Nanotech or Nano-Not?
LabRat007 writes "CNN has a story on the current status and future of nanotechnology. This infromative overview on the technology talks about current research and when we can expect nano-parts for our geek gear."
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
... "Young Lady's Illustrated Primer" for any female children I may someday have. That's all I ask.
Freedom: "I won't!"
The only nanos I'm okay with are nanoseconds.
Nothing is so smiple that it can't get screwed up.
This infromative...
maybe some nanotech spell bots for our keyboards would be more handy...
- Carpe diem, quam minimum credula postero.
I don't know about you, but the prospect of moving a planet out of its orbit and into another sounds like a fun thing to try. I know this is an article about nanotech, but after hearing that example written in there, we should put more research into moving around planets. I think that would be awesome.
Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
-"Dan"
Perhaps before you attempt anything as difficult as PhD-level research you should work on something simpler, such as the use of a dictionary.
What is the advantage of having a building measuring but a few nanometers in height?
...
I just dont get it
Heh. Mr Coward you are either a master of irony, or you are also in need of a dictionary.
That's why some people are opposed to nanotechnology.
So blame Matt Groening; it's his fault.
Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
I don't know what country this article comes from, but 'minus 455 degrees fahrenheit'? What third world country still uses that scale?
10 years ago I missed the bandwagon on microtechnology.
Now I'm missing out on the nanotech money.
As of today, I am jumping the gun and writing proposals to study areas which will give insight into the upcoming picotech field. If things go well. I will be pulling in femptotech money by the end of the decade.