Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

The World's Smallest Jigsaw Puzzle Piece

Posted by timothy on from the lost-behind-couch dept.

An anonymous reader writes "Scientists from the Laser Zentrum Hannover used a femtosecond laser to make what is probably the world's smallest jigsaw which will be shown at the Hannover Messe. Its size is 5mm x 5mm and it consists of 100 parts. It's supposed to demonstrate the precision with which femtosecond lasers can cut materials without burning or damaging them. (Closeup 1, Closeup 2)"

13 of 21 comments (clear)

  1. is it just me by tolan-b · · Score: 2, Insightful

    or is 5mm not really very small?

    (also..fp! heh)

    1. Re:is it just me by momerath2003 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is when it's split into 100 interlocking pieces.

      --
      I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
    2. Re:is it just me by Artega+VH · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well its half a centimeter along each edge obviously.

      With 10 pieces along each edge, (If you look at the picture they are pretty much square) then each piece has the width of 0.05cm or 0.0005m which for me is pretty tiny.

      But the most impressive thing is that the laser is able to cut this substance while not destroying it.

      --
      groklaw, wired and slashdot. The holy trinity of work based time wasting.
    3. Re:is it just me by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 2, Interesting

      the whole piece is 5 x 5 mm, approx. 3/16"
      the 100 pieces are said to be of dust grain size (now handle that - and don't you sneeze!).
      its extremely short pulses (1 Femtosec. = 10e-15 sec.) make this a great tool for cutting materials without damaging or burning them.

      --
      I hope I didn't brain my damage.
    4. Re:is it just me by morcheeba · · Score: 2, Informative

      I am horrible at converting number distances to something I can conceptualize, so here's an example for others like me:

      Each piece is about 0.5mm x 0.5mm square, the same size as the diameter of the lead in my mechanical pencil.

      --
      HIV Crosses Species Barrier... into Muppets
  2. That's Terrific... by yabbo · · Score: 5, Funny

    As if people didn't have enough trouble as it is keeping track of jig-saw pieces! "I think I found the corner piece...get me my electron microscope!"

  3. waiting for version 2.0 by Polo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That is indeed a small puzzle, but...

    why did they make all the pieces almost 100% alike? Jigsaw puzzles aren't supposed to have interchangeable pieces. Each piece should be somewhat unique.

    Well, not all is lost... at least the pieces seem to have a little texture...

    1. Re:waiting for version 2.0 by DonnieD701 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've done a couple of puzzles where EVERY piece is the exact same shape. You have to build the puzzle matching the picture. It makes it more difficult. I've also assembled puzzles upside down, not using the picture at all... You want to spend time cursing while building puzzles, try one of the 3-D ones.. This is impressive in my book. 100 pieces out of 5x5mm?

      --
      A witty saying proves nothing. Voltaire (1694-1778)
  4. Loss of mass? by sithkhan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used Google to translate the text, and nowhere is a mention of loss of mass mentioned. Given that these are small materials to begin with, how much mass is consumed in this process? The pics show pieces that are not snug. Just a thought ...

    --

    is it that bad seein a hot chick again? if i see a hot chick walkin down the hall i dont say "repost"
    1. Re:Loss of mass? by Smidge204 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just looking at the picture, the cuts seem to be about 1/20th the width of the piece, with 9 cuts in each direction plus a little extra for the lobes... that works out to about one whole row of piece worth of material removed (figure somewhat uniform density and thickness) (9 + 9 = 18 + a little extra = 20, line is 1/20th width of piece and full width)

      So 10 piece gone and 100 remaining, which comes out to about 10% loss.
      =Smidge=

  5. Depth? by cornjchob · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OK, it can cut through paper with that accuracy and didn't destory it--I'm impressed. However, how deep would a laser like this be able to penetrate before it would be rendered impotent/would start destroying the material? Or isn't that relevant because of the apps this would be used in?

    --
    We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
    1. Re:Depth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Laser penetration depends on two factors. First being the divergence of the beam. A good laser will have that measured in milliradians, which makes it useable for hundreds of meters.

      The second is the amount of time you want to spend cutting. Deeper takes longer.

      Given time you could cut the same 5mm square jigsaw out of a piece of paper 10 meters thick.

  6. Pentium creates a missing piece? by Roman_(ajvvs) · · Score: 2, Funny
    what? you mean a puzzle with 99 pieces instead of 100?

    I can imagine the scenario already:
    "Why are you sifting through the A/C filter?"
    "I sneezed while I was doing my mini-jigsaw.."

    --
    click-clack, front and back. I'm not moving this car otherwise.