Slashdot Mirror


User: roj3

roj3's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
54
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 54

  1. Re:Just read TFA: on Automated Tiered Storage Coming to Desktops? · · Score: 1

    RTFM

  2. Re:Oh, now there's an unbiased opinion. on Global Warming Dissenters Suppressed? · · Score: 1

    Exactly! Slashdot's editor's are really bad at reading an industry-funded PR stunt. As a PR person, if I were working for Big Oil, this is *exactly* what I would do. Get a study or paper with MIT's name on it, claiming "censorship" of my views/business model.

  3. Re:Skype didn't work for us on Skype Announces Skype For Business · · Score: 1

    Could it have been your internet provider that was filtering internet traffic in order to control how much Skype traffic was hogging their pipes? "Skype for Business" is happening so that ISPs can easily determine what is "common" Skype and what is "profitable" Skype. Behind the scenes Skype will be making deals with the ISPs to ensure quality of service for "Skype Business" while the consumer offering remains unreliable.

  4. Re:why exactly would they shoot themselves? on Google Won't Pay Bell South · · Score: 1
    Carriers want to create additional revenue streams by providing QoS for certain internet services. Unfortunately, this is not a matter of "if" but of "when."

    The available technology for network traffic management is becoming extremely sophisticated -- check out the offerings of Sandvine and Allot.

    With the products from these vendors (among others), carriers can prioritize traffic across their entire network -- in some cases this becomes a sizable chunk of the Internet. The traffic management products integrate seamlessly to the billing systems -- think "click here for a 10 minute, 2 GB speed boost for $10."

    At some point, some website will sign a deal to guarantee a certain amount of throughput to their site, or for a special event, etc. It starts with carriers "recouping costs" by ensuring QoS on the Superbowl and then quickly gets ugly. When will Microsoft Live (Hotmail, etc.) sign a deal to ensure it loads faster than Google?

  5. Gizmodo write up of Unveiled on A CES Preview: CES Unveiled · · Score: 1

    Gizmodo seems to have a better write up.

  6. Re:Newspapers are dead. Long live newspapers. on A Recipe for Newspaper Survival in the Internet Age · · Score: 1

    The Columbia Journalism Review covered this issue last week.

  7. Re:Bzzt. Wrong Answer. on MA Lawmakers Question Move to OpenOffice · · Score: 1

    >>after blind and other visually impaired state workers raised concerns.

    Translation: after MSFT's PR people dragged out some blind people, called Senators, called the media.. and yeah.. "raised concerns."

  8. Get a demo of the Compellent Storage Center on Building a Massive Single Volume Storage Solution? · · Score: 1

    Their founding engineers are old-school storage guys who built a new system from scratch in 2002. The SAN supports FC and iSCSI front end, FC and SATA backend and natively virtualizes all storage into a single pool. When you want more storage, just add more controllers, enclosures, etc.. - the array supports n-way dynamic controllers. They don't have a ton of information on their website because they sell entirely through partners. The demo is worth your time b/c you'll see where SANs are headed.

  9. Let "Real Life Mom" educate your boss on Uneducated IT Managers, and How to Deal? · · Score: 1

    Thanks to XIOTech, we now have a "real life mom" to explain the complexities of data storage, server clustering and more! You should have your boss watch this series of videos.
    warning: videos may result in ROTFL

  10. Re:And for TOTAL newbies, try this: on Astronomy Hacks · · Score: 1

    Holy Crap - for total newbies (like me, who is also about to go on a long backpacking trip) this is (Stikky) is awesome.

  11. Vitamin D "science" backed by tanning assoc. on Sunscreen Not So Good for You? · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Unfortunately the article does not disclose the researcher's close dealings with the tanning salon industry. Is the science real? Yes. Does it encourage tanning and irresponsible sun exposure? Yes. Solution: it's better to simply drink vitamin D-fortified milk & OJ.

    Let's learn something from Australia, where 1 in 7 people get skin cancer in their lifetimes.

    /.ers would do well to look further into the hard science and get past the industry-backed FUD.

    Rather than, or in addition to, SPF lotion, wear clothing. This brand is lightweight, well-vented and has titanium dioxide built right into the microfiber. My mom (who is sun sensitive from medication) uses them.

  12. Gizmodo has the images on Bill Gates in 1983 Teen Beat Magazine · · Score: 1
  13. Re:15 minutes? on Firefox New York Times Ad, Soon · · Score: 2, Funny

    C'mon, give us a little credit. We're obviously using networked TI-80s with a graphics app I wrote in 10th grade study hall.

    Rob Davis

  14. Re:I can already see how this will turn out on Firefox New York Times Ad, Soon · · Score: 2, Informative

    We thought of that and the problem has been addressed.

    Rob Davis

  15. Re:Too commercial? on Firefox New York Times Ad, Soon · · Score: 4, Informative

    The New York Times has an advocacy ad review board. An advocacy message (save the whales) is seen differently than a commercial message (buy caffeinated soap). The review board provides feedback, etc.. it's not a hard and fast line.

    Rob

  16. Hello? It's marketing bs ... on MS Indemnifies Customers Against IP Threats · · Score: 1
    This is a smart move by MSFT. They get to stir up all kinds of FUD about purchasing open source products. "Microsoft protects you from IP lawsuits.. all open source does is open you to lawsuits."


  17. Nebraska: more votes than voters on 2004 Election Weirdness Continues · · Score: 1


    Sarpy County election officials are trying to figure out how they ended up with more votes than voters in the general election.

    Deputy Sarpy County Election Commissioner Ed Gilbert says, "It affected 32 of the 80 precincts. And I suppose as many as 10,000 votes."

  18. Re:I think this is a step in the wrong direction on NYT Firefox Campaign Raises $250,000 · · Score: 1
    interesting point. However, you forget that $250,000 was raised.. on the condition that a full page ad in the NY Times is placed.


    Think of it like this.. it cost $50,000 to raise $250,000 -- which means that the rest is left over for developers.

  19. Re:Is it just me that feels slightly uneasy? on NYT Firefox Campaign Raises $250,000 · · Score: 1
    I think of Firefox as "independent media." If we, consumers, are going to continue to have access to the truth, we need to know that there is not a profit motive controlling our access to information.

    It's not the most important thing, but it's a step in the same direction.

  20. Re:Why NYT? on NYT Firefox Campaign Raises $250,000 · · Score: 1
    sorry.. read the actual demographic information provided by the papers. The NYT has a larger % of readers that regularly access the internet.

  21. Re:10 days, 10,000 names, $250,000 on NYT Firefox Campaign Raises $250,000 · · Score: 1
    I was watching the Wikipedia fundraiser with interest (and gave $50 to support it).


    A successful fundraiser is more than just asking for money - that's why you have charity balls each year. Throwing the party is a lot of money, but they raise back 3-4x the amount they spend on the party. In this case it cost less than $50,000 to raise $250,000.

  22. Re:How about double-page ad? on NYT Firefox Campaign Raises $250,000 · · Score: 1
    yeah, we looked into that.

    Unfortunatley you can't go on "standby" with a "double wide" ad. Which means you're back in the range of the wicked-expensive ads. So, for this one pager we'll pay less than $50K, a double wide ad would have cost over $150,000.

  23. Re:Whoah! on NYT Firefox Campaign Raises $250,000 · · Score: 1

    that's what it costs when you're a for-profit company. The Mozilla Foundation is a non profit. The ad cost less than $50K.

  24. Re:Seems a shame to waste it on a newspaper ad on NYT Firefox Campaign Raises $250,000 · · Score: 1
    actually no, it means that it cost $50K to RAISE $250K.

    Only a tiny percentage of people contribute money spontaneously - the rest need more motivation.

    The people supported this idea with their dollars, if they agreed with you, they wouldn't have funded it.

  25. Re:Seems a shame to waste it on a newspaper ad on NYT Firefox Campaign Raises $250,000 · · Score: 1
    FTFM

    the ad is less than $50,000