Slashdot Mirror


OO.org Selects Its Own Sea Bird

Elektroschock writes "A new mascot of the OO.org project was announced today: A crazy sea gull. I wonder whether it will help to convince office workers of Open Office. "Andrea [Maggioni]'s contribution is not only beautiful and effective but also illustrates the potential of young people to contribute importantly to real projects under the banner of Free and Open Source Software." Andrea, "whose cheerful drawing, of a fun-looking seagull holding a fish, plays on the "OOo" shorthand of OpenOffice.org"... ehemm, it's a crazy sea gull."

15 of 413 comments (clear)

  1. Pun on by ciroknight · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Migration? maybe?

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
  2. Re:Please note by pvt_medic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    thats good to hear, because while it is a nice picture and all. I dont think this is the logo that will get them international respect as an alternative to microsoft office.

    However i do applaud them for involving school aged children into this project and their efforts to bring open office to schools. This will not only save schools hundreds of dollars (more like thousands) but also will having children involved with the development of such a product has countless educational value.

    I tip my hat to them

    --
    30% Troll, 50% Underrated, 10% Interesting
    Score:5, Troll
  3. Re:Not the OO.org mascot by DoraLives · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I have enough trouble trying to convince coworkers to adopt F/OS Software without having to deal with "cutesy" mascots

    Amen brother. What the hell is the deal with so much of the visual symbology for OSS being ... well ... retarded? We're trying to draw folks in here, not push them away, right?

    Proceed mods, I'll let the karma burn on this one.

    --
    Is it fascism yet?
  4. The "OK" sign the gull is making is obscene in EU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The "OK" sign is another way of referring to the female genetalia in some countries, and is considered obscene, which could be a bit of an impediment to OO use in some countries.

    Maybe they should have researched this a bit more...

  5. Oh great by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Andrea receives a great prize of a web-hosting service for one year, 200 Mb of web space on a Linux server, with 50 IMAP/POP3 mailboxes (protected from virus and spam), unlimited aliases, one IP address, PHP/MySQL/PostGreSQL support, and the registration of an .it .com .net or .org domain name. The prize is donated by E4A, a Free Software based ISP that supports the OpenOffice.org community.

    That's a nice price, sure. But for a girl who's prolly still in high school or maybe even elementary school?

  6. Re:See the Other Submissions by Spyffe · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Well, the kids were of various ages. A ten-year-old that had spent some time with Illustrator could have done that. I don't think it's clear that a parent assised (aside from teaching the kid Illustrator, which IMO is fair game).

    I agree that this is head and shoulders over the others, partially because the use of a computer made it more easily integratable into electronic media. The kid clearly had a very good sense of what it takes to make a good logo (the image creates a relationship with the viewer, with the bird looking straight in the viewer's eye).

    Very nice, too, is how both the bird and the fish are smiling, which makes the image very cheerful and "childlike" (in the way adults define it).

    --
    Sigmentation fault - core dumped
  7. Re:Well..... by vondo · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Many other people have pointed out that this is for schools only, so it should appeal to children and young adults, not business people.

    But aside from that, can you honestly claim the seagull is any less professional than Clippy or the stupid Windows XP puppy?

  8. Re:See the Other Submissions by orkysoft · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Okay, so I sinned and did RTFA. Here's a quote from the last paragraph, which is ROTFLMAO, IMHO.

    Context: case study of OOo being burned to CD in a school project.

    One of the students has suggested we try to get individuals and local organisations to sponsor individual disks and this is something we'll definitely be considering - Chris is already working on a draft letter to Bill Gates!

    It'll be a cold day in hell when Bill Gates will sponsor OOo for schools! That would go straight against his business strategy in so many ways...

    --

    I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  9. Re:In my well paid opinion by JamesOfTheDesert · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You're right as to the qualities one might want in a general-purpose OOo mascott, though perhaps there's a misunderstanding about what this image is for.

    Still, even for a kid's education program, the image suggests a goofy, amaturish feeling that implies OOo may be merely qualified as a children's application, i.e., not suitable for professional work

    It's worth noting, too, that despite what the article says, people are refering to this as *the* OOo mascott. An unfortunate bit of misinformation that may be hard to squash.

    (I also think that the doofy Tux penquin does not help the Linux image one bit, though apparently it hasn't hurt it much either.)

    --

    Java is the blue pill
    Choose the red pill
  10. We understand the qualifiers, but still... by roj3 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    >>1) This is just the mascot for OOOEdu, not OOo.
    >>2) It was a childs drawing, who won a competition.
    >>I think it's quite cute.

    The problem is, it doesn't matter if it's "just" the mascot for OOOedu -- it reflects on the entire OO.org brand. Unfortunately, it communicates "sloppy, stoned bird," rather than "whimsical kid-friendly software."

    The idea of using a kid's drawing is good, but as you see, the results leave you explaining it EVERY TIME ("see.. it was drawn by a kid.. see?). What about incorporating the feedback of kids? What about working with kids to come up with various themes? or having various schools vote on a selection of professional designs?

    Cute isn't going to win us (the open source software movement) any battles.

  11. This is stupid too by AvantLegion · · Score: 4, Insightful
    how do you expect to be taken seriously when that's your logo?

    Yeah. Because a penguin is not silly at all.

    Uhmm.....

  12. Re:In my well paid opinion by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As far as graphic designers and marketers go (I'm a graphic designer, too, although I find that "salary" and "talent" are hardly synonymous), I think you're missing the point. Especially on the PR front.

    This was a PR ploy, and as such, was successful. Okay, so you're saying that the unschooled efforts of a 15-year-old are a poor reflection on a competition targeted at schools? Um. Yeah. As any good designer will tell you, the right design for the project.

    Secondly: opinions are subjective. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it didn't fulfill its purpose. Bad designers forget to target the average person and instead waste their time trying to impress other designers.

    Oh, and by the way: a mascot is not a logo, by any means; that's why we have two different names for them. Do you think the MGM lion, an easily recognizable and well-known mascot, would fulfill your criteria? No. Does that nullify the hitherto-successful history of MGM? No.

    A well-paid opinion does not make it a good opinion (although possibly a pompous one with an inferiority complex who takes pot shots at teenagers.) It just means that you're good at convincing other people with no artistic sensibilities that you know what you're doing.

    --
    "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
  13. Target audience? by antic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who's the target here? If kids are making the decision to roll out OO in schools, then by all means go with the demented bird, but if you're trying to sway Principals or MS-happy IT staff, then you might want to choose something that suggests professionalism, reliability, and easy for kids to use.

    The retarded bird says unprofessional, flaky, and unattractive.

    The competition was surely a great idea to get awareness up amongst kids, but I wouldn't run around with that bird as a letterhead to managers of schools and boards representing schools.

    --
    'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
  14. Re:In my well paid opinion by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The what?

    Guh-new Image Manipulation program?

    Guh-what?

    Guh-new, G.N.U.

    WTF?

    Guh-new's not Unix

    What's Unix?

    An Operating system, don't worry about it, it's the Guh-new Image Manipulation Program.

    That's stupid.

    No, it's great, check out www.gimp.org

    Haha. Nice try, that's a hardcore porn site right? I don't think I want to hang around with you anymore.

    I'm serious, it's a graphic program, it's great, it's written by free software devlopers. It's licensed under the GPL.

    The GPL?

    The Guh-new public license

    You're frightening me.

    Try the GIMP, it's not very good on Windows though, you should try it on Linux.

    I think I'll stick to Photoshop. There's a new version coming out. Check out this glossy book I picked up.

    I don't have to pay for my documentation.

    Where is it?

    www.gimp.org

    Ooooh Kaaay. I've got work to do now, please leave.

  15. Re:In my well paid opinion by Catbeller · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You beat me to it on the "GIMP" comment.

    Why, OH WHY, can't nerds come up with names for their projects that don't sound like overt attempts to make the straights grimace?

    Names matter.

    Ogg Vorbis? I get where the name comes from, being a rabid Pratchett fan, but what does it have to do with a sound file format? Why not .snd or .mus or .tun or .trx? OGG? How do you market that? It sounds like someone trying to cough up mucus! You're supposed to be marketing to people who like music! The name should be as cool as the tunes it's playing.

    No one gets the joke, even if there was a joke (or a bad pun). PRATCHETT people don't get it. A combination of the torturer priest inSmall Gods and the family name of the witch Gytha Ogg of Lancre? WTF??

    The GIMP? The name of some poor bastard imprisoned in a box, zipped up in filthy leather from head to toe, tortured for months until he loses his mind and identifies with his torturers? This is a name you want to drop at the art department at Cosmo when you're trying to convince them that it's better to use open source than Photoshop? You want to put up a name meaning ultimate degradation to people who want to deal with beauty? Are you TRYING to fail?

    Now a bloody seagull. Not just a seagull, but a freaked out, stoned seagull. For kids. And the office environment.

    ARRGGGHHHHH.

    Now I can hear the snorks and wheezing laughter out there as all the geeks cut loose. It is ultimate geek humor, I know, to make up a totally inappropriate name to describe a prosaic project. If the dumbasses out there can't take a joke, fuck 'em.

    Which is why geeks don't do marketing. They don't do GUI's either. Not much into making music. They don't identify with the common herd, so there it is: they torpedo their own projects in the real world.

    I mean, what else can I say? Ogg should have been OpenSound, GIMP should have been OpenDraw, and OpenOffice should have a more mainstream symbol.