excised the SPARC VI proc and decided on Rock by JPriest · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Register has it here. Sun Kills off Sparc V and Gemini and releases Niagara and Rock. Not as big a deal as most of you make it out to be.

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
  10. Perspective by Bill_Royle · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Every time I think of Sun, I think about my commute home past their headquarters. In the summer of 2001 (if memory serves correct), I drove by via San Tomas and saw a tree in one of those planter boxes - like the wooden boxes that trees come in when you buy them from a nursery.

    This tree was a HUGE oak tree though - had to be 100 feet tall at least, with a trunk that was probably 5 feet wide. And it sat there in a big planter box waiting to be "planted." The transportation costs alone must have cost a fortune.

    The point is, while the industry began plunging into the abyss, Sun was farting around buying full-blown oak trees to make their campus look "pretty" - while other companies were working to stay afloat.

    It seemed then that they had their blinders on, and while a fair amount of companies are stabilizing now here in the valley, they seem to be trying to stop the bleeding a bit late.

    Perhaps if they'd spent less time farting around with building campuses and more time on building their market, they'd be in better shape. After all - if you let your employees go, who's going to look at the trees?

    Just a thought... it seemed symbolic to me of what was wrong there - perspective. Shame though... they're so much more likeable than MS.

    1. Re:Perspective by IntlHarvester · · Score: 3, Informative

      I agree -- Sun was doing so well during the dotcom days that they totally lost track of their competitive position in the market.

      On the high-end, the death of SPARC was a long time coming, yet Sun continued to plow massive amounts of money into a chip that was not competing with POWER etc.

      On the low-end, they didn't do anything about the growth of Linux except diss it. Had they positioned Solaris x86 strongly against Linux back in the RedHat 5/6 days, they would have killed alot of Linux's market growth -- remember back in 1999, UNIX was the "safe choice" and Linux was not. But Solaris x86 was so obviously an orphan product that nobody took it seriously.

      Instead they spent a lot of time bashing Microsoft (not their #1 competitor) and farting around with things like StarOffice. And planting trees.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
  11. No, Ultrasparc V and Gemini employees will stay. by beamz · · Score: 4, Informative

    Please, if you're going to enourage your readerbase to read an article, please do the same.

    Sun said nothing about laying off the Ultrasparc V or Gemini staff.

    "Sun plans to lay off 3,300 employees, but many from the UltraSparc V and Gemini projects will remain at Sun, the spokeswoman said."

  12. Yes. by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They are getting ready to layoff 30% of their staff, not 9%
    After the election, HP and IBM will be doing some as well, but it it unknown how much.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Yes. by Doomdark · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Maybe, maybe not. Note that you are comparing something official announced by the company (which, amongst other things, means it's what's told as current truth to its shareholders) with unsubstantiated rumours, which at best outline one prominent way of thinking amongst Sun's leaders. Basically, even if rumour is true to its fullest, many things can happen now and then. Executives always keep many options open, have multiple scenarios, from best to worst case plans etc. etc.

      Personally, I very much doubt that company would total net reduction of 30% over next financial year. If they tried, they might as well liquidate company's assets right now and give proceeds to shareholders. That's where Sun's current value is (share value fairly close to book value, that is); to get more share value via growth, company HAS to continue spending on R&D... and that can not be done by firing 30% of employees during next year. It's hard enough to grow by 30% over couple of years; reducing by that amount in one year is only done on death spirals of companies when all other options have been exhausted. It's like amputating your left leg, instead of liposuction, to lose more weight.

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
  13. Not what it looks like by Wateshay · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Those who read the article will see that this is far from Sun getting out of the chip business and moving to Windows, but rather a retooling that will allow them to return to profitablility in the near future. Instead of the UltraSparc V, they're going to stick with modifications to the UltraSparc IV for the time being while they work on putting out their multicore followup, the Nigara. Personally, I'm glad to see this. Sun has been a stagnating company in the hardware department for a while now, and I think a good shakeup is what they need. There will always be a need for the rock-solid server market that they fill, and x86 just doesn't cut it in a lot of cases. So, don't worry, Sun isn't going anywhere, and if they did, someone else would step in to fill their place (and it wouldn't be MS &/| Intel).

    --

    "If English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for everyone else."

    1. Re:Not what it looks like by devinoni · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Since the UltraSparc IV is really just two UltraSparc III's, and those were considered underpowered compared to the processors coming out at the same time. Sun's chip "strategy" is starting to remind me more and more like 3dfx's Voodoo "strategy" before they went belly up. They think they can fix their processing power crisis by putting more an more old designs together.

  14. Re:Sun excised the SPARC VI proc and decided on Ro by JPriest · · Score: 5, Insightful

    BTW, am I the only person that thinks Slashdot's one sided "sun is dying" post is an attack on Sun? They settle with MS and the OSS crowd turns their back on them almost over night.

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
  15. CPU doesn't make the system by flsquirrel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't confuse the CPU a system uses for the entire performance value of the system. There are different bus and memory architectures that can do a lot to differentiate the performance of a "pricey" Sun with an AMD and the "value" machine you'd assemble from commodity parts

    SGI did this with Pentiums (II's or III's if I remember correctly), though a lot depends on marketing which has not beeb SGI's strong point as of late so don't site SGI as an anecdote to predict Suns failure also.

  16. Re:Sun excised the SPARC VI proc and decided on Ro by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 4, Informative

    You mean here

    Another story is here, which explains things a bit more clearly.

  17. Short sighted plans by levram2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Then, in late 2006 and 2007, the company will release Niagara, a multicore, multithreaded chip."

    Sun will somehow finish a significantly more complex processor when they give up on this one? IBM, AMD, and Intel will be four times ahead of Sun in three years. By killing the UltraSparc V, Sun has to execute perfectly in an arena they've stumbled in the past.
    1. Re:Short sighted plans by hitchhikerjim · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They didn't give up on it... they finished it.

      On the surface it seems silly to cancel a chip that was basically done. The vast majority of money put toward a chip is in the design, not the manufacturing. But when looking at the potential of having 7 different chip architectures in the marketplace at the same time in a couple of years, it really makes sense to simplify the product line a bit. Keep the tried-and-true, and finish the biggest capability jump. They just cut out an intermediate step.

      I'm staying with US III machines for the next couple of years. In two years, say there was a new chip out that was only a littel better than the US III, and the Niagara coming out within months... I'd certainly decide to wait for Niagara and make the biggest jump possible (so I could sit on it a while). I suspect they'd have hardly sold any USV machines.

    2. Re:Short sighted plans by YetAnotherGeekGuy · · Score: 4, Informative

      The vast majority of money put toward a chip is in the design, not the manufacturing.

      The intro only talks about it being taped out. That isn't the end of the design effort. In fact, that's when the really expensive validation work begins. Now its true that the amount of people (and thus salaries) goes down, but the really expensive validation phase ususally consumes more than half the R&D of a development. Heck, a single machine configuration to run benchmarks runs in the Millions of dollars (US).

      --

      to the Engineer, the glass is neither half full nor half empty. Its just two times too big.
  18. Hooray by cubicledrone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And another group of several thousand highly-qualified people lose their careers! Just what society needs! Another example of how hard work and dedication just don't matter any more.

    Oh, and don't forget to "keep your skills current."

    "So, what was your last job?"

    "I was a microprocessor designer."

    "What makes you think you're qualified to work at Lying Rat Bastards Inc.?"

    "I have a Masters Degree in Electrical Engineering from Cal Tech"

    "Well, unless you graduated last year, I'm afraid your skills aren't current. Thanks for stopping by."

    --
    Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
  19. Re:Sun is going down by dafoomie · · Score: 4, Funny

    Has Netcraft confirmed this?

  20. Obvious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Those developers deserved to be fired, not graced with a lay-off. They were a couple years behind schedual. AC Sun employee.

    1. Re:Obvious... by randyest · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I wish you hadn't posted AC, though I understand why. I bet I know you, if you work(ed) in Sun Burlington. A lot of people there have privately expressed that sentiment to me. And there's a lot of truth to it based on my personal observations.

      I've been working with the HESE (High-end Server Engineering) group there for almost 4 years making ASIC support chipsets for this cancelled SPARC program ("Eagle"). We had already taped out one, had the first design for another cancelled two years ago, and were 70-80% done with it's replacement (they switched from InfiniBand to PCI Express, which was smart, but resulted in tossing away about $80M in development and lots and lots of cancellation fees from my company.)

      ASICs that should have taken 8-12 months tops were scheduled for 2+ year development cycles, then Sun's delays stretched that out even more. It was frustrating for me, since I spent a lot of time waiting for netlists and constraints, and aside from 2-3 key (lower-level) people I worked with who were competant, I saw so much waste and stupidity in the Sun management organization that I often got mildly depressed about it.

      Their management is sorely lacking in hierarchy -- there are dozens of people with power to influence any decision (they are "stakeholders" as Sun calls them) yet never any one powerful enough to make a final decision, and many of these folks are too smart for the company good. Rather than pick a workable implementation and go with it, they would have meeting after meeting for months arguing about which way was "better". There was never any "main manager" who would step in and halt the endless nitpicking and force a decision. This delayed projects to an almost silly degree, and it's hard to believe how incessant it is unless you see it yourself.

      So, just about everyone I worked with in Burlington was laid off. Some were given the chance to move to California to work on the SPARC stuff still going there, but most of their managers advised them that this program will also be cancelled within a few years, so unless they just wanted to go to California (few do), they should take the severance and run. Everyone I know did just that.

      So, now the project I was working on for Sun that was cancelled and revived slightly differently once, is now completely cancelled. My company still got paid, but nothing like what we would have made had we gone to mass production (though even those forecasts were dropping steadily every year before cancellation). Worse, we had 60+ engineers in Japan and four here in Mass. devoted to Sun, and we even turned down some projects last year because we didn't have the engineering resources to handle them. Now we wish we had those back, and our sales staff are hustling to bring in some more work.

      It just makes me sick, since I always thought of Sun as the great, innovative company, and I was so thrilled to be able to work with them (at first), and now they fall apart in front of my eyes.

      On the bright side, I did get some great free trips to Japan and Australia on a extra-juicy expense account during the initial design win when we were wooing Sun every-which-way. Even met my wife on one trip to Japan. So it's not all bad for me, but it sure sucks for Sun.

      --
      everything in moderation
  21. This is to make way for their new product line by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny

    SANTA CLARA, CALIF. - April 10, 2004 - Sun Microsystems, Inc., is pleased to announce their intention to expand into a whole different market with their new line of chips, labelled "SUN potato chips 1000". This new product is a direct response to the fritolay product with a similiar name. "We expect to have instant brand name recognition with the top consumers of snack products, primarily made up of computer geeks" one company spokesperson said with the condition that he remain anonymous.

  22. No more Sun in EDA? by erice · · Score: 5, Interesting

    These are big, generally single threaded applications. In 2001, we used Suns becuase they supported memory sizes we needed. Gate simulation needed about 5GB of physical memory. P&R more like 10GB. For smaller jobs, we used x86 boxes. They wern't just cheaper. They were faster.

    But now EDA vendors are starting to support AMD64. With Sun's announcment, the performance gap is going to get wider. No Ultrasparc V. Niagara and Rock won't help, even when they get here.

    "The technique, which won't result in chips larger than those from competitors, sacrifices the ability to perform one task extremely quickly for the ability to do multiple independent tasks simultaneously"

    No good. No good at all. How long before Synopsys, Cadence, and Magma do the unthinkable and actually drop support for Sparc/Solaris?

  23. Obligatory Monty Python Reference by Nick+Fury · · Score: 3, Funny

    Those in charge of sacking the Sun Ultra Moose V have been sacked... ...Those in charge of sacking the previous sackers hav enow been sacked as well. The processor race will now end in an entirely different manner from the way in which it began.

  24. Tape out doesn't mean done by erice · · Score: 4, Informative

    They didn't give up on it... they finished it.

    Not quite. Big chips almost never work right the first time. Minor design changes are always required. Best case, Ultrasparc V was months and millions of dollars away from done. Each "spin" throught he fab is .5Million just for the mask set.

    I suspect the situation for Ultrasparc V was worse than that. If they had truly taped out then the chip would already be in the fab. More likely, the database was in condition that it could have been fabed but it was not meeting performance targets.

  25. Feh, Sun will change their mind tomorrow by bratgrrl · · Score: 4, Funny

    "We have no Linux strategy. Linux sux!"
    "We love Linux, so we are slapping our brand on SuSE Linux, and calling it JavaDesktop for no good reason whatsoever, and will get rich, rich I tell you!"
    "We want EVERYONE to use Java. Oh, pay no attention to those hoops over there..."
    "We hire the greatest talent in the world. Our employees are our most valued assets."
    "Microsoft is our arch-enemy."

    --

    ---

    SCO is weenies
    Gator is Spyware
    Microsoft is thugs

  26. Re:Perspective - Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Those trees were for the RiverMark development across the street from the Sun campus (nothing to do with Sun's campus). I watched them dig them out of the field and put them in planters (used to live over at Mansion Grove on Lick Mill Blvd & San Tomas/Montague); they were just being moved while the RiverMark construction took place. There was a huge field there with nothing but a couple of beautiful old oak trees that is now full of houses, shopping center, etc... I was quite impressed with the developers for taking the time and expense to save those great old oaks.

  27. Phew! You had me worried for a second! by darkonc · · Score: 3, Informative
    At first it looked like Sun was killing off the future of Sparc and laying off much of the sparc development team. In reality all they seem to be doing is killing off some dead-end development paths. The 3300 layoffs remark is revisiting old news -- a red herring, even.

    Ultra-Sparc is alive and well! If anything, Sun seems to be freeing up some engineers to work on the more promising future versions. As long as these extra hands and eyes don't slow things down (now, who's law is that?), this will probably be a good thing.

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  28. fujitsu primepower so much better than ultrasparc by rapiddescent · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I am surprised that no one has mentioned the fujitsu primepower servers. I recently did a server procurement for a big organisation in the EU and tendered Sun against Fujitsu for lots of mid-range <8 cpu servers for a J2EE cluster and Oracle RAC databases.

    The PrimePower 850 just blew away the V880, even with 2 less cpu. The PrimePowers use Sun Solaris and are 99.9999% * compatible because (I didn't realise this) that Sun do not own the Sparc design, Sparc Consortium do. I do not believe that Fujitsu will buy Sun outright because they simply do not have the money and have been doing lots of expensive merging of various subsidiary companies this year to save costs; e.g. the old ICL has become Fujitsu Services along with some other straggler companies including Fujitsu's Sun reseller company.

    I would say that Fujitsu PrimePower are about 1 year ahead of Sun in terms of power & speed and in our tendering process were a lot cheaper as well.

    Probably worth mentioning that I didn't buy Fujitsu in the end because the machines were not certified to use Oracle RAC - instead, I went for HP (linux) - the business benefits for linux outweighed the change from solaris.

    * PrimePower won't run SunCluster - that scared me a bit about fujitsu's compatibility claims.

  29. Writing on the wall... by digitalhermit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My first real computing experiences were on Sun hardware. I've logged lots of time in front of Sparcstations up to E6500s and dozens of E450s. At one point, I thought Linux was a fad because it was so amateurish and unpolished compared to SunOS/Solaris. I still know more about SunOS/Solaris than I do about Linux. What a difference a few years makes...

    I think Sun started dying when they started to push remote framebuffer devices as a viable business solution. Besides costing more than a PC, it required extensive reworking of the network in many cases. They killed off (then brought back) Solaris on Intel when sticking with it might have slowed down Linux adoption in the data center (people looking for cheap hardware -- PC servers -- are generally not looking for Sun boxes). Sun was riding high on the dot.com and Y2K booms but they were too slow, too entrenched to react when the landscape changed. Their hardware can no longer keep up with equivalent priced Intel machines with equivalent availability features. Hell, even the Apple machines are eating into traditional Sun markets in research and academia. Why? Their low-end, slowest machines are still $1,200 more than Apple or Intel.

    Don't get me wrong. I liked Sun and still do. I want them to survive not only because it makes my skills more valuable, not only because they were largely friendly to open source, but because they have developed some cool technologies. But they have to change. Maybe these moves are a good thing (they can't be worse than the previous path). But they have to do more: quit being so wishy-washy with Linux (either embrace it fully or compete against it); make Java easier to install on Linux (I don't care if it's opened up or not); make Solaris9/Intel as functional as the Sparc version (where's SMC? At least make a Linux SMC client); lower the hardware prices to be more in line with the industry (even if this means putting together an IA32 or IA64 machine).

  30. H-1B Fallacy: SPARC64-V versus UltraSPARC-V by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Here is the scoop. The SPARC64-V made by Fujitsu beats the pants off the UltraSPARC-V made by Sun. So, McNealy finally made a smart decision and killed the UltraSPARC-V project.

    Another interesting point is that the SPARC64-V was made almost exclusively by native (Japanese) engineers. Fujitsu, as a matter of traditional Japanese corporate policy, does not hire H-1B workers.

    Sun hired hordes of H-1B workers. About 66% of the people who worked on the UltraSPARC-V were former/current H-1B workers. This observation proves the fact that H-1B workers are not needed to create high-technology.

    Here's the sweetest part: Sun will sell re-badged Fujitsu servers, starting in 2006. I know. I work in Sun's server department.

  31. And this is bad for... Who? by nkrgovic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ok - here goes my carma, but I just have to say it.

    The cancellation of UltraSparc V is probably a good thing for everyone. US V was to be a new design, not fully compatible with the old ones, but instead leaning towards Itanic. This is good, mainly because it means that they will continue to focus on Sparc compatible chips. This means more stable hardware for us. Also this means that they will continue the focus towards multithread/multicore chips - which are terrific for server usage. KISS design, the way it should be done.

    The alliance with Fujitsu is definitely a good thing. Fujitsu has great potential as a chip maker, and their Sparc CPU's are just as good as those made by Sun. What's bad is the supporting logic (Fujitsu-Siemens sparcs have limited LOM and are more expensive). This "union" if it happened would probably mean that we would see future sparcs with the best from both worlds.

    Even the MS "pact" is not bad. It gets more money to sun, so that they can continue with the work, and shows us the perspective of using Sun instead of MS software for our server, while still being able to support MS clients. This would allow us to phase out MS from the corporate server pool easily, and also open room for Linux and other unices on the corporate desktop. Weather we like it or not MS is the current office standard and it will take us a lot of work to get it out of there. Not for the "office" (i.e. word, excel) but for the "groupware" software as the main backbone (outlook, exchange, and the new products).

    The only "bad" thing is the layoff of 3000+ workers from the US, and the potential move of sun's cpu production from T.I. (and the US) to Fujitsu. And this is noting bad for the computing industry. It is bad for the US economy, but that's just the US. The rest of the world - and the unix community will probably end up benefiting from this.

  32. Re:Old news? by Hoser+McMoose · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm sure someone on /. has said that many times over, but it's not at all the case.

    For those who are too lazy to read the article, Sun is NOT killing off the SPARC line, they are NOT discontinuing all their CPU production and they are NOT switching everything to AMD64 chips.

    What Sun is doing is finally putting an end to their rather unsuccessful attempts to produce a single-threaded raw number crunching chip. Sun hasn't been successful at this for some time now (certainly since at least the UltraSparc II and probably for a while before then) and the UltraSparc V was just going to be another failure in this regard. No one buys Sun's for their raw number crunching performance anyway (since they stink in this regard), so this is really a pretty bright move by Sun. Really it's something they should have done a while ago.

    The plan going forward is for Sun to work to their strengths. Their CPU division will produce highly multithreaded chips that are designed for server work, ie the sort of stuff that people buy Suns for in the first place. Their workstation line will be replaced by AMD64 systems since EVERYONE is moving their workstation line to x86 anyway. The only thing holding people to Sun workstations (and IBM or SGI workstations as well) was the lack of 64-bit capabilities on x86 chips, but that restriction is no more.

    Sun will still need some SPARC workstation products for a while going forward to support customers with legacy Solaris software that can't easily be upgraded though. If they are smart, what Sun will do is buy some SPARC64-V chips from Fujitsu. This gives Sun faster chips for much lower cost then developping their own.

  33. Okay, something I just don't get by mcc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Everyone keeps talking about Sun "working with" Microsoft. I just don't see where this is happening. I don't see "settling a lawsuit" and "partnering" as being the same thing at all.

    If you're talking about the cryptic "IP cross-licensing agreement", then why aren't you spitting the same venom at Apple? Because they signed such an agreement with Microsoft as well when they settled their lawsuits against Microsoft in 1997. I don't see this cross-licensing as "working with". This is just an "okay, no more lawsuits" agreement. Sun hasn't given up on fighting MS, they've just given up on fighting them in the courtroom.

    Am I missing something?