AutoZone Responds To SCO

loftis writes "Groklaw is reporting that AutoZone has responded to The SCO Group's Lawsuit. Here is a link to the Groklaw community's discussion where you can find all the filings in raw form. Here is a text copy of the filing without amendments. AutoZone has pretty much said to the court, SCO has to prove 1) they own the code, and 2) that Linux infringes. Since SCO is litigating these two issues in other cases, they ought to wait until those questions are answered. Or, they say, 'If we cannot wait, we need SCO to tell us what we are infringing upon with specificity.' Since we know how SCO will answer the second question, and the court likely will too, since they amended the filings from SCO v IBM and SCO v RedHat and SCO v Novell, it seems to me (IANAL) that they should get to wait."

Comments

We know you're not a lawyer!

[Haxwell]

I just have to say how stupid the IANAL acronym is getting. Can we pretty much assume that anybody who is on Slashdot commenting on a legal case is not a lawyer?! Can we get some IAAL up in here?! And if not that, then cut out the damn IANAL.. We know YNAL!

Hax.