Slashdot Mirror


Paid To Spam

Lathiat writes "It seems that spammers have taken a new distributed approach to sending spam, and you get paid for it. Virtual MDA will pay you $1 per CPU hour their program is running to relay spam around the world. Obviously this is not something you should do, most users are all to familiar with the atrocity of sorting through up to hundreds of spams a day just to find one real email, Although it has been previously reported that some users love spam, I for one don't. Is there any way end users can fight back against people like this?" At $1/hour, this sounds like a low-gain way to infuriate both your friends and perfect strangers.

126 of 629 comments (clear)

  1. Fight back! by YanceyAI · · Score: 3, Insightful
    (1 x 24) x 7 = $168/week.

    I say we sentence the people who like/read/send spam to filter through all the email that the filters tosses, just to make sure no legitimate email has been accidentally deleted. Maybe if the know what it's to sift through this crap all day long (like I do when the server filter goes down), they'll get the drift.

    --
    Can I bum a sig?
    1. Re:Fight back! by The_Mr_Flibble · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ok I've got a bunch of old 386's in the attic and I'm pretty sure that I can lock down my bandwidth down to about 1 bit an hour for a seperate lan.

    2. Re:Fight back! by Spyffe · · Score: 4, Interesting
      In addition, you don't even have to use up bandwidth.

      If you simply install a firewall filter that blocks the outgoing spam mail, the spammers can never figure it out and you're making money for nothing. The program runs, it sends spam, the spam just gets nowhere.
      A powerful computer to pump out spam quickly and a decent firewall to block it will pay for themselves quickly if you keep them running 24/7.

      --
      Sigmentation fault - core dumped
    3. Re:Fight back! by TykeClone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is there a minimum CPU level? How much spam can a 486/25 send in the course of an hour's worth of cycles?

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    4. Re:Fight back! by drooling-dog · · Score: 2
      (1 x 24) x 7 = $168/week.

      Umm... I believe they said $1 per CPU hour. You'd probably have to send many millions of messages just to get your first buck.

    5. Re:Fight back! by The_Mr_Flibble · · Score: 5, Informative

      You know it only takes 15 mins of elevated mail traffic on our systems before your ip gets locked down.

    6. Re:Fight back! by shadowcabbit · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Sadly, an easy way to prevent decent folks like you and me from screwing over the bad guys would be to seed several addresses into the listing that go back to the master spammer. If the master spammer never receives the email-- which conveniently has a tracking number to identify the machine that sent it-- the sender never gets a dime.

      I'm unimpressed, but wait till someone codes this into a trojan with his spam-sender-id-thingy on it. He'll easily make thousands an hour without ever sullying his own machine, and at no risk to his ISP account because hey-- he's not sending the spam, the zillions of clueless users he infected are.

      --
      "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
    7. Re:Fight back! by Technician · · Score: 3, Interesting

      (1 x 24) x 7 = $168/week.

      And loss of your ISP connection due to violation of the TOS.

      I guess they will find enough short term accounts this way. They don't care that the people they use have a new problem to deal with.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    8. Re:Fight back! by bfields · · Score: 2
      If you simply install a firewall filter that blocks the outgoing spam mail, the spammers can never figure it out and you're making money for nothing.

      It'd be trivial for them to detect this--seed the mailing lists they give you with a few addresses that forward to them. I believe the same thing is established practice in the world of mass (non-electronic) mailings.

      --Bruce Fields

    9. Re:Fight back! by brassman · · Score: 3, Informative

      One catch -- if you read through their "agreement," they have the right to round the time you "work" downwards, they have the right to defer payment until you reach a certain amount accrued, and they have the "right" to LOSE YOUR ACCOUNT INFORMATION. Really. "Sorry, we lost your info, so we don't owe you anything."

      In short, after you sell your soul and your internet access, you get nothing in return. Zero, zilch, nada. Find someone who has received a nickel from these guys, if you can.

      --
      "Ain't no right way to do a wrong thing."
    10. Re:Fight back! by Glamdrlng · · Score: 2, Interesting
      A powerful computer to pump out spam quickly and a decent firewall to block it will pay for themselves quickly if you keep them running 24/7.
      Forget the firewall (Well, don't forget it. Just don't block the outgoing mail) Instead, just report your IP to the major blacklists. Everyone who uses an RBL wil be unaffected, and the people who don't will have more pressure put on them to use blacklists. Problem solved...
      --

      Yes, my only tool is a hammer. And you're starting to look like a nail.
    11. Re:Fight back! by tdemark · · Score: 2, Informative

      A lot more than you would guess.

      A few years ago I developed and managed a cluster of such machines to send out daily emails to the users of a large internet site (these were emails that people signed up for, not spam).

      One machine ran a perl script which accessed the db and pulled out the various bits of content, addresses, and names. It would piece together the basic message and hand off the rest of the assembly and actual sending to one of three other machines.

      These four 486/25 with 32M RAM running FreeBSD were able to send about 300,000 custom emails per hour without breaking a sweat.

    12. Re:Fight back! by WuphonsReach · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In short, after you sell your soul and your internet access, you get nothing in return. Zero, zilch, nada. Find someone who has received a nickel from these guys, if you can.

      I'll bet you get a free gift!

      Identity theft! Especially since they'll probably ask for account information where they can deposit your ill-gotten gains.

      (Never try to out-scam a scammer... it's like trying to argue with an idiot.)

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  2. $1/hour by PurdueGraphicsMan · · Score: 4, Insightful
    At $1/hour, this sounds like a low-gain way to infuriate both your friends and perfect strangers.

    What happens when other spammers adopt this business model? That $1/hour assumes that you would only work for one spammer at a time. If you were really trying to make a career out of it I'm sure you'd be working for as many spammers as once as you can handle. That being said, it's still a very sleezy way to make a few bucks considering the majority of people hate spam.

    I for one would feel like I was selling the rights of everyone else for a living. I'm not sure how people can feel "good" about doing something like this.

    --


    The guitars sound good, now give me about 10db more on the cow bell.
    1. Re:$1/hour by Maestro4k · · Score: 4, Insightful
      • That $1/hour assumes that you would only work for one spammer at a time.
      Actually it's $1 per CPU hour, so you can only work for one spammer per CPU hour. Seeings as spammers spam nonstop, I doubt your CPU cycles would ever be free to sign up with another spammer.
    2. Re:$1/hour by SilkBD · · Score: 2, Funny
      I'd feel extremely bad doing this... I'd have to spend more time in the Carribean on my Yaht to feel better about it.

      I'm sure that a daily massage by beautiful exotic woman would also help me feel better about it.

      *gulps*

      --
      00101010
    3. Re:$1/hour by Suidae · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What makes you think I'd actually report valid data?

      Never trust a client computer, particularly if you are a spammer paying that client.

      I'd be willing to report about 500 hours of work per day to as many spammers as I can scam.

    4. Re:$1/hour by danidude · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I for one would feel like I was selling the rights of everyone else for a living. I'm not sure how people can feel "good" about doing something like this.

      Well, It is not a breaking new, but there are people in the world capable of killing, practicing genocide, throwing planes into buildings full of other people. I'm sure that finding people willing to gain a buck/hour when it is the computer that is doing all the work will not be that hard. Unfortunelly. :(

      --
      - no sig.
    5. Re:$1/hour by Cobralisk · · Score: 2, Funny

      You only have 1 CPU laying around your basement?

      --
      Waiting for ad.doubleclick.net...
    6. Re:$1/hour by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 4, Funny

      $1 per CPU hour. But nobody said anything about how fast that CPU needs to be.

      How about a beowulf cluster of x286's?

      Fifty old slow cpu's and you're making $50/hour.

      Oh, and did I mention that my 50 old x286 boxes all share a single dial up line?

      On a 300 baud modem?

      --
      The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
    7. Re:$1/hour by STrinity · · Score: 3, Funny

      $1/CPU hour? That's outrageous! Not only are spammers clogging servers, but they pay computers sweat-shop wages! Fight back. Demand they pay your computer minimum wage.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    8. Re:$1/hour by Eraser_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Assuming they don't seed the list with their own addresses to insure validity (damn gave them the idea), whats to stop you from just, you know, setting up your {freebsd|openbsd|linux} gateway from re-routing port 25 traffic to your own custom sendmail hack? "Accept" all the mail it sends and pipe it to /dev/null. Check to see if it's the daily report or whatever just in case they use email to send themselves the data. I see this as a great way to STOP spam ;-)

    9. Re:$1/hour by jrcamp · · Score: 3, Informative
      Assuming they don't seed the list with their own addresses to insure validity (damn gave them the idea)

      Not really an original idea. Snail mail mass marketers seed their lists with their own PO Boxes and such to ensure that mails are actually getting sent.

  3. Sounds like a bad idea by thebra · · Score: 5, Funny

    and plus I'm still waiting for my check from All-Advantage!

  4. Great by TheSpoom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Great. Way to give them free advertising on a very popular website. As much as Slashdot has users that for the most part hate spam, we also have trolls and people who just don't care and see this as a way to make money. I can hear them cheering right now.

    On another note, perhaps legislation should be put forward to outlaw distributed (this would have to be defined further... perhaps third party or in a different physical location, obviously wouldn't want it to affect legitimate servers) mail delivery like this. There's not really any point in a widescale distributed email delivery system OTHER than delivering spam that I can think of... Though I'm sure spam companies would try to come up with something. In this case, I think legislation may be a good thing.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
    1. Re:Great by Mr.+Darl+McBride · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Great. Way to give them free advertising on a very popular website. As much as Slashdot has users that for the most part hate spam, we also have trolls and people who just don't care and see this as a way to make money. I can hear them cheering right now.
      Oh, tish tosh. They're now very much in the public eye because of articles like this, which means a better chance of a politician spotting them. And, being an election year, they'll be tripping over themselves to be the one to legislate this monkey into the ground.

      Believe me -- they would very much have preferred to have the URL passed around by naive high-schoolers on AIM than have had it thrown so far and wide as this.

    2. Re:Great by Jeagoss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, I wouldn't call it free advertising. I would call it preventitive measures. It appears their website has been slashdotted. The slashdot effect seams to be a very good defence for preventing people from visiting a website. Maybe, we should just run a different story every hour or so with the website address of this software in it.

      --
      Password Authentication Bypassed for Root
  5. Thousands per year by millahtime · · Score: 2, Interesting

    (1 x 24) x 365 = $8760 per year.

    The money is tempting. Imagine all the toys that could be bought with it.

    1. Re:Thousands per year by PurdueGraphicsMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I will also confess/be honest and say that it is tempting. That's money that would seem free to the person "earning" it.

      --


      The guitars sound good, now give me about 10db more on the cow bell.
    2. Re:Thousands per year by gowen · · Score: 5, Funny
      Imagine all the toys that could be bought with it.
      Forget that, Imagine how much I'll be able to extend my penis...
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    3. Re:Thousands per year by nojomofo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I'm going to sell my soul, I'm going to sell it for a lot more than that!

    4. Re:Thousands per year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      These aren't "good Xian soldiers" here (not that that would be any better). Do you REALLY trust them to pay?... I somehow doubt that they're willing to cut you a cheque or M.O. Wouldn't surprise me if they were running a double-scam: "Yeah, umm, your $1723 weasel payment is coming right up. Can we just have your account and routing numbers?"

      Not that we would fall for it, but just think about who will.

    5. Re:Thousands per year by mirko · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, I'd go for these 87xx$ : I'd just run their spam program on a very very old computer which'd perform only one mail per day (and which'd only resolve adresses within my own intranet so that it would not bother many people).

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    6. Re:Thousands per year by Braingoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      5 computers runing 24/7 is 120$ a day runinng 7 days straight is 840 a week you could live off that easliy.

    7. Re:Thousands per year by antarctican · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wonder, is there any way one could setup a dummy machine between your "CPU" and the internet to trick this software into thinking it's sending out spam? Some kind of dummy MTA that responds to all outbound port 25 requests and "accepts" all emails.

      It would be fantastic! Take the spammers money and have all their spam flow into a big blackhole. This has definite possibilities....

    8. Re:Thousands per year by ForteTuba · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I dunno, if I were writing a program like this, I'd insert mail addresses I monitor into the stream of addresses I sent out. If I send one of those addresses to you, and I don't get my mail back, no soup for you.

    9. Re:Thousands per year by aastanna · · Score: 4, Informative

      From their terms and conditions:
      "In the event of technical problems or data loss which causes a loss of account information, your account will be reset at $0.00, and you hereby waive any and all claims for any amount previously accrued but not yet disbursed."

      You can't claim until it gets to $50, and your account can be reset to $0 at any time.

    10. Re:Thousands per year by John.Thompson · · Score: 2, Informative

      I suspect it will be much less than that. Note that the Virtual MDA web site states that "Sendmails pays VirtualMDA users based on every CPU hour used." CPU time is not the same as the entire time your computer is switched on; only those CPU cycles used by their spamming software will accrue towards the $1/hr they offer. From my mail server:

      last pid: 1164; load averages: 2.06, 2.03, 2.05 up 9+18:45:52 14:10:25

      118 processes: 3 running, 114 sleeping, 1 zombie CPU states: 0.0% user, 99.2% nice, 0.8% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle

      Mem: 170M Active, 118M Inact, 89M Wired, 17M Cache, 61M Buf, 106M Free

      Swap: 512M Total, 484K Used, 511M Free

      PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND

      79891 smmsp 2 0 1880K 1168K poll 0 0:14 0.00% 0.00% mimedef

      636 smmsp -6 0 25880K 24908K piperd 0 0:08 0.00% 0.00% perl

      835 smmsp -6 0 14304K 13812K piperd 0 0:03 0.00% 0.00% perl

      73986 smmsp 2 0 2188K 984K select 1 0:01 0.00% 0.00% mimedef

      243 smmsp 18 0 2384K 1224K pause 0 0:01 0.00% 0.00% sendmail

      73986 smmsp 18 0 2388K 1760K pause 0 0:00 0.00% 0.00% sendmail

      You can see that sendmail only accrued about a seconds worth of cpu time in the 9+ days it has been running here. Granted, a busy spam spewer would rack up cycles much faster, but it still wouldn't amount to the total length of time the computer has been running. I'd guess after a couple weeks of continuous spamming, you might have earned an hour or so of cpu time. Whoopee! Sign me up. Not.

  6. illegal in many places by PrvtBurrito · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It also needs to be said that this is also illegal in many places (due to spam laws). Spammers are very good at hiding their identities. Stupid users are not, and would be relatively easy to get caught. Honestly, it sounds like a money saving scheme, get someone else to break the law for you, and you come out clean as a whistle. -Sean

    --
    Laboratree - Scientific collaboration based on OpenSocial.
  7. We've already struck back... by Phil+John · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...ph33r the /. effect ;o)

    --
    I am NaN
  8. ISPs by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 5, Informative

    Most ISPs prohibit this in their T&Cs. So unless you have a direct pipe to the Internet, you're surely going to be cut off as soon as they realise what all that 24/7 traffic is?

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    1. Re:ISPs by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Practically every AUP says that. That doesn't mean they actually stop people doing it.

    2. Re:ISPs by Suidae · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Cox blocks all outgong and incoming connections on the standard SMTP port.

      As a 'power user', I was a bit annoyed when I noticed this. Then I reconsidered, I'd rather be forced to my ISPs SMTP relay (which really isn't a big deal for non-business accounts) than have spammers free to send email.

  9. UBE/UCE Liability Issues? by aksansai · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does that mean that for a buck an hour, you also get your own set of legal issues if some ISP, like AOL, decides to come after you for spamming their customers?

    --
    Ayup
  10. Earn money fast! by EinarH · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder how long it will take before someone finds out that they can use captured, trojan infected, computers to relay spam and earn money through this scheme.
    I guess it's tempting to think that "ahh, I have 500 "clients" and could earn thousands each day!".

    --

    Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

  11. Take the money and run by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How can they check that you're actually processing the spam? Sign up, block the outgoing non-meat product and take their money.

    1. Re:Take the money and run by semaj · · Score: 2, Insightful
      How can they check that you're actually processing the spam? Sign up, block the outgoing non-meat product and take their money.
      Well, it's a pretty outlandish, off the wall type idea, but perhaps maybe add a couple of their own addresses in there and see if they arrive?
      --
      Meep meep
  12. Cool! I'll do it! by fearlezz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    $168 a week? Cool! I'll do it!

    Psst.. don't tell the spammers: I'll fix the spamming problem by putting a black hole transparent proxy between the machine running their program and the internet... :)
    Anything they'll try to mail gets sent straight to /dev/null.

    No, not really, but it'd be a nice way to cheat them...

    --
    .sig: No such file or directory
    1. Re:Cool! I'll do it! by greechneb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sure they send a test message so they can check that you actually are sending spam.

      Spammers may be immorral liars, but they aren't stupid!

  13. CPU hour, not normal hour by Theatetus · · Score: 4, Informative

    It runs as a service (or whatever windows calls daemons nowadays) so you're not getting even close to a CPU hour in an hour.

    --
    All's true that is mistrusted
    1. Re:CPU hour, not normal hour by gerardrj · · Score: 4, Informative

      You are assuming that a daemon/service is incapable of running at 100% CPU utilization, which is just an entirely erroneous assumption. Background processes can hog just as much CPU time as your newest 3D shooter.
      It all depends on what the thing it trying to do. Look at Seti or Folding, bot run as daemon/service/background processes and both will use 100% CPU.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    2. Re:CPU hour, not normal hour by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      so what is a cpu hour?

      does a VIRTUAL cpu hour cost?

      how about running 100 clients on one computer under virtualisation on one feeble line that, that gets the sent spam filtered later on the line anyways, just to screw these guys up?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:CPU hour, not normal hour by DR+SoB · · Score: 4, Insightful

      True although, Windows for example will never let a single application always run at 100% CPU, because if so, the OS wouldn't be running now would it?

      Look at it this way, if you let it use 100% CPU usuage, but only give it a 1bps internet connection (use a router to alterate the uprate speed or something), do you still get paid by CPU? Isn't the problem with spam bandwidth not CPU? I'm so confused! Would a person running a 486 with a modem get paid as much for 100% cpu as someone running a zSeries IBM mainframe on bundled T3's??

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    4. Re:CPU hour, not normal hour by mwood · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed, a Windows service is just a process started by the service controller. It could be running at top priority and starving everything else in the system, if it's set up to do that.

      Even at lowest priority it'll get all the cycles no one else demands, which could be just shy of 100% all night long (plus most of the day, while you're at work or in class or whatever). Viewed over a 24-hour period, the vast majority of computers nowadays have essentially zero load.

  14. Here's some more free advertising.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Including their phone number and mailing address:

    Sendmails Corporation
    P.O. Box 195
    Manchester, NH 03105
    TEL: 603.622.6999
    FAX: 603.624.9089


    Of course what you choose to do with that information is up to you...

  15. Hungry People. by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This summer I was living on about 5 bags of ramen a day, and was in danger of losing a place to live. About all I had to my name was my PC, and a free internet connection.

    As much as I hate spam, if I was ever in the same situation again, I would sign up for this in a heartbeat. $720 per month is more than I would make with a legitimate part time job (considering that I am a student, making Canadian money). Spam isn't going away, and I would be more than willing to run the risk of losing friends, and making enemies of perfect strangers if it meant putting food on my table, and giving me a roof to live under.

    At the moment however, I am doing fine, and in spite of the nice things I could buy with $1000 a month, I will not be signing up for this, as I value my principles more than material goods.

    Just something to keep in mind before slamming people who give CPU time to this cause.

    1. Re:Hungry People. by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Good thing you didn't go for something like this. All it would do is leave you broke and without an internet connection, after it was shut off for spamming. And as other people have pointed out, its unlikely that you would have gotten paid. I'm sure the agreement has enough technicalities in it to let the company use almost any excuse not to pay you. Its unfortunate that sleazy companies do tend to prey on those who don't have a lot, since they tend to be the most desperate for any offer of money, no matter how unlikely it really is.

    2. Re:Hungry People. by schon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      all I had to my name was my PC, and a free internet connection.[...] if I was ever in the same situation again, I would sign up for this in a heartbeat

      And you'd deserve everything you got - like having your internet account terminated, and not getting any money.

      Remember rule #1: SPAMMERS LIE.

      These are people who have no problem with stealing from people. You really think that they'd pay you?

      Spammers are con men who prey on stupid people. I'm guessing they're counting on people like you.

      I value my principles more than material goods

      Didn't you just finish saying the exact opposite?

  16. Once again, missing the obvious! by wowbagger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Folks, they are paying PER CPU hour, not per wallclock hour.

    Since in almost every case you will be I/O bound, while this thing may tie up your entire connection it will not run more than a couple of CPU minutes per wallclock hour.

    Thus the spammers screw the people doing this - they think they are going to get 24*7 = $168 a week, but they really are going to get about 24*7*.1 = $16.8 a week. Then they will get nothing because their account was terminated.

    HOWEVER, this gives us a GREAT way to screw the spammers - run this sucker on an UNDERCLOCKED machine.

    WAYYYYYY underclocked.

    Like about 100 kHz.

    That way, even with a modem the program will be CPU bound.

    1. Re:Once again, missing the obvious! by imr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, YOU missed the OBVIOUS:
      they are SPAMMERS, they won't pay, EVER.

  17. Just out of curiosity by CGP314 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just out of curiosity, are there any legitimate companies out there that pay for CPU cycles? I'm sure the hordes of unemployed on slashdot (myself included) would like to know.


    -Colin

    1. Re:Just out of curiosity by zsazsa · · Score: 2, Informative

      Gomez Peer is a legitimate company that'll pay you for your bandwidth and CPU time. Basically, it checks various websites for reachability/performance. Apparently it's hard to get in, unless you're on their "most wanted" location list.

    2. Re:Just out of curiosity by shachart · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm working on it. No, seriously, I am.

      I'm starting a distributed computing start-up that pays internet users for their cycles. And yes, there is a business model.

      Interested in joining? Unmangle my slashdot-mangled email address to drop me a line.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, consult.
  18. No Payday by Mr.+Darl+McBride · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can bet that you'll never see a dime. Of course they're going to insist that they only send a check once you reach $100 or some number like that. And how many ISPs will tolerate four days of spam complaints? Hint: None of them are in the USA. And if you're not in the USA, ask around and see who's heard of an "international small claims court."

  19. Profit by tcdk · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. Install on all computers at work.
    2. Quit.
    3. Profit.

    (not that it should take a new sysadm long to notice...)

    --
    TC - My Photos..
  20. TOS? by Richardsonke1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First of all, does this mean that the mail is sent through your own mail server? If so, that's a major TOS violation for most ISPs. If your computer is going to be its own mailserver, that may not work either, because of the number of ISPs now blocking outbout mail servers on their networks.

    Secondly, check out their own TOS. For example, this line:

    "In the event of technical problems or data loss which causes a loss of account information, your account will be reset at $0.00, and you hereby waive any and all claims for any amount previously accrued but not yet disbursed."
    So, not only are you helping spammers, but if they "accidentally" drop that table in their database, they don't have to pay you a thing. Sounds like a really good scam to me. I should go buy a house and put in the contract that if I forget to pay, the house is free for me to keep and the loan is forgiven.
    --
    "Men lie."
    "Yeah, about sleeping with other women, but never about bioluminescent plankton."
    -Dan Brown
  21. Use the VMDA as an input to spam filtering by InsomniaCity · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This could be coupled with upstream filtering, and used to collect hashes of known spam in order to block spam all over the world.

    How about getting paid $1/hour to help STOP spam ??

    This sounds like a great idea for an open source project!

    --
    You cant make anything foolproof, they'll only invent better fools.
  22. College students by Sefert · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is going to be extremely appealing as easy money for college students who often have broadband connections and very little extra cash. This amount of money goes a long way. The smarter ones will even figure out a way to throttle the connection so they don't catch hell from their ISP for bandwidth usage. This is extra appealing to people in countries outside of the U.S. where the U.S. dollar has more buying power. Add 25% alone in value for us Canadians. I expect to see widespread adoption. Most importantly, this will really make the use of blacklists irrelevant as I expect these machines will act as their own SMTP servers.

  23. Not so free... by blorg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...when their internet connection gets pulled. Which would probably happen within the first week.

    1. Re:Not so free... by Mattintosh · · Score: 2, Informative

      A few boxen on the party-end of a T1 would be $8k/yr. each, and I doubt anyone would yank your line. Only morons that try this stunt on a home DSL connection would get cut off. With the extra $$$ flowing in (a T1 costs about $500/mo around these parts), you could buy another T1 and some nice gear. Maybe even a $1m house.

      You'd still be evil, though. It's so hard to wash away the stains spam leaves on your hands.

    2. Re:Not so free... by Chiasmus_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A few boxen on the party-end of a T1 would be $8k/yr. each

      Well, the fact that a company would happily pay you $1 an hour to send spam over an ADSL is strong evidence that, if you were delivering spam from eight machines hooked up to a T1, you could be making far, far more than $8 an hour.

      I mean, if you want to be evil, why pay most of your profit to a middleman?

      --
      "Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he deems himself your master."
  24. There is potential here for good use by HullBreach · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Think about this: I offer you a free broadband connection on a couple of terms: #1: you must leave your computer on at all times, and #2: You must install and leave installed my special little distributed computing applet. When your machine is idle, it would connect to my servers and become a node in a massive cluster. I could then sell time on this cluster to companies and individuals with needs for extreme processing power. Interesting idea, no?

    --
    "Hand me the bullet-shooty-thing and a box of little hurts" -Overheard on a USMC Rifle range
  25. $1/CPU hour? Sure! by Warpedcow · · Score: 4, Funny
    Virtual MDA will pay you $1 per CPU hour their program is running to relay spam around the world.

    Sure I'll run it. I'll also setup a firewall so that this program can't send any actual data. After all, you're getting paid per CPU hour and not per email actually sent. Who cares if the program sits there and spins the cpu trying to send and resend it's first email message? Sounds like easy money to me! ;)

    --
    moo
  26. And don't forget their WHOIS Info: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Atriks, LLC
    55 Bridge Street
    Manchester, NH 03101-1188
    US

    Administrative Contact:
    Host Master hostmaster@atriks.com
    Atriks, LLC
    55 Bridge Street
    Manchester, NH 03101-1188
    US
    Phone: 603-624-7008
    Fax: 603-624-9089

    Technical Contact:
    Host Master hostmaster@atriks.com
    Atriks, LLC
    55 Bridge Street
    Manchester, NH 03101-1188
    US
    Phone: 603-624-7008
    Fax: 603-624-9089

  27. no outbound connections? by Capt_Troy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Someone needs to set up a huge server room that accepts only incoming packets so the spammers can seed the servers. Then no spam is sent out, but you still get paid. Make spam more costly that the revenue it generates... (Yea I know server rooms are expensive... just a thought)

  28. Not a bad pay rate... by akaina · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... considering the value of a dollar in some countries. I guess this program's demographic includes any computer up to spec in 3rd world countries.

    Hey, all the more reason to go to war with them!!!

    --
    Remembering that you are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose.
  29. Aw crap... end run around RBLs? by weslocke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is actually a heckuva way for the spammers to get around RBLs such as the ones used by Razor for blocking high spam domains. Now instead there will be god knows how many spammers coming from more trustworthy domains such as att.net, comcast.net, msn.com, etc. Granted each person may be only able to do 100 or so a day before tripping their ISP mail server off, but if a few thousand people are doing it... sheesh...

    And I just installed SpamAssassin/Amavisd-New/Razor/etc, then they go and do this.

    --

    'Life is like a spoonful of Drain-O, it feels good on the way down but leaves you feeling hollow inside'
  30. Don't get too excited by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 5, Informative

    I hate to blow some people expectations here, but these are _cpu_ hours we're talking about.

    Let me demonstrate: here's a section from my ps -ax:

    PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND
    1 ? S 0:05 init [4]

    and here's my uptime:
    16:45:07 up 4:31, 4 users, load average: 0.09, 0.34, 0.34

    (yes I turn my PC off at night, so what...).

    To sum it up, init has been running for 4 hours 30 minutes, but only has 5 cpu seconds on the clock. This is an extreme example, X on my laptop has used 15 mins on 2:30 hours uptime, but it get's the point across.

    Sending out spam is bandwidth limited, not cpu limited (unless you run this on a 486 over a T1), therefor, you are going to be hammering your connection, whilst only using a small percentage of your cpu, and only earning mabey 2-3 dollars a night (and I'm being optimistic there, it could be a lot less).

    So in short, this will work until people realise that there being had, and then it'll just disappear into the mist.

    Nice try, but zombies are more effective...

    --
    Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
  31. Re:SCAM THEM! by agentZ · · Score: 3, Informative
    Of course, signing up with them will also guarentee you a lifetime's worth of spam. Check out this from their "Privacy Policy"

    Upon registration our members are required to provide full name, postal address, e-mail address.... Email address is required to provide user login and/or value-added services. In addition, we require user-specific information such as interests, gender, age, household income, and education, which is used to build member profiles that are used for the purposes of targeted advertising and benefit distribution.
    Sendmails Corporation will not share, sell, trade, or give away personally identifiable member information to third parties without members' explicit permission. Upon registration, all users grant to Sendmails Corporation their explicit permission (1) to contact them with important information about members' accounts and updates to our services, policies and business practices, and (2) to share members' information with third parties. The users have the option to choose not to be contacted or their information shared by terminating their account.
  32. The Lighter Side by MrNonchalant · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There will be plenty of anti-spam tirades and jokes, so I will not bother duplicating that effort. However this is the first instance I've heard of commercial distributed computing (I'm sure there are others). If this trend continues, and I have faith that it will, some very cool sh!te could be in our future. I for one would welcome $1 dollar a processor hour for something not connected to penis enlargement and illegal nigerian money transfers. Though I have to wonder if eventually the computers will unionize and demand a higher hourly wage.

  33. Your check is in the mail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Riiiiiight! We'll pay you, sure. Your check is in the mail.

  34. Pay people to find spammers by bersl2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    and beat the crap out of them.

    That will end the spamming quickly.

  35. IP address fun by Theatetus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm a commercial bulk emailer. We've wanted to do something like this for a while but always got scared off by liability issues.

    This is a brilliant solution because the one thing we're always short of (even as legal bulk emailers) is IP blocks that aren't blacklisted (since a lot of the blacklists run simply on volume of email sent or take the word of somebody who's too stupid to remember he actually did sign up for a mailing list). I would assume actual spammers have an even tougher time with their IP addresses. Now they can spam up all the cable ISP's IP blocks, and once a block gets blacklisted they can just switch to a new set of users. Brilliant.

    --
    All's true that is mistrusted
    1. Re:IP address fun by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Now they can spam up all the cable ISP's IP blocks, and once a block gets blacklisted they can just switch to a new set of users. Brilliant.

      Yes, very "brilliant" of them. The only thing this will accomplish is getting port 25/tcp blocked all across the Internet completely whether you're an offender or not. Thanks asshole.

    2. Re:IP address fun by micromoog · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'm a commercial bulk emailer.

      Does telling yourself you're not a spammer make your money seem less dirty?

    3. Re:IP address fun by CritterNYC · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm a commercial bulk emailer. We've wanted to do something like this for a while but always got scared off by liability issues.

      This is a brilliant solution because the one thing we're always short of (even as legal bulk emailers) is IP blocks that aren't blacklisted **SNIP**

      Except for the fact that *legitimate* "commercial bulk email" uses confirmed opt-in (note that I didn't say "double opt-in", a term used by spammers to imply that it's somehow extra work), has a simple and effective unsubscribe process, never purchases or rents lists, never assumes permission to do anything (email, phone, physical mail, etc), provides something of real value (weekly commentary newsletter, real sales specials, etc), and doesn't send it out too often. I have colleagues that support companies with thousands subscribed to weekly newsletters and the like (industry commentary, etc) which they send directly from their own mail server and they've never been on an RBL or had a spam complaint.

    4. Re:IP address fun by Theatetus · · Score: 3, Interesting
      and they've never been on an RBL or had a spam complaint.

      We've had maybe 10 spam complaints in 5 years, and in all 10 cases we had the date, time, and IP address from which the user signed up for the list. Despite the fact that we can prove when and where they signed up for the list, those complaints + our mail volume is enough to get us blacklisted.

      --
      All's true that is mistrusted
    5. Re:IP address fun by Theatetus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah the email address signing up receives a confirm/deny email with three links: "subscribe", "don't subscribe", and "for God's sake don't ever send me anything from any of your servers ever again" (last two links are also in the footer of all messages we send out). We did once have a problem with a h4x0r (one of our clients at the time) trying to automate hits to the subscribe link but we caught him.

      We never could think of a good fix to prevent that. Anybody have any ideas?

      --
      All's true that is mistrusted
  36. perfect! by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One thing I have noticed in this world is, nothing gets fixed until there's some major crap hitting the big collective fan.

    Now here we have an email system which is increasingly broken, taken over by spammers, yet no one can agree to cooperate on a solution. Even the laws we make dont have any teeth.

    I think we should promote this new thing, and all jump onto the bandwagon.

    We should be able to definitely slashdot the email system at a planetary scale, thereby causing massive amounts of media aired/printed 24/7 for a few weeks.

    The repercussions on spammers would be spectacular, to say the least.

    I bet there would also be some political clout to revamp email to eliminate spam and prevent it from ever occuring again.

    I equate this to a spammer saying: "here's a perfectly working gun. now use it to shoot me."

  37. Okay, here's how to do it... by janic · · Score: 2, Informative

    Providing you have a Linux(tm) (or something) firewall handy, and a junk windows box to run the proggie on, you can set up a few rules with iptables, bind, and sendmail to put this together as follows:

    1 - install crapware on the junk machine
    2 - on the fw, have iptables transparently redirect all outboud smtp traffic to the local copy of sendmail
    3 - configure bind on FW to be a root, and put a wildcard MX record in to point to your FW as the MX for world+dog
    4 - have sendmail configured to accept all messages from everywhere (the wildcard MX record above will aid in this)
    5 - work some virtusertable magic to get sendmail to dump all messages to a local account whose mailspool dumps to dev/null
    6 - ???
    7 - Profit!

    Of course, we would have to include some exceptions to allow some presumed "test" or "tracker" messages through to let the company know that the program is running, and to fool them into thinking you are sending the spam out, but hey...

    Anything else I am missing?

    John

  38. Yeah, right. by Phs2501 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Since
    • They're paying by CPU time
    • Sending mail is by nature completely I/O bound
    • Computers are really really fast these days
    • They're not paying anyone until they build up $50
    It's almost a certainty that they will never have to pay anyone anything before they are put out of business. It would take months if not years to build up fifty hours of CPU time sending mail over a cable modem. And if they actually manage to hook someone with a rediculously large pipe, they're getting their money's worth in spades.

    This is a brilliant scam for people who don't know what CPU time means.

  39. And when thay are done sending spam? by Zocalo · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Virtual MDA will pay you $1 per CPU hour their program is running to relay spam around the world.

    And what might "their" program do when, after approximately one CPU hour, the IP that it is running on has been blacklisted and is no longer of use for spamming? Join a DDoS net? Download and host some very dodgy software or porn? The list goes on... Still, at least you'd be able to afford a quartet of two bit lawyers when you get busted for hosting a kiddie porn site or something.

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  40. $1 per *CPU* hour by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 4, Informative

    Please read it carefully. It is $1 per CPU hour, not $1 per hour. Sending email is not a CPU-intensive task. One CPU hour can be equivalent to as much as several weeks of saturated modem traffic!

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  41. Ah yes by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 2, Funny

    Of course, considering spammers are such honest and legitimate business people, they will pay me fairly for the amount of CPU time I have given them. I mean, people who spam do not have questionable business models and serve as role models for entrepeneurs of all levels.

    Excuse me, the nurse says it's time for my medication again. I need my happy fun pills!

  42. Paid spam by garlicfarmer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    1. Set up dummy email server that goes nowhere. 2. Sign up for spam program. 3. Send spam to dummy server. 4. Collect $24/day ($8760/year) The more people who do this, the broker the spammers will become.

  43. Non-event by Safety+Cap · · Score: 2, Informative
    The few people who fall into this sucker trap will quickly wake up when they discover that their ISP terminated their account for TOS violations.

    I noticed recently while trying to diagnose an email problem that Time Warner Cable now limits its "unlimited service" to 1,000 emails sent per day. Obviously, you'll hit your limit well before that CPU-hour, so you'll never make more than $365/year and eliminate your ability to send any personal email.

    You'd make more money hanging out at the street corner holding cardboard sign that says, "Will compute for food."

    --
    Yeah, right.
  44. My usual response: by Luckboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Time to give Spam hunters some extra tools. Trace, Ping, Whois, Frequent Flier Miles, Louisville Slugger.

  45. Check your ISP's Terms and Conditions by Caveman+Og · · Score: 2, Informative
    Using VirtualMDA almost certainly is a direct violation of the terms and conditions you signed when you first purchased your DSL or cable modem connection.

    In addition, Atriks' own policy insures that they will NEVER pay you.

    Believe me, this news hits slashdot late. The folks at your ISP almost certainly are aware of Atriks, and its owner Brian Harberstroh by now, and if not, you can point them to THIS. Spamhaus does not add listings to ROKSO until after a spammer has had three documented terminations. In fact it often takes several before one can get three which are documented, as most ISPs don't announce when they've terminated a spammer.

    --Og

  46. Wow! What a deal!! by DrDebug · · Score: 2, Funny

    For the great introductory price of only ONE DOLLAR per CPU HOUR, I can have friends and enemies alike want to COME TO MY HOUSE and SMASH MY COMPUTER to bits with SLEDGEHAMMERS!!

    What can be the downside to that?

    Sarcasm mode off.

  47. Both your friends? by carlos_benj · · Score: 5, Funny

    At $1/hour, this sounds like a low-gain way to infuriate both your friends and perfect strangers.

    Hey, how'd you know I only have two friends...?

    --

    --

    As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  48. Terms of Service by thebus · · Score: 3, Informative

    I case you couldn't get to the site like me, here are the terms of service from the google cache.

    Terms Of Service
    1. ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND ACCEPTANCE OF TERMS OF SERVICE. Atriks, LLC
    ("ATRIKS") web site, VirtualMDA and other ATRIKS services and web properties ("Service"),
    owned and operated by ATRIKS, is provided to the
    member community under the following Terms of Service and any operating rules
    or policies that may be published by ATRIKS. The Terms of Service comprise the
    entire agreement between Member and ATRIKS and supersede all prior agreements
    between the parties, regarding the subject matter contained herein. By
    participating in the registration process, members are indicating their
    agreement to be bound by all of these Terms of Service.

    2.Payment. Upon completing the registration procedure, you will be given a unique
    identification account number ("UID"). You will be paid by ATRIKS $0.25 for every
    Central Processing Unit Hour ("CPU HOUR") used by the VirtualMDA software located
    on your personal or business computer(s) (either or both of which shall be the
    "Installed Computer(s)") is actively connected to the internet ("Online"). The
    Installed Computer may accumulate a maximum of 24 CPU HOUR's in one day. If
    your UID logs more than 24 CPU HOURS in one 24 hour period, your account
    may be suspended or terminated for unusual or suspicious activity. In order to
    receive payment, you must submit a request to ATRIKS using the electronic request
    form provided to you via your member account webpage. Your member account webpage
    will contain a calculation showing the amount of money accrued in your account.
    In case of a dispute as to the amount accrued, the amount shown in your account
    is final and binding upon you in all respects. You may only request payment, and
    ATRIKS shall only disburse from your account, when your account is equal to or
    greater than $50.00 for United States residents and $90.00 for those residents
    outside the United States. In the event of technical problems or data loss which
    causes a loss of account information, your account will be reset at $0.00, and
    you hereby waive any and all claims for any amount previously accrued but not yet
    disbursed. All payments shall be by check, made payable to you, and sent to you
    at your last known address via the U.S. Postal Service, first class mail. There
    will be a check processing fee of $3.00 (three dollars) and any payment returned
    to ATRIKS shall be voided, and your account shall be deleted and any accrued
    amounts will be forfeited

    3. DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE. ATRIKS is providing Member with Internet services and
    opportunities to get rewarded while using the Internet in exchange for performing
    certain actions as desired by our advertisers. As part of this service ATRIKS provides
    Member with proprietary software ("SOFTWARE") for relaying email messages.
    In consideration for this Service, Member agrees to: (1) create only
    one account per household and, (2) provide certain current, complete, and accurate
    information about Member as prompted to do so by the Service and, (3) maintain and
    update this information as required to keep it current, complete and accurate and.
    All information requested on original sign-up shall be referred to as account
    information ("Account Information"). Furthermore, ATRIKS will not share, sell, trade,
    or give away personally identifiable Member information to third parties without Members'
    explicit permission. Upon registration, all users grant to ATRIKS their explicit
    permission (1) to contact them with important information about Members' accounts and
    updates to our services, policies and business practices, (2) to access and use the
    Installed Computer(s) for relaying permission based (opt-in) email for ATRIKS and/or
    third parties, and (4) data gathering activities, without further notice to or permission
    from Member. The users have the option to choose not to be contacted or t

    1. Re:Terms of Service by Hassman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is total BS:
      In the event of technical problems or data loss which causes a loss of account information, your account will be reset at $0.00, and you hereby waive any and all claims for any amount previously accrued but not yet distibuted.

      This is their back door. Every time their accounts get to the point where they need to pay out... they have an 'accident'. I can see it now:

      You: Where is my paycheck bitch?
      Them: I'm sorry sir, there was a technical problem that resulted in data loss of account information.
      You: So? Where is my paycheck?
      Them: The terms of agreement clearly state that we are not responsible for any payment if this happens.
      You: But this is the 4th time in a row that you were suppose to pay me!!!
      Them: Sucks to be you. Now get outta here, you bother me.

      I also like section 15. Give it a read.

      What a scam.

      --
      -Mark
      Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
  49. Perfect use for Vmware by Oriumpor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Dual Processor Xeon Server system w/2gigs of ram: $4000
    Single Professional License for Vmware from ebay: $200~
    The ability to milk a spammer for 30 bucks an hour: priceless.

  50. umm ... by jacobm · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is there any way end users can fight back against people like this?

    You could've started by not advertising their product for free on the front page of Slashdot ...

    --
    -jacob
  51. Oh my goodness by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Since your post - it seems like this place is suffering under slashdot load. I'm afraid that some people have actually figured out number 2 in the 1, 2, 3: Profit! Scenario.

    Bottom line though, good luck finding an ISP that will sell you a T1 without SPAM restrictions. Perhaps more importantly, you would be 1/2 or 1/3 responsible for any CAN-SPAM violation law-suits. That would put a hamper on your day. The lawyer fees alone would swallow your profits whole.

    --
    Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
    1. Re:Oh my goodness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      of course i didn't rtfa...but stay with me i have a plan...

      you get about a dozen or so computers running...since they pay per cpu hour, you run it on all of the boxes 24/7 now you put up a firewall that blocks all outgoing email traffic...now you are killing 2 birds with one stone because you are sucking money out of the spammers and you aren't actually sending any spam!

      now i guess i will rtfa...

  52. Re:validation by hpavc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    yes they send special messages through you and test that they got them.

    simular to mass snailmail mailing where you rent a list from someone and then if you continue to use it after the period you paid they know because they planted fake people in the list.

    --
    members are seeing something, your seeing an ad
  53. Re:First thought.... by Violet+Null · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Though spammers have, as a rule, shown themselves to be pretty dumb in general, they are not, as a rule, dumb technically.

    Trivial to have every nth (perhaps with some random deviation) email address be one of a number that the spammer itself monitors. If the mail does not get to those monitor accounts, you don't get paid.

  54. DUL RBL *NOW* by mabu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is why we need to get the major ISPs to contribute to centralized IP address lists of all broadband DUL space. Legitimate mail servers should refuse to accept mail from cable and DSL SMTP traffic. Then these spammers' schemes won't work, and it will also dramatically cut down on virus/worm propagation. I'm unaware of any really good DUL RBL except for Maps which is now pay. Does anyone know of a solid DUL RBL that's free?

  55. Here's how they describe their distributed system by Cytotoxic · · Score: 2

    From the description below, you can see that they don't want your ISP to block your connection. They only send you 100 emails at a time. I would speculate that their service is very difficult to uninstall, ensuring stability in their network.

    Atriks Description:

    Email Deployment

    Reliable and Effective Email Campaigns

    Atriks has created relationships with over 60,000 individuals throughout the world who act as sending agents for the Atriks Distributed Email Delivery System. Atriks has developed a software called VirtualMDA (see www.virtualmda.com ) which resides on these sending agents' machines and periodically talks to an array of servers within our data center, looking for messages to deliver. When messages are available, each agent machine can receive up to 100 emails to deliver. For example, with 20,000 agents sending 100 emails each, the Atriks Distributed Email Delivery System can deliver 2 Million emails in one quick shot.

    Politeness is key

    There are approximately 4500 "well known" mail servers within the US and Canada, so being "polite" on how we connect and deliver the messages is important. Atriks doesn't want to cripple the receiving mail servers with millions of messages, so we create delays and meter traffic so not to overload the receiving server with connections.

    Distributed delivery prevents blocking

    Atriks developed our Distributed Email Delivery System because many email providers will obstruct otherwise legal emails from very large senders at will and without notification to the sender/list owner. Using sending agents and VirtualMDA, blocking is much less likely.

    Creating a campaign

    Once signed up with Atriks, most customers can create their campaigns in a few easy steps through our web interface:
    Create the campaign
    Test and OK the campaign
    Set delivery date and time
    Upload your data records
    Set the campaign to "Ready."
    Our system automatically starts delivery at the time and date set within the campaign.

    For more information about using Atriks to deploy your next email marketing campaign, contact us.

  56. Not that much by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 4, Interesting
    $840 a week sounds good, but let's break it down.

    DSL/Cable Method:
    Sounds good: $840 per week
    First, Taxes: $500
    DSL/Cable gets cut off after a week, weekly replacement, non refundable: $440
    Two day wait for installation of new DSL provider (cuts funds by 2/7): $315
    Give two months, and you have likely run out of providers.

    T1 Method
    Sounds good: $840 per week
    First, Taxes: $500
    Pay for T1: $375
    Now were talking!

    Oh, but wait - assuming you find a provider that offers a T1 that doesn't cut you off... then, within 6 to 12 months, you become a Co-Defendant in a CAN-SPAM law suit. Assuming the judge does not find you responsible... Good luck paying yourself and a lawyer on $375 per month.

    There's another thing here as well. There's very little likelyhood that ANY computer can dedicate more than 95% CPU to a single task (unless you are running this program on DOS). It also assumes that they give you enough addresses to process to actually make this type of money (very doubtful).

    However, assuming everything were to go your way, T1 provider that likes you and no law-suit...Yeah, you can live on that, but you'd probably want to steal candy from kids to suppliment your income.

    --
    Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
  57. Why are spammers doing this? by mabu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Do you wonder why spammers are now trying to sign up individual users to help them relay spam?

    The answer is because relay-blacklisting is working!

    None of the client-side, server-side, content-based filtering has made any difference. What HAS made a difference are mail servers which are utilizing relay-blacklists of known spammer IP space and refusing to connect with them. This has forced the spammers to begin abandoning their havens in China, Brazil, Korea and other areas. Now they're trying to infiltrate domestic broadband IP space. First they tried it via propagating viruses and worms and that isn't working out as well as they'd like (and they probably figure sooner or later, the Feds just might actually prosecute one of them), so now they want to sucker people into spamming for them.

    All this is an indication that relay blacklisting IS effective.

    RBLs are becoming more sophisticated nowadays. Spamcop can usually ID a spam source in real time within an hour of it beginning operation. AOL and other major ISPs are now looking at RBLs to help them block spam. It's much more economical than strip-searching e-mail content using filters.

    Let's keep up the pressure. Let's continue to force the spammers into smaller areas of the Internet where they can be identified and dealt with. This latest effort is a good sign they're getting desperate to figure out where they can send spam out from. None of the content-based filtering schemes have come nearly as close to slowing down their efforts as much as RBLs.

  58. I've been blacklisted by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've had my mailserver blacklisted, and I tell you - $1000 an hour couldn't possibly be enough to blacklist-bait yourself like that. You never realise just how totally your business relies on email until suddenly it mostly stops working.

    Of course, then there's the fact that this proposal is offensive, anti-social, and just plain retarded.

    How were we blacklisted, you ask? We use an exim server as the gateway, with sendmail internally. The gateway server was marked as a trusted host for relaying on the internal server (indirectly; it was part of a subnet of hosts that needed to be able to relay). Normally that's not an issue, because the exim gateway would refuse to accept messages asking for relaying anyway.

    Unfortunately, the exim gateway permitted percent-hack messages to pass, permitting an attacker to bypass the gateway server's checks, and deliver a message for relaying to the sendmail server. Which promptly relayed it, because the gateway was a trusted host.

    Fix: disable percent hack (Why TF is it even supported anymore anyway?) and set the gateway to be able to deliver, but not relay.

  59. Business plan by ultranova · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1. Take 2 computers.

    2. Connect them with a LAN.

    3. Run Windows and this spam generator on computer A. Set it's network settings to use machine B as its gateway.

    4. Run Linux on computer B. Hijack all connections and packets originating from computer A and destined for port 25 (or all which are targeted outside the spammer's IP, to be safe). Let other packets to travel to Internet normally, so that the spammer can download new spam definitions.

    5. Run a mail server on computer B. Forward all mail coming from computer A to be study material for a Bayesian filter and then /dev/null -filler.

    6. Profit !!!

    7. Watch as all the other geeks get the same bright idea.

    8. Watch and enjoy as the spammers go bankrupt.

    9. ??? (it is impossible to predict what a post-spam Internet will be like).

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  60. The real company is Atriks, LLC in New Hampshire by Animats · · Score: 2, Informative
    OK, who's behind "virtualmda.com"?

    Whois:

    • Atriks, LLC
      55 Bridge Street
      Manchester, NH 03101-1188
      Phone- 603-624-7008
      Fax- 603-624-9089
      hostmaster@atriks.com

    Atriks is a mailing list company. "Atriks offers targeted public record data that comes entirely from publicly available Internet sources. We collect, compile, aggregate and provide the most high-quality, complete, and up-to-date data possible for every individual and business with a presence on the Internet." They're a member of the Direct Marketing Association. They claim a server farm with 330 servers and seven terabytes of data. Here are some of the lists they offer:

    • Atriks Broadband Consumers "1,000,000+ consumers who have demonstrated a thirst for better technology and a willingness to spend money for enhanced products and services are included."
    • Atriks Personal Domain Owners with Credit Cards "7,000,000+ consumers have registered a domain for their own personal use and have created Web sites that share everything from jokes to family pictures. A key part of their registration is supplying credit card information, resulting in a file with all major credit card selects available."
    • Atriks Subscribers by ISP "6,700,000+ subscribers identified by ISP are included in this database. Mailers can target these subscribers by more than 100 selectable ISP providers."
    Those are just the "consumer" lists. They also have business-to-business lists.

    Atriks is co-located with a local ISP, MV Communications.. MV has been in business for many years. They have modest backbone connections for an ISP; 6Mb/s to Global Crossing, 12Mb/s to Level 3, and 12Mb/s to Paetec. Unclear at this time if MV and Atriks have common ownership.

    They're what the DMA would call a "legitimate spammer".

  61. This give me a GREAT idea by SilentReproach · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let's all sign up for it, for the sole purpose of finding out who owns the originating mailservers! Then we can ddos them, and blackhole 'em, and report 'em, and order pizzas for them...

    --
    Religion is the opium of the people. Evolution is the opium of scientists.
  62. Re:Yes, 386 by radiophonic · · Score: 2, Funny

    Damn! I wish Gentoo would hurry up and build on this thing so I can start making $$$ !

    --
    Whenever you read this sig someone's refrigerator light turns on.
  63. I got paid! by Dog135 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I got paid! No, really, I got lots of money from them! I got rich, and I did it quick! Now go sign up and tell them luser#29766628 sent you!

    While you're at it, don't forget to make your order for viagralax, the only viagra alternative that's also a laxative. I'm not only a peddler, I'm also a satisfied customer!

    (As if you could really trust someone who said they got paid.)

    --
    "That's so plausible, I can't believe it!" - Leela
  64. Don't forget the spyware! by nf0s3c · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From their license agreement: Examples of information that we collect, other than through the registration form, include URL of visited pages, registration for offerings and IP addresses. Examples of data gathering activities include web page retrieval, domain tld discovery, and internet port/proxy discovery. Upon termination of the online session, closing of the browser and/or termination of your membership, this information will no longer be collected. We gather this information to improve the administration of the services and to increase the earning potential of our members. What a deal - lose your ISP, get sued, give them free marketing data, then have them lose the info to pay you. They even charge YOU a $3 check processing fee just to pay you.

  65. Summary of ToS, with comments by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 2, Informative

    Full ToS is on their website
    http://www.virtualmda.com/terms.htm

    I've paraphrased their clauses.
    My comments are in italics after.

    1. By signing up, you agree to this ToS

    2. You get $1 for every "CPU HOUR".
    You have to ask to get paid.
    We won't pay unless it's at least $50.
    If there's anything suspicious, or we make a mistake in accounting, you get nothing.

    Comment: it's not clear what a "CPU HOUR" is, but I suspect despite the many claims on slashdot, that they really do mean $1 for every hour your computer is running their program and is connected to the internet sending email. But their program doesn't run unless both you and they tell it to, so they could guarantee that it runs less than 40 hours if they wanted to.

    3. You agree not to cheat.

    4. We can change the Terms of Service whenever we want.

    My guess is that this happens if you would actually get paid if they didn't.

    5. You are responsible for security.

    6. There is no warranty.

    7. We aren't liable for anything.

    8. Our software has a copyright.

    9. We decide if you violated the ToS.

    10. You can't resell the service.

    I wonder why they're worried about that.

    11. You are responsible for anything we send.

    Yes, they really do expect you to take the fall for what they are doing.

    12. You indeminfy us.

    And if they should happen to take the fall, then you have to pay for that too.

    13. All you can do if you don't like it is quit.

    14. The legal jurisdicition for everything is New Hampshire.

    15. You agree not to participate in class actions against us.
    And that goes for all time, not just this.

    In other words, they know you're going to want to sue them, so they want to make sure it's not worthwhile to do it.

    Mostly, the ToS is the usual collection of stupidity, but that last clause is so out there that I had to comment.

    -- this is not a .sig

  66. Not quite (Also, it has a trojan) by Guspaz · · Score: 3, Informative

    I installed the client just for kicks (Don't expect them to pay out, I'm curious):

    Time Run: 1:31:14:999
    CPU Time Used: 0:01:05:199
    CPU % Usage: 1.69%

    Oh yeah, did I mention it has a trojan?

    Typed screenshot from AVG Antivirus:

    AVG Residant shield

    Virus
    Trojan horse Downloader.4.Small.BT

    is found in file
    D:\Program Files\VirtualMda\package.exe

    To remove this virus, please run AVG for Windows

  67. They hope you're bad at math. by dtfinch · · Score: 2, Informative

    At 0.2% CPU usage:
    24x365x.002 = $17.52/yr

    You can bet they've optimized it for minimal cpu usage, and that it'll suck up nearly all of your bandwidth. You'd be paid about $20 a year for most of what you pay over $300 a yr for. A very raw deal, not to mention the high probability of it getting you in trouble with your isp.

  68. Sounds like fun . . . by Java+Ape · · Score: 2, Funny
    OK, lets all sell them time on our computers. I've got seven CPU's running in my basement, most of which are idle far too often. If they can get 70% CPU utilization I'll make $4.90 an hour, which ought to offset the electrical bill.

    However, since that $4.90/hour won't even come close to covering the potential bandwidth charges they'd accumulate, it seems only prudent that I configure a mail filter to route outbound messages to /dev/null . . .

  69. Some info about the application by jrj102 · · Score: 2, Informative
    OK, I installed it in a closed-lab scenario, and poked, prodded, and port-scanned to get some info. Here are some basics:

    • CPU time is, indeed, CPU time. It is based on the amount of time the CPU actually spends on the given process ID. I cranked everything for 60 minutes, and the total CPU time was 41 seconds.
    • It sends traffic on port 25 as expected.
    • SMTP failure does not seem to have a short-term impact on the calculated CPU time. I ran it for 30 minutes where it was being tricked into thinking the messages were sent, and 30 minutes where it WASN'T being tricked into thinking the messages were sent. The CPU time was about the same for each of those half hour segments. (19 seconds for the first, 23 second for the second.) They don't seem to be checking. These numbers WERE reflected on the web site's management area as well.
    • based on the above info (i.e. that they are not checking to see if the messages are actually being sent) I have to assume that they don't plan to pay anyone. I can't imagine they would have made that mistake otherwise.
    • Their backend (which handles the requests) seems to be web services based, and doesn't seem to have any form of authentication in place.
    • The app is pretty configurable. I've posted some informative screenshots on my blog.

  70. Memo from VirtualMDA by CristalShandaLear · · Score: 2, Funny

    From: Prez
    TO: Logistics Staff
    RE: TEST PHASE/ FRAUD

    Finding morons who think they'll get away with spamming their family, friends, and neighbors is no problem.

    Issue: those who will find a way around the system with successful results that we haven't even thought of yet. Test phase provided some unexpected results in regards to fraud and you numbskulls better way to conteract this.

    Come up with something fast!

    Prez

    To: Prez
    From: Logistics
    RE: TEST PHASE/ FRAUD

    We have assmebled a special IT team working on this issue. Our team will be of no additional cost to our company. They are a volunteer, international team, working 24/7, for the sheer delight of exploring our new brand of technology. What's more, with minimal information, they will soon provide us with enough ground level feedback to foresee any possible avenues of fraud and/or minimize any such activity. Some of them will even sign up or the service themselves just to "test" it.

    The situation is under control sir.

    *giggle from the IT team over the memo after they hit SEND*

    The slashdot folk will find out about us soon enough. They'll figure out all the possible ways anyone could possibly think of for fraud, and post their answers, theories, and countless possibilities for us to go over whenever we get a sec. Let's go to lunch! :)

  71. Scary terms of service... by billybob · · Score: 2, Informative

    Allight, this is just scary...

    Upon registration, all users grant to SENDMAILS CORPORATION their explicit
    permission (1) to contact them with important information about Members' accounts and
    updates to our services, policies and business practices, (2) to access and use the
    Installed Computer(s) for relaying permission based (opt-in) email for SENDMAILS CORPORATION and/or
    third parties, (3) to access and use the Installed Computer(s) for domain name resolution,
    and (4) data gathering activities, without further notice to or permission
    from Member.
    The users have the option to choose not to be contacted or their
    information shared by terminating their account. SENDMAILS CORPORATION collects online behavior
    statistical information for our members. Examples of information that we collect,
    other than through the registration form, include URL of visited pages, registration
    for offerings and IP addresses. Examples of data gathering activities include web page
    retrieval, domain tld discovery, and internet port/proxy discovery.
    Upon termination
    of the online session, closing of the browser and/or termination of your membership,
    this information will no longer be collected. We gather this information to improve
    the administration of the services and to increase the earning potential of our members.
    This information will be made available to third parties. If any information provided
    by Member is incomplete or inaccurate, SENDMAILS CORPORATION retains the right to terminate Member's
    membership and rights to use the Service.


    No thank you....

    O_O

    --
    Joseph?