Slashdot Mirror


Paid To Spam

Lathiat writes "It seems that spammers have taken a new distributed approach to sending spam, and you get paid for it. Virtual MDA will pay you $1 per CPU hour their program is running to relay spam around the world. Obviously this is not something you should do, most users are all to familiar with the atrocity of sorting through up to hundreds of spams a day just to find one real email, Although it has been previously reported that some users love spam, I for one don't. Is there any way end users can fight back against people like this?" At $1/hour, this sounds like a low-gain way to infuriate both your friends and perfect strangers.

57 of 629 comments (clear)

  1. Fight back! by YanceyAI · · Score: 3, Insightful
    (1 x 24) x 7 = $168/week.

    I say we sentence the people who like/read/send spam to filter through all the email that the filters tosses, just to make sure no legitimate email has been accidentally deleted. Maybe if the know what it's to sift through this crap all day long (like I do when the server filter goes down), they'll get the drift.

    --
    Can I bum a sig?
    1. Re:Fight back! by The_Mr_Flibble · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ok I've got a bunch of old 386's in the attic and I'm pretty sure that I can lock down my bandwidth down to about 1 bit an hour for a seperate lan.

    2. Re:Fight back! by Spyffe · · Score: 4, Interesting
      In addition, you don't even have to use up bandwidth.

      If you simply install a firewall filter that blocks the outgoing spam mail, the spammers can never figure it out and you're making money for nothing. The program runs, it sends spam, the spam just gets nowhere.
      A powerful computer to pump out spam quickly and a decent firewall to block it will pay for themselves quickly if you keep them running 24/7.

      --
      Sigmentation fault - core dumped
    3. Re:Fight back! by TykeClone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is there a minimum CPU level? How much spam can a 486/25 send in the course of an hour's worth of cycles?

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    4. Re:Fight back! by The_Mr_Flibble · · Score: 5, Informative

      You know it only takes 15 mins of elevated mail traffic on our systems before your ip gets locked down.

    5. Re:Fight back! by shadowcabbit · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Sadly, an easy way to prevent decent folks like you and me from screwing over the bad guys would be to seed several addresses into the listing that go back to the master spammer. If the master spammer never receives the email-- which conveniently has a tracking number to identify the machine that sent it-- the sender never gets a dime.

      I'm unimpressed, but wait till someone codes this into a trojan with his spam-sender-id-thingy on it. He'll easily make thousands an hour without ever sullying his own machine, and at no risk to his ISP account because hey-- he's not sending the spam, the zillions of clueless users he infected are.

      --
      "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
    6. Re:Fight back! by Technician · · Score: 3, Interesting

      (1 x 24) x 7 = $168/week.

      And loss of your ISP connection due to violation of the TOS.

      I guess they will find enough short term accounts this way. They don't care that the people they use have a new problem to deal with.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    7. Re:Fight back! by brassman · · Score: 3, Informative

      One catch -- if you read through their "agreement," they have the right to round the time you "work" downwards, they have the right to defer payment until you reach a certain amount accrued, and they have the "right" to LOSE YOUR ACCOUNT INFORMATION. Really. "Sorry, we lost your info, so we don't owe you anything."

      In short, after you sell your soul and your internet access, you get nothing in return. Zero, zilch, nada. Find someone who has received a nickel from these guys, if you can.

      --
      "Ain't no right way to do a wrong thing."
  2. $1/hour by PurdueGraphicsMan · · Score: 4, Insightful
    At $1/hour, this sounds like a low-gain way to infuriate both your friends and perfect strangers.

    What happens when other spammers adopt this business model? That $1/hour assumes that you would only work for one spammer at a time. If you were really trying to make a career out of it I'm sure you'd be working for as many spammers as once as you can handle. That being said, it's still a very sleezy way to make a few bucks considering the majority of people hate spam.

    I for one would feel like I was selling the rights of everyone else for a living. I'm not sure how people can feel "good" about doing something like this.

    --


    The guitars sound good, now give me about 10db more on the cow bell.
    1. Re:$1/hour by Maestro4k · · Score: 4, Insightful
      • That $1/hour assumes that you would only work for one spammer at a time.
      Actually it's $1 per CPU hour, so you can only work for one spammer per CPU hour. Seeings as spammers spam nonstop, I doubt your CPU cycles would ever be free to sign up with another spammer.
    2. Re:$1/hour by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 4, Funny

      $1 per CPU hour. But nobody said anything about how fast that CPU needs to be.

      How about a beowulf cluster of x286's?

      Fifty old slow cpu's and you're making $50/hour.

      Oh, and did I mention that my 50 old x286 boxes all share a single dial up line?

      On a 300 baud modem?

      --
      The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
    3. Re:$1/hour by STrinity · · Score: 3, Funny

      $1/CPU hour? That's outrageous! Not only are spammers clogging servers, but they pay computers sweat-shop wages! Fight back. Demand they pay your computer minimum wage.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    4. Re:$1/hour by Eraser_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Assuming they don't seed the list with their own addresses to insure validity (damn gave them the idea), whats to stop you from just, you know, setting up your {freebsd|openbsd|linux} gateway from re-routing port 25 traffic to your own custom sendmail hack? "Accept" all the mail it sends and pipe it to /dev/null. Check to see if it's the daily report or whatever just in case they use email to send themselves the data. I see this as a great way to STOP spam ;-)

    5. Re:$1/hour by jrcamp · · Score: 3, Informative
      Assuming they don't seed the list with their own addresses to insure validity (damn gave them the idea)

      Not really an original idea. Snail mail mass marketers seed their lists with their own PO Boxes and such to ensure that mails are actually getting sent.

  3. Sounds like a bad idea by thebra · · Score: 5, Funny

    and plus I'm still waiting for my check from All-Advantage!

  4. Great by TheSpoom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Great. Way to give them free advertising on a very popular website. As much as Slashdot has users that for the most part hate spam, we also have trolls and people who just don't care and see this as a way to make money. I can hear them cheering right now.

    On another note, perhaps legislation should be put forward to outlaw distributed (this would have to be defined further... perhaps third party or in a different physical location, obviously wouldn't want it to affect legitimate servers) mail delivery like this. There's not really any point in a widescale distributed email delivery system OTHER than delivering spam that I can think of... Though I'm sure spam companies would try to come up with something. In this case, I think legislation may be a good thing.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  5. illegal in many places by PrvtBurrito · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It also needs to be said that this is also illegal in many places (due to spam laws). Spammers are very good at hiding their identities. Stupid users are not, and would be relatively easy to get caught. Honestly, it sounds like a money saving scheme, get someone else to break the law for you, and you come out clean as a whistle. -Sean

    --
    Laboratree - Scientific collaboration based on OpenSocial.
  6. ISPs by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 5, Informative

    Most ISPs prohibit this in their T&Cs. So unless you have a direct pipe to the Internet, you're surely going to be cut off as soon as they realise what all that 24/7 traffic is?

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  7. Re:Thousands per year by PurdueGraphicsMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I will also confess/be honest and say that it is tempting. That's money that would seem free to the person "earning" it.

    --


    The guitars sound good, now give me about 10db more on the cow bell.
  8. UBE/UCE Liability Issues? by aksansai · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does that mean that for a buck an hour, you also get your own set of legal issues if some ISP, like AOL, decides to come after you for spamming their customers?

    --
    Ayup
  9. Earn money fast! by EinarH · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder how long it will take before someone finds out that they can use captured, trojan infected, computers to relay spam and earn money through this scheme.
    I guess it's tempting to think that "ahh, I have 500 "clients" and could earn thousands each day!".

    --

    Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

  10. CPU hour, not normal hour by Theatetus · · Score: 4, Informative

    It runs as a service (or whatever windows calls daemons nowadays) so you're not getting even close to a CPU hour in an hour.

    --
    All's true that is mistrusted
    1. Re:CPU hour, not normal hour by gerardrj · · Score: 4, Informative

      You are assuming that a daemon/service is incapable of running at 100% CPU utilization, which is just an entirely erroneous assumption. Background processes can hog just as much CPU time as your newest 3D shooter.
      It all depends on what the thing it trying to do. Look at Seti or Folding, bot run as daemon/service/background processes and both will use 100% CPU.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    2. Re:CPU hour, not normal hour by DR+SoB · · Score: 4, Insightful

      True although, Windows for example will never let a single application always run at 100% CPU, because if so, the OS wouldn't be running now would it?

      Look at it this way, if you let it use 100% CPU usuage, but only give it a 1bps internet connection (use a router to alterate the uprate speed or something), do you still get paid by CPU? Isn't the problem with spam bandwidth not CPU? I'm so confused! Would a person running a 486 with a modem get paid as much for 100% cpu as someone running a zSeries IBM mainframe on bundled T3's??

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
  11. Here's some more free advertising.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Including their phone number and mailing address:

    Sendmails Corporation
    P.O. Box 195
    Manchester, NH 03105
    TEL: 603.622.6999
    FAX: 603.624.9089


    Of course what you choose to do with that information is up to you...

  12. Hungry People. by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This summer I was living on about 5 bags of ramen a day, and was in danger of losing a place to live. About all I had to my name was my PC, and a free internet connection.

    As much as I hate spam, if I was ever in the same situation again, I would sign up for this in a heartbeat. $720 per month is more than I would make with a legitimate part time job (considering that I am a student, making Canadian money). Spam isn't going away, and I would be more than willing to run the risk of losing friends, and making enemies of perfect strangers if it meant putting food on my table, and giving me a roof to live under.

    At the moment however, I am doing fine, and in spite of the nice things I could buy with $1000 a month, I will not be signing up for this, as I value my principles more than material goods.

    Just something to keep in mind before slamming people who give CPU time to this cause.

    1. Re:Hungry People. by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Good thing you didn't go for something like this. All it would do is leave you broke and without an internet connection, after it was shut off for spamming. And as other people have pointed out, its unlikely that you would have gotten paid. I'm sure the agreement has enough technicalities in it to let the company use almost any excuse not to pay you. Its unfortunate that sleazy companies do tend to prey on those who don't have a lot, since they tend to be the most desperate for any offer of money, no matter how unlikely it really is.

  13. Once again, missing the obvious! by wowbagger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Folks, they are paying PER CPU hour, not per wallclock hour.

    Since in almost every case you will be I/O bound, while this thing may tie up your entire connection it will not run more than a couple of CPU minutes per wallclock hour.

    Thus the spammers screw the people doing this - they think they are going to get 24*7 = $168 a week, but they really are going to get about 24*7*.1 = $16.8 a week. Then they will get nothing because their account was terminated.

    HOWEVER, this gives us a GREAT way to screw the spammers - run this sucker on an UNDERCLOCKED machine.

    WAYYYYYY underclocked.

    Like about 100 kHz.

    That way, even with a modem the program will be CPU bound.

    1. Re:Once again, missing the obvious! by imr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, YOU missed the OBVIOUS:
      they are SPAMMERS, they won't pay, EVER.

  14. Re:Thousands per year by gowen · · Score: 5, Funny
    Imagine all the toys that could be bought with it.
    Forget that, Imagine how much I'll be able to extend my penis...
    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  15. TOS? by Richardsonke1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First of all, does this mean that the mail is sent through your own mail server? If so, that's a major TOS violation for most ISPs. If your computer is going to be its own mailserver, that may not work either, because of the number of ISPs now blocking outbout mail servers on their networks.

    Secondly, check out their own TOS. For example, this line:

    "In the event of technical problems or data loss which causes a loss of account information, your account will be reset at $0.00, and you hereby waive any and all claims for any amount previously accrued but not yet disbursed."
    So, not only are you helping spammers, but if they "accidentally" drop that table in their database, they don't have to pay you a thing. Sounds like a really good scam to me. I should go buy a house and put in the contract that if I forget to pay, the house is free for me to keep and the loan is forgiven.
    --
    "Men lie."
    "Yeah, about sleeping with other women, but never about bioluminescent plankton."
    -Dan Brown
  16. Use the VMDA as an input to spam filtering by InsomniaCity · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This could be coupled with upstream filtering, and used to collect hashes of known spam in order to block spam all over the world.

    How about getting paid $1/hour to help STOP spam ??

    This sounds like a great idea for an open source project!

    --
    You cant make anything foolproof, they'll only invent better fools.
  17. Re:Thousands per year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These aren't "good Xian soldiers" here (not that that would be any better). Do you REALLY trust them to pay?... I somehow doubt that they're willing to cut you a cheque or M.O. Wouldn't surprise me if they were running a double-scam: "Yeah, umm, your $1723 weasel payment is coming right up. Can we just have your account and routing numbers?"

    Not that we would fall for it, but just think about who will.

  18. Not so free... by blorg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...when their internet connection gets pulled. Which would probably happen within the first week.

  19. $1/CPU hour? Sure! by Warpedcow · · Score: 4, Funny
    Virtual MDA will pay you $1 per CPU hour their program is running to relay spam around the world.

    Sure I'll run it. I'll also setup a firewall so that this program can't send any actual data. After all, you're getting paid per CPU hour and not per email actually sent. Who cares if the program sits there and spins the cpu trying to send and resend it's first email message? Sounds like easy money to me! ;)

    --
    moo
  20. And don't forget their WHOIS Info: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Atriks, LLC
    55 Bridge Street
    Manchester, NH 03101-1188
    US

    Administrative Contact:
    Host Master hostmaster@atriks.com
    Atriks, LLC
    55 Bridge Street
    Manchester, NH 03101-1188
    US
    Phone: 603-624-7008
    Fax: 603-624-9089

    Technical Contact:
    Host Master hostmaster@atriks.com
    Atriks, LLC
    55 Bridge Street
    Manchester, NH 03101-1188
    US
    Phone: 603-624-7008
    Fax: 603-624-9089

  21. Don't get too excited by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 5, Informative

    I hate to blow some people expectations here, but these are _cpu_ hours we're talking about.

    Let me demonstrate: here's a section from my ps -ax:

    PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
    1 ? S 0:05 init [4]

    and here's my uptime:
    16:45:07 up 4:31, 4 users, load average: 0.09, 0.34, 0.34

    (yes I turn my PC off at night, so what...).

    To sum it up, init has been running for 4 hours 30 minutes, but only has 5 cpu seconds on the clock. This is an extreme example, X on my laptop has used 15 mins on 2:30 hours uptime, but it get's the point across.

    Sending out spam is bandwidth limited, not cpu limited (unless you run this on a 486 over a T1), therefor, you are going to be hammering your connection, whilst only using a small percentage of your cpu, and only earning mabey 2-3 dollars a night (and I'm being optimistic there, it could be a lot less).

    So in short, this will work until people realise that there being had, and then it'll just disappear into the mist.

    Nice try, but zombies are more effective...

    --
    Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
  22. Re:SCAM THEM! by agentZ · · Score: 3, Informative
    Of course, signing up with them will also guarentee you a lifetime's worth of spam. Check out this from their "Privacy Policy"

    Upon registration our members are required to provide full name, postal address, e-mail address.... Email address is required to provide user login and/or value-added services. In addition, we require user-specific information such as interests, gender, age, household income, and education, which is used to build member profiles that are used for the purposes of targeted advertising and benefit distribution.
    Sendmails Corporation will not share, sell, trade, or give away personally identifiable member information to third parties without members' explicit permission. Upon registration, all users grant to Sendmails Corporation their explicit permission (1) to contact them with important information about members' accounts and updates to our services, policies and business practices, and (2) to share members' information with third parties. The users have the option to choose not to be contacted or their information shared by terminating their account.
  23. Pay people to find spammers by bersl2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    and beat the crap out of them.

    That will end the spamming quickly.

  24. IP address fun by Theatetus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm a commercial bulk emailer. We've wanted to do something like this for a while but always got scared off by liability issues.

    This is a brilliant solution because the one thing we're always short of (even as legal bulk emailers) is IP blocks that aren't blacklisted (since a lot of the blacklists run simply on volume of email sent or take the word of somebody who's too stupid to remember he actually did sign up for a mailing list). I would assume actual spammers have an even tougher time with their IP addresses. Now they can spam up all the cable ISP's IP blocks, and once a block gets blacklisted they can just switch to a new set of users. Brilliant.

    --
    All's true that is mistrusted
    1. Re:IP address fun by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Now they can spam up all the cable ISP's IP blocks, and once a block gets blacklisted they can just switch to a new set of users. Brilliant.

      Yes, very "brilliant" of them. The only thing this will accomplish is getting port 25/tcp blocked all across the Internet completely whether you're an offender or not. Thanks asshole.

    2. Re:IP address fun by CritterNYC · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm a commercial bulk emailer. We've wanted to do something like this for a while but always got scared off by liability issues.

      This is a brilliant solution because the one thing we're always short of (even as legal bulk emailers) is IP blocks that aren't blacklisted **SNIP**

      Except for the fact that *legitimate* "commercial bulk email" uses confirmed opt-in (note that I didn't say "double opt-in", a term used by spammers to imply that it's somehow extra work), has a simple and effective unsubscribe process, never purchases or rents lists, never assumes permission to do anything (email, phone, physical mail, etc), provides something of real value (weekly commentary newsletter, real sales specials, etc), and doesn't send it out too often. I have colleagues that support companies with thousands subscribed to weekly newsletters and the like (industry commentary, etc) which they send directly from their own mail server and they've never been on an RBL or had a spam complaint.

    3. Re:IP address fun by Theatetus · · Score: 3, Interesting
      and they've never been on an RBL or had a spam complaint.

      We've had maybe 10 spam complaints in 5 years, and in all 10 cases we had the date, time, and IP address from which the user signed up for the list. Despite the fact that we can prove when and where they signed up for the list, those complaints + our mail volume is enough to get us blacklisted.

      --
      All's true that is mistrusted
  25. perfect! by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One thing I have noticed in this world is, nothing gets fixed until there's some major crap hitting the big collective fan.

    Now here we have an email system which is increasingly broken, taken over by spammers, yet no one can agree to cooperate on a solution. Even the laws we make dont have any teeth.

    I think we should promote this new thing, and all jump onto the bandwagon.

    We should be able to definitely slashdot the email system at a planetary scale, thereby causing massive amounts of media aired/printed 24/7 for a few weeks.

    The repercussions on spammers would be spectacular, to say the least.

    I bet there would also be some political clout to revamp email to eliminate spam and prevent it from ever occuring again.

    I equate this to a spammer saying: "here's a perfectly working gun. now use it to shoot me."

  26. $1 per *CPU* hour by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 4, Informative

    Please read it carefully. It is $1 per CPU hour, not $1 per hour. Sending email is not a CPU-intensive task. One CPU hour can be equivalent to as much as several weeks of saturated modem traffic!

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  27. Paid spam by garlicfarmer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    1. Set up dummy email server that goes nowhere. 2. Sign up for spam program. 3. Send spam to dummy server. 4. Collect $24/day ($8760/year) The more people who do this, the broker the spammers will become.

  28. Re:Thousands per year by Braingoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    5 computers runing 24/7 is 120$ a day runinng 7 days straight is 840 a week you could live off that easliy.

  29. Both your friends? by carlos_benj · · Score: 5, Funny

    At $1/hour, this sounds like a low-gain way to infuriate both your friends and perfect strangers.

    Hey, how'd you know I only have two friends...?

    --

    --

    As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  30. Terms of Service by thebus · · Score: 3, Informative

    I case you couldn't get to the site like me, here are the terms of service from the google cache.

    Terms Of Service
    1. ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND ACCEPTANCE OF TERMS OF SERVICE. Atriks, LLC
    ("ATRIKS") web site, VirtualMDA and other ATRIKS services and web properties ("Service"),
    owned and operated by ATRIKS, is provided to the
    member community under the following Terms of Service and any operating rules
    or policies that may be published by ATRIKS. The Terms of Service comprise the
    entire agreement between Member and ATRIKS and supersede all prior agreements
    between the parties, regarding the subject matter contained herein. By
    participating in the registration process, members are indicating their
    agreement to be bound by all of these Terms of Service.

    2.Payment. Upon completing the registration procedure, you will be given a unique
    identification account number ("UID"). You will be paid by ATRIKS $0.25 for every
    Central Processing Unit Hour ("CPU HOUR") used by the VirtualMDA software located
    on your personal or business computer(s) (either or both of which shall be the
    "Installed Computer(s)") is actively connected to the internet ("Online"). The
    Installed Computer may accumulate a maximum of 24 CPU HOUR's in one day. If
    your UID logs more than 24 CPU HOURS in one 24 hour period, your account
    may be suspended or terminated for unusual or suspicious activity. In order to
    receive payment, you must submit a request to ATRIKS using the electronic request
    form provided to you via your member account webpage. Your member account webpage
    will contain a calculation showing the amount of money accrued in your account.
    In case of a dispute as to the amount accrued, the amount shown in your account
    is final and binding upon you in all respects. You may only request payment, and
    ATRIKS shall only disburse from your account, when your account is equal to or
    greater than $50.00 for United States residents and $90.00 for those residents
    outside the United States. In the event of technical problems or data loss which
    causes a loss of account information, your account will be reset at $0.00, and
    you hereby waive any and all claims for any amount previously accrued but not yet
    disbursed. All payments shall be by check, made payable to you, and sent to you
    at your last known address via the U.S. Postal Service, first class mail. There
    will be a check processing fee of $3.00 (three dollars) and any payment returned
    to ATRIKS shall be voided, and your account shall be deleted and any accrued
    amounts will be forfeited

    3. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE. ATRIKS is providing Member with Internet services and
    opportunities to get rewarded while using the Internet in exchange for performing
    certain actions as desired by our advertisers. As part of this service ATRIKS provides
    Member with proprietary software ("SOFTWARE") for relaying email messages.
    In consideration for this Service, Member agrees to: (1) create only
    one account per household and, (2) provide certain current, complete, and accurate
    information about Member as prompted to do so by the Service and, (3) maintain and
    update this information as required to keep it current, complete and accurate and.
    All information requested on original sign-up shall be referred to as account
    information ("Account Information"). Furthermore, ATRIKS will not share, sell, trade,
    or give away personally identifiable Member information to third parties without Members'
    explicit permission. Upon registration, all users grant to ATRIKS their explicit
    permission (1) to contact them with important information about Members' accounts and
    updates to our services, policies and business practices, (2) to access and use the
    Installed Computer(s) for relaying permission based (opt-in) email for ATRIKS and/or
    third parties, and (4) data gathering activities, without further notice to or permission
    from Member. The users have the option to choose not to be contacted or t

  31. umm ... by jacobm · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is there any way end users can fight back against people like this?

    You could've started by not advertising their product for free on the front page of Slashdot ...

    --
    -jacob
  32. Not that much by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 4, Interesting
    $840 a week sounds good, but let's break it down.

    DSL/Cable Method:
    Sounds good: $840 per week
    First, Taxes: $500
    DSL/Cable gets cut off after a week, weekly replacement, non refundable: $440
    Two day wait for installation of new DSL provider (cuts funds by 2/7): $315
    Give two months, and you have likely run out of providers.

    T1 Method
    Sounds good: $840 per week
    First, Taxes: $500
    Pay for T1: $375
    Now were talking!

    Oh, but wait - assuming you find a provider that offers a T1 that doesn't cut you off... then, within 6 to 12 months, you become a Co-Defendant in a CAN-SPAM law suit. Assuming the judge does not find you responsible... Good luck paying yourself and a lawyer on $375 per month.

    There's another thing here as well. There's very little likelyhood that ANY computer can dedicate more than 95% CPU to a single task (unless you are running this program on DOS). It also assumes that they give you enough addresses to process to actually make this type of money (very doubtful).

    However, assuming everything were to go your way, T1 provider that likes you and no law-suit...Yeah, you can live on that, but you'd probably want to steal candy from kids to suppliment your income.

    --
    Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
  33. Why are spammers doing this? by mabu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Do you wonder why spammers are now trying to sign up individual users to help them relay spam?

    The answer is because relay-blacklisting is working!

    None of the client-side, server-side, content-based filtering has made any difference. What HAS made a difference are mail servers which are utilizing relay-blacklists of known spammer IP space and refusing to connect with them. This has forced the spammers to begin abandoning their havens in China, Brazil, Korea and other areas. Now they're trying to infiltrate domestic broadband IP space. First they tried it via propagating viruses and worms and that isn't working out as well as they'd like (and they probably figure sooner or later, the Feds just might actually prosecute one of them), so now they want to sucker people into spamming for them.

    All this is an indication that relay blacklisting IS effective.

    RBLs are becoming more sophisticated nowadays. Spamcop can usually ID a spam source in real time within an hour of it beginning operation. AOL and other major ISPs are now looking at RBLs to help them block spam. It's much more economical than strip-searching e-mail content using filters.

    Let's keep up the pressure. Let's continue to force the spammers into smaller areas of the Internet where they can be identified and dealt with. This latest effort is a good sign they're getting desperate to figure out where they can send spam out from. None of the content-based filtering schemes have come nearly as close to slowing down their efforts as much as RBLs.

  34. This give me a GREAT idea by SilentReproach · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let's all sign up for it, for the sole purpose of finding out who owns the originating mailservers! Then we can ddos them, and blackhole 'em, and report 'em, and order pizzas for them...

    --
    Religion is the opium of the people. Evolution is the opium of scientists.
  35. Re:Thousands per year by ForteTuba · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I dunno, if I were writing a program like this, I'd insert mail addresses I monitor into the stream of addresses I sent out. If I send one of those addresses to you, and I don't get my mail back, no soup for you.

  36. I got paid! by Dog135 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I got paid! No, really, I got lots of money from them! I got rich, and I did it quick! Now go sign up and tell them luser#29766628 sent you!

    While you're at it, don't forget to make your order for viagralax, the only viagra alternative that's also a laxative. I'm not only a peddler, I'm also a satisfied customer!

    (As if you could really trust someone who said they got paid.)

    --
    "That's so plausible, I can't believe it!" - Leela
  37. Re:Thousands per year by aastanna · · Score: 4, Informative

    From their terms and conditions:
    "In the event of technical problems or data loss which causes a loss of account information, your account will be reset at $0.00, and you hereby waive any and all claims for any amount previously accrued but not yet disbursed."

    You can't claim until it gets to $50, and your account can be reset to $0 at any time.

  38. Not quite (Also, it has a trojan) by Guspaz · · Score: 3, Informative

    I installed the client just for kicks (Don't expect them to pay out, I'm curious):

    Time Run: 1:31:14:999
    CPU Time Used: 0:01:05:199
    CPU % Usage: 1.69%

    Oh yeah, did I mention it has a trojan?

    Typed screenshot from AVG Antivirus:

    AVG Residant shield

    Virus
    Trojan horse Downloader.4.Small.BT

    is found in file
    D:\Program Files\VirtualMda\package.exe

    To remove this virus, please run AVG for Windows