Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft's Strategy Memos

jg21 writes "So Linux made it onto Steve Ballmer's radar screen at last? No mention last year, in his annual strategy memo, but this year there's sentence after sentence - summarized at LinuxWorld this morning - which means, I guess, that 50,000-plus more folks around the world now will be aware of open source...he sent it to everyone in the company! Interestingly, in his public-facing CEO memo, distributed the same day as the internal one, Ballmer in contrast mentions Linux just once. What is it that conjurers call this, ah yes - distraction strategy?"

18 of 465 comments (clear)

  1. A great gag for Steve Ballmer by phaetonic · · Score: 2, Funny

    If someone booted his laptop with a Linux LiveCD and started the BSOD screen saver.

  2. What we all really want to know is... by JoeBaldwin · · Score: 4, Funny

    What sort of dance did Steve do this year?

  3. Favorite Quote by spellraiser · · Score: 3, Funny

    This Ballmer quote sticks out in particular, and pretty much sums it all up:

    Linux, Linux, Linux, Linux ...

    --
    I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
    1. Re:Favorite Quote by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Funny
      "noncommercial software"

      What I find interesting is that Balmer refuses to say "Open Source software". I think those words have been banned from Redmond.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  4. Sea Change? by tb3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    We will rise to this challenge, and we will compete in a fair and responsible manner that puts our customers first.
    Damn! And you thought when they refocused on the internet it was serious!
    This time they'll have to change everything about how they do business.

    --

    www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

  5. Looks like the message seeped through at last by GillBates0 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Microsoft's Ballmer: "Linux Requires Our Concentrated Focus and Attention"

    Exactly. I'm glad they got the message at last. It's about time they ditched Windows and started working full time on Linux.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  6. Re:Bugfixes? by ozric99 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sure. Instead of the dull, outdated, two-colour effect we now have, longhorn will include a selection of wonderful pastel shades incorporating the finest Laura Ashley designs for a more relaxed and tranquil "User-Interrupt"[tm] experience.

  7. "sentence after sentence" by wunderhorn1 · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...wow, a whole five of them!

    --
    Karma: Bored. (Thinking about resurrecting the "Anyone else is an imposter" joke.)
  8. Re:what? by Quobobo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes, it shall be a mighty and terrible battle, where the blood of the innocent shall mingle with that of the combatants!


    ...wait, you're talking about Linux and Microsoft?

  9. Microsoft's Linux strategy in three words or less by titaniam · · Score: 2, Funny

    Fear, uncertainty, doubt.

  10. Development by Vexware · · Score: 3, Funny

    In the event of needed enhancements or fixes, the Linux development community, no matter how well intentioned, simply cannot advance Linux the way we can - and must - innovate in Windows.
    Steve Ballmer does have a truly valid statement here, and does make a strong point besides. It is true that the Linux development community, no matter how well intentioned, simply cannot fix, advance and innovate Linux both as slowly and as hideously as Microsoft can.
    --
    "Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect" -- Linus Torval
  11. Re:Bugfixes? by the+morgawr · · Score: 2, Funny
    I had some problems with a bad driver in 2k.

    Unfortunately it was a Microsoft provided one that was loaded durring install (and cause the installer to crash).

    It worked out though; I swapped to linux and managed to break my computer game adiction :)

    --
    The policy of the United States is worse than bad---it is insane. -- Ludwig von Mises, Economic Policy(1959)
  12. Re:This is news? Company A cares about smth strate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why would Linux vendors focus on selling Win XP Plus?

  13. Re:Umm, not quite Steve. We find them *better* by Ciderx · · Score: 2, Funny

    How anyone can get "Insightful" for saying OpenOffice is better than Office is beyond me...oh hang on, "http://slashdot.org/...", ah I see...

  14. Re:This is news? Company A cares about smth strate by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2, Funny
    . . .an MS support contract will cost an imperial shitload (that's 36 craploads) more than a comparible IBM solution.

    I am not familiar with your crap conversion methods. Is there a website where I can see the conversion? www.crapcse.se perhaps?

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  15. Re:This is news? Company A cares about smth strate by Hentai · · Score: 4, Funny

    From wherethesundontshine.net:

    First, if we take 'a shit' to be the amount of effort required for an average european male to evacuate his bowels, precisely 2.5 hours after eating 451 grams (one serving) of Kellog's shredded wheat (plus or minus 5% for generic store brands), then we have a rather precise handle on what the phrase "I don't give a shit" means. Now. We'll call this the "metric shit". Taking a sample of 217 average adult male rats, the volume of excrement produced, on average, equals one metric shit's worth every week and a half. Given the average rat's metabolism, we find that a rat's body undergoes complete cellular mitosis roughly every fourty five weeks. Thus, a rat's ass is not, in fact, the same ass it had 11 months ago, and the timespan of a rat's ass is roughly 10.4 months. Thus, through its lifespan, one rat's ass produces (45 / 1.5) = 30 shits. Thus, we now know exactly what is meant by "I could give a rat's ass". Extrapolating further, this same sample of 217 rats was used to determine exactly how many rat's asses are required before a flying fuck is achieved (details classified to protect the experimenters' privacy from the prying eyes of the SPCA). It was determined that one flying fuck is, in fact, achievable after only 3 rats are airborne, in optimal conditions. The actual number is closer to 3.27 So, one flying fuck is equal to 101 shits, with a margin of error of 5%. This moment of science brought to you by 217 dead rats and a whole fucking lot of rock cocaine.

    --
    -Hentai [in vita non pacem est]
  16. Re:why is this surprising? by micromoog · · Score: 2, Funny

    The workload of the 8 Linux servers was previously handled by 500 Windows servers.

  17. Re:Hold on Steve, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You aren't terribly familiar with the Dutch, are you?