Slashdot Mirror


Messenger Spacecraft Prepared for Mercury

An anonymous reader writes "NASA's first orbiter to the planet Mercury is shown today in cut-away, revealing the parasol design that will protect it from intense heat. Twenty layers of aluminized Kapton will be its sunshade. Curiously since the innermost planet is so close to the Sun, the Mercury mission itself will look for (cometary) water-ice preserved on the less baked north pole."

18 of 142 comments (clear)

  1. Ice? by seanmcelroy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Being the closest planet to the Sun you would expect Mercury to be the hottest but this is not true. Mercurys maximum temperature falls 50C short of that of Venus. The reason for this is that Mercury has very little atmosphere so there is no 'greenhouse' effect on the environment. The 430C daytime temperature is dictated purely by the Suns radiation. The Mercurian day is 176 terrestrial days long, the night is 88 terrestrial days long with a minimum temperature of -180C.

    --
    Be very, very careful what you put into that head, because you will never, ever get it out. -Thomas Cardinal Wolsey
    1. Re:Ice? by internewt · · Score: 4, Informative

      Quick google search reveals this too:
      http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/ice/ice_mercu ry.html

      --
      Car analogies break down.
    2. Re:Ice? by calyxa · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      Decay! Decay! Decay! -Helium
  2. Re:Is that even possible? by Xandu · · Score: 4, Informative

    How can you keep the spacecraft at room temperature if everything around it is at least 212F? I need to get some of those fans for my computer.

    It would be amazing if it was true that everything around the spacecraft was at 100C. But the side which doesn't face the sun A) doesn't need the sun shields, and B) sees the cold vacuum of space, a great place to passivly radiate unwanted heat to.

    Check out this page from the MESSENGER site showing the sun shields only on the side facing the sun.

    --


    --Xandu
  3. Re:Is that even possible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's the key concepts: Stefan's Law states that the net power of radiated heat absorbed is proportional to the surface area, the emmissivity (black = 1, white = 0), and the temperature difference to the fourth power (T_you ^ 4 - T_them ^ 4). Since them is the Sun in one case, you aren't going to win so you put up the Parasol to block off the Sun. In the second case, them is just space, so all you have to do is adjust your emmissivity to have the power created by your electronic components equal the power radiated into space.

  4. Re:Looking for water... by guile*fr · · Score: 2, Informative

    since oil is organic matter more or less fossilized, in facts it would be interresting to look for extraterrestrial oil :D

  5. Re:Ion drive by cbiffle · · Score: 4, Informative

    You're thinking of a solar sail. Ion drives derive thrust directly from the force of the escaping gas (lightweight but high energy), generally xenon.

    Trying to ride the 'wind' from your own ion drive is very similar to trying to windsurf by blowing into your own sail -- or, to use a more familiar analogy, pulling one's self up by one's own bootstraps.

  6. Re:Is that even possible? by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, it seems infeasable, since you lack both convective and conductive heat sinks, but you do get to radiate your excess heat to a 3K (-270C) heatsink.

    It's still an annoying problem, as radiators take up valuable surface area / FOV space which would preferable used for observational instrumentation.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  7. Re:Is that even possible? by Detritus · · Score: 5, Informative
    There are three modes of heat transfer:
    • Conduction
    • Convection
    • Radiation

    Conduction and convection are not going to work in a vacuum, but radiation works just fine. This is electromagnetic radiation, like light and radio waves, so it does not need a medium.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  8. Re:Ion drive by physicsnerd · · Score: 5, Informative
    Sorry, I keep seeing this misconception about Ion engines and it's bugging me. Ion drives do not have exit velocities anywhere near the speed of light. The absolute best Ion engines on the drawing board have a maximum Isp below 10,000s. The conversion between exit velocity and Isp is simple Ve=Isp*g so the best engines even on the drawing board have exit velocities no greater then 100,000 m/s while the speed of light is roughly 30,000,000 m/s. Production engines like the one on Deep Space One have Isps closer to 3,000s.

    For comparison purposes the best Isp from a chemical rocket system in use is pretty much Lox/H2 which gives you an Ispvac in the 460s range.

    More info here: http://nmp.jpl.nasa.gov/ds1/tech/ionpropfaq.html

    And yes, I am a rocket scientist.

  9. Re:Send a rover! by qualico · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, the sunrise and settings last over many months. So it would be boring to watch unless you time lapsed it.

    Further, with such a slow procession, there would be no need to worry about getting caught in the sun. Mapping would take place with the current messanger anyway.

    As for overheating, just give the thing 20 Kapton Umbrellas. :-)

    Here is a short movie I created in StaryNight Pro to give a good visualization of a sun rise and set:

    spacecanada.org/mercuryrising.mov

  10. Re:Is that even possible? by StateOfTheUnion · · Score: 2, Informative
    BTW: Stefan's law has nothing to do with the color of an object. A perfect blackbody has a emissivity of 1 but this has nothing to do with color.

    If an object only gets rid of heat only through electromagentic radiation, it's emissivity is one (this is a perfect blackbody), if it gets rid of heat through other means, the emissivity will be something less than one. Color is not relevent . . . radiation of heat is.

    Note that for very hot objects, other methods of getting rid of heat can be assumed to be negligible (e.g. stars) and one may assume an emmisivity of one.

  11. Re:Bottom of the (gravity) well by DudeG · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's worth mentioning that although it's true that Mercury is tidal-locked with the sun, it's in a 3:2 lock, not 1:1.

    This means that it does rotate relative to the sun, so there's no permanent "dark side".

    (For comparison, the moon is tidal-locked 1:1 with Earth, so we never see the far side.)

  12. Re:Is that even possible? by StateOfTheUnion · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, there is no heatsink . . . space may be cold, but it also has no heat capacity. Heatsinks rely on conduction (which requires heat capacity). Stefan's law states that radiating heat in the form of electromagnetic radiation has nothing to do with the ambient temperature, only the temperature of the radiant object.

  13. Re:Send a rover! by VanillaCoke420 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Bepi-Colombo project was meant to carry to orbiters and one lander, but the lander was scrapped. I think that they should have sent a rover or two... I mean, someone will do that some day anyway. Why wait? Also a sample return or two would be nice, one from the nightside, one from the dayside, or something.

  14. Re:Ion drive by physicsnerd · · Score: 4, Informative
    It's little g, 9.8m/s^2. Isp is defined as the total impulse per unit of propellant weight on Earth. It's basically a rating system to tell us how efficent a particular rocket system is with respect to it's fuel. We use weight because that's what you get when you stick something on a scale on Earth.

    Let me define a few things real quick
    It=total Impulse=Thrust*Time [N-s]
    F=Thrust [N]
    t= time [s]
    Mp=Propellant Mass [kg]
    dMp/dt=Propllant mass flow rate [kg/s]
    Wp=Propellant weight [N]

    Isp=It/Wp=F*t/(Mp*g)
    which if you solve for F in terms of Isp you get:
    F=Isp*Mp*g/t

    Then, you have Newton's law: F=dP/dt=d(mv)/dt which for a constat exit velocity you get:

    F=Ve*dMp/dt
    which for a constant mass flow can be written as:
    F=Ve*Mp/t

    Setting the two equations for thrust together you get:
    F=Isp*Mp*g/t=Ve*Mp/t
    which if you cancel out the Mp/t on both sides of the equation you get that:

    Ve=Isp*g.

    One of the real nice things about using Isp is that it's one of the few things that is the same in both EE and metric because it's units are seconds. For more info on this I recomend Chapter 2 from 'Rocket Propulsion Elements' by George Sutton and for a more advanced look at this stuff check out 'Space Propulsion Analysis and Design' By Humble, Henry and Larson. Both books can be purchased through Amazon or other large book sellers.

  15. Re:Is that even possible? by barakn · · Score: 2, Informative
    150 million miles

    150 million kilometers, or 93 million miles.

    --
    "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
  16. Federal budget vetoed Messenger mission by peter303 · · Score: 2, Informative

    April Physics Today reports the Bush administration cut Messenger from the budget. This in order to concentrate on remaining missions like the Kuiper Pluto mission, Kepler planetary dectection, New Technology Space Telescope, and a few others. This is an advisory to Congress, which occasionally restores programs over administration objections.