Slashdot Mirror


Sapphire: A Liquid That Won't Get Things Wet

eaglebtc writes "Tuesday on Good Morning America, a representative from Tyco Fire & Security demonstrated an amazing new substance called Sapphire: a water-like fluid that does not get things wet. He filled a small fish tank with Sapphire and submerged a book, a laptop, and a flat panel TV. Both electronics were turned on when submerged; all three items came out completely unharmed. Click here for a slideshow of the demonstration. The official name for Sapphire is actually Novec 1230. Read about it here (PDF). Tyco sees practical applications of Sapphire in fire extinguisher systems for museums and libraries. By the same token of practicality, regular readers of Slashdot probably have something else in mind: total-immersion watercooling. Just think of the possibilities!"

31 of 843 comments (clear)

  1. "Water"-cooling by Liselle · · Score: 5, Informative

    Offtopic, but the submitter opened the door: according to their specs sheet (PDF warning), this stuff has a boiling point of 49.2C (120.6F). Processors burn hotter than that, how useful would it still be for cooling purposes if it were a gas? I also have to wonder what the long-term effects of exposure would be... it's one thing to dunk a laptop for a few seconds, it's something else entirely to have it swimming all day long. At least your machine would never catch on fire.

    They might have some information there about how well the stuff will conduct heat, but I got a lousy grade in Chemistry, so I'll leave it to the experts. ;)

    --
    Auto-reply to ACs: "Truly, you have a dizzying intellect."
    1. Re:"Water"-cooling by stereoroid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The actual usefulness of the fluid in any state depends on the specific heat capacity, which I can't see 'coz the site is /.'d ...

      Since the phase change itself is be a major energy-absorber, that could be very helpful indeed as long as fresh condensed fluid comes in after a radiator of some sort.

      --
      (this is not a .sig)
    2. Re:"Water"-cooling by Phurd+Phlegm · · Score: 5, Interesting
      yes... but no-one's concerned about reusing the water you used to put out the fire. coolant, on the other hand, should stick around for more than a few seconds before it bubbles off into the atmosphere.

      If you put it deep enough in the fluid, the bubbles will condense on the way up. If the heat of vaporization is anything reasonable, this should work quite well to remove heat from your chip--the fluid changing to a gas absorbs a bunch of heat, and then swims away with it, while more cool fluid rushes in to take its place. Probably look cool, too.

    3. Re:"Water"-cooling by jspoon · · Score: 5, Insightful
      If they're using it to put out fires, it's a safe bet that it can handle your Athlon.

      Not the same thing. You aren't trying to put out fires by cooling them, you're depriving them of oxygen. It could be that it's just as good at that application in gaseous state as when a liquid. In processor's, on the other hand, you want something to conduct away the heat from the processor. Gasses are usually bad heat absorbers.

      I do like what was said below about using the state change to cool, pumping the gaseous Sapphire away and re-condensing it. It would be more complicated than just putting your computer in a fish tank full of the stuff and letting convection do the rest (circulate the liquid keeping the coolest of it at the bottom), though.

    4. Re:"Water"-cooling by random+coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      According to the fact sheet, this is meant to put out fire by lowering the temperature below the burning point, not by preventing oxygen from combusting the fuel. So it is the same thing, in fact.

    5. Re:"Water"-cooling by psychofox · · Score: 5, Interesting
      You have to be careful with 3M's Fluorinert: Mustard gas doesn't sound too pleasant to me!

      Mustard gas

      Corporate site for Fluorinert

    6. Re:"Water"-cooling by kcdoodle · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A good cooling setup would have enough flow to keep the liquid from boiling.

      With a high enough recirculation flow rate, any boiling the would take place would be at the chip. Small bubbles would form and be swept away by the fluid flow.

      This process is called "Nucleate Boiling" and is the best heat transfer method there is. The latent heat of vaporization is absorbed by the liquid in it's phase change to a gas. Then the tiny gas bubbles are swept away by the fluid flow and the gas bubbles collapse, giving their latent heat to the surrounding fluid. This heat is later removed by the cooling radiator at the other end.

      As long as the bulk temperature of the fluid stays well below the boiling point and the fluid flow is sufficent to strip the small bubbles that form on the heat source surface, this is really the best setup imaginable!

      I live the greatest adventure anyone could want -- Tosk the Hunted.

      --

      - I live the greatest adventure anyone could possibly desire. - Tosk the Hunted
    7. Re:"Water"-cooling by Myrrh · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, it is the same thing.

      Fire suppression systems such as those that use Halon (which was outlawed in the '90s due to its ozone-destroying side-effects) put out fires by displacing oxygen with some other gas.

      Spraying water on a fire does not "deprive" the fire of oxygen. In fact, this is why you aren't supposed to fight certain types of fires (a magnesium fire, for example) by spraying water on it. That's because if the fire is hot enough, it will "crack" the water molecules, liberating both oxygen and hydrogen -- which will of course make the fire much worse.

      Spraying water on a fire robs the fire of thermal energy. Evaporation (converting a liquid to a gas) is an endothermic process; it takes a significant amount of energy. When you dump a bunch of water on a fire, it takes energy from the combustion reaction to turn the water into steam. Eventually so much thermal energy has been taken from the fire that the fire extinguishes.

    8. Re:"Water"-cooling by ryepup · · Score: 5, Interesting

      on a more practical note, do you want a hermetically sealed case? Thats seems like it would be a lot more expensive and much more difficult to maintain. When you're hard drive dies, not only do you have to get a replacement drive and pop it in, you have to pop the seal on your case, drain some fluid, switch the hardware, then re-fill and re-seal the case.

    9. Re:"Water"-cooling by syn3rg · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually you're right. Hard drives aren't hermetically sealed either -- They have small holse to allow the air inside to expand or contract based on heat load. The liquid would get in. It might not fry your electronics, but I'll bet it'd give the heads a hard time. possibly even corrupt the disks.

      --
      The contents of this message have been doubly encrypted by ROT13
    10. Re:"Water"-cooling by fintler · · Score: 5, Informative
      It makes me wonder why they haven't developed hard drives to work in a vacuum.


      Hard drives work because air is there. The head basically "takes off" in a sense. It flys above the platters. In a vacuum, the head would just drag along the platter, probably destroying the drive.
  2. Don't tell my boss by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    [...] a total flooding clean agent, which serves as an effective halon replacement.

    So, in other words, a server room full of "Sapphire" will kill us just as fast as a server room full of Halon? That and the added entertainment of watching lifeless geeks float around behind the room's glass wall? My PHB will likely be faxing Tyco a P.O. this afternoon!

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  3. Great! by Rapid+Home+Offer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I don't have to rub myself with ducks before I go swimming!

  4. That's pretty cool. by demonic-halo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Perhaps I'll use it to fake my death by submerging myself in a bath tub full of it, then dropping a hair dryer into the tub and video tape the whole thing.

  5. Fluorocarbons by BWJones · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hmmmm. This sounds like the fluorocarbons that we used to bathe the insides of Cray supercomputers with. They were pretty cool with little windows that one could look in and see "waterfalls" of fluorocarbon flowing over the circuitboards and components to keep them cool.

    Of course we had to have an entire floor below us dedicated to refrigeration, but hey. Governments can afford this kind of stuff.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
  6. Re:Uhm by strictnein · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm no expert but if something's on fire, getting it wet is the least of your worries.

    Yep, you are no expert. In many fires by far the most damage is not caused by the fire itself, but by the massive amounts of water used to put it out.

  7. Finally... by jlowery · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I can give my cat a bath.

    --
    If you post it, they will read.
  8. Ted Kennedy by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they could make this available on Cape Cod, Ted Kennedy would not have to worry about explaining his drenched suits after he goes driving.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  9. Uh.. by hookedup · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why give a new substance the name of an older substance?

  10. If it doesn't get things wet... by ShdwStkr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    how to you clean it up? Or pick it up? Say, after it's been used to put out a fire? Or does some 'special' cloth absorb it?

    -j

    1. Re:If it doesn't get things wet... by gardyloo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The way you clean up spilled Mercury is to sprinkle zinc dust all over, and then sweep it up. It's one of the very few toxic substances that Environmental Health and Safety people will let an "untrained" chemistry or physics person clean up without a lot of shoulder-peeking. Hell, they even hand out these "special" sponges, which are essentially just a regular sponge with zinc bits glued on.

      The point is that Mercury WILL stick to zinc (amalgam, anyone?) and copper, but zinc is a bit less toxic than copper to have around.

      Similarly, I work with 3M's fluorinert liquids quite a bit, although not for cooling. They're useful for some of their other properties (which I'm not revealing right now, because my research could get scooped -- that's science in action!), but the BEST property is that they're STABLE, and they're awfully nonreactive with organics (humans). There've been studies where fish were immersed in fluorinert liquids for long times. Just bubble some oxygen through the stuff so the fish can breathe, and choose the right density, and the fish do fine. Choose the wrong densities, though, and the fish'll be bobbing about on the surface, wondering how the hell to deflate their swim bladders.

  11. Another liquid that won't get things wet: by rsidd · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mercury. May not be a good idea to submerge electronics in it though. And it's expensive, and toxic.

  12. Fluorinert by Winter · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is of course not the first liquid that does not cause harm to electronics, and can be used for total immersion water cooling. Fluorinert (3m) has been around for a while. One version of it is(was) also used for liquid breething deep diving (same as used on "The Abyss").

    --
    main(i){putchar(177663314>>6*(i-1)&63|!!(i<5)<<6)&&main(++i);}
  13. Specs Data by Liselle · · Score: 5, Informative
    Here, I pulled it before /. nuked the site:
    Chemical Formula CF3CF2C(O)CF(CF3)2
    Molecular Weight 316.04
    Boiling Point @ 1 atm 49.2&#176;C (120.6&#176;F)
    Freezing Point -108.0&#176;C (-162.4&#176;F)
    Critical Temperature 168.7&#176;C (335.6&#176;F)
    Critical Pressure 18.65 bar (270.44 psi)
    Critical Volume 494.5 cc/mole (0.0251 ft3/lbm)
    Critical Density 639.1 kg/m3 (39.91 lbm/ft3)
    Density, Sat. Liquid 1.60 g/ml (99.9 lbm/ft3)
    Density, Gas @ 1 atm 0.0136 g/ml (0.851 lbm/ft3)
    Specific Volume, Gas @ 1 atm 0.0733 m3/kg (1.175 ft3/lb)
    Specific Heat, Liquid 1.103 kJ/kg&#176;C (0.2634 BTU/lb&#176;F)
    Specific Heat, Vapor @ 1 atm 0.891 kJ/kg&#176;C (0.2127 BTU/lb&#176;F)
    Heat of Vaporization @ boiling point 88.0 kJ/kg (37.9 BTU/lb)
    Liquid Viscosity @ 0&#176;C/25&#176;C 0.56/0.39 centistokes
    Solubility of Water in Novec 1230 Fluid <0.001 % by wt.
    Vapor Pressure 0.404 bar (5.85 psig)
    Relative Dielectric Strength, 1 atm (N2=1.0) 2.3
    --
    Auto-reply to ACs: "Truly, you have a dizzying intellect."
    1. Re:Specs Data by Cecil · · Score: 5, Informative

      I am not a chemist, but you do know that CFC stands for 'chlorofluorocarbon' right? As in, Chlorine, Flourine, and Carbon? Where in that chemical composition do you see any chlorine? It's not a CFC just because it has the letters 'C', 'F', and 'C' in it somewhere.

      Which isn't to say fluorine is pleasant stuff, but it's not going to destroy the ozone layer.

  14. Fluorinert by Skyshadow · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I was in intern at the Chippewa Falls offices of Cray (well, SGI, but we all called it Cray) back in 1999.

    I seem to remember hearing that the fluorinert they cooled the processors with was perfectly safe unless turned into a gas, in which case it was roughly as toxic as mustard gas. So, if there was ever an electrical fault in one of the machines that caused the coolant to boil off, there was a distinct possibility that you'd end up with a few dead operators.

    Can anyone confirm/deny this? Actually, don't deny -- this is one of my best geek stories.

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
  15. A Liquid That Won't Get Things Wet by tony1c · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hopefully this will work out better than their previous product "The Towel That Won't Get Things Dry".

  16. Oh crap, another thing we can't use against RIAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    >"Making bits hard to copy is like making water not wet..." - Bruce Schneier

    Shit, here goes another argument against DRM.

  17. Evaporation... by Benm78 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Take a look at these specs:

    Boiling Point @ 1 atm 49.2 C
    Heat of Vaporization @ boiling point 88.0 kJ/kg
    Vapor Pressure 0.404 bar

    This is a liquid that will readily evaporate (a little slower than ether would). If a limited quanitity is used (such as in a hand-held extinguisher), it will probably evaporate before you get the chance to clean it up.

    The article also states that the LC50 is over 10% by volume, which tells this substance is probably not very dangerous, unless specific medical problems arise.

    As it seems to be safe to the atmosphere as well, i guess the 'plan' is to just let it sit there and evaporate.

    This may sound dangerous, but we do the same with CO2 - which is more lethal to anyone entering the room and possibly to the environment (global warming) as well.

  18. Re:Vapor Pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wouldn't want to breath this stuff any more than I want to inhale octane, or anything else.

    I think it's best to inhale at least something; I find an Oxygen/Nitrogen mix works well for me YMMV.

  19. Bad idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    One problem. Try heating a frying pan with nothing on it. After you can sense that it's hot enough, sprinkle a little water on it. The water will float over the pan.

    When the water makes contact with the hot pan, it turns to steam, which then insulates the remaining water above the pocket. The temperature of that pocket of steam gets quite high since it has little opportunity to escape and doesn't really get cooled. More importantly, the pan gets very little cooling effect from the water evaporation.

    Therefore, you should never rely on coolant when any part of it is at or very close to its boiling point. The coolant properties of the fluid break down.

    The above doesn't really match your example, since it's not immersed within a coolant environment. For a better example, use a boiling pot of water. Examination of the locations of steam nucleation reveal that those areas (however small) do not get wet, and gets insulated as illustrated above.