Slashdot Mirror


India Starts All-Electronic National Elections

fantomas writes "Forget the problems of e-voting in a state in some middling sized western country as recently reported by Slashdot. The world's largest democracy is about to go to the polling stations and vote for a new government using all-electronic voting systems. Will it work? Will the USA follow if all goes to plan? Can any readers from India comment on how it seems to be going?"

4 of 395 comments (clear)

  1. Electronic Voting by ke4roh · · Score: 5, Informative
    Electronic voting in the U.S. is only slightly different from that in India. The systems in India have simpler hardware and software, leading me to trust them more - but still not as much as a piece of paper.

    India's system is a simple box that counts. The system in the U.S. is typically more like an automated teller machine (ATM) with a computer behind it.

    The Mercuri method of electronic voting allows the voter to inspect a paper printout of the cast ballot before it lands in the box for use only in the event of a recount. Brazil (and other places) use it. I would like to see it in use wherever direct-recording electronic (DRE) voting is used.

    The big quirk in the United States is the decentrallized nature of the voting systems - every county (of which there are about 3400) selects its own voting machines, ballots, and so forth.

    --
    I hate call waitin`~+~~~
    NO CARRIER
  2. Voted in the morning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Just voted in the morning. The Electronic Voting machines (EVMs) have been around in India since 5 years or so, but this is the first one in which they are used throughout India.
    The voting process is something like this,
    U go to the poll booth assigned, someone finds U in the printed list of voters for the booth, the candidates can have their agents sitting inside, who also verify that my name exists.
    The identification is via a electoral card or some defined photo-ids
    Next U get a ink mark on the index finger, whcih is supposed to be difficult to erase ( techniques to erase them are "well-known":-))
    After that U get a slip which is taken by next official who has to press a button to make the EVM operable. So there is a paper trail of who has voted.
    The EVM (as shown in the BBC article is a flat device with the names, symbol of the party and a LED and a button) When the official has given the go ahead, there is a green light on top; one has to press the button against the candidate, a red LED against the candidate glows and U are done.
    The procedure is quite simple and is lot better than the ballot paper stuffing before.

    The counting is done on a scheduled date, wherein all these EVMs are kept in a specified place and counting happens with the candidates' representatives around.

  3. some related links by ek-1000-ek · · Score: 5, Informative
    For the curious and restless

    Some pictures:

    http://specials.rediff.com/election/2004/apr/20ele cimg8.htm

    The elephant carrier news:

    http://www.hindu.com/2004/04/20/stories/2004042001 451300.htm

    Some candidates:

    http://specials.rediff.com/election/2004/apr/16bod y1.htm

    This is third time the EVMs have been used but first time for a national elections.

    --
    where did my sig go? where's my sig at?
  4. Just voted by rasteroid · · Score: 5, Informative

    I squeezed in just before the polls closed at 5:00 PM in Bangalore. I was a little rushed because all the security people kept telling me to hurry up so that they could go home. However the election in my constituency was very peaceful, unlike some other areas.

    Interestingly Indian media is not as vocal about the relatively small incidents of violence when compared to the international media.

    The electronic voting machines felt a little awkward. There was no feedback to tell me that I had actually voted for the right person, and no mechanism that I could tell to correct myself had I pressed the wrong button. In fact one of the instructions for voters that came out in the Times of India today mentioned that we should make sure the election commission employees monitoring the election didn't "accidentally" press one of our buttons for us.

    I would have liked the machine to somehow tell me (either through a display or by printing a little paper receipt) that I had voted for the right person.

    Also, one of the women election commission workers was looking down on my machine as I proceeded to push my button. I had to give her a really ugly look, "Do you mind?". She shrugged and went and sat down on her chair. There were representatives from all the political parties contesting for the seat from my constituency.

    What's probably not as common in the West is that there were about 10 people contesting from my constituency alone. One each from the major national parties (BJP/NDA, Congress), a couple from the major state parties and a few independents. I think the choice in the West is usually never more than 3 or 4.

    After voting each voter is marked with a small drop of ink between the nail and the skin on the forefinger of the left hand. Not sure what they do if you are handicapped.

    A state-wide holiday was declared to encourage people to vote. However in some areas it was just too hot in north of the state so the turnout was quite poor (40%-ish) whereas in my state on average I think it is around 60%. I'm sure there were many other factors that affected the voter turnout.

    The national parties are promising between 10-12% economic growth, which has probably never been achieved in India's post-independence history. Let's see how things pan out, although it appears the ruling BJP-led alliance will dominate. The question is by how much.

    All in all, it still felt good to cast a vote, although numerically the bigger the democracy the smaller the net value of each vote.