GCC 3.4.0 Released
AaronW writes "While checking the GCC website I saw that GCC version 3.4 was officially released on April 18th. Version 3.4 includes numerous changes and enhancements, including better optimization, and the ability to build a profiled version of gcc which is 7.5-11% faster on i386 hardware. Be kind and please use one of the mirror sites."
This announcement is premature, it's still propagating to mirrors; the "announcment" is an error. The official release will be tomorrow.
Human/Ranger/Zangband
"precompiled announcements"
is still using a 386 anymore??? Get with the times, gcc! ;)
four nine eighteen twenty-7 thirty-nine forty-7 fiftyeight sixty-nine seventy-9 eighty-8 one-hundred-and-nine one-twenty
Ideally no one would have noticed until tomorrow, when the official announcement will go out..
/., did they?
They did not think about
Has the ability to profile shared libraries been fixed? I have tried to do this, and even if you compile a shared library with -pg, and specify it in the LD_PROFILE environment variable, the resulting profile file cannot be processed by gprof V2.4 - instead you get "error: unsupported profile revision 131,071"
I *really* need to profile a shared library, and building it as a staticly linked executable is not an option.
www.eFax.com are spammers
If you run across them, be sure to thank Paolo Carlini, Petur Runolfsson, and Jerry Quinn for making 3.4 iostreams as fast as (and often faster than) Glibc's stdio. Thank them, too for making filebuf support large files (>2G) natively without any code or build changes needed, on any target that allows them.
Worth noting, too, is that this is the first release in which the library is part of the ABI. Every previous release since 2.95 has had to increment the libstdc++.so version number, but future 3.4 (and maybe 3.5) releases should be backward compatible. Ask your distribution maintainers to ship 3.4-built versions of all C++ libraries they package, so that they will be compatible with programs built with this and future releases.
They broke binary compatibility in gcc 3.0, and again in 3.2, and now in 3.4.
What do you think the outlook is for binary compatibility with 3.6?
Stupid job ads, weird spam, occasional insight at
6) No screenshots
Unfortunately, these changes are not a part of the 3.4.0 release of GCC/GCJ and will only be available from 3.5.0 (or 4.0.0, as the case might be).
rmathew.com
Well, you are wrong in a number of ways:
1) Like you already noticed yourself, GCC doesn't have the even/odd numbered version logic of Linux. Each version number is a release version. Development versions have the next release version with a date attached to the version. The development process is formalized and is described here
2) GCC 3.4 is a regular new version with a number of new features. It is certainly not a minor version with just some compile speed tuning. I would consider the changes from 3.3 to 3.4 bigger than the previous changes from 3.2 to 3.3.
3) The real oddball in the GCC 3.x series is GCC 3.2.x. This is just a bugfix version of GCC 3.1. However as some of the bugs fixed were a major C++ ABI issue and fixing those bugs lead to incompatibility, the GCC developers decicded to exceptionally increment the version number not following the regular release scheme.
Marcel